Economic Botany

, 53:188 | Cite as

1492 and the loss of amazonian crop genetic resources. I. The relation between domestication and human population decline

  • Charles R. Clement
Article

Abstract

There may have been 4–5 million people in Amazonia at the time of European contact. These people cultivated or managed at least 138 plant species in 1492. Many of these crop genetic resources were human artifacts that required human intervention for their maintenance, i.e., they were in an advanced state of domestication. Consequently, there was a relationship between the decline of Amazonian Amerindian populations and the loss of their crop genetic heritage after contact. This relationship was influenced by the crop’s degree of domestication, its life history, the degree of landscape domestication where it was grown, the number of human societies that used it, and its importance to these societies. Amazonian crop genetic erosion probably reflects an order of magnitude loss and the losses continue today.

Key Words

Amazonia Landscape domestication Crop domestication Pre-Columbian demography European contact Genetic erosion 

1492 e a Perda dos Recursos Genéticos da Amazônia. I. A Relação entre Domesticação e o Declínio das Populações Humanas

Résumé

A Amazônia poderia ter tido de 4 a 5 milhÕes de habitantes quando os Europeus chegaram. Estes povos cultivaram ou manejaram pelo menos 138 espécies vegetais em 1492. Muitos destes recursos genéticos eram artefatos humanos que requeriam a intervenção humana para sua manutenção, ou seja, estavam num estado avançado de domesticação. Conseqiientemente, existiu uma relaçao entre o declínio das populaçÕes indigenas da Amazônia e a perda de seus recursos genéticos apòs o contato. Esta relaç00E3o foi influenciada pelo grau de domesticação do cultivo, sua história de vida, o grau de domesticação da paisagem em que foi cultivada, o número de sociedades indigenas que o utilizou, e sua importância a estas sociedades. A erosão dos recursos genéticos indigenas da Amazônia provavelmente reflete uma perda de um ordern de magnitude e as perdas continuam hoje.

