Skip to main content
Log in

Specialization, hybridization, and mutation in the cereal rusts

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The 50 years that have elapsed since Eriksson’s discovery of physiologic specialization in the cereal rusts have seen notable advances in man’s understanding of these important pathogens. The discovery that theformae speciales or varieties, which were at first regarded as the ultimate units of specialization, were in turn made up of many specialized strains or physiologic races gave a great impetus to the study of the various rusts and, despite the fact that the existence of these physiologic races complicated the problem of developing rust resistant varieties of cereals, served also as a stimulus to greater efforts on the part of the breeders of rust resistant cereal varieties. The discovery of the existence of heterothallism in the rusts made possible studies on the crossing and selfing of the physiologic races of cereal rusts. Such studies have indicated that a great variety of physiologic races may be expected to arise by hybridization and have permitted a much more accurate evaluation than otherwise would have been possible of the significance of the alternate hosts in the production of physiologic races. These studies have also thrown considerable light on the genetics of the rust fungi and have shown that the inheritance of such rust characteristics as pathogenicity and spore color is subject to the same laws that have been found to govern inheritance in higher plants and animals.

The writers are indebted to Dr. J. H. Craigie and Mr. I. L. Conners for reading and criticizing the manuscript.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, Ruth F. Further cytological studies of heterothallism inPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.47: 1–16. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allison, C. C. andIsenbeck, K. Biologische Spezialisierung vonPuccinia glumarum tritici Eriksson und Henning. Phytopath. Zeits.2: 87–98. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Appel, O. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der physiologischen Formen des Weizengelbrostes. Ang. Bot.12: 463–470. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arthur, J. C. The plant rusts. 1929.

  5. -. Manual of the rusts in United States and Canada. 1934.

  6. Asuyama, H. The life cycle of heteroecious species ofPuccinia. I.Puccinia culmicola Diet. andP. zoysiae Diet. Ann. Phytop. Soc. Japan5: 23–29. 1935. [Rev. Appl. Myc. 14: 796. 1935.]

    Google Scholar 

  7. — Physiologic specialization in Japanese wheat rusts. Proc. Pac. Sci. Congr. 6th (1939)4: 775–778. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bailey, D. L. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia graminis avenae Erikss. and Henn. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull.35. 1925.

  9. Barmenkoff, A. S. In Summary of the scientific research work of the Institute of plant protection for the year 1936. Part I. Pests and diseases of cereals and shelter belts. pp. 150–152, Leningrad 1937. [Rev. Appl. Myc. 17: 436. 1938.]

  10. de Bary, A. Neue Untersuchungen über die Uredineen, insbesondere die Entwicklung derPuccinia graminis und den Zusammenhang derselben mitAecidium Berberidis. Monatsber. Kgl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin,1865: 15–49. 1866.

    Google Scholar 

  11. — Untersuchungen über Uredineen. Monatsber. Kgl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin,1866: 205–215. 1867.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Becker, Hanna. Zur Immunitätszüchtung des Weizens gegenPuccinia glumarum undPuccinia triticina. Kühn-Arch.38: 293–305. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Becker, Hanna andHart, Helen. Das Auftreten und die Verbreitung von Gelbrost in Ostharz und den daran angrenzenden Weizenanbaugebieten. Zeits. Pflanzenkr.49: 449–481. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bever, W. M. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia glumarum in the United States. Phytopathology24: 686–688. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blackman, V. H. On the fertilization, alternation of generations, and general cytology of the Uredineae. Ann. Bot.18: 323–373. 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brown, A. M. Physiologic specialization in the dwarf leaf rust of barley,Puccinia anomala Rostr. Rep. Dom. Bot. 1929, Canada Dept. Agr. 1931.

  17. -. Investigations of dwarf leaf rust of barley (Puccinia anomala). Rep. Dom. Bot. 1930, Canada Dept. Agr. 1931.

