Summary
-
1.
The first person to draw the attention of the scientific world to peyote was doubtless Dr. J. R. Briggs, and not Mrs. A. B. Nickels as is often stated.
-
2.
The first report of alkaloids in peyote seems to be the laboratory report by F. A. Thompson at Parke-Davis, although Louis Lewin was the first to publish.
-
3.
The variability ofLophophora williamsii and imperfect knowledge of the species laid the foundation for the controversy over botanical names. Only recently have field studies in Mexico indicated that there are two species,Lophophora williamsii andL. diffusa, differing in distribution and chemical characters.Anhalonium lewinii is now referred toL. williamsii.
-
4.
Present and earlier studies of the Querétaro peyote,Lophophora diffusa, show that this species differs considerably in its alkaloid set-up fromL. williamsii. L. diffusa produces predominantly (>90%) phenolic tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids (mainly pellotine) and almost no mescaline. This lends support to the earlier postulation of an independent metabolic pathway to pellotine and anhalidine.
-
5.
In our opinion, Heffter’s results withAnhalonium williamsii can be explained if we assume that his plant material was collected in Querétaro and was in factL. diffusa. The alkaloid analysis ofL. diffusa also provides an explanation of other controversial points in the history of peyote research.22 It seems especially appropriate here to recall that Kauder (p. 23) said: “The circumstances seem to me to call for further clarification, which will only be possible when we succeed in obtaining that cactus, which only contains pellotine.”
-
6.
An 80-year old sample of “mescal buttons” has been shown to still contain identifiable alkaloids, most notably mescaline.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Agurell, S. 1969. Cactaceae Alkaloids. I. Lloydia32(2): 206–216.
—. and J. Lundström. 1968. Apparent Intermediates in the Biosynthesis of Mescaline and Related Tetrahydroisoquinolines. Chem. Commun. 1968: 1638–1639.
—, J. G. Bruhn, J. Lundström and U. Svensson. 1971. Cactaceae Alkaloids. X. Alkaloids ofTrichocereus species and some other cacti. Lloydia34(2): 183–187.
Altamirano, F. 1905. Memoria acerca de una excursioń botánica al Estado de Querétaro. An. Inst. Méd. Nac. Méx.7: 389–423.
Anderson, E. F. 1969. The biogeography, ecology, and taxonomy of Lophophora (Cactaceae). Brittonia21: 299–310.
— and M. S. Stone. 1971. A pollen analysis of Lophophora (Cactaceae). Cact. Succ. Journ. (USA)43: 77–82.
Anonymous. 1892. Memorial and Biographical History of Dallas County, Texas. Illustrated. Containing a History of this Important Section of the great State of Texas, from the Earliest Period of its Occupancy to the Present Time, together with Glimpses of its Future Prospects; with Full-Page Portraits of the Presidents of the United States, and also Full-Page Portraits of some of the most Eminent Men of the County, and Biographical Mention of many of its Pioneers, and also of Prominent Citizens of Today. Lewis Publishing Co., Chicago. 1011 pp.
-. 1959. Peyotl. Bull. Narcotics, U.N. Dept. Social Affairs11: 16–41.
Baird, Violet M. 1972. Nineteenth Century Medical Journalism in Texas: With a Journal Checklist. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc.60(3): 375–381.
Bartlett, John Russell. 1860. Dictionary of Americanisms. A Glossary of Words and Phrases Usually Regarded as Peculiar to the United States. Third Edition. Little, Brown and Co., Boston. 524 pp.
Battersby, A. R., R. Binks and R. Huxtable. 1968. Biosynthesis of pellotine. Tetrahedron Letters1968: 6111–6115.
Bender, G. A. 1968. Rough and Ready Research — 1887 Style. Journal of the History of Medicine23: 159–166.
Beringer, K. 1927.Der Meskalinrausch, seine Geschichte und Erscheinungsweise. Monographien aus dem Gesamtgebiete der Neurologie und Psychiatre 49. Berlin, J. Springer.
Bisset, N. G. and J. D. Phillipson. 1971. The tertiary alkaloids of some Asian species ofStrychnos. J. Pharm. Pharmac.23, Suppl., 244S.
Boke, N. H. and E. F. Anderson. 1970. Structure, development, and taxonomy in the genus Lophophora. Amer. J. Bot.57(5): 569–578.
Bravo H., H. 1931. Contribución al conocimiento de las cactáceas de México. Nota acerca de la histología del peyote, Lophophora williamsii Lemaire. An. Inst. Biol. Méx.2(1): 3–14.
—. 1967. Una revisión del género Lophophora. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas12: 8–17.
-. 1973. Letter to J. G. Bruhn, March 22.
