Skip to main content
Log in

Sensory evaluation of breads containing various levels of potato peel

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breads prepared from 5, 10, and 15% potato peel/white flour, 30% whole wheat flour, and 100% white flour plus two commercial, high fiber, dark breads in fresh and frozen/defrosted forms were evaluated sensorially by both untrained and trained panels. It appears that potato peel can be included in bread for the purpose of increasing dietary fiber without unduly sacrificing quality and acceptability. However, a musty aroma in the breads containing peel possibly influenced their flavor and overall rating scores, roughly in proportion to the amount of peel they contained.

Resumen

Degustadores tanto entrenados como sin entrenamiento evaluaron sensorialmente panes preparados con 5, 10 y 15% de piel (corteza) de tubérculo de papa más harina blanca, con 30% de harina de trigo entera, y 100% de harina blanca, más dos clases de pan comercial con alto contenido de fibra, y color oscuro. Se usaron tanto en forma fresca como congelada/descongelada. Los resultados indican que la piel de tubérculo de papa puede ser incluida en los ingredientes del pan para aumentar el contenido de fibra digestiva sin sacrificar indebidamente la calidad y aceptabilidad. Sin embargo, un aroma a mono, presente en los panes con piel de papa, probablemente afectó el sabor y las calificaciones generales, en proportión de la cantidad de piel incorporada al pan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Amerine, M.A., R.M. Pangborn, and E.B. Roessler, 1965. “Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food.” Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cloninger, M.R., R.E. Baldwin, R.T. Marshall, D.R. Mertens, and J.R. Campbell. 1972. Effect of rations containing newsprint on flavor or milk. J Dairy Sci 55:1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eastwood, M.A. 1977. Fiber and enterohepatic circulation. Nutr Rev 35:42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Forsythe, W.A., W.L. Chenoweth, and M.R. Bennink. 1976. The effect of various dietary fibers on serum cholesterol and taxation in the rat. J Nutr 106:26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelsay, J.L. 1978. A review of research on effects of fiber intake on man. Am J Clin Nutr 31:142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kritchevsky, D. 1977. Dietary Fiber: What It Is and What It Does. Food Prod Dev Vol. 11(5):111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Orr, P.H., R.B. Toma, B. Persky, and M.M. Tabekhia. 1980. Effect of peeling procedure on the ultrastructure of potato peels. Am Potato J 57:115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Toma, R.B., P.H. Orr, B. D’Appolonia, F.R. Dintzis, and M.M. Tabekhia. 1979. Physical and chemical properties of potato peel as a source of dietary fiber in bread. J Food Sci 44:805–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Truswell, A.S. and R.M. Kay. 1976. Bran and blood lipids. Lancet. 1:367.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orr, P.H., Toma, R.B., Munson, S.T. et al. Sensory evaluation of breads containing various levels of potato peel. American Potato Journal 59, 605–611 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02867600

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02867600

Key Words

Navigation