  18. Brown, M. R. A study of crown rust,Puccinia coronata Corda, in Great Britain. I. Physiologic specialization in the uredospore stage. Ann. Appl. Biol.24: 504–527. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. — A study of crown rust,Puccinia coronata Corda, in Great Britain. II. The aecidial hosts ofP. coronata. Ann. Appl. Biol.25: 506–527. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bryzagalova, V. A. On a new intermediate host of brown rust of wheat,Puccinia triticina Erikss. Sborwick Trudor Zashch. Rast. Vostochn. Sibiri5: 75–88. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buchheim, A. N. andLissitzyna, M. I. Concerning the question of physiologic specialization of leaf rust of wheat in the central European part of the U.S.S.R. Moscow Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.1: 1–16. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Buller, A. H. R. Fusions between flexuous hyphae and pycnidiospores ofPuccinia graminis. Nature141: 33. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cassell, R. C. The effect of temperature on infection and development of eight physiologic races ofPuccinia graminis tritici on wheat seedlings. Phytopathology29: 4. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chester, K. Starr and Jamison, C. Physiologic races of wheat leaf rust involved in the 1938 epiphytotic. Phytopathology29: 962–967. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Christman, A. H. Sexual reproduction in the rusts. Bot. Gaz.39: 267–275. 1905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cotter, R. U. A new form of oat stem rust from a barberry area. Phytopathology22: 788–789. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  27. — White pycnia and aecia ofPuccinia graminis. Phytopathology24: 1121–1122. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  28. — andLevine, M. N. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia graminis secalis. Jour. Agr. Res.45: 297–315. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Craigie, J. H. Experiments on sex in rust fungi. Nature120: 116–117. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. — Discovery of the function of the pycnia of the rust fungi. Nature120: 765–767. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. — On the occurrence of pycnia and aecia in certain rust fungi. Phytopathology18: 1005–1015. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  32. — An experimental investigation of sex in the rust fungi. Phytopathology21: 1001–1040. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  33. — Union of pycniospores and haploid hyphae inPuccinia Helianthi Schw. Nature131: 25. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cunningham, G. H. The rust fungi of New Zealand. 1931.

  35. Dietz, S. M. The alternate hosts of crown rust,Puccinia coronata Corda. Jour. Agr. Res.33: 953–970. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Doak, K. D. Effect of mineral nutrition on the reaction of wheat varieties to leaf rust Phytopathology21: 108–109. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dillon Weston, W. A. R. The effect of ultra-violet radiation on the urediniospores of some physiologic forms ofP. graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.12: 81–87. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dodoff, D. N. de|Physiologic forms in the leaf rust of wheat (Puccinia triticina Erikss.) in Bulgaria. Zemledelska misal2: 34 pp., 1931.

  39. Eremeyeva, A. M. On the aecidial stage ofPuccinia triticina Eriks. Morbi Plantarum, Leningrad13: 123–124. 1924. [Rev. Appl. Myc. 5:25. 1926.]

    Google Scholar 

  40. — Beobachtungen über das Aeddienstadium des “Weizenbraunrostes”Puccinia triticina Erikss. Morbi Plantarum15: 144–155, 1926. [Russian with German Resumé.]

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eriksson, Jakob. Ueber die Specialisierung des Parasitismus bei den Getreiderostpilzen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.12: 292–331. 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  42. —. A general review of the principal results of Swedish research into grain rust. Bot. Gaz.25: 26–38. 1898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. —. Nouvelles études sur la rouille brune des céréales. Ann. Sci. Nat. VIII, Bot.9: 241–288. 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  44. —. Ueber die Spezialisierung des Getreideschwarzrostes in Schweden und in anderen Ländern. Zentrabi. Bakt: II,9: 590–607, 654–658. 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  45. -. Fungous diseases of plants, 2nd ed. 1930.

  46. — andHenning, E. Die Hauptresultate einer neuen Untersuchung über die Getreideroste. Zeits., Pflanzenkr.4: 66–73, 140–142, 197–203, 257–262. 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  47. - and -. Die Getreideroste. 1896.

  48. Fang, C. T. Physiologic specialization ofPuccinia glumarum Erikss. and Henn. in China. Phytopathology34: 1020–1024. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fischer, G. W. andClaassen, C. E. Studies of stem rust (Puccinia graminis) fromPoa ampla, Avena fatua, andAgropyron spicatum in the Pullman, Washington, region. Phytopathology34: 310–314. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Forward, D. F. The influence of altered host metabolism upon modification of the infection type withPuccinia graminis tritici p.f. 21. Phytopathology22: 493–555. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fraser, W. P. andLedingham, G. A. Studies of the crown rust,Puccinia coronata Corda. Sci. Agr.13: 313–323. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Freeman, E. M. andJohnson, E. C. The rusts of grains in the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Bull. 216. 1911.

