Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Natural hybridization with particular reference to introgression

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Allan, H. H. The significance of hybridism in the New Zealand Flora. Rep. 20th Meet. Aust. & N. Z. Assn. Adv. Sci.20: 429–477. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Wild species-hybrids in the phanerogams. Bot. Rev.3: 593–615. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • — The nomenclature of hybrids. Chron. Bot.5: 205–209. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. Natural hybridization in relation to taxonomy.In J. Huxley, The New Systematics. Pp. 515–528. 1940.

  • — Wild species-hybrids in the phanerogams. II. Bot. Rev.15: 77–105. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard, H. A. A progeny study of the so-called oak speciesQuercus saulii, with notes on other probable hybrids found in or near the District of Columbia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club59: 267–277. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. An experimental study of hybridization in the genusApocynum. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.23: 159–168. 1936a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — The species problem inIris. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.23: 457–509. 1936b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Hybridization in American Tradescantias. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.23: 511–525. 1936c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — A morphological comparison of triploid and tetraploid interspecific hybrids inTradescantia. Genetics21: 61–65. 1836d.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Recombination in species crosses. Genetics24: 668–698. 1939a.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — The hindrance to gene recombination imposed by linkage: An estimate of its total magnitude. Am. Nat.73: 185–188. 1939b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — The technique and use of mass collections in plant taxonomy. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.28: 287–292. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — The hybridization of the habitat. Evolution2: 1–9. 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. Introgressive hybridization. Biol. Mem. 1949.

  • — andD. G. Diehl. Contributions to theTradescantia problem. Jour. Arn. Arb.8: 213–231. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andL. Hubricht. Hybridization inTradescantia. III. The evidence for introgressive hybridization. Am. Tour. Bot.25: 396–402. 1938a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. The American sugar maples. I. Phylogenetic relationship as deduced from a study of leaf variation. Bot. Gaz.100: 312–323. 1838b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — andK. Sax. A cytological monograph of the American species ofTradescantia. Bot. Gaz.97: 433–476. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — andW. B. Turrill. Biometrical studies on herbarium material. Nature136: 986. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. Statistical studies on two populations ofFraxinus. New Phyt.37: 160–172. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — andR. E. Woodson, Jr. The species ofTradescantia indigenous to the United States. Contr. Am. Arb.9: 1–132. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, E. B. Cyto-genetics and the species-concept. Am. Nat.65: 5–18. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. Cytogenetics and speciation inCrepis.In M. Demerec, Advances in Genetics, Vol.1: 69–93. 1947.

  • Baker, H. G.Melandrium. Jour. Ecol.35: 271–283. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Criteria of hybridity. Nature159: 221–223. 546. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. T., Jr.Hevea: a first interpretation. Jour. Hered.38: 54–64. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, R. C. Problems and objectives in the study of fern hybrids. Am. Fern Jour.35: 65–76. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. D. andL. O. Williamson. Artificial hybrids between muskellunge and northern pike. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci.38: 299–314. 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. A. Description of a new eucalypt hybrid. X.Eucalyptus radiodives (“Buttercup Peppermint”) (radiata ×dives) R. A. Black, hybrid nov. Victorian Nat.60: 175. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, A. P. Variation, isolating mechanisms, and hybridization in certain toads. Genetics26: 398–417. 1941a.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — Isolating mechanisms in tree frogs. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.27: 14–17. 1941b.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — Isolating mechanisms in a complex of four species of toads. Biol. Symp.6: 235–249. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, L. E. andR. M. Tryon. A study ofElymus in Minnesota. Rhodora50: 80–91. 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, E. Hybridism in the genusViola. II. Rhodora8: 6–10. 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, R. G. A survey of Eucalypt species in Tasmania. Pap. & Proc. Royal Soc. Tasmania1937: 76–109. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butters, F. K. andE. C. Abbe. The genusPoa in Cook County, Minnesota. Rhodora49: 1–21. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, S. A. Foundations of plant geography. 1944.

  • Camp, W. H. Studies in the Ericales. A discussion of the genusBefaria in North America. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club68: 100–111. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — On the structure of populations in the genusVaccinium. Brittonia4: 189–204. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Cinchona at high altitudes in Ecuador. Brittonia6: 394–430. 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — andC. L. Gilly. The structure and origin of species. Brittonia4: 323–385. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castle, W. E. Genes which divide species or produce hybrid vigor. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.32: 145–149. 1946.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, J. P. Variation and hybridization among the paradise flycatchers of Africa. Evolution2: 111–126. 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J. Studies on the collective speciesViola tricolor L. II. Bot. Tidsk.37: 363–416. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,et al. The concept of species based on experiment. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 103–106. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,et al. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Pub.520: 1–452. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,et al. Experimental studies on the nature of species. II. Plant evolution through amphiploidy and autoploidy, with examples from the Madiinae. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Pub.564: 1–174. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,et al. Heredity of geographically and ecologically isolated races. Am. Nat.81: 114–133. 1947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, R. E. The problem of species inOenothera. Am. Nat.78: 5–28. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockayne, L. Hybridism in the New Zealand flora. New Phyt.22: 105–127. 1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. Hybridism in the forests of New Zealand. Acta Forest. Fenn.34: 23 pp. 1929.

