Skip to main content

Early peyote research an interdisciplinary study

Summary

  1. 1.

    The first person to draw the attention of the scientific world to peyote was doubtless Dr. J. R. Briggs, and not Mrs. A. B. Nickels as is often stated.

  2. 2.

    The first report of alkaloids in peyote seems to be the laboratory report by F. A. Thompson at Parke-Davis, although Louis Lewin was the first to publish.

  3. 3.

    The variability ofLophophora williamsii and imperfect knowledge of the species laid the foundation for the controversy over botanical names. Only recently have field studies in Mexico indicated that there are two species,Lophophora williamsii andL. diffusa, differing in distribution and chemical characters.Anhalonium lewinii is now referred toL. williamsii.

  4. 4.

    Present and earlier studies of the Querétaro peyote,Lophophora diffusa, show that this species differs considerably in its alkaloid set-up fromL. williamsii. L. diffusa produces predominantly (>90%) phenolic tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids (mainly pellotine) and almost no mescaline. This lends support to the earlier postulation of an independent metabolic pathway to pellotine and anhalidine.

  5. 5.

    In our opinion, Heffter’s results withAnhalonium williamsii can be explained if we assume that his plant material was collected in Querétaro and was in factL. diffusa. The alkaloid analysis ofL. diffusa also provides an explanation of other controversial points in the history of peyote research.22 It seems especially appropriate here to recall that Kauder (p. 23) said: “The circumstances seem to me to call for further clarification, which will only be possible when we succeed in obtaining that cactus, which only contains pellotine.”

  6. 6.

    An 80-year old sample of “mescal buttons” has been shown to still contain identifiable alkaloids, most notably mescaline.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literature Cited

  1. Agurell, S. 1969. Cactaceae Alkaloids. I. Lloydia32(2): 206–216.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. —. and J. Lundström. 1968. Apparent Intermediates in the Biosynthesis of Mescaline and Related Tetrahydroisoquinolines. Chem. Commun. 1968: 1638–1639.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —, J. G. Bruhn, J. Lundström and U. Svensson. 1971. Cactaceae Alkaloids. X. Alkaloids ofTrichocereus species and some other cacti. Lloydia34(2): 183–187.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Altamirano, F. 1905. Memoria acerca de una excursioń botánica al Estado de Querétaro. An. Inst. Méd. Nac. Méx.7: 389–423.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, E. F. 1969. The biogeography, ecology, and taxonomy of Lophophora (Cactaceae). Brittonia21: 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. — and M. S. Stone. 1971. A pollen analysis of Lophophora (Cactaceae). Cact. Succ. Journ. (USA)43: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anonymous. 1892. Memorial and Biographical History of Dallas County, Texas. Illustrated. Containing a History of this Important Section of the great State of Texas, from the Earliest Period of its Occupancy to the Present Time, together with Glimpses of its Future Prospects; with Full-Page Portraits of the Presidents of the United States, and also Full-Page Portraits of some of the most Eminent Men of the County, and Biographical Mention of many of its Pioneers, and also of Prominent Citizens of Today. Lewis Publishing Co., Chicago. 1011 pp.

  8. -. 1959. Peyotl. Bull. Narcotics, U.N. Dept. Social Affairs11: 16–41.

  9. Baird, Violet M. 1972. Nineteenth Century Medical Journalism in Texas: With a Journal Checklist. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc.60(3): 375–381.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartlett, John Russell. 1860. Dictionary of Americanisms. A Glossary of Words and Phrases Usually Regarded as Peculiar to the United States. Third Edition. Little, Brown and Co., Boston. 524 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Battersby, A. R., R. Binks and R. Huxtable. 1968. Biosynthesis of pellotine. Tetrahedron Letters1968: 6111–6115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bender, G. A. 1968. Rough and Ready Research — 1887 Style. Journal of the History of Medicine23: 159–166.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beringer, K. 1927.Der Meskalinrausch, seine Geschichte und Erscheinungsweise. Monographien aus dem Gesamtgebiete der Neurologie und Psychiatre 49. Berlin, J. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bisset, N. G. and J. D. Phillipson. 1971. The tertiary alkaloids of some Asian species ofStrychnos. J. Pharm. Pharmac.23, Suppl., 244S.

  15. Boke, N. H. and E. F. Anderson. 1970. Structure, development, and taxonomy in the genus Lophophora. Amer. J. Bot.57(5): 569–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bravo H., H. 1931. Contribución al conocimiento de las cactáceas de México. Nota acerca de la histología del peyote, Lophophora williamsii Lemaire. An. Inst. Biol. Méx.2(1): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. —. 1967. Una revisión del género Lophophora. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas12: 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. -. 1973. Letter to J. G. Bruhn, March 22.