  53. Fromme, F. D. The culture of the cereal rusts in the greenhouse. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club40: 501–521. 1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Frenzel, H. Beiträge zur Spezialisierung des Haferkronenrostes,Puccinia coronijera f. sp.avenae Kleb. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.18: 153–176. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Garbowski, L. Études sur la rouillePuccinia graminis tritici (Pers.) Er. et Henn. en Pologne durant 1933–1937. Prace Wydz. Chor. Szkodn. Rośl. Państw. Inst. Nauk. Gosp. Wiejsk., Bydgoszcz18: 5–76. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Garcia-Rada, G. et al. An unusually virulent race of wheat stem rust, No. 189. Phytopathology32: 720–726. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gassner, G. andHassebrauk, K. Untersuchungen über die Beziehungen zwischen Mineralsälzernähung und Verhalten der Getreidepflanzen gegen Rost. Phytopath. Zeits.3: 535–617. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. —— Ueber die Beeinflüssung der Rostanfälligkeit durch Eintauchen geimpfter Blätter im Lösungen von Mineralsalzen und anderen Stoffen. Phytopath. Zeits.5: 323–342. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. —— Der Einfluss der Mineralsalzernährung auf das Anfälligkeitsverhalten der zur Rassenbestimmung von Getreiderosten dienenden Standardsortimente. Phytopath. Zeits.7: 63–72. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. — andKirchhoff, H. Einige Versuche zum Nachweis biologischer Rassen innerhalb des Roggenbraunrostes,Puccinia dispersa Erikss. und Henn. Phytopath. Zeits.7: 479–486. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  61. — andStraib, W. Untersuchungen über die Infektionsbedingungen vonPuccinia glumarum undPuccinia graminis. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.16: 609–629. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  62. —— Experimentelle Untersuchungen über das Verhalten der Weizensorten gegenPuccinia glumarum. Phytopath. Zeits.1: 215–275. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  63. —— Über das Aufreten einer neuen Gelbrostform auf Weizen. Der. Züchter2: 313–317. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  64. —— Zur Frage der Konstanz des Infektionstypus vonPuccinia triticina Erikss. Phytopath. Zeits.4: 57–64. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  65. —— Untersuchungen zur Frage der biologischen Spezialisierung des Weizengelbrostes. Der Züchter3: 229–240. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  66. —— Ueber Mutationen in einer biologischen Rasse vonPuccinia glumarum tritici. (Schmidt) Erikss. und Henn. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.63: 154–180. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. —— Die Bestimmung der biologischen Rassen des Weizengelbrostes (Puccinia glumarum f. sp.tritici (Schmidt) Erikss. u. Henn). Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.20: 141–163. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  68. —— Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Epidemiologie des GelbrostesPuccinia glumarum (Schm.) Erikss. und Henn. Phytopath. Zeits.7: 285–302. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  69. —— Untersuchtingen über das Auftreten biologischer Rassen des Weizengelbrostes im Jahre 1932. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.21: 59–72. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  70. —— Weitere Untersuchungen über biologische Rassen und über die Spezialisierungsverhältnisse des GelbrostesPuccinia glumarum (Schm.) Erikss. und Henn. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.21: 121–145. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Gordon, W. L. Effect of temperature on host reactions to physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis avenue Erikss. & Henn. Sci. Agr.11: 95–103. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  72. — A study of the relation of environment to the development of the uredinial and telial stages of the physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis avenae Erikss. and Henn. Sci. Agr.14: 184–237. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  73. — andBailey, D. L. Physiologic forms of oat stem rust in Canada. Sci. Agr.9: 30–38. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  74. — andWelsh, J. N. Oat stem rust investigations in Canada. Sci. Agr.13: 228–235. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hart, Helen. Stem rust onTriticum timopheevi. Phytopathology33: 335–337. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  76. —. Stem rust on new wheat varieties and hybrids. Phytopathology34: 884–899. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  77. — andBecker, Hanna. Beiträge zur Frage des Zwischenwirtes fürPuccinia glumarum. Zeits. Pflanzenk.49: 559–566. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Hassebrauk, K. Über die Abhängigkeit der Rostinfektion von der Mineralsalzernährung der Getreidepflanze. Ang. Bot.12: 23–35. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. — Gräserinfektionen mit Getreiderosten. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.20: 165–182. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  80. — Die Bedeutung der Bodenfeuchtigkeit für das Verhalten vonPuccinia graminis undPuccinia triticina auf verschiedenen Weizensorten. Phytopath. Zeits.7: 259–269. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  81. — Untersuchungen über die biologische Spezialisierung vonPuccinia graminis tritici (Pers.) Erikss. et Henn. undPuccinia graminis avenae (Pers.) Erikss. et Henn. in Deutschland und Südeuropa. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.22: 65–70. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  82. — Untersuchungen über die physiologische Spezialisierung vonPuccinia triticina Erikss. in Deutschland und einigen anderen europäischen Staaten während der Jahre 1934 und 1935. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.22: 71–89. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  83. — Untersuchungen über die physiologische Spezialisierung des Weizen- und Haferschwarzrostes in Deutschland im Jahre 1937. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.22: 479–482. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  84. — Untersuchungen über den Einfluss einiger Aussenfaktoren auf das Anfälligkeitsverhalten der Standardsorten gegenüber verschiedenen physiologischen Rassen des Weizenbraunroste. Phytopath. Zeits.12: 233–276. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  85. — Zur Frage der Wirkung von Aussenfaktoren auf verschiedene Stadien von Weizenbraunrostinfektionen. Phytopath. Zeits.12: 490–508. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Hey, Alfred. Beiträge zur Spezialisierung des Gerstenzwergrostes,Puccinia simplex Erikss. et Henn. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.19: 227–261. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Hitchcock, A. S. andCarleton, M. A. Second report on rusts of grain. Kans. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 46. 1894.