Literature Cited

  1. Alcorn, J. B. 1989. Process as resource: the traditional agricultural ideology of Bora and Huastec resource management and its implications for research. Pages 63–77in D. A. Posey, and W. Balée, eds., Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies. Advances in Economic Botany 7. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Altieri, M. A. 1995. Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. 2nd ed. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, A. B., and D. A. Posey. 1989. Management of a tropical scrub savanna by the Gorotire Kayap00F3;of Brazil. Pages 159–173in D. A. Posey, and W. Balée, eds., Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies. Advances in Economic Botany 7. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Balée, W. 1988. Indigenous adaptation to Amazonian palm forests. Principes 32:47–54.Google Scholar
  5. —. 1989. The culture of Amazonian forests. Pages 1–21in D. A. Posey, and W. Balée, eds., Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies. Advances in Economic Botany 7. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  6. — 1992. People of the fallow: a historical ecology of foraging in lowland South America. Pages 35–57in K. H. Redford, and C. Padoch, eds., Conservation of Neotropical Forests—Working from traditional resource use. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Barbosa, L. C. 1993. The world-system and the destruction of the Brazilian Amazon rain forest. Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 16:215–240.Google Scholar
  8. Bonatto, S. L., and F. M. Salzano. 1997a. A single and early migration for the peopling of the Americas supported by mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94:1866–1871.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. —,and F. M. Salzano. 1997b. Diversity and age of the four major mtDNA haplogroups, and their implications for the peopling of the New World. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61:1413–1423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brücher, H. 1989. Useful plants of neotropical origin and their wild relatives. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  11. Bruhns, K. O. 1994. Ancient South America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Burger, J. 1987. Report from the frontier: the state of the world’s indigenous peoples. Cultural Survival/ Zed Press, London.Google Scholar
  13. Carvajal, G. de. 1894. Descubrimiento del río de las Amazonas. Imprenta de E. Rasco, Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
  14. Cavalcante, P. B. 1991. Frutas Comestiveis da Amazonia. 5th ed. EdiçÕes CEJUP/Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belém, Pará.Google Scholar
  15. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., A. Piazza, and P. Menozzi. 1994. History and geography of human genes. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  16. Chase, A. K. 1989. Domestication and domiculture in northern Australia: a social perspective. Pages 42–54in D. R. Harris, and G. C. Hillman, eds., Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploitation. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  17. Chernela, J. M. 1983. Hierarchy and economy among the Kotiria (Uanano) speaking peoples of the northwest Amazon. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  18. — 1987. Os cultivares de mandioca na área do Uaupés (Tukâno). Pages 151–158in B. G. Ribeiro, ed., Suma etnológica brasileira. 1. Etnobiologia. FI-NEP, Petrópolis, RJ, Brasil.Google Scholar
  19. Clay, J. W. 1990. Indigenous peoples—the miner’s canary for the twentieth century. Pages 106–117in S. Head, and R. Heinzman, eds., Lessons of the Rainforest. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  20. — 1996. Generating income and conserving resources: 20 lessons from the field. World Wildlife Fund Publ., Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  21. Clement, C. R. 1988. Domestication of the pejibaye palm(Bactris gasipaes): past and present. Pages 155–174in M. J. Balick, ed., The palm—tree of life. Advances in Economic Botany 6. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  22. — 1989. A center of crop genetic diversity in western Amazonia. BioScience 39:624–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. — 1990. Regeneraçao natural de pupunha(Bactris gasipaes). Acta Amazonica 20:399–404.Google Scholar
  24. — 1991. Amazonian fruits: neglected, threatened and potentially rich resources require urgent attention. Diversity 7:56–59.Google Scholar
  25. — 1997. Environmental impacts of, and biological and socio-economic limitations on new crop development in Brazilian Amazonia. Pages 134–146in J. Smartt, and N. N. Haq, eds., Domestication, production and utilization of new crops: practical approaches. International Centre for Underutilised Crops, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Clement, C. R., C. H. Müller, and W. B. Chávez Flores. 1982. Recursos genéticos de espécies frutiferas nativas da Amazonia Brasileira. Acta Amazonica 12:677–695.Google Scholar