  19. Briggs, J. R. 1887. “Muscale Buttons” — Physiological Effects — Personal Experience. Medical Register, April 9th, pp. 276–277. A reprint of this article appeared in the Druggists’ Bulletin1(5): 78 (May 1887) under the title: Muscale Buttons — Physiological Action — A Mexican Fruit with Possible Medicinal Virtues.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brossi, A., F. Schenker, R. Schmidt, R. Banziger and W. Leimgruber. 1966. Synthesen in der Isochinolinreihe. Zur Darstellung 6,7,8-Hydroxy-dimethoxy-substituierter 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroisochinoline aus 3-Benzyloxy-4,5-dimethoxy-phenäthylamin und Bericht über die Resultate der pharmakologischen Prüfung von Anhalamin, Anhalidin,rac. Anhalonidin undrac. Pellotin. Helv. Chim. Acta49: 403–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruhn, J. G. 1973a. Ethnobotanical Search for Hallucinogenic Cacti. Planta Medica24: 315–319.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. —. 1973b. Búsqueda Etnobotánica de Cactáceas Alucinógenas. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas18: 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. — and C. Bruhn. 1973. Alkaloids and Ethnobotany of Mexican Peyote Cacti and Related Species. Econ. Bot.27: 241–251.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Burton, Richard. 1963. The Look of the West, 1860- Across the Plains to California. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska. (Originally published in London, 1862).

  25. Coulter, J. M. 1894. Preliminary revision of the North American Species of Cactus, Anhalonium, and Lophophora. Contr. U.S. Nat. Herb.3: 91–132.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Diguet, L. 1907. Le “Peyote” et son usage rituel chez les indiens du Nayarit. Journal de la Societé des Américanistes de Paris, n.s.,4(1): 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dixon, W. E. 1899. The physiological action of the alkaloids derived from Anhalonium Lewinii. Journ. Physiol.25: 69–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ellis, H. 1897. A note on the phenomena of mescal intoxication. Lancet1: 1540–1542.

    Google Scholar 

  29. -. 1898. Mescal: A New Artificial Paradise. The Contemporary Review (London) no. 385 (Jan.), pp. 130–141.

  30. Ewell, E. E. 1896. The chemistry of the Cactaceae. Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc.18: 624–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Furst, P. T. 1972. To Find Our Life: Peyote Among the Huichol Indians of Mexico.In: P. Furst, ed.,Flesh of the Gods. Praeger Publishers, New York. pp. 136–184.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Giles, Marie Louise. 1951. The early history of medicine in Dallas, 1841–1900. M.A. Thesis, University of Texas.

  33. Guttmann, A. 1914. Experimentelle Halluzinationem durch Anhalonium Lewinii. Bericht über d. VI Kongress f. exp. Psychol. pp 75–79.

  34. Heffter, A. 1894a. Ueber Pellote. Ein Beitrag zur pharmakologischen Kenntniss der Cacteen. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.34: 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. —. 1894b. Ueber zwei Cacteenalkaloide. Ber. Chem. Ges.27: 2975–2979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. —. 1895. Ueber Pellote. Pharm. Ztg.40(28): 234. (April 6, 1895).

    Google Scholar 

  37. —. 1896a. Ueber Cacteenalkaloide. (II. Mittheilung). Ber. Chem. Ges.29: 216–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. —. 1896b. Ueber Pellotin. Therapeut. Monatsh.10: 327–328.

    Google Scholar 

  39. —. 1896c. Beiträge zur chemischen Kenntnis der Cactaceen. Apoth. Ztg.11: 746.

    Google Scholar 

  40. —. 1898a. Ueber Pellote. Beiträge zur chemischen und pharmakologischen Kenntniss der Cacteen. Zweite Mittheilung. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.40: 385–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. —. 1898b. Ueber Cacteenalkaloide. (III. Mittheilung). Ber. Chem. Ges.31: 1193–1199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. —. 1901. Ueber Cacteenalkaloide. (IV. Mittheilung). Ber. Chem. Ges.34: 3004–3015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. — and R. Capellmann. 1905. Versuche zur Synthese des Mezcalins. Ber. Chem. Ges.38: 3634–3640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hennings, P. 1888. Eine giftige Kaktee, Anhalonium Lewinii n. sp. Gartenflora37: 410–412.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Holmstedt, B. 1967. Historical Survey.In: Ethnopharmacologic Search for Psychoactive Drugs. U.S. Publish Health Service Publication No. 1645, Washington, D.C. pp. 3–32.

  46. — and G. Liljestrand. 1963.Readings in Pharmacology. Pergamon Press Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  47. - and J. E. Lindgren. 1967. Chemical Constituents and Pharmacology of South American Snuffs.In: Ethnopharmacologic Search for Psychoactive Drugs. U.S. Public Health Service Publication No. 1645, Washington, D.C. pp. 339–373.