  88. Hoerner, G. R. Biologic forms ofPuccinia coronata on oats. Phytopathology9: 309–314. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Humphrey, H. B. andCromwell, R. O. Stripe rust,Puccinia glumarum, on wheat in Argentina. Phytopathology20: 981–985. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Humphrey, H. B. et al. Stripe rust (Puccinia glumarum) of cereals and grasses in the United States. Jour. Agr. Res.29: 209–227. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Hungerford, C. W. andOwens, C. E. Specialized varieties ofPuccinia glumarum and hosts for varietytritici. Jour. Agr. Res.25: 363–401. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Jackson, H. S. Present evolutionary tendencies and the origin of life cycles in the Uredinales. Mem. Torr. Bot. Club18: 5–108. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  93. — andMains, E. B. Aecial stage of the orange leaf rust of wheat,Puccinia triticina Eriks. Jour. Agr. Res.22: 151–172. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Johnson, T. A study of the effect of environmental factors on the variability of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici Erikss. and Henn. Dom. Can., Dept. Agr., Bull. 140-New Series. 1931.

  95. - andNewton, Margaret. Hybridization betweenPuccinia graminis tritici andPuccinia graminis avenae. Proc. World’s Grain Exh. & Conf. II: 219–223. 1933.

  96. ——. The effect of high temperatures on uredial development in cereal rusts. Can. Jour. Res. C,15: 425–432. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  97. ——. The origin of abnormal rust characteristics through the inbreeding of physiologic races ofPuccinia graminis Tritici. Can. Jour. Res. C,16: 38–52. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  98. ——. Mendelian inheritance of certain pathogenic characters ofPuccinia graminis Tritici. Can. Jour. Res. C,18: 599–611. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  99. ——. Crossing and selfing studies with physiologic races of oat stem rust. Can. Jour. Res. C,18: 54–67. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  100. ——. The predominance of race 56 in relation to the stem-rust resistance of Ceres wheat. Sci. Agr.22: 152–156. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  101. ——. The inheritance of a mutant character inPuccinia graminis Tritici. Can. Jour. Res. C,21: 205–210. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  102. —— andBrown, A. M. Hybridization ofPuccinia graminis tritici withPuccinia graminis secalis andPuccinia graminis agrostidis. Sci. Agr.13: 141–153. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  103. ——— Further studies of the inheritance of spore colour and pathogenicity in crosses between physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.14: 360–373. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Johnston, C. O. An aberrant physiologic form ofPuccinia triticina Eriks. Phytopathology20: 609–620. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  105. - andMains, E. B. Studies on physiologic specialization inPuccinia triticina. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bull. 313. 1932.

