Skip to main content
Log in

Introduced plants in the indigenous Pharmacopoeia of Northern South America

Plantas Introducidas En La Farmacopea IndíGena Del Norte De AméRica Del Sur

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intellectual property rights debate focuses on the flow of germplasm from developing tropical countries to developed temperate nations. Few investigators have addressed the converse. We discuss the abundance and importance of introduced plants in pharmacopoeias of northern South America. Introduced species commonly are employed as medicines throughout the region and include at least 216 Eurasian, North American, African, and Pacific species. Among the Shuar of lowland Ecuador, four introduced plants (Citrus aurantium, Cymbopogon citratus, Saccharum officinarum, and Zingiber officinale) are included in their most commonly prescribed remedies. The widespread use of introduced plants is due, in part, to the medicinal value of plants whose primary use is for food (e.g., Musa X paradisiacal Similarly, many introduced ornamentals also have therapeutic value (e.g., Hedychium coronarium). Other species have been introduced specifically as medicines (e.g., Aloe vera). Restrictions on the flow of germplasm and plant knowledge may protect the economic interests of governments and national industry. If applied bilaterally, however, constraints on the movement of plants will limit the continued evolution of traditional medicinal systems in areas where they are most needed.

Resumen

El debate sobre los derechos de propiedad intelectual se enfoca principalmente en el movimiento de germoplasma desde los paises en vias de desarrollado de las regíones tropicales hacia los paises desarrollados de la zona templada. Pocos investigadores han examinado lo contrario. Discutimos la abundancia y la importancia de plantas introducidas en las farmacopeas del norte de América del Sur. El uso medicinal de plantas introducidas es mu común y incluye por lo menos 216 especies de Europa, Asia, América del Norte, Africa, y la regián Pacífica. Entre las Shuaras de las tierras bajas de Ecuador, cuatro plantas introducidas (Citrus aurantium, Cymbopogon citratus, Saccharum officinarum, and Zingiber officinale) estan incluidas en sus remedios más comunes. El extenso uso de plantas introducidas, es en gran parie, debido al valor medicinal de plantas que tienen su uso primario como alimento (e.g., Musa X paradisiaca). Muchas plantas ornamentales también tienen valor terapéutico (e.g., Hedychium coronarium). Otras especies han sido introducidas específicamente como medicinas (por ejemplo, Aloe vera). Restricciones en el movimiento de germoplasma y conocimiento respecto a plantas quizás protejan el interés económico de gobiernos y industrias nationales. Sin embargo, si se aplica en una manera bilateral, restriciones en el movimiento de plantas limitará la evolutión continuada de sistemas tradiconales de medicina en los regiones en donde son más necesarias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alarcön, R. 1988. Etnobotánica de los Quichuas de la Amazonia Ecuatoriana. Miscelánea Antropolögica Ecuatoriana 7:1–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida Cabrai, J. C. 1996. Faça sua horta medicinal. Editora PNE/HPM, Fortaleza, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorozo de Mello, M. C., and A. Gely. 1988. Uso de plantas medicinais por caboclos do Baixo Amazonas, Barcarena, Pará, Brásil. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Série Botánica 4:47–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G. 1978. Plants and civilization. 3rd ed. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B. C. 1990. The ethnobotany of bromeliads: the use ofTillandsia species in the highlands of southern Peru. Journal of the Bromeliad Society 40: 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991a. Variatiön de los nombres y de los usos que dan a las plantas los indigenas Shuar del Ecuador. Pages 129–137in M. Rios and H. Borgtoff Pedersen, eds., Las plantas y el hombre. AbyaYala, Quito, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991b. Aspectos econömicos y sociologicos de la etnobotánica. Pages 359–365in M. Ríos and H. Borgtoff Pedersen, eds., Las plantas y el hombre. Abya-Yala, Quito, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992a. Plants and people of the Amazonian rainforests: The role of ethnobotany in sustainable development. BioScience 42:599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992b. Uses of epiphytes, lianas, and parasites by the Shuar people of Amazonian Ecuador. Selbyana 13:99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992c. Hallucinogenic plants of the Shuar and related indigenous groups in Amazonian Ecuador and Peru. Brittonia 44:483–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. Ethnobotany and economic botany of epiphytes, lianas, and other host-dependent plants: an overview. Pages 547–586in M. Lowman and N. Nadkarni, eds., Forest canopies: a review of research on this biological frontier. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and R. Alarcón. 1994.Osteophloeum platyspermum (A.DC.) Warburg andVirola duckei A.C. Smith (Myristicaceae): newly reported as hallucinogens from Amazonian Ecuador. Economic Botany 48:152–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,R. Alarcón, and C. Cerön. 1992. The ethnobotany ofCarludovica palmata Ruíz and Pavön (Cyclanthaceae) in Amazonian Ecuador. Economic Botany 46:233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,M. A. Baker, and P. Gomez, n.d. Ethnobotany of the Shuar of Eastern Ecuador. Advances in Economic Botany 14 (in press).