  48. —. 1972. Alkaloid analyses of botanical material more than a thousand years old. Etnol. Stud.32: 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hutchings, R. H. 1897. Report on the use of pellotine as a sedative and hypnotic. State Hospital Bulletin, Utica,2: 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jaensch, W. 1920. Pharmakologische Versuche über die Beziehungen optischer Konstitutionsstigmen zu den Halluzinationen. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiatrie23: 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jolly, F. 1896a. Ueber die schlafmachende Wirkung des Pellotinum muriaticum. Therapeut. Monatsh.10: 328–329.

    Google Scholar 

  52. —, 1896b. Ueber Pellotin als Schlafmittel. Deut. Med. Wochenschrift22: 375–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kapadia, G. J., N. J. Shah and T. B. Zalucky. 1968. Peyote Alkaloids. II. Anhalotine, Lophotine, and Peyotine, the Quaternary Alkaloids ofLophophora williamsii. J. Pharm. Sci.57: 254–262.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. —, and M. B. E. Fayez. 1970. Peyote Constituents: Chemistry, Biogenesis, and Biological Effects. J. Pharm. Sci.59: 1699–1727.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. —, and —. 1973. The chemistry of peyote alkaloids. Lloydia36(1): 9–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kauder, E. 1899. Ueber Alkaloide aus Anhalonium Lewinii. Arch. Pharm.237: 190–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Khanna, K. L., M. Takido, H. Rosenberg and A. G. Paul. 1970. Biosynthesis of phenolic tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids of peyote. Phytochemistry9: 1811–1815.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Krayer, O. 1963. Letter to B. Holmstedt.

  59. La Barre, W. 1964.The Peyote Cult. Shoe String Press, Inc., Hamden, Conn. 260 pp.

  60. Lewin, L. 1888a. Ueber Anhalonium Lewinii. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.24: 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. -. 1888b. Anhalonium Lewinii. Therapeutic Gaz. IV, No. 4, April 16.

  62. —. 1894a. Ueber Anhalonium Lewinii und andere Cacteen. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.34: 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. -. 1894b. Ueber Anhalonium Lewinii und andere giftige Cacteen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.12: 283–290.

  64. -. 1895. Ueber Anhalonium Lewinii. Pharm. Ztg.40(41): 343. (May 22, 1895).

  65. —. 1964.Phantastica. Narcotic and Stimulating Drugs, Their Use and Abuse. Foreword by Bo Holmstedt. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. 335 pp. (First German edition appeared in 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  66. -. 1929.Gifte und Vergiftungen. 4. Auflage, Stilke, Berlin, 1087 pp.

  67. Lumholtz, C. 1894. Tarahumari dances and plant worship. Scribner’s Magazine16(4): 438–456.

    Google Scholar 

  68. —. 1898. The Huichol Indians of Mexico. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, X: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  69. —. 1900. Symbolism of the Huichol Indians. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History,III: 1–228.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lundström, J. 1970. Biosynthesis of mescaline and 3,4-dimethoxy-phenethylamine inTrichocereus pachanoi. Br. & R. Acta Pharm. Suecica7: 651–666.

    Google Scholar 

  71. —. 1971a. Biosynthetic studies on mescaline and related cactus alkaloids. Acta Pharm. Suecica8: 275–302.

    Google Scholar 

  72. —. 1971b. Biosynthesis of tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids inLophophora williamsii (Lem.) Coult. Acta Pharm, Suecica8: 485–496.

    Google Scholar 

  73. —. 1972. Identification of New Peyote Alkaloids; Isomers of the Main Phenolic Tetrahydroisoquinolines. Acta Chem. Scand.26: 1295–1297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. — and S. Agurell. 1967. Thin-layer chromatography of the peyote alkaloids. J. Chromatog.30: 271–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. — and S. Agurell. 1968. Gas chromatography of peyote alkaloids. A new peyote alkaloid. J. Chromatog.36: 105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. — and S. Agurell. 1971. Biosynthesis of mescaline and tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids inLophophora williamsii (Lem.) Coult. Acta Pharm. Suecica8: 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Merck, E. 1895. Merck, Darmstadt. Bericht über das Jahr 1894. 127 pp.

  78. -. 1897. Merck, Darmstadt. Bericht über das Jahr 1896. 191 pp.

  79. -. 1900. Merck, Darmstadt. Bericht über das Jahr 1899. 185 pp.

  80. Michaëlis, Paul. 1896. Beitrage zur vergleichenden Anatomie der GattungenEchinocactus, Mamillaria undAnhalonium, mit besonderer Betrachtung einzelner Arten der Gattung Anhalonium bezüglich ihrer Zugehörigkeit zu derselben. Inaugural-Dissertation der Friedrich-Alexanders-Universität Erlangen. 39 pp.

