Skip to main content
Log in

Transition from native forest rubbers toHevea Brasiliensis (Euphorbiaceae) among tribal smallholders in Borneo

Peralihan Karet Hutan Aland Menjadi Perkebunan Karet Rakyat Oleh/Dalam Petani-Petani Suku di Kalimantan

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a study of the historic transition in Southeast Asia, in particular Borneo, from the exploitation of native forest rubbers to Para rubber (Hevea brasiliensis, Euphorbiaceae). During the second half of the nineteenth century, booming international markets subjected forest rubbers to more intensive and competitive exploitation. At the same time, the settlement patterns of tribal rubber gatherers were becoming more sedentary and their agriculture more intensive.Hevea spp. was better suited to these changed circumstances than the native forest rubbers, largely because it was cultivated not naturally grown. The status ofHevea spp. in Southeast Asia as a cultigen, as opposed to a natural forest product, and the political-economic implications of this helps to explain the contrasting histories of smallholder rubber producers in the New and Old Worlds. This study offers an historical perspective on current debates regarding relations between forest resources, forest peoples, and the state.

Résumé

Penelitian ini mempelajari sejarah peralihan di Asia Tenggara, khususnya Kalimantan, dari eksploitasi karet hutan menjadi penanaman karet Para (Hevea brasiliensis, Euphorbiaceae). Selama pertengahan kedua abad ke sembilanbelas, melonjaknya pasar internasional menyebabkan karet hutan di eksploitasi lebih intensif dan kompetitif. Pada saat yang sama, pola pemukiman pemulung-pemulung karet hutan menjadi lebih menetap dan sistem pertanian mereka menjadi lebih intensif. Penanaman Hevea spp. lebih sesuai terhadap peralihan ini dibanding dengan karet hutan, terutama karena Hevea spp. tersebut ditanam bukan tumbuh secara alami. Status Hevea spp. di Asia Tenggara sebagai suatu tanaman yang diusahakan (kultigen) yang berlawanan dengan pohon hutan alam, dan akibat ekonomi-politik untuk ini, menerangkan perbandingan sejarah pengelolahan Hevea spp. di Asia dan Amerika Selatan. Penelitian ini juga memberikan suatu pandangan sejarah pada perdebatan saat ini tentang hubungan sumberdaya hutan, suku terasing yang hidup di dalam hutan, dan kebijaksanaan pemerintah.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allen,G. C, andA. G. Donnithorne. 1957. Western enterprise in Indonesia and Malaysia. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1925. A Dyak house. Sarawak Gazette 859 (1 April).

  • Baring-Gould, S., andC. A. Bampfylde. 1909. A history of Sarawak under its two white rajahs, 1839–1908. H. Sotheran and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, C. 1978. The natural rubber industry: its development, technology, and economy in Malaysia. Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. T. 1948. The rubber industry: a study in competition and monopoly. Longmans, Green and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beer, J. H., and M. J. McDermott. 1989. The economic value of non-timber forest products in Southeast Asia: with emphasis on Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Netherlands Committee for IUCN, Amsterdam.

  • Black, I. 1985. The “Lastposten”: Eastern Kalimantan and the Dutch in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 16:281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, C. 1881. The head-hunters of Borneo: a narrative of travel up the Mahakam and down the Barito; also journeyings in Sumatra. Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. 1988. Agricultural development in Indonesia. Asian Studies Association of Australia, Southeast Asia Publications Series No. 16. Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, H., F. J. Lian, L. Kwai-Sim, and L. Potter. 1990. Borneo and the Malay Peninsula. Pages 495–512in B. L. Turner, W. C. Clark, R. W. Kates, J. F. Richards, J. T. Mathews, and W. B. Meyer, eds., The earth as transformed by human action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummeler, T. 1883. Getah pertjah en caoutchouc. Tijdschrift voor Nijverheid & Landbouw in Nederlandsch-Indie 28:11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, F. W. 1880. The gardens of the sun: a naturalist’s journal of Borneo and the Sulu Archipelago. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkill, I. H. 1962. A dictionary of the economic products of the Malay Peninsula. 2 vols. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperation, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAPD (Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation). 1982. Indonesian forestry abstracts: Dutch literature until about 1960. CAPD, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, M., and P. Eaton. 1992. Borneo: change and development. Oxford University Press, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, A. 1987. The commerce in rubber: the first 250 years. Oxford University Press, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corominas, J., and J. A. Pascual. 1980. Diccionario critico etimologico Castellano e Hispanico. 5 vols. Editorial Gredos, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corry, S. 1993. The rainforest harvest: who reaps the benefit? The Ecologist 23(4):148–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPIS (Center for Policy and Implementation Studies). 1993. Towards a planting materials policy for Indonesian rubber smallholdings: lessons from past projects. Agriculture Group Working Paper No. 14. CPIS, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramb, R. A. 1988. The commercialization of Iban agriculture. Pages 105–134in R. A. Cramb and R. H. W. Reece, eds., Development in Sarawak: historical and contemporary perspectives. Monash Paper on Southeast Asia No. 17, Center of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. Shifting cultivation and sustainable agriculture in East Malaysia: a longitudinal case study. Agricultural Systems 42:209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, H. S. 1985. Development of rubber smallholders in north Sumatra. Pages 116–126in Smallholder rubber production and policies: proceedings of an international workshop held at the University of Adelaide. ACIAR, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, A., H. Roditi, and L. Silverman. 1991. From forest to market: a feasibility study of the development of selected non-timber forest products from Borneo for the U.S. market. 2 vols. Project Borneo, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove, M. R. 1985. Swidden agriculture in Indonesia: the subsistence strategies of the Kalimantan Kantu’. Mouton, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. The dialectical history of “jungle” in the subcontinent. Journal of Anthropological Research 48:231–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993a. Para rubber and swidden agriculture in Borneo: an exemplary adaptation to the ecology and economy of the tropical forest. Economic Botany 47:136–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993b. A revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development. Environmental Conservation 20:17–24, 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. n.d. Rice-eating rubber and people-eating governments: peasant versus state critiques of rubber development in colonial Indonesia. Ethnohistory.

