Skip to main content
Log in

Detection threshold of sensory panels for mealiiness of baked potatoes as related to specific gravity differences

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Thresholds of mealiness detection in baked potatoes were demonstrated in three series of tests each representing three specific gavity levels within a broad range of 1.096 to 1.056.

Only one of 15 contrasts of 0.002 differences in specific gravity was detected significantly by 29-member panels in three 6-sample tests of stored Russet Burbank potatoes.

With comparable potatoes differing by 0.004 (three samples each in three studies), perception by 23- to 28-member panels was significant in five of six contrasts in complete blocks with four tastings, and in all six contrasts by paired comparison presentation, eight tastings.

When specific gravity differences were 0.006, four three-sample complete-block tests revealed significant discernment by 28 to 30 judges in all eight contrasts (two in Russet Burbanks and six in Kennebecs, all newly-harvested).

Sensitivity of perception in the one Russet Burbank 0.006 test was significantly greater than in three Russet Burbank tests with samples differing by 0.004 and in two of three Kennebec tests differing by 0.006.

Panel sensitivity was not related significantly nor consistently to the specific gravity levels tested.

Coefficients of correlation, determination, and regression of the 0.002 series showed weak association (r2s of 0.36 to 0.51) between mealiness rankings and three combined physical measurements: specific gravity, total solids, and alcohol insoluble solids. With larger differences, the relationships of mealiness to the measured characteristics were strong and of practical as well as statistical significance. The r2s ranged from 0.76 to 0.88 for the 0.004 samples and 0.84 to 0.95 for those in the 0.006 series.

The minimum detectable specific gravity difference of 0.004 was coincident with a mean total solids difference of 1.05 gm/100 gms and an alcohol insoluble solids difference of 1.13 gm/100 gms of cooked riced potato.

Resumen

El punto mínimo de revelación de la harinosidad en papas asadas fue demostrado en tres series de experimentos, cado uno representando tres niveles diferentes de gravedad especifica, a saber, de 1.095 a 1.085; de 1.085 a 1.075; y de 1.075 a 1.065.

Solamente uno de los 15 contrastes de 0.002 fue significativamente descubierto por un jurado de 29 miembros en tres experimentos de seis muestras cada uno con papas Russet Burbank almacenadas.

En papas similares, con variantes de 0.004 (tres estudios con tres muestras cada uno), la percepción de un jurado compuesto de 23 a 28 miembros fue sifnificativa en cinco de los seis contrastes, con cuatro saboreos en bloques completos, y en todos los seis contrastes en una comparación presentada en pares, con ocho saboreos.

Cuando las diferencias en gravedad especifica fueron de 0.006, cuatro experimentos de tres muestras en bloque completo, revelaron significativos discernimientos en los 28 a 30 jueces, en todos los ochos contrastes. (Dos en la variedad Russet Burbanks y seis en la Kennebec, todas recién cosechadas.)

La sensibilidad de percepción en el experimento de 0.006 con la Russet Burbank fue significativamente mayor que en dos de los tres experimentos comparables con Kennebec, y que en los tres experimentos con la Russet Burbanks con muestras vardiando en los 0.004.

La sensibilidad del jurado no pudo ser relacionada significativa ni consistentemente a los niveles de gravedad especifica experimentados.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1955. Official Methods of Analysis, 8th ed., Associaton of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D. C. p. 572.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bliss, C. I. 1960. Some statistical aspects of preference and related tests. Applied Statistics 9: 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley, R. A and D. E. W. Schumann. 1957. The comparison of the sensitivities of similar experiments: applications. Biometrics 13: 496–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cullen, J. C. 1960. Texture in Cooked Potatoes, from Texture in Foods. Soc. Chem. Ind. Monograph No. 7, The Macmillan Co., New York pp. 128–134.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multple range and multiple F tests Biometrics 11: 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, R. A. and F. Yates. 1948. Statistical Tables. Hafner Publishing Co., Inc., New York p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gridgeman, N. T. 1961. A comparison of some taste-test methods. J. Food Scence 26: 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, P. E. 1966. A consumer survey for acceptance evaluation of cured ham treated by a combinaton of heat and irradiation. Food Tech. 20: 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kramer, Amihud, E. F. Murphy, A. M. Briant, Marian Wang, and M. E. Kirkpatrick. 1961. Studies in taste panel methodology. J. Agri. Food Chem. 9: 224–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kramer, Amihud and B. A., Twigg. 1962. Fundamentals of Quality Control for the Food Industry. The Avi Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, Conn. pp. 450–451.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, P. G., J. H. Nair and A. J. Harriman. 1955. A household and a labortaory type of panel for testing consumer preference. Food Tech. 9: 445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy, E. F., Reiner Bonde, and F. E. Manzer. 1963. The specific gravity, mealiness, and flavor of baked Maine potatoes as related to fungicide treatment. Amer. Potato J. 40: 35–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy, E. F., B. S. Clark, and R. M. Berglund. 1958. A consumer survey versus panel testing for acceptance evaluation of Maine sardines. Food Tech. 12: 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murphy, E. F., M. R. Covell, and J. S. Dinsmore, Jr. 1957. An examination of three methods for testing palatability as illustrated by strawberry flavor differences. Food Res. 22: 423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scheffé, Henry. 1952. An analysis of variance for paired comparisons. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 47: 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Simone, Marion, Sherman Leonard, Elly Hinreiner, and Rose Marie Valdés. 1956. Consumer studies on sweetness of canned cling peaches. Food Tech. 10: 279–282.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snedecor, G. W. 1946. Statistical Methods 4th ed. The Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tukey, J. W. 1953, Some selected quick and easy methods of statistical analysis. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci., Ser. 2, 16: 88–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Young, D. A. 1962. The selection of potato samples for the evaluation of culinary quality. Amer. Potato J. 39: 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, E.F., True, R.H. & Hogan, J.M. Detection threshold of sensory panels for mealiiness of baked potatoes as related to specific gravity differences. American Potato Journal 44, 442–452 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862544

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862544

Keywords

Navigation