  27. Darwin, C. 1882. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. 2nd ed. Vol. I & II. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  28. Denevan, W. M. 1966. The aboriginal cultural geography of the Llanos de Mojos de Bolivia. Ibero-Americana no. 48. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  29. — 1992a. The aboriginal population of Amazonia. Pages 205–234in W. M. Denevan, ed., The native population of the Americas in 1492. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  30. — 1992b. Native American populations in 1492: recent research and a revised hemispheric estimate. Pages xvii-xxxviiin W. M. Denevan, ed., The native population of the Americas in 1492. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  31. — 1992c. The pristine myth: the landscape of the Americas in 1492. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 82:369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. — 1992d. Stone vs metal axes: the ambiguity of shifting cultivation in prehistoric America. J. Steward Anthropology Society 2(1/2): 153–165.Google Scholar
  33. — 1996. A bluff model of riverine settlement in prehistoric Amazonia. Annals Association American Geographers 86(4):654–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Denevan, W. M., and C. Padoch. 1987. Introduction: The Bora agroforestry project. Pages 1–7 in W. M. Denevan, and C. Padoch, eds., Swidden-fallow agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon. Advances in Economic Botany 5. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  35. —,and A. Zucchi. 1978. Ridged field excavations in the central Orinoco Llanos. Pages 235–246in D. L. Browman, ed., Advances in Andean archeology. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  36. Dillehay, T. D., G. Ardila Calderón, G. Politis, and M. C. M. C. Beltrao. 1992. Earliest hunters and gatherers of South America. Journal of World Prehistory 6:145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dobyns, H. F. 1966. Estimating aboriginal American populations: an appraisal of techniques with a new hemispheric estimate. Current Anthropology 7: 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Doebley, J. 1989. Isozymic evidence and the evolution of crop plants. Pages 165–191in D. E. Soltis, and P. S. Soltis, eds., Isozymes in plant biology. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  39. Engels, J. M. M., ed. 1995.In situ conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in developing countries. Report of a DSE/ATSAF/IPGRI workshop, 2–4 May 1995, Bonn-Röttgen, Germany. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), German Foundation for International Development (DSE), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  40. Fearnside, P. M. 1993. Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: The effect of population and land tenure. Ambio 22:537–545.Google Scholar
  41. Fowler, C, and P. Mooney. 1990. Shattering: Food, politics, and the loss of genetic diversity. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  42. Frikel, P. 1978. Areas de arboricultura pre-agricola na Amazônia: notas preliminares. Revista Antropológica 21:45–52.Google Scholar
  43. Galloway, P. 1992. The unexamined habitus; direct historical analogy and the archaeology of the text. Pages 178–195in J. C. Gardin, and C. S. Peebles, eds., Representations in archaeology. Univ. Indiana Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  44. Gheerbrant, A. 1992. The Amazon: Past, present, and future. Harry N. Abrams, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Goodman, M. M. 1976. Maize,Zea mays (Graminae-Maydeae). Pages 128–136in N. W. Simmonds, ed., Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  46. Groube, L. 1989. The taming of the rain forests: a model for Late Pleistocene forest exploitation in New Guinea. Pages 292–304in D. R. Harris, and G. C. Hillman, eds., Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploitation. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  47. Harlan, J. R. 1992. Crops and Man. 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy/Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  48. Harris, D. R. 1989. An evolutionary continuum of people-plant interaction. Pages 11–26in D. R. Harris, and G. C. Hillman, eds., Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploitation. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  49. Hawkes, J. G. 1983. The diversity of crop plants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussets.Google Scholar
  50. Hecht, S., and A. Cockburn. 1990. The fate of the forest: developers, destroyers and defenders of the Amazon. Harper Perennial, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Heiser, C. B. 1988. Aspects of unconscious selection and the evolution of domesticated plants. Euphytica 37:77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hemming, J. 1978. Red gold: The conquest of the Brazilian Indians. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  53. Leon, J. 1987. Botánica de los cultivos tropicales. Instituto Interamericano para la Cooperatión Agrícola-IICA, San José, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  54. — 1992. Los recursos fitogenéticos del Nuevo Mundo. Pages 3–22in J. E. Hernandez Bermejo, and J. Leon, eds., Cultivos marginados: otra per-spectiva de 1492. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAOyjardín Botánico de Córdoba, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  55. Lévi-Strauss, C. 1950. The use of wild plants in tropical South America. Pages 465–486in J. H. Steward, ed., Handbook of South American Indians. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  56. Meggers, B. J. 1988. The prehistory of Amazonia. Pages 53–62in J. S. Denslow, and C. Padoch, eds., People of the tropical rain forest. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  57. — 1992a. Amazonia: real or counterfeit paradise? Review of Archaeology 13:25–40.Google Scholar
