Abstract
The mutagenic effect of 0.05m and 1m HA onMycobacterium phlei PA was investigated. To establish the mutagenic effect the inactivating effect was studied under the same experimental conditions. Hydroxylamine at a higher concentration (1m) exhibited relatively high mutagenic effect. This was indicated by about 100-fold and 10-fold higher frequency of INHr and STMr mutants, respectively (as compared with spontaneous mutations) and induction of auxotrophic mutants. On the other hand, the mutagenic effect of 0.05m hydroxylamine was low under the same experimental conditions.
The inactivating effect of a higher HA concentration (1m under given experimental conditions) was considerably higher when using the given model microorganism than that of the lower one (0.05m under the same experimental conditions). This finding does not agree with literature data obtained in other experimental models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Freese, E., Bautz-Freese, E. and Bautz, E.:Hydroxylamin as a Mutagenic and Inactivating Agent. J. mol. Biol. 3: 2, 133, 1961.
Freese, E. B. and Freese, E.:Two Separate Effects of Hydroxylamine on Transforming DNA. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. 5: 5, 1289, 1964.
Freese, E., Freese, E. B. and Graham, S.:The Oxygen-dependent Reaction of Hydroxylamin with Nucleotides and DNA. Biochim. biophys. Acta 123: 17, 1966a.
Freese, E. and Freese, E. B.:Mutagenic and Inactivating DNA Alterations. Radiation Res. 6: 97, 1966b.
Lederberg, J.:Isolation and Characterization of Biochemical Mutants of Bacteria. Methods in Med. Res. 3: 5, 1950.
Lederberg, J. and Lederberg, E. M.:Replica plating and Indirect Selection of Bacterial Mutants. J. Bacteriol. 63: 399, 1952.
Lie, S.:The Mutagenic Effect of Hydroxylamine on Escherichia coli. Acta path. microb. scand. 62: 575, 1964.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koníčková-Radochová, M., Málek, I. The mutagenic effect of hydroxylamine onMycobacterium phlei strain PA. Folia Microbiol 13, 226–230 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871038
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871038