Abstract
(I) The influence of the dose of antigen on the amount of antibodies produced was studied in two inbred strains of mice that were different with respect to the ability to produce antibodies top-aminobenzoic acid, i.e. well responding strain B10.LP and poorly responding CBA/J strain. Similar dependence between the dose of antigen and the antibody titre was demonstrated in both strains. (2) It was found that the type of reaction to the antigenic determinant (i.e. hapten) appeared to be a constant property of the inbred strain and that it did not change during the long period of the immunological maturity of the organism. (3) Antibodies of 19S type (2-mercaptoethanol sensitive) were formed in sera of both inbred strains, particularly in strain B10.LP, even after the third adjuvant immunization. Antibodies of 7S type appeared to be partially 2-mercaptoethanol sensitive, however, the major part was resistant to this agent. No 7S, 2-mercaptoethanol resistant antibodies were found in sera of the poorly responding strain CBA/J.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson B., Wigzell H., Klein G.: Some characteristics of 19S and 7S mouse isoantibodiesin vivo andin vitro.Transplantation 5, 11 (1967).
Bretscher P. A., Cohn M.: Minimal model for the mechanism of antibody induction and paralysis by antigen.Nature 220, 444 (1968).
Dietrich S.: Adult mice unresponsive to heterologous serum albumins.Nature 219, 525 (1968).
Eidinger D., Pross H. F.: The immune response to sheep erythrocytes in the mouse. I. A study of the immunological events utilizing the plaque technique.J. Exptl. Med. 126, 15 (1967).
Fleischman J. B., Pain R. H., Porter R. R.: Reduction of gammaglobulins.A. B. B. suppl. 1, 174 (1962).
Hardy D., Rowley D.: The production of antibody to bovine serum albumin in unresponsive (Sobey) mice.Immunology 14, 401 (1968).
Humphrey J. H.: Haemolytic efficiency of rabbit IgG anti-Forssman antibody and its augmentation by anti-rabbit Ig.Nature 216, 1295 (1967).
Ingraham J. S.: Artificial radioactive antigens. I. Preparation and evaluation of35S-sulphanilic acid-azobovine-gammaglobulinJ. Inf. Dis. 89, 109 (1951).
Ingraham J. S.: Specific, complement dependent hemolysis of sheep erythrocytes by antiserum to azo hapten groups.J. Inf. Dis. 91, 268 (1952).
Řiha I.: Antibody formation in young rabbits immunized within the first days after birth. Proceedings of symposium on “Mechanisms of immunological tolerance”. Academia, Prague 1961, pp. 103.
Říha I.: The estimation of IgG antibodies in haemagglutination and haemolytic reaction by the use of anti-gamma-globulin sera. 4th Symposium onAntigen-antibody reactions, Leipzig, 1970. In press.
Sobey W. R., Magrath J. M.: Acquired immunological unresponsivenes to bovine plasma albumin in mice.Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 947 (1965).
Škárová B., Říha I.: Genetic control of the immune response. I. Differences in immune response of inbred strains of mice top-aminobenzoic acid and sulphanilic acid.Folia Microbiol. 14, 364 (1969).
Takátsy G.: The use of spiral loops in serological and virological micromethods.Acta microbiol. Hung. 3, 191 (1955).
Warner N. L., Vaz N. M., Ovary Z.: Immunoglobulin classes in antibody responses in mice. I. Analysis by biological properties.Immunology 14, 725 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Říhová-Škárová, B., Říha, I. Genetic control of the immune response. Folia Microbiol 17, 66–74 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872255
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872255