  • —,and J. R. Hicklin. 1998. Use of saw palmetto(Serenoa repens, Arecaceae) in Florida. Economic Botany 52:381–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boom, B. M. 1987. Ethnobotany of the Chácobo In dians, Beni, Bolivia. Advances in Economic Botany 4:1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brako, L., and J. L. Zarruchi. 1993. Catalogue of the flowering plants and gymnosperms of Peru. Monographs in Systematic Botany (Missouri Botanical Garden) 45:1–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, L. C., and M. F.da Silva. 1983. Folk medicine of Alter do Cháo, Para, Brazil. Acta Amazonica 13:737–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro Martins, J. E. 1989. Plantas medicinais de uso na Amazônia. Ediçöes, CEJUP, Belém.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerön Martinez, C. 1993. Etnobotánica del Ecuador: Estudios regionales. Hombre y Ambiente 25:7–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, A., Jr. 1972. The Colombian exchange: biological and cultural consequences of 1492. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, M. P., M. E. Oliveira Matos, F. J. A. Matos, M. I. L. Machado, and A. A. Craveiro. 1991. Constituintes quimicos ativos de plantas medicinais brasileiras. Edicoes Universidade Federal Ceará, Laboratörio de Productos Naturais, Fortaleza, Brasil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, germs, and steel: the fate of human societies. W.W. Norton and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D. L., and W. M. Wilson. 1994. Characteristics of “wild“ plant foods used by indigenous populations in Amazonia. Pages 114–142in N. L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the wild side: the pharmacologie, écologie, and social implications of using noncultigens. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, J. A, and E. S. Ayensu. 1985. Medicinal plants of China, vol. 1. Reference Publications, Algonac, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and R. Vasquez. 1994. Amazonian ethnobotanical dictionary. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etkin, N. L. 1994. The cull of the wild. Pages 1–21in N. L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the wild side: the pharmacologie, écologie, and social implications of using noncultigens. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and P. J. Ross. 1991. Should we set a place for diet in ethnopharmacology? Journal of Ethno-pharmacology 32:25–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,and P. J. Ross. 1982. Food as medicines and medicines as food: an adaptive framework for the interpretation of plant utilization among the Hausa of northern Nigeria. Social Science and Medicine 16:1559–1573.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,and P. J. Ross.. 1994. Pharmacologie implications of “wild“ plants in Hausa diet. Pages 85–101in N. L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the wild side: the pharmacologie, écologie, and social implications of using noncultigens. University of Arizona Press, TAicson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franquemont, C., T. Plowman, E. Franquemont, S. R. King, C. Niezgoda, W. Davis, and C. R. Sperling. 1990. The ethnobotany of Chinchero, an Andean community in southern Peru. Fieldiana Botany New Series 24:1–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Barriga, H. 1975. Flora medicinal de Colombia. Imprenta Nacional, Bogotá, D.E. 3 vols.

  • Gonçalves Furtado, L., R. C. de Souza, and M. E. van de Berg. 1978. Notas sobre uso terapéutico de plantas pela populaçáo cabocla de Marapanim, Pará. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilío Goeldi, Nova Série Antropologia 70:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner, M. J. The Jívaro: people of the sacred waterfall. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