Briggs, J. R. 1887. “Muscale Buttons” — Physiological Effects — Personal Experience. Medical Register, April 9th, pp. 276–277. A reprint of this article appeared in the Druggists’ Bulletin1(5): 78 (May 1887) under the title: Muscale Buttons — Physiological Action — A Mexican Fruit with Possible Medicinal Virtues.
Brossi, A., F. Schenker, R. Schmidt, R. Banziger and W. Leimgruber. 1966. Synthesen in der Isochinolinreihe. Zur Darstellung 6,7,8-Hydroxy-dimethoxy-substituierter 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroisochinoline aus 3-Benzyloxy-4,5-dimethoxy-phenäthylamin und Bericht über die Resultate der pharmakologischen Prüfung von Anhalamin, Anhalidin,rac. Anhalonidin undrac. Pellotin. Helv. Chim. Acta49: 403–411.
Bruhn, J. G. 1973a. Ethnobotanical Search for Hallucinogenic Cacti. Planta Medica24: 315–319.
—. 1973b. Búsqueda Etnobotánica de Cactáceas Alucinógenas. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas18: 8–13.
— and C. Bruhn. 1973. Alkaloids and Ethnobotany of Mexican Peyote Cacti and Related Species. Econ. Bot.27: 241–251.
Burton, Richard. 1963. The Look of the West, 1860- Across the Plains to California. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska. (Originally published in London, 1862).
Coulter, J. M. 1894. Preliminary revision of the North American Species of Cactus, Anhalonium, and Lophophora. Contr. U.S. Nat. Herb.3: 91–132.
Diguet, L. 1907. Le “Peyote” et son usage rituel chez les indiens du Nayarit. Journal de la Societé des Américanistes de Paris, n.s.,4(1): 21–29.
Dixon, W. E. 1899. The physiological action of the alkaloids derived from Anhalonium Lewinii. Journ. Physiol.25: 69–86.
Ellis, H. 1897. A note on the phenomena of mescal intoxication. Lancet1: 1540–1542.
-. 1898. Mescal: A New Artificial Paradise. The Contemporary Review (London) no. 385 (Jan.), pp. 130–141.
Ewell, E. E. 1896. The chemistry of the Cactaceae. Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc.18: 624–643.
Furst, P. T. 1972. To Find Our Life: Peyote Among the Huichol Indians of Mexico.In: P. Furst, ed.,Flesh of the Gods. Praeger Publishers, New York. pp. 136–184.
Giles, Marie Louise. 1951. The early history of medicine in Dallas, 1841–1900. M.A. Thesis, University of Texas.
Guttmann, A. 1914. Experimentelle Halluzinationem durch Anhalonium Lewinii. Bericht über d. VI Kongress f. exp. Psychol. pp 75–79.
Heffter, A. 1894a. Ueber Pellote. Ein Beitrag zur pharmakologischen Kenntniss der Cacteen. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.34: 65–86.
—. 1894b. Ueber zwei Cacteenalkaloide. Ber. Chem. Ges.27: 2975–2979.
—. 1895. Ueber Pellote. Pharm. Ztg.40(28): 234. (April 6, 1895).
—. 1896a. Ueber Cacteenalkaloide. (II. Mittheilung). Ber. Chem. Ges.29: 216–227.
—. 1896b. Ueber Pellotin. Therapeut. Monatsh.10: 327–328.
—. 1896c. Beiträge zur chemischen Kenntnis der Cactaceen. Apoth. Ztg.11: 746.
—. 1898a. Ueber Pellote. Beiträge zur chemischen und pharmakologischen Kenntniss der Cacteen. Zweite Mittheilung. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.40: 385–429.
—. 1898b. Ueber Cacteenalkaloide. (III. Mittheilung). Ber. Chem. Ges.31: 1193–1199.
—. 1901. Ueber Cacteenalkaloide. (IV. Mittheilung). Ber. Chem. Ges.34: 3004–3015.
— and R. Capellmann. 1905. Versuche zur Synthese des Mezcalins. Ber. Chem. Ges.38: 3634–3640.
Hennings, P. 1888. Eine giftige Kaktee, Anhalonium Lewinii n. sp. Gartenflora37: 410–412.
Holmstedt, B. 1967. Historical Survey.In: Ethnopharmacologic Search for Psychoactive Drugs. U.S. Publish Health Service Publication No. 1645, Washington, D.C. pp. 3–32.
— and G. Liljestrand. 1963.Readings in Pharmacology. Pergamon Press Ltd., London.
- and J. E. Lindgren. 1967. Chemical Constituents and Pharmacology of South American Snuffs.In: Ethnopharmacologic Search for Psychoactive Drugs. U.S. Public Health Service Publication No. 1645, Washington, D.C. pp. 339–373.