  58. — 1992b. Prehistoric population density in the Amazon basin. Pages 197–206in J. W. Verano, and D. H. Ubelaker, eds., Disease and demography in the Americas. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  59. — 1993-5. Amazonia on the eve of European contact: ethnohistorical, ecological, and anthropological perspectives. Revista de Arqueologfa Americana 8:91–115.Google Scholar
  60. Mora Urpí, J. 1992. Pejibaye(Bactris gasipaes). Pages 209–220in J. E. Hernández Bermejo, and J. León, eds., Cultivos marginados: otra perspectiva de 1492. Food and Agriculture Organization-FAO/ Jardin Botánico de Córdoba (Españia), Rome.Google Scholar
  61. Myers, T. P. 1988. El efecto de las pestes sobre las poblaciones de la Amazonia alta. Amazonia Peruana 8:61–81.Google Scholar
  62. Patino, V. M. 1963. Plantas cultivadas y animales do-mésticos en America Equinoctial. Tomo I. Frutales. Imprenta Departamental, Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
  63. — 1964. Plantas cultivadas y animales domésti-cos en América Equinoccial. Tomo II. Plantas alimenticias. Imprenta Departamental, Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
  64. Pearsall, D. M. 1992. The origins of plant cultivation in South America. Pages 173–206in C. W. Cowan, and P. J. Watson, eds., The origins of agriculture— An international perspective. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  65. Pickersgill, B., and C.B. Heiser, Jr. 1977. Origins and distribution of plants domesticated in the New World Tropics. Pages 803–836in C. A. Reed, ed., Origins of agriculture. Mouton Publ., The Hague.Google Scholar
  66. Rindos, D. 1984. The origins of agriculture: An evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  67. Roosevelt, A. C. 1989. Resource management in Amazonia before the conquest: beyond ethnographic projection. Pages 30–62in D. A. Posey, and W. Balée, eds., Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies. Advances in Economic Botany 7. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  68. — 1991. Moundbuilders of the Amazon: geophysical archaeology on Marajo Island, Brazil. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  69. — 1993. The rise and fall of the Amazon Chiefdoms. L’Homme 33:255–283.Google Scholar
  70. — ed. 1994. Amazonian indians from prehistory to the present—anthropological perspectives. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  71. R. A. Housley, M. I. da Silveira, S. Maranca, and R. Johnson. 1991. Eighth millennium pottery from a prehistoric shell midden in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 254:1621–1624.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. —,M. Lima da Costa, C. Lopes Machado, M. Michab, N. Mercier, H. Valladas, J. Feathers, W. Barnett, M. Imazio da Silveira, A. Henderson, J. Silva, B. Chernoff, D. S. Reese, J. A. Holman, N. Toth, and K. Schick. 1996. Paleoindian cave dwellers in the Amazon: the peopling of the Americas. Science 272:373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schultes, R. E. 1984. Amazonian cultigens and their northward and westward migrations in pre-Colum bian times. Pages 19–38in D. Stone, ed., Pre-Columbian plant migration. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  74. -,and A. Hofmann. 1979. Plants of the Gods: origins of hallucinogenic use. Alfred van der Marck Ed., New York.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, N. J. H. 1995. Human-induced landscape changes in Amazonia and implications for development. Pages 221–251in B. L. Turner II, A. Gomez Sal, E. Gonzalez Bernáldez, and F. di Castri, eds., Global land use change—a perspective from the Columbian encounter. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientifícas, Madrid.Google Scholar
  76. Smith, N. J. H., and R. E. Schultes. 1990. Deforestation and shrinking crop gene-pools in Amazonia. Environmental Conservation 17:227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. —,J. T. Williams, D. L. Plucknett, and J. P. Talbot 1992. Tropical forests and their crops. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  78. Treece, D. 1990. Indigenous peoples in Brazilian Amazonia and the expansion of the economic frontier. Pages 264–288in D. Goodman, and A. Hall, eds., The future of Amazonia—Destruction or sustainable development. MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  79. Vavilov, N. I. 1992a. On the origin of cultivated plants (First published in 1926 in Novoye v Agronomii [News in Agronomy]). Pages 14–21in V. F. Dorofeyev, ed., Origin and geography of cultivated plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  80. — 1992b. Universal centers of a wealth of types (genes) of cultivated plants (First published in 1927 in Izd. Gos. In-ta, opyt. agr. (Pub. National Institutes of Experimental Agriculture) 5(5)). Pages 144–157in V. E Dorofeyev, ed., Origin and geography of cultivated plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  81. Wiersum, K. F. 1997. From natural forest to tree crops, co-domestication of forests and tree species, an overview. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences 45:425–438.Google Scholar
  82. Yen, D. E. 1989. The domestication of environment. Pages 55–75in D. R. Harris, and G. C. Hillman, eds., Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploitation. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© New York Botanical Garden Press 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles R. Clement
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute Nacional de Pesquisas da AmazôniaManausBrasil

Personalised recommendations