  106. Kingsolver, C. H. andMurphy, H. C. Physiologic race determination inPuccinia coronata avenae. Phytopathology30: 13–14. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Klebahn, H. Kulturversuche mit heteröcischen Uredineen. Zeits. Pflanzenk.2: 332–345. 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  108. -. Die Wirtswechselnden Rostpilze. 1904.

  109. Küderling, O-E. Untersuchungen über die Feldresistenz einzelner Weizensorten gegenPuccinia glumarum tritici. Zeits. Zuchtg. A.21: 1–40. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Lamb, I. M. The initiation of the dikaryophase inPuccinia Phragmitis (Schum.) Körn. Ann. Bot.49: 403–438. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Lathbury, R. J. The appearance of a new physiologic form of stem rust in Kenya Colony. East Afr. Agr. Jour., Nov. 1938, pp. 183–185.

  112. — Annual report of the plant breeder. Rep. Dept. Agr. Kenya, 1938,2, pp. 52–59. 1939. [Rev. Appl. Myc. 19: 76. 1940.]

    Google Scholar 

  113. Leach, Julian G. The parasitism ofPuccinia graminis tritici Erikss. and Henn. andPuccinia graminis tritici-compacti Stak. and Piem. Phytopathology9: 59–88. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Levine, M. N. A statistical study of the comparative morphology of biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.24: 539–568. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  115. — Biometrical studies on the variation of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici and the effect of ecological factors on the susceptibility of wheat varieties. Phytopathology18: 7–123. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  116. — andCotter, R. U. A synthetic production ofPuccinia graminis hordei F. and J. Phytopathology21: 107. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  117. —— andStakman, E. C. The production of an apparently new variety ofPuccinia graminis by hybridization on bar-berry. Phytopathology24: 13–14. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  118. — andStakman, E. C. A third biologic form ofPuccinia graminis on wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.13: 651–654. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  119. —— Biologic specialization ofPuccinia graminis secalis. Phytopathology13: 35. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Mains, E. B. The relation of some rusts to the physiology of their hosts. Am. Jour. Bot.4: 179–220. 1917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. — Studies in rust resistance. Jour. Hered.17: 313–325. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  122. — Host specialization of barley leaf rust,Puccinia anomala. Phytopathology20: 873–882. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  123. — Host specialization in the leaf rust of grasses,Puccinia rubigo-vera. Papers Mich. Acad. Sci.17: 289–394. 1932 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  124. — andJackson, H. S. Aecial stages of the leaf rusts of rye,Puccinia dispersa Erikss. and Henn. and of barley,P. anomala Rostr., in the United States. Jour. Agr. Res.28: 1119–1126. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  125. —— Physiologic specialization in the leaf rust of wheat,Puccinia triticina Erikss. Phytopathology16: 89–120. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Marchionatto, J. B. Dos informes sobre la roya “amarilla” del trigo. Min. Agr. Nac. (Buenos Aires) Secc. Prop. e Inform. Circ.836, pp. 3–20. 1931. [Rev. Appl. Myc. 10: 509. 1931.]

    Google Scholar 

  127. McDonald, J. Some factors influencing the occurrence and distribution of plant diseases in Kenya. Col. Prot. Kenya Dept. Agr. Bull. 13. 1926.

  128. — The existence of physiologic forms of wheat stem rust in Africa. Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc.15: 235–247. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. — Two new records of physiologic forms of wheat-stem rust in Kenya Colony. Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc.18: 218–222. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Mehta, K. C. Annual outbreaks of rusts on wheat and barley in the plains of India. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 297–301. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  131. — The cereal rust problem in India. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 302–305. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  132. — Rusts of wheat and barley in India. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 939–962. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  133. -. Further studies on cereal rusts in India. Sci. Mon. No. 14, Imp. Coun. Agr. Res., Calcutta, 1940.