—. 1972. Alkaloid analyses of botanical material more than a thousand years old. Etnol. Stud.32: 139–144.
Hutchings, R. H. 1897. Report on the use of pellotine as a sedative and hypnotic. State Hospital Bulletin, Utica,2: 45–48.
Jaensch, W. 1920. Pharmakologische Versuche über die Beziehungen optischer Konstitutionsstigmen zu den Halluzinationen. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiatrie23: 119–120.
Jolly, F. 1896a. Ueber die schlafmachende Wirkung des Pellotinum muriaticum. Therapeut. Monatsh.10: 328–329.
—, 1896b. Ueber Pellotin als Schlafmittel. Deut. Med. Wochenschrift22: 375–376.
Kapadia, G. J., N. J. Shah and T. B. Zalucky. 1968. Peyote Alkaloids. II. Anhalotine, Lophotine, and Peyotine, the Quaternary Alkaloids ofLophophora williamsii. J. Pharm. Sci.57: 254–262.
—, and M. B. E. Fayez. 1970. Peyote Constituents: Chemistry, Biogenesis, and Biological Effects. J. Pharm. Sci.59: 1699–1727.
—, and —. 1973. The chemistry of peyote alkaloids. Lloydia36(1): 9–35.
Kauder, E. 1899. Ueber Alkaloide aus Anhalonium Lewinii. Arch. Pharm.237: 190–198.
Khanna, K. L., M. Takido, H. Rosenberg and A. G. Paul. 1970. Biosynthesis of phenolic tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids of peyote. Phytochemistry9: 1811–1815.
Krayer, O. 1963. Letter to B. Holmstedt.
La Barre, W. 1964.The Peyote Cult. Shoe String Press, Inc., Hamden, Conn. 260 pp.
Lewin, L. 1888a. Ueber Anhalonium Lewinii. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.24: 401–411.
-. 1888b. Anhalonium Lewinii. Therapeutic Gaz. IV, No. 4, April 16.
—. 1894a. Ueber Anhalonium Lewinii und andere Cacteen. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.34: 374–391.
-. 1894b. Ueber Anhalonium Lewinii und andere giftige Cacteen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.12: 283–290.
-. 1895. Ueber Anhalonium Lewinii. Pharm. Ztg.40(41): 343. (May 22, 1895).
—. 1964.Phantastica. Narcotic and Stimulating Drugs, Their Use and Abuse. Foreword by Bo Holmstedt. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. 335 pp. (First German edition appeared in 1924).
-. 1929.Gifte und Vergiftungen. 4. Auflage, Stilke, Berlin, 1087 pp.
Lumholtz, C. 1894. Tarahumari dances and plant worship. Scribner’s Magazine16(4): 438–456.
—. 1898. The Huichol Indians of Mexico. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, X: 1–14.
—. 1900. Symbolism of the Huichol Indians. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History,III: 1–228.
Lundström, J. 1970. Biosynthesis of mescaline and 3,4-dimethoxy-phenethylamine inTrichocereus pachanoi. Br. & R. Acta Pharm. Suecica7: 651–666.
—. 1971a. Biosynthetic studies on mescaline and related cactus alkaloids. Acta Pharm. Suecica8: 275–302.
—. 1971b. Biosynthesis of tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids inLophophora williamsii (Lem.) Coult. Acta Pharm, Suecica8: 485–496.
—. 1972. Identification of New Peyote Alkaloids; Isomers of the Main Phenolic Tetrahydroisoquinolines. Acta Chem. Scand.26: 1295–1297.
— and S. Agurell. 1967. Thin-layer chromatography of the peyote alkaloids. J. Chromatog.30: 271–272.
— and S. Agurell. 1968. Gas chromatography of peyote alkaloids. A new peyote alkaloid. J. Chromatog.36: 105–108.
— and S. Agurell. 1971. Biosynthesis of mescaline and tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids inLophophora williamsii (Lem.) Coult. Acta Pharm. Suecica8: 261–274.
Merck, E. 1895. Merck, Darmstadt. Bericht über das Jahr 1894. 127 pp.
-. 1897. Merck, Darmstadt. Bericht über das Jahr 1896. 191 pp.
-. 1900. Merck, Darmstadt. Bericht über das Jahr 1899. 185 pp.
Michaëlis, Paul. 1896. Beitrage zur vergleichenden Anatomie der GattungenEchinocactus, Mamillaria undAnhalonium, mit besonderer Betrachtung einzelner Arten der Gattung Anhalonium bezüglich ihrer Zugehörigkeit zu derselben. Inaugural-Dissertation der Friedrich-Alexanders-Universität Erlangen. 39 pp.