  • — andH. H. Allan. An annotated list of groups of wild hybrids in the New Zealand flora. Ann. Bot.48: 1–55. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, L. J. andR. M. Shackelford. Fox hybrids. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci.38: 315–332. 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, M. B. The origin and behavior of cultivated plants.In J. Huxley, The New Systematics. Pp. 529–547. 1939.

  • Cugnac, A. de Sur les conséquences systématiques de la dominance et de recéssivité des caractères spécifiques dans les croisements. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris211: 268–270. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, P. Études sur les hybrides de Cistes. III. Statistiques des caractères duCistus monspeliensis L. Bull. Soc. Bot. France85: 668–678. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Monographie du genreCistus L. Boissiera4: 1–90. 1939a.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Sens de l’hybridation dans le genreCistus. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.49: 412–413. 1939b.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Definizione del genereHalimiocistus. Nuovo Gior. Bot. Ital.46: 357–360. 673. 1939c.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Études sur les hybrides de Cistes. Ann. Épiphyt. et Phytogén.6: 7–26. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Études sur les hybrides de Cistes. IV. Correlation des caractères duC. salviifolius L. VI. Introgression dans la section Ladanium. Canad. Jour. Res., C.,19: 27–39. 59–67. (Contr. Inst. Bot. Univ. Montreal, 38.) 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Études sur les hybrides de Cistes. V. Le comportement dux C. florentinus Lam. Candollea10: 9–22. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andY. Desmarais. Introgression in sugar maples. II. Am. Midl. Nat.37: 146–161. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — andA. Lafond. Introgression des caractères del’Acer saccharophorum K. Koch et del’Acer nigrum Michx. Contr. Inst. Bot. Univ. Montreal37: 15–31. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrow, G. M. andW. H. Camp.Vaccinium hybrids and the development of new horticultural material. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club72: 1–21. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. What is a hybrid? Jour. Hered.28: 308. 1937a.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. Recent advances in cytology. 2nd ed. 1937b.

  • - andE. K. Janaki Ammal. Chromosome atlas of cultivated plants. 1945.

  • Darwin, C. The origin of species. 6th ed. 1872.

  • Davidson, J. F. The polygonal graph for simultaneous portrayal of several variables in population analysis. Madroño9: 105–110. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. Genetics and the origin of species. Rev. ed.1941.

  • Du Rietz, G. E. The fundamental units of biological taxonomy. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr.24: 333–428. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, F. C Cross-fertility and cytogenetics of selectedBromopsis section members within the genusBromus L. [Unpubl.]

  • Epling, C. Actual and potential gene flow in natural populations. Am. Nat.81: 104–113. 1947a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — Natural hybridization ofSalvia apiana andS. mellifera. Evolution1: 69–78. 1947b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R O. TheClematis Fremontii var.Riehlii population in the Ozarks. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.32: 413–460. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. Embryologische, cytologishe und bestäubungsexperimentelle Studien in der Familie Rubiaceae nebst Bemerkungen über einige Polyploidistätsprobleme. Acta Horti Bergiana11: 195–470. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassett, N. C.Juniperus virginiana, J. horizontalis, andJ. scopulorum. I. The specific characters. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club71: 410–418. 1944. II. Hybrid swarms ofJ. virginiana andJ. scopulorum. ibid. 475–483. III. Possible hybridization ofJ. horizontalis andJ. scopulorum. ibid.72: 42–46. 1945. IV. Hybrid swarms ofJ. virginiana andJ. horizontalis. ibid. 379–384. V. Taxonomic treatment.ibid. 480–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Focke, W. O. Die Pflanzenmischlinge, ein Beitrag zur Biologie der Gewächse. 1881.

  • Fosberg, F. R. Taxonomy and hybridism. Chron. Bot.5: 397–398. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • — For an open-minded taxonomy. Chron. Bot.6: 368–370. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. C. A cyto-taxonomic survey of the North American species ofIris. Contr. Gray Herb. No. 119: 3–82. 1937.

