Skip to main content
Log in

Specific and general combining ability for yield in potatoes

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Forty-five lines were crossed to six testers to evaluate their general combining ability. These lines did not clearly represent a random selection of lines with respect to this character, though they had not undergone any formal selection in this respect. In these lines, the variance in specific combining ability exceeded the variance in general combining ability. Six or more testers are required to evaluate general combining ability in lines of this nature. The interaction of general combining ability and locations was less than the variation in SCA and locations.

The variation in specific combining ability of a line was not related to the magnitude of its GCA effect.

The general combining ability effects of 32 of the lines are given. Four of the better lines were B2368-4, La1859, I-1015-2 and I-1077W28-5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Akeley, R. V. 1958. National Potato-Breeding Program Report. Plant Industry Station, Beltsville, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carnahan, H. L., A. W. Havin, H. O. Graumann, W. R. Kehr, R. L. Davis, L. J. Elling, C. H. Hanson. 1960. General vs. specific combining ability in alfalfa for seedling vigor and fall growth habit in the year of establishment. Agron. J. 52: 511–516.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Federer, W. T., and R. L. Plaisted. 1958. A rectangular lattice design for potato breeding experiments. B.U.-105-M. Biometrics Unit, Plant Breeding Dept., Cornell University.

  4. Federer, W. T., and R. L. Plaisted. 1962. A method for estimating combining ability components of variance in incomplete block designs. Am. Potato J. 39: 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Federer, W. T., and G. F. Sprague. 1947. A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials. I. Error, tester x line, and line components in top cross experiments. J. Am. Soc. Agr. 39: 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Green, John M. 1948. Relative value of two testers for estimating top cross performance in segregating maize progenies. J. Am. Soc. Agr. 40: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kalton, R R., and R. C. Leffel. 1955. Evaluation of combining ability inDactylis glomerata L. III. General and specific effects. Agron. J. 47: 370–373.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matzinger, D. F. 1953. Comparison of three types of testers for the evaluation of inbred lines of corn. Agron. J. 45: 493–495.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matzinger, D. F., G. F. Sprague, and C. C. Cockerham. 1959. Diallel crosses of maize in experiments repeated over locations and years. Agron. J. 51: 346–350.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rojas, B. A., and G. F. Sprague. 1952. A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials. III. General and specific combining ability and their interaction with locations and years. Agron. J. 44: 462–466.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sprague, G. F., and L. A. Tatum. 1942. Generalvs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Jour. Am. Soc. Agr. 34: 923–932.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Turner, J. H., Jr. 1953. A study of heterosis in upland cotton. II. Combining ability and inbreeding effects. Agron. J. 45: 487–491.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Paper No. 397, Plant Breeding Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. Journal Paper No. J4074 of the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 1184.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plaisted, R.L., Sanford, L., Federer, W.T. et al. Specific and general combining ability for yield in potatoes. American Potato Journal 39, 185–197 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871402

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871402

Keywords

Navigation