Mitchell, S. W. 1896. Remarks on the effects of Anhelonium Lewinii (the Mescal Button). Brit. Med. J., Dec. 5th, 1896, pp. 1625–1629.
Mitich, L. W. 1971. Anna B. Nickels — Pioneer Texas Cactophile. Cact. Succ. Journ. (USA)43: 209–212, 227 and 259-263.
Mogilewa, A. 1903. Ueber die Wirkung einiger Kakteenalkaloide auf das Froschherz. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmakol.49: 137–156.
Mooney, J. 1892a. Eating the mescal. Augusta, Ga., Chronicle, Jan. 24, 1892, p. 11, cols. 1–2.
—. 1892b. A Kiowa Mescal Rattle. Am. Anthropologist, o.s.5: 64–65.
—. 1896. The Mescal Plant and Ceremony. Therapeutic Gaz.20: 7–11.
Paul, A. G. 1973. Biosynthesis of the peyote alkaloids. Lloydia36(1): 36–45.
Pilcz, A. 1896. Ueber Pellotin. Wiener Klin. Wochenschrift9: 1121–1122.
Prentiss, D. W. and F. P. Morgan. 1895. Anhalonium Lewinii (Mescal Buttons). A study of the drug, with especial reference to its physiological action upon man, with report of experiments. Therapeutic Gaz.19: 577–585.
— and —. 1896. Therapeutic uses of mescal buttons (Anhalonium Lewinii). Therapeutic Gaz.20: 4–7.
Raffauf, R. F. and E. A. Morris. 1960. Persistence of Alkaloids in Plant Tissue. Science131: 1047.
Robles, C. and J. Gomez Robleda. 1931. Trabajo inicial acerca de la acción fisiológica del clorhidrato de peyotina. An. Inst. Biol. Méx.2(1): 15–46.
Rouhier, A. 1927.La plante qui fait les yeux émerveillés — le peyotl. Doin, Paris. 371 pp.
Rusby, H. H. 1894. Muscale Buttons. Bull. Pharm.8: 306.
Safford, W. E. 1915. An Aztec Narcotic. Journ. Hered.6: 291–311.
Schultes, R. E. 1937a. Peyote and plants used in the peyote ceremony. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ.4(8): 129–152.
—. 1937b. Peyote (Lophophora williamsii) and plants confused with it. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ.5(5): 61–88.
—. 1972a. Ilex Guayusa from 500 A.D. to the present. Etnol. Stud.32: 115–138.
—. 1972b. An Overview of Hallucinogens in the Western Hemisphere.In: P. Furst, ed.,Flesh of the Gods. Praeger Publishers, New York. pp. 3–54.
—, B. Holmstedt and J. E. Lindgren. 1969. De Plantis Toxicariis e Mundo Novo Tropicale Commentationes III. Phytochemical Examination of Spruce’s Original Collection of Banisteriopsis Caapi. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ.22(4): 121–132.
Schumann, K. 1895. Uber giftige Kakteen. Ber. Pharm. Ges.5: 103–110. An abstract of this paper was published in Pharm. Ztg.40(21): 175. (March 13, 1895).
—. 1898. Die Gattung Ariocarpus (Anhalonium). Bot. Jahrb.24: 541–567.
—. 1903.Gesamtbeschreibung der Kakteen (Monographia Cactacearum). Zweite Auflage, Verlag von J. Neumann, Neudamm.
Shulgin, A. T. 1973. Mescaline: The chemistry and pharmacology of its analogs. Lloydia36(1): 46–58.
Slotkin, J. S. 1955. Peyotism, 1521–1891. Am. Anthropol.57: 202–230.
Späth, E. 1919. Über dieAnhalonium — Alkaloide. I. Anhalin und Mezcalin. Monatsh. Chem.40: 129–154.
—. 1922. Über die Anhaloniumalkaloide. V. Die Synthese des Anhalonidins und des Pellotins. Monatsh. Chem.43: 477–484.
Todd, J. S. 1969. Thin-layer Chromatography Analysis of Mexican Populations ofLophophora (Cactaceae). Lloydia32: 395–398.
Wasson, V. P. and R. G. Wasson. 1957. Mushrooms Russia and History. New York: Pantheon Books. 2 vols., 435 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Cactaceae Alkaloids XIX. Part XVII, Econ. Bot.27: 241 (1973). Part XVIII, J. Pharm. Sci.63: 574 (1974). Submitted for publication July, 1974.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruhn, J.G., Holmstedt, B. Early peyote research an interdisciplinary study. Econ Bot 28, 353–390 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862854
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862854