  • Down to Earth. 1990. Fanner shot in plantation dispute, No. 7 (March) 3; Loggers destroy local forest product supplies, No. 7 (March): 10.

  • Drijber, B. H. 1912. Djeloetoeng concessie op Borneo. De Indische Gids 34:1444–1469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, F. L. 1975. Rain-forest collectors and traders: a study of resource utilization in modern and ancient Malaya. Monographs of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, No. 5.

  • Eaton, B.J. 1952. Wild and plantation rubber plants: gutta-percha and balata. Pages 49–63in P. Schidrowitz and T. R. Dawson, eds., History of the rubber industry. W. Heffer and Sons for the Institution of the Rubber Industry, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R. F. 1985. Patterns of indigenous timber extraction from Moluccan forest fringes. Journal of Biogeography 12:559–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. D. 1970. Report on the Iban. The Athlone Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, A. J. 1949. Gutta percha. Malayan Forester 12: 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, W. R. 1954. The Land Dayaks of Sarawak. Colonial Research Study no. 14. H.M.S.O., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1963. Agricultural involution: the processes of ecological change in Indonesia. For the Association of Asian Studies, by the University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianno, R. 1986. The exploitation of resinous products in a lowland Malayan Forest. Wallaceana 43:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R., and T. C. Feaw. 1989. The profitability of smallholder rattan cultivation in Central Borneo. Human Ecology 16(4):397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, E. H. 1911. Seventeen years among the Sea Dyaks of Borneo: a record of intimate association with the natives of the Bornean jungles. Seeley and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouyon, A., H. de Foresta, and P. Levang. 1993. Does ’jungle rubber’ deserve its name? An analysis of rubber agroforestry systems in southeast Sumatra. Agroforestry Systems 22:181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Indonesia. 1992. Statistik Indonesia: statistical yearbook of Indonesia. Central Bureau of Statistics, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerreiro, A. 1988. Cash crops and subsistence strategies. Sarawak Museum Journal 39(60):15–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, J. H. 1992. Extractive economies in a historical perspective: gum arabic in West Africa. Advances in Economic Botany 9:107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Heine-Geldern, R. 1945. Prehistoric research in the Netherlands Indies. Southeast Asia Institute, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, C. 1988. The “wild Punan” of Borneo: a matter of economics. Pages 89–118in M. R. Dove, ed., The real and imagined role of culture in development: case studies from Indonesia. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornaday, W. T. 1885. Two years in the jungle: the experiences of a hunter and naturalist in India, Ceylon, the Malay Peninsula and Borneo. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home, E. C. 1974. Javanese-English dictionary. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose, C., and W. McDougall. 1912. The pagan tribes of Borneo. 2 vols. Macmillan and Co., Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, W., and D. J. S. Bailey. 1900. A Sea Dyak dictionary. American Mission Press, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, A. B. 1967. Padju Epat: the ethnography and social structure of a Ma’anyan Dajak group in Southeastern Borneo. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Imbs, P. 1977. Tresor de la langue Francaise. 15 vols. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.