  • Harris, D. R. 1998. Introduction: the multi-disciplinary study of cross-cultural plant exchange. Pages 85–91in H. D. V. Pendergast, N. L. Etkin, D. R. Harris, and P. J. Houghton, eds., Plants for food and medicine. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, M. 1998. Plants as antidiorrheals in medicine and diet. Pages 17–30in H. D. V. Pendergast, N. L. Etkin, D. R. Harris, and P. J. Houghton, eds., Plants for food and medicine. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, M. H., and A. R. Dixon. 1994. Agriculture and the acquisition of medicinal plant knowledge. Pages 25–45in N. L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the wild side: the pharmacologie, écologie, and social implications of using noncultigens. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. B., Jr. 1973. Seeds to civilization: the story of man’s food. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T. 1994. Ambivalence to the palatability factors in wild food plants. Pages 46–61in N. L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the wild side: the pharmacologie, écologie, and social implications of using noncultigens. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. 1976. Hortus Third: a concise dictionary of the plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley, D. J. 1987. The plant-book: a portable dictionary of the higher plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos, F. J. A. 1996. Uma planta medicinal do povo validada para o povo. Projeto Farmácia Viva da UFC. Leaflet of the Associação Plantas do Nordeste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos, F. J. A., F. S. Cavalcanti, and M. F. F. B. Queiroz. 1988. Plantas da medicina popular do Ceará selecionadas pela maior freqüéncia de seu uso. Acta Amazonica 18:37–38 (supplemento).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, W., and B. Albert. 1996. The use of medicinal plants by the Yanomami Indians of Brazil. Economic Botany 50:10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E. 1994. North American food and drug plants. Pages 166–181in N. L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the wild side: the pharmacologie, écologie, and social implications of using noncultigens. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E. 1998. Native American ethnobotany. Timber Press, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavetti, C., I. Basualdo, M. Ortiz, and N. Soria. 1988. Plantas nativas de uso en medicina popular en el Paraguay. Parte III. Acta Amazonica 18:39–48 (suplemento).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, C. M. P, M. Perazzolo, V. L. N. Susin, and M. Bergesch. 1988. Levantamento preliminar dos végétai medicentosos existentes no Municipio do Rio Grande, RS. Acta Amazonica 18:49–59 (suplemento).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T. 1970. Notes on the use of hallucinogens in Amazonian Brazil. Economic Botany 24:62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1972. Ethnobotanical notes from Amazonian Brazil. Economic Botany 26:221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. The use of edible fungi by Amazonian Indians. Advances in Economic Botany 1:127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. The genus Caryocar L. (Caryocara-ceae): an underexploited tropical resource. Advances in Economic Botany 8:177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,D. G. Campbell, and B. W. Nelson. 1977. The ethnobotany of the Paumari Indians. Economic Botany 31:129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and V. Plana. 1998. The use of alien plants in tropical South American folk medicines. Pages 185–200in H. D. V. Pendergast, N. L. Etkin, D. R. Harris, and P. J. Houghton, eds., Plants for food and medicine. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego, T. J. A. S. 1988. Levantamento de plantas medicinais na Baixada Maranhense. Acta Amazonica 18:75–88 (suplemento).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W. V., S. A. Laird, C. A. Meyer, R. Gámez, A. Sittenfeld, D. Janzen, M. A. Gollin, and C. Juma. 1996. Biodiversity prospecting. Pages 142–173in M. J. Balick, E. Elisabetsky, and S. A. Laird, eds., Medicinal resources of the tropical forest: biodiversity and its importance to human health. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robineau, L., and D. D. Soejarto. 1996. TRAMIL: a research project on the medicinal plant resources of the Caribbean. Pages 317–325in M. J. Balick, E. Elisabetsky, and S.A. Laird, eds., Medicinal resources of the tropical forest. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roersch, C. 1994. Plantas médicinales en el sur Andino del Ecuador. Vols. 1 and 2. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuttes, R. E., and R. Raffauf. 1990. The healing forest: medicinal and toxic plants of the northwest Amazonia. Dioscorides Press, Portland,OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, T. L. 1990. Stedman’s medical dictionary. 25th ed. W. R. Hensyl, ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugarte, C. 1997. The ethnopharmacology of plants used as both foods and medicines in a Totonac Community of Mexico. M.S. thesis, Florida International University, Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphof, J. C. Th. 1968. Dictionary of economic plants. 2nd ed. Verlag Von Cramer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, M. E. 1982. Plantas medicinais na Amazônica: Contribuiçáo ao seu conhecimento sistemático. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, PTU/MPEG, Belém.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,and M. H. Lima da Silva. 1985. Contribuiáo ao conhecimento da flora medicinal do Mar anhäo. Anais do I Simposio do Tropico Úmido, Belém 119–125.

  • —,and M. H. Limada Silva.. 1988. Contribuição ao conhecimento da flora medicinal de Roraima. Acta Amaonica 18:23–35 (suplemento).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, W. T., and T. Plowman. 1984. Useful plants of the Siona and Secoya Indians of Eastern Ecuador. Fieldiana Botany New Series 15:1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. 1985. Hierbas del Ecuador: Plantas médicinales. Ediciones Libri Mundi, Quito, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, B.C., Prance, G.T. Introduced plants in the indigenous Pharmacopoeia of Northern South America. Econ Bot 54, 90–102 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866603

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866603

Key Words

Navigation