  • Friesner, R. C. TwoSolidago hybrids worthy of names. Butler Univ., Bot. Stud.6: 81–83. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • {saGoldschmidt, R.} The material basis of evolution. 1940.

  • Goodspeed, T. H. andM. V. Bradley. Amphidiploidy. Bot. Rev.8: 271–316. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R. H. Notes on the distribution and hybrid origin ofx Solidago asperula. Rhodora39: 22–28. 1937a.

    Google Scholar 

  • — The cytogenetics of two species ofSolidago and its bearing on their polymorphy in nature. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 425–432. 1937b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. Interchanging genetic mechanisms for sex determination. Jour. Hered.37: 307–320. 1946a.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — Introgressive hybridization in domesticated fishes. I. The behavior of comet, aPlatypoecilus maculatus gene inXiphophorus helleri. Zoologica30: 77–88. 1946b.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. Speciation in fishes. Distribution in time and space of seven dominant multiple alleles inPlatypoecilus maculatus.In M. Demerec, Advances in Genetics Vol.1: 95–132. 1947.

  • Griggs, R. F. Hybridity as a factor in evolution. Jour. Wash. Acad. Sci.27: 329–343. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. The genetical conception of the species. Biol. Rev.11: 83–112. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — The genetics of cotton. XVII. Increased mutability of a gene inG. purpurascens as a consequence of hybridization withG. hirsutum. Jour. Genet.34: 153–168. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. B., Jr. Hybridization between the sunflower speciesHelianthus annuus andH. petiolaris. Evolution1: 249–262. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — An evolutionary study of the sunflower speciesHelianthus annuus andH. Bolanderi. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.23: 157–208. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andT. W. Whitaker. Chromosome number, polyploidy, and growth habit in California weeds. Am. Jour. Bot.35: 179–186. 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiorth, G. Genetische Versuche mitCollinsia. IV. Die Analyse eines nahezu sterilen Artbastardes. I. Teil. Die diploiden Bastarde zwischenCollinsia bicolor undC. bartisaefolia. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.66: 106–157. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovanitz, W. Ecological segregation of interfertile species ofColias. Ecology29: 461–469. 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs, C. L. Speciation of fishes. Am. Nat.74: 198–211. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — andL. C. Hubbs. Natural hybrids between two species of Catostomid fishes. Pap. Mich. Acad.31: 147–167. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,et al. Hybridization in nature between species of Cantostomid fishes. Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Mich. No.22: 1–76. 1943.

  • — andK. Kuronuma. Hybridization in nature between two genera of flounders in Japan. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci.27: 267–306. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andR. R. Miller. Mass hybridization between two genera of Cyprinid fishes in the Mohave desert, California. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci.28: 343–378. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,et al. Hybridization in nature between species of American Cyprinodont fishes. Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Mich. No.23: 1–21. 1943.

  • Hubricht, L. andE. Anderson. Vicinism inTradescantia. Am. Jour. Bot.28: 957. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huskins, C. L. Criteria of hybridity. Science69: 399–400. 1929.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. B.et al. The Evolution ofGossypium, and the differentiation of the cultivated cottons. 1947.

  • Koelreuter, J. G. Vorläufige Nachricht von einigen das Geschlecht der Pflanzen. (1761–1766). Ost. Klas. Exak. Wiss.41. 1893.

  • Larisey, M. M. Analysis of a hybrid complex betweenBaptisia leucantha andBaptisia viridis in Texas. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 624–628. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht, H. Die Artgrenze zwischenPhaseolus vulgaris L. undmultiflorus Lam. Hereditas27: 51–175. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Die genisch-plasmatische Grundlage der Artbarriere. Agr. Hort. Genet.2: 75–142. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Intra- and inter-specific genes. Agr. Hort. Genet.3: 45–60. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. andC. Epling. Formation of a diploid species ofDelphinium byhybridization. Am. Jour. Bot.23: 21s-22s. 1946. [Abs.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotsy, J. P. Evolution by means of hybridization. 1916.

  • -. Evolution considered in the light of hybridization. 1925.

  • McMinn, H. E. The importance of field hybrids in determining species in the genusCeanothus. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci.25: 323–356. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C. The origin and evolution of maize.In M. Demerec, Advances in genetics Vol.1: 161–207. 1947.

  • — andR. G. Reeves. The origin of Indian corn and its relatives. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.574: 1–315. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden-Jones, E. M. The genetics ofGeum intermedium Willd. haud Ehrh. and its back-crosses. Jour. Genet.23: 377–395. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —et al. Special herbaria as adjuncts to modern botanical research. Jour. Ecol.18: 379–383. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - andW. B. Turrill. Researches onSilene maritima andS. vulgaris. I-XXVI. Kew Bull. 1928–1947.

  • ——. Species studies in plants. Rep. Bot. Exchange Cl.1930: 416–420. 1930a.

    Google Scholar 

  • - and -. Hybridization in certain genera of the British Flora. [Abs.] Proc. Linn. Soc. London. 141st sess., p. 36. 1930b.

  • ——. Genetical studies inCentaurea scabiosa L. andCentaurea collina L. Jour. Genet.34: 487–495. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, H. L. Evidence from the fossil record and from the modern distribution for the genetic submergence ofPinus remorata byPinus muricata. [Abs.] Committee on Geology and Geography, Rep. of the Subcommittee on Common Problems of Genetics and Paleontology (mimeographed). Nat. Res. Council. 1942.

  • Mayr, E. Systematics and the Origin of species. 1942.

  • -. The bearing of the new systematics on genetical problems. The nature of species.In M. Demerec, Advances in genetics. Vol.2: 205–237. 1948.

  • Moore, J. A. Incipient intraspecific isolating mechanisms inRana pipiens. Genetics31: 304–326. 1946.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, C. E. Some natural hybrids ofClematis, Anemone, andGerbera from the Transvaal. [Abs.] Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond., 141st sess., pp. 36–38. 1930.

  • Myers, W. M. Cytology and genetics of forage grasses. Bot. Rev.13: 319–421. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, E. C. The broad-leaved species ofPotamogeton of North America north of Mexico. Rhodora45: 57–105, 119–163, 171–214. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostenfeld, C. H. The present state of knowledge on hybrids between species of flowering plants. Masters Lectures, 1927. Jour. Royal Hort. Soc.53: 31–44. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ownbey, M. A monograph of the genusCalochortus. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.27: 371–560. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — andW. A. Weber. Natural hybridization in the genusBalsamorhiza. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 179–187. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, B. On some hybrid populations ofOrchis incarnata ×maculata in Gotland. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.41: 115–140. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov, M. G. The geographic-morphological method of systematics and the hybridization process in nature. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Breed.171: 221–290. 1927. [Eng. summary.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R. G. andP. C. Mangelsdorf. A proposed taxonomic change in the tribe Maydeae (family Gramineae). Am. Jour. Bot.29: 815–817. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickett, H. W. andW. H. Camp. The nomenclature of hybrids. Bull. Torrey Bot Club75: 496–501. 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, H. P. A. character analysis of colonies ofIris fulva, I. hexagona var.giganticaerulea and natural hybrids. Am. Tour. Bot.25: 727–738. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. The problem of species in Louisiana Irises. Bull. Am. Iris Soc. July. 5 pp. 1939a.

  • — Pollen fertility inIris. Jour. Hered.30: 481–483. 1939b.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Introgressive hybridization in a natural population ofTradescantia. Genetics24: 753–769. 1939c.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • -. Introduction to genetics and cytogenetics. 1948.

  • Roberts, H. F. Plant hybridization before Mendel. 1929.

  • Rollins, R. C. Evidence for natural hybridity between guayule (Parthenium argentatum) and mariola (Parthenium incanum). Am. Jour. Bot.31: 93–99. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Some known and probable levels of reciprocal introgression between guayule (Parthenium argentatum) and mariola (P. incanum). [Abs.] Genetics30: 18–19. 1945a.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Interspecific hybridization inParthenium. I. Crosses between guayule (P. argentatum) and mariola (P. incanum). Am. Jour. Bot.32: 395–404. 1945b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. G. andR. E. Duncan. Cytological evidences of hybridization betweenJuniperus virginiana andJ. horizontalis. [Unpubl.]

  • Sauer, C. O. Early relations of man to plants. Geog. Rev.37: 1–25. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, H. J. andK. Sax. The cytogenetics of generic hybrids ofSorbus. Jour. Arn. Arb.28: 137–140. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, R. J. A study ofHevea (with its economic aspects) in the Republic of Peru. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.34: 261–352. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — The uses ofHevea for food in relation to its domestication. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.35: 117–121. 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Showalter, H. M. The distribution ofTradescantia in the eastern Tennessee region. Jour. Tenn. Acad. Sci.13: 253–258. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, J. K. andE. J. Alexander. Botanical interpretation of the iridaceous plants of the Gulf States. Contr. New York Bot. Gard. No. 327: 325–357. 1931.

  • Sprague, T. A. The nomenclature of hybrids. Chron. Bot.5: 209–212. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., Jr. The significance of polyploidy in plant evolution. Am. Nat.75: 54–66. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — The role of isolating mechanisms in the differentiation of plant species. Biol. Symp.6: 217–233. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • — The cytological analysis of species hybrids. II. Bot. Rev.11: 463–486. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. Types of polyploids: their classification and significance.In M. Demerec, Advances in genetics1: 403–429. 1947a.

  • — Evidence of rates of evolution from the distribution of existing and fossil plant species. Ecol. Mon.17: 149–158. 1947b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —et al. Hybridization in a population ofQuercus marilandica andQuercus ilicifolia. Evolution1: 79–88. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, S. G. Cytogenetics ofGossypium and the problem of the origin of new world cottons.In M. Demerec, Advances in genetics, Vol. 1: 431–442. 1947.

  • Steyermark, C. S. Distribution and hybridization ofVernonia in Missouri. Bot. Gaz.100: 548–562. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweadner, W. R. Hybridization and the phylogeny of the genusPlatysamia. Ann. Carnegie Mus.25: 163–242. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turrill, W. B. The plant-life of the Balkan Peninsula. 1929.

  • — The correlation of morphological variation with distribution in some species ofAjuga. New Phyt.33: 218–230. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — The expansion of taxonomy with special reference to the Spermatophyta. Biol. Rev.13: 342–373. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Taxonomy and phylogeny. Bot. Rev.8: 247–270; 473–532; 655–707. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — The ecotype concept. A consideration with appreciation and criticism, especially of recent trends. New Phyt.45: 34–43. 1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uittien, H. Reflections on the nomenclature of so-called hybrids. Chron. Bot.5: 212–214. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, D. H. Studies in British primulas. I. Hybridization between primrose and oxlip (Primula vulgaris Huds, andP. elatior Schreb.) New Phyt.46: 229–253. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Studies in British primulas. II. Ecology and taxonomy of primrose and oxlip (Primula vulgaris Huds. andP. elatior Schreb.) New Phyt.47: 111–130. 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viosca, P. Jr. The irises of southeastern Louisiana. A taxonomic and ecological interpretation. Bull. Am. Iris Soc., April, p. 3–56. 1935.

  • Weber, W. A. A taxonomic and cytological study of the genusWyethia, family Compositae, with notes on the related genusBalsamorhiza. Am. Mid. Nat.35: 400–542. 1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore, R. H. andA. L. Delisle. Studies in the genetics and cytology of two species in the genusAster and their polymorphy in nature. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 1–12. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, K. M. A taxonomist’s experience with hybrids in the wild. Science81: 161–166. 1935.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winge, Ø. Artkrydsningproblemer i Planteriget. Beretning om Nord. Jordbrugsforsk. Foren. tredie Kongres, Oslo, pp. 592–606. 1926. [Not seen.]

  • -. The genetic aspect of the species problem. Proc. Linn. Soc. London, 150th sess., pp. 231–238. 1938.

  • Wolf, C. B. California plants notes.X. Quercus morehus Kellogg. Rancho Santa Ana Bot. Gard., Occas. Pap.1: 47–52. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • — The Gander oak, a new hybrid oak from San Diego County, California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci.25: 177–188. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, R. E., Jr. Notes on some North American asclepiads. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.31: 363–370. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Some dynamics of leaf variation inAsclepias tuberosa. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.34: 353–432. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle, C. The beginnings of plant hybridization. Morris Arb. Mono.1: 1–231. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

Recent papers of interest

  • Baker, H. G. Stages of invasion and replacement demonstrated by species ofMelandrium. Jour. Ecol.36: 96–119. 1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. T. Jr. Review of Anderson’s “Introgressive Hybridization”. Jour. Hered.40: 256–257. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, W. H. Review of Anderson’s “Introgressive Hybridization”. Bull Torrey Bot. Club76: 369–372. 1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, F. C.Bromus inermis andB. pumpellianus in North America. Evolution3: 142–149. 1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. H. Field studies inOrchis L. I. The structure of Dactylorchid populations on certain islands in the Inner and Outer Hebrides. Trans. & Proc. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh35: 26–66. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovanitz, W. Increased variability in populations following natural hybridization.In G. L. Jepsonet al, Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution. pp. 339–355. 1949.

  • Mason, H. L. Evidence for the genetic submergence ofPinus remorata. In G. L. Jepsenet al, Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution. pp. 356–362. 1949.

  • Rickett, H. W. An editor’s point of view.In Symposium on Botanical Nomenclature. Am. Jour. Bot.36: 10–13. 1949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indiana University, USA

    Charles B. Heiser

Authors
  1. Charles B. Heiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heiser, C.B. Natural hybridization with particular reference to introgression. Bot. Rev 15, 645–687 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861577

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861577

Keywords

Search

Navigation