  81. Mitchell, S. W. 1896. Remarks on the effects of Anhelonium Lewinii (the Mescal Button). Brit. Med. J., Dec. 5th, 1896, pp. 1625–1629.

  82. Mitich, L. W. 1971. Anna B. Nickels — Pioneer Texas Cactophile. Cact. Succ. Journ. (USA)43: 209–212, 227 and 259-263.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Mogilewa, A. 1903. Ueber die Wirkung einiger Kakteenalkaloide auf das Froschherz. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.49: 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Mooney, J. 1892a. Eating the mescal. Augusta, Ga., Chronicle, Jan. 24, 1892, p. 11, cols. 1–2.

  85. —. 1892b. A Kiowa Mescal Rattle. Am. Anthropologist, o.s.5: 64–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. —. 1896. The Mescal Plant and Ceremony. Therapeutic Gaz.20: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Paul, A. G. 1973. Biosynthesis of the peyote alkaloids. Lloydia36(1): 36–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Pilcz, A. 1896. Ueber Pellotin. Wiener Klin. Wochenschrift9: 1121–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Prentiss, D. W. and F. P. Morgan. 1895. Anhalonium Lewinii (Mescal Buttons). A study of the drug, with especial reference to its physiological action upon man, with report of experiments. Therapeutic Gaz.19: 577–585.

    Google Scholar 

  90. — and —. 1896. Therapeutic uses of mescal buttons (Anhalonium Lewinii). Therapeutic Gaz.20: 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Raffauf, R. F. and E. A. Morris. 1960. Persistence of Alkaloids in Plant Tissue. Science131: 1047.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Robles, C. and J. Gomez Robleda. 1931. Trabajo inicial acerca de la acción fisiológica del clorhidrato de peyotina. An. Inst. Biol. Méx.2(1): 15–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Rouhier, A. 1927.La plante qui fait les yeux émerveillés — le peyotl. Doin, Paris. 371 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Rusby, H. H. 1894. Muscale Buttons. Bull. Pharm.8: 306.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Safford, W. E. 1915. An Aztec Narcotic. Journ. Hered.6: 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Schultes, R. E. 1937a. Peyote and plants used in the peyote ceremony. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ.4(8): 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  97. —. 1937b. Peyote (Lophophora williamsii) and plants confused with it. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ.5(5): 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  98. —. 1972a. Ilex Guayusa from 500 A.D. to the present. Etnol. Stud.32: 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

  99. —. 1972b. An Overview of Hallucinogens in the Western Hemisphere.In: P. Furst, ed.,Flesh of the Gods. Praeger Publishers, New York. pp. 3–54.

    Google Scholar 

  100. —, B. Holmstedt and J. E. Lindgren. 1969. De Plantis Toxicariis e Mundo Novo Tropicale Commentationes III. Phytochemical Examination of Spruce’s Original Collection of Banisteriopsis Caapi. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ.22(4): 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Schumann, K. 1895. Uber giftige Kakteen. Ber. Pharm. Ges.5: 103–110. An abstract of this paper was published in Pharm. Ztg.40(21): 175. (March 13, 1895).

    Google Scholar 

  102. —. 1898. Die Gattung Ariocarpus (Anhalonium). Bot. Jahrb.24: 541–567.

    Google Scholar 

  103. —. 1903.Gesamtbeschreibung der Kakteen (Monographia Cactacearum). Zweite Auflage, Verlag von J. Neumann, Neudamm.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Shulgin, A. T. 1973. Mescaline: The chemistry and pharmacology of its analogs. Lloydia36(1): 46–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Slotkin, J. S. 1955. Peyotism, 1521–1891. Am. Anthropol.57: 202–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Späth, E. 1919. Über dieAnhalonium — Alkaloide. I. Anhalin und Mezcalin. Monatsh. Chem.40: 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. —. 1922. Über die Anhaloniumalkaloide. V. Die Synthese des Anhalonidins und des Pellotins. Monatsh. Chem.43: 477–484.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Todd, J. S. 1969. Thin-layer Chromatography Analysis of Mexican Populations ofLophophora (Cactaceae). Lloydia32: 395–398.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Wasson, V. P. and R. G. Wasson. 1957. Mushrooms Russia and History. New York: Pantheon Books. 2 vols., 435 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan G. Bruhn.

Additional information

Cactaceae Alkaloids XIX. Part XVII, Econ. Bot.27: 241 (1973). Part XVIII, J. Pharm. Sci.63: 574 (1974). Submitted for publication July, 1974.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruhn, J.G., Holmstedt, B. Early peyote research an interdisciplinary study. Econ Bot 28, 353–390 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862854

Download citation

Keywords

  • Alkaloid
  • Economic Botany
  • Bravo
  • Lewin
  • Mescaline