Skip to main content
Log in

Factors contributing to the demise of tung production in the United States

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

Complete disappearance of commercial tung acreage has not occurred as yet; but it is almost a certainty. Less than thirty years ago, viable tung holdings were dispersed across the Southeast from Louisiana in the west to Georgia in the east. Presently, tung groves in northern Florida are really the sole support of American production (Fig. 3); and these holdings are quickly disappearing (12). It may be possible, if the remaining Florida groves are not damaged by weather, and if several thousand acres are replanted in Mississippi and Louisiana with new variety clones, that the industry may buy itself an extended life span. This will provide the time that researchers need to discover new and better uses for the oil. Perhaps with patience and an extraordinary amount of perseverance, tung growers may survive the rigors of competition, climatic problems, and rising costs; but it is, alas, highly improbable. Tung oil production in the United States will never be more than a token agricultural activity, a curiosity on the landscape, a relic of past endeavors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Blackmon, G. H. 1947. Tung oil — a gift of China. Econ. Bot.1: 161–175. Potter, G. F. 1960. The domestic tung industry. I. Production and improvement of the tung tree. Econ. Bot.13: 328-342.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernolz, D. L. 1942. Cold resistance of buds, flowers and young fruits of tung. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.41: 124.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fitche, B. E. 1970. The new land. The Farm Quarterly25(2): 47.

    Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. Department of Agriculture 1969. Fats and oil situation. Economics Research Service, F.O.S.249: 20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Merrill, Jr., S. 1948. Breakage of tung trees by hurricane winds in relation to variety, pruning method and crop. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.51: 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fitche,op. cit.

  7. Potter, G. F. 1969. Introduction. Proceedings, A.T.O.A.: 3.

  8. U.S. Department of Agriculture 1971. Agricultural statistics1971: 139.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Communication from Tax Assessors of the following counties and parishes: Louisiana — Beauregard, Washington, St. Helena, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa Mississippi — Amite, George, Hancock, Harrison, Marion, Perry, Pike, Walthall Alabama — Baldwin, Covington, Escambia, Geneva, Mobile Florida — Bradford, Calhoun, Escambia, Jackson, Jefferson, Putnam, Santa Rosa

  10. Thingpen, J. E. 1967. USDA tung oil market activities. Proceedings A.T.O.A.: 7.

  11. Becke, R. R., J. A. Rawls, T. L. Epperson 1967. Tung center programs and future plans. Proceedings A.T.O.A., p. 23.

  12. Tallahassee (Florida) Democrat, June 12, 1970, p. 13.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fry, V.K. Factors contributing to the demise of tung production in the United States. Econ Bot 27, 131–136 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862226

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862226

Keywords

Navigation