  • Jessup, T. C., and A. P. Vayda. 1988. Dayaks and forests of interior Borneo. Expedition 30(l):5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. S. 1982. From peasants to petty commodity production in Southeast Asia. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 14(1):3–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. Peasant political consciousness in West Sumatra: a reanalysis of the communist uprising of 1927. Senri Ethnological Studies 13:293–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian, F. J. 1988. The economics and ecology of the production of the tropical rainforest resources by tribal groups of Sarawak, Borneo. Pages 113–125in J. Dargavel, K. Dixon, and N. Semple, eds., Changing tropical forests: historical perspectives on today’s challenges in Asia, Australasia and Oceania. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblad, J. T. 1988. Between Dayak and Dutch: the economic history of Southeast Kalimantan, 1880–1942. Verhandelingen No. 134. Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, H. 1848. Sarawak, its inhabitants and productions: being notes during a residence in that country with his excellency Mr. Brooke. R. Bentley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumholtz, C. 1920. Through central Borneo: an account of two years’ travel in the land of the headhunters between the years 1913 and 1917. 2 vols. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medway, Lord. 1977. Mammals of Borneo. Monograph No. 7. The Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missen, G. J. 1972. Viewpoint on Indonesia: a geographical study. Thomas Nelson, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C. 1982. Migration and its alternatives among the Iban of Sarawak. Verhandelingen No. 98. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and A. P. Vayda. 1983. Patterns of resource use and human settlement in tropical forests. Pages 301–313in F. B. Golley, ed., Tropical rain forests: structure and function. Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, J., and M. Bloch, eds. 1989. Money and the mortality of exchange. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso, N. P. 1983. Networking in the commons: a tragedy for rattan? Indonesia 35:95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelzer, K. 1945. Pioneer settlement in the Asiatic tropics: studies in land utilization and agricultural colonization in Southeast Asia. American Geographical Society (Special Publication No. 29), New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C. M., A. H. Gentry, and R. O. Mendelsohn. 1989. Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339:655–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, L. 1988. Indigenes and colonisers: Dutch forest policy in South and East Borneo (Kalimantan), 1900 to 1950. Pages 127–149in J. Dargavel, K. Dixon, and N. Semple, eds., Changing tropical forests: historical perspectives on today’s challenges in Asia, Australasia and Oceania. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, R. 1970. Rajahs and rebels: the Ibans of Sarawak under Brooke rule, 1841–1941. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purseglove, J. W. 1968. Tropical crops: dicotyledons. Longman, Harlow (U.K.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambo, A. T. 1982. Orang Asli adaptive strategies: implications for Malaysian natural resource development planning. Pages 251–299in C. MacAndrews and L. S. Chin, eds., Too rapid rural development. Ohio University Press, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, R. H. W. 1988. Economic development under the Brookes. Pages 21–34in R. A. Cramb and R. H. W. Reece, eds., Development in Sarawak: historical and contemporary perspectives. Monash Paper on Southeast Asia No. 17, Center of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, A. 1981. An Iban-English dictionary. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Romburgh, P. 1897. Getah Pertja, hare eigenschappen, haar voorkomen en de wijze, waarop zij gewonnen wordt. Teysmannia 7:37–44, 134-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, H. L. 1896. The natives of Sarawak and British North Borneo. 2 vols. Truslove and Hanson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, E. A., and R. A. Godoy. 1993. Effects of government policies on smallholder palm cultivation: an example from Borneo. Human Organization 52: 294–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone Age economics. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandin, B. 1980. Iban adat and augury. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sather, C. 1990. Trees and tree tenure in Paku Iban society. Borneo Review 1(1):16–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, D. G. 1990. Rice, rupees, and ritual: economy and society among the Samosir Batak of Sumatra. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thee, Kian-wie. 1977. Plantation agriculture and export growth: an economic history of East Sumatra, 1863–1942. LEKNAS-LIPI, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. 1984. Politics and culture in the Meratus mountains. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayda, A. P. 1961. Expansion and warfare among swidden agriculturalists. American Anthropologist 63(2):346–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1976. War in ecological perspective: persistence, change, and adaptive processes in three Ocean societies. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. B. 1966. Rajah’s servant. Cornell Southeast Asia Program Data Paper 61. Cornell University, Department of Asian Studies, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • te Wechel, P. 1911. lets over z.g.n. Djeloetoeng. Teysmannia 22:588–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, J. A. 1983. Rattan: ecological balance in a Borneo rainforest swidden. Economic Botany 37: 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and N. T. Vergara. 1987. Land or plants: agricultural tenure in agroforestry systems. Economic Botany 41:312–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wijk, C. L. 1941. Enkele aantekeningen over de verjonging van de Pantoeng (Dyera lowii enD. borneensis). (Notes on the regeneration of the pantung (Dyera lowii and D. borneensis).) Unpublished.

  • Wilkinson, R. J. 1959. A Malay-English dictionary, 2 vols. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. R. 1982. Europe and the people without history. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, H., and R. Wolf. 1936. Rubber: a story of glory and greed. Covici Friede, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, O. 1967. Early Indonesian commerce. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dove, M.R. Transition from native forest rubbers toHevea Brasiliensis (Euphorbiaceae) among tribal smallholders in Borneo. Econ Bot 48, 382–396 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862233

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862233

Key Words

Navigation