  134. Melander, L. W. Effect of temperature and light on development of the uredial stage ofPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.50: 861–880. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Melchers, L. E. andParker, J. H. Another strain ofPuccinia graminis. Kans. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 68. 1918.

  136. Melhus, I. E. et al. Alternate hosts and biologic specialization of crown rust in America. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 72. 1922.

  137. Murphy, H. C. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia coronata avenae. Phytopathology20: 143–144. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  138. -. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia coronata avenae. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bull. 433. 1935.

  139. Naumova, N. A. The influence of temperature and humidity of the air on the incubation period ofPuccinia triticina. Pl. Prot. Leningr.5: 33–55. 1935. [Rev. Appl. Myc. 15: 562–563. 1936.]

    Google Scholar 

  140. Naumov, N. A. The rusts of cereals in the U.S.S.R. 1939.

  141. Newton, Margaret. Studies in wheat stem rust (Puccinia graminis tritici). Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, III16: 153–210. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  142. —. The cereal rusts in Canada. Empire Jour. Exp. Agr.6: 125–140. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  143. — andJohnson, T. Color mutations inPuccinia graminis tritici (Pers.) Erikss. and Henn. Phytopathology17: 711–725. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  144. - and -. Specialization and hybridization of wheat stem rust,Puccinia graminis tritici, in Canada. Dom. Can., Dept. Agr., Bull. 160-New Series, 1932.

  145. —— Stripe rust,Puccinia glumarum, in Canada. Can. Jour. Res. C,14: 89–109. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  146. —— Production of uredia and telia ofPuccinia graminis onBerberis vulgaris. Nature139: 800. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. - and -. Variation and hybridization inPuccinia graminis. Proc. 3rd Int. Cong. Microbiol., p. 544. 1939.

  148. —— A mutation for pathogenicity inPuccinia graminis Tritici. Can. Jour. Res. C,17: 297–299. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  149. —— Environmental reaction of physiologic races ofPuccinia triticina and their distribution in Canada. Can. Jour. Res. C,19: 121–133. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  150. —— Physiologic specialization of oat stem rust rust in Canada. Can. Jour. Res. C,22: 201–216. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  151. —— andBrown, A. M. New physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.9: 209–215. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  152. ——— A preliminary study on the hybridization of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.10: 721–731. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  153. ——— A study of the inheritance of spore colour and pathogenicity in crosses between physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.10: 775–798. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  154. D’Oliveira, B. Brown rust of wild species ofHordeum. Revista Agronómica25: 230–234. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  155. — Studies onPuccinia anomala Rost. I. Physiologic races on cultivated barleys. Ann. Appl. Biol.26: 56–82. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. — Notas sobre a producao da fase aecidica de algumas ferrugens dos cereais em Portugal. Revista Agronómica28: 201–208. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  157. — andDe Sousa, M. C. F. Raças fisiologicas daPuccinia graminis Tritici em Portugal. Agronomia Lusitana2: 243–252. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Pantanelli, E. Sui rapporti fra nutrizioni e recettivita per la ruggini. Riv. di Patol. Veg.11: 36–64. 1921. [Rev. Appl. Myc. 1: 118–121. 1922.]

    Google Scholar 

  159. Parson, H. E. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia coronata avenae. Phytopathology17: 783–790. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Peltier, G. L. A study of the environmental conditions influencing the development of stem rust in the absence of an alternate host. III. Infection studies withPuccinia graminis tritici form 3 and form 9. Neb. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 25. 1923.

  161. -. A study of the environmental conditions influencing the development of stem rust in the absence of an alternate host. VI. Influence of light on infection and subsequent development of urediniospores ofPuccinia graminis tritici on wheat. Neb. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 35. 1925.

  162. — Relation of weather to the prevalence of wheat stem rust in Nebraska. Jour. Agr. Res.46: 59–73. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  163. — Physiologic forms of wheat stem rust in Kansas and Nebraska. Phytopathology23: 343–356. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Persoon, C. H. Neuer Versuch einer systematischen Eintheilung der Schwämme. Römer’s Neues Mag. Bot.1: 63–128. 1794.

    Google Scholar 

  165. -. Synopsis methodica fungorum, 1801.

  166. Peturson, B. Effect of temperature on host reactions to physiologic forms ofPuccinia coronata avenae. Sci. Agr.11: 104–110. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  167. -. Crown rust of oats in Canada. Rep. Dom. Bot. 1929, Canada Dept. Agr. 1931.

  168. — Physiologic specialization inPuccmia coronata Avenae. Sc. Agr.15: 806–810. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  169. Poirault, G. andRaciborski, M. Sur les noyaux des Urédinées. Jour. de Bot.9: 318–332, 381–388. 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Popp, W. Crown rust of oats in Eastern Canada. Quebec Soc. Prot. Plants 1925–1926. Ann. Rep.18: 38–54.

  171. Radulescu, E. Zur physiologischen Spezialisierung des Weizenbraunrostes (Puccinia triticino Erikss.). Kühn-Archiv33: 195–205. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  172. — Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Feldresistenz des Weizens gegenPuccinia glumarum tritici. Planta20: 244–286. 1933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Ralski, E. Die Empfängligkeit des Weizens für den Braunrost,Puccinia triticina Erikss. Pol. Akad. Umiejetnosci, Prac. Rolniczo-Lesne Nr. 33. 1939.

  174. Rashevskaya, V. F. andBarmenkoff, A. S. Determination of physiologic races ofPuccinia triticina Erikss. in U.S.S.R. in 1935. Pl. Prot. Leningr.10: 5–20. 1936. [Rev. Appl. Myc. 16: 163. 1937.]

    Google Scholar 

  175. Roberts, Florence M. The determination of physiologic forms ofPuccinia triticina Erikss. in England and Wales. Ann. Appl. Biol.23: 271–301. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Ronsdorf, L. Einige Versuche über biologische Rassen des Gerstenzwergrostes. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.21: 109–114. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  177. — Weitere Untersuchungen über den Nachweis biologischer Rassen des Gerstenzwergrostes,Puccinia simplex Erikss. et Henn. Phytopath. Zeits.8: 237–243. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Rudorf, W. Beiträge zur Immunitatszüchtung gegenPuccinia glumarum tritici (Streifenrost des Weizens). Phytopath. Zeits.1: 465–525. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  179. — andJob, Maria. Untersuchungen bezüglich der Spezialisierung vonPuccinia graminis tritici, Puccinia triticina undPuccinia glumarum tritici sowie über Resistenz und ihre Vererbung in verschiedenen Kreuzungen. Zeits. Züchtg. A,19: 333–365. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Sanford, G. B. andBroadfoot, W. C. Stripe rust in Alberta. Sci. Agr.9: 337–345. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  181. —— Epidemiology of stripe rust in western Canada. Sci. Agr.13: 77–96. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  182. Sappin-Trouffy, P. Recherches histologiques sur la famille des Urédinées. Le Botaniste5: 59–244. 1896.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Savulescu, T. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Biologie der Pucciniaarten, die den Weizen in Rumänien befallen. Zeits. Pflanzenk.43: 577–594. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  184. Scheibe, A. Studien zum Weizenbraunrost,Puccinia triticina Erikss. III. Über die geographische Verbreitung der einzelnen physiologischen Formen und Formenkreise in Deutschland und in seinen angrenzenden Gebieten. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.18: 55–82. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Schmitz, F. K. J. Untersuchungen über die Struktur des Protoplasmas und der Zellkerne der Pflanzenzellen. Sitzb. Niederrhein. Ges. Bonn37: 159–198. 1880.

    Google Scholar 

  186. Sibilia, C. Ricerche sulle ruggini die cereali. La specializzazione della‘Puccinia triticina’ Erikss. in Italia. Boll. Staz. Pat. Veg. Roma, N.S.15: 277–300. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  187. — Ricerche sulle ruggini dei cereali. V. Ulteriore ricerche sulla specializzazione dellaPuccinia triticina Erikss. in Italia. Boll. Staz. Pat. Veg. Roma, N.S.16: 69–75. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  188. — Le razze fisiologiche di ‘Pucciniagraminis tritici’ Erikss. et Henn. nell’ Africa Orientale Italiana. Boll. Staz. Pat. Veg. Roma, N.S.19: 497–508. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Stakman, E. C. Physiologic specialization in pathogenic fungi. Proc. Int. Congr. Pl. Sci. Vol.2: 1312–1330. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  190. — andCassell, R. C. The increase and importance of race 56 ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Phytopathology28: 20. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  191. — andLevine, M. N. Effect of certain ecological factors on the morphology of the urediniospores ofPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.16: 43–77. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  192. - and -. The determination of biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis onTriticum spp. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 8. 1922.

  193. ——Puccinia graminis poae Erikss. and Henn. in the United States. Jour. Agr. Res.28: 541–548. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  194. et al. Biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis on varieties ofAvena spp. Jour. Agr. Res.24: 1013–1018. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  195. et al. Die Bestimmung physiologischer Rassen pflanzenpathogener Pilze. Nova Acta Leopoldina, Neue Folge3: 281–336. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  196. et al. Origin of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis through hybridization and mutation. Sci. Agr.10: 707–720. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  197. et al. Relation of barberry to the origin and persistence of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 953–969. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  198. et al. New biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.16: 103–105. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  199. et al. The value of physiologic-form surveys in the study of the epidemiology of stem rust. Phytopathology19: 951–959. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  200. — andLoegering, W. Q. The potential importance of race 8 ofPuccinia graminis avenae in the United States. Phytopathology34: 421–425. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  201. -et al. Physiologic races ofPuccinia graminis in the United States in 1940. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent. & Pl. Quar. E-522-A. 1942. [Mult.]

  202. et al. Population trends of physiologic races ofPuccinia graminis tritici in the United States for the period 1930 to 1941. Phytopathology33: 884–898. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  203. — andPiemeisel, F. J. A new strain ofPuccinia graminis. Phytopathology7: 73. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  204. —— Biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis on cereals and grasses. Jour. Agr. Res.10: 429–495. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  205. et al. Observations on stem rust epidemiology in Mexico. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 90–99. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Straib, W. Auftreten und Verbreitung biologischer Rassen des Gelbrostes (Puccinia glumarum (Schm.)) Erikss. et Henn. im Jahre 1934. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.21: 455–466. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  207. — Ueber Gelbrostanfälligkeit und -Resistenz der Gerstenarten. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.21: 467–481. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  208. — Infektionsversuche mit biologischen Rassen des Gelbrostes auf Gräsern. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.21: 483–497. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  209. — Die Bestimmung der physiologischen Rassen vonPuccinia coronata Cda. auf Hafer in Deutschland. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.22: 121–157. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  210. — Die Untersuchungsergebnisse zur Frage der biologischen Spezialisierung des Gelbrostes (Puccinia glumarum) und ihre bedeutung fur die Pflanzenzüchtung. Der Züchter9: 118–129. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  211. — Untersuchungen über das Vorkommen physiologischer Rassen des Gelbrostes (Puccinia glumarum) in den Jahren 1935/36 und über die Agressivität einiger neuer Formen auf Getreide und Gräsern. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.22: 91–119. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  212. — Las razas fisiologicas dePuccinia glumarum en Sudamerica y su comportamiento en la infección comparado con el de las formas europas. Archiv. Fitotécnico del Uruguay2: 217–233. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  213. — Zur Frage der aufHordeum murinum L. vorkommenden Rostarten und der Selbständigkeit vonPuccinia hordei Fckl. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges. 1937,55: 120–126. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  214. — Weiterer Beitrag der Spezialisierung vonPuccinia glumarum (Schm.) Erikss. et Henn. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.22: 571–579. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  215. — Der Einfluss des Entwicklungsstadiums und der Temperatur auf des Gelbrostverhalten des Weizens. Phytopath. Zeits.12: 113–168. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  216. Tedin, O. Till fragan om havresvartrostens mangformighet i. Sverige. Sverig. Utsadesf. Tidskr.40: 111–114. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  217. Tranzschel, W. Culturversuche mit Uredineen in den Jahren 1911–1913. Myc. Centralbl.4: 70–71. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  218. — Die Zwischenwirte der Getreiderostpilze und ihre Verbreitung in der U.d.S.S.R. Bull. Pl. Prot. Leningr. Ser. II (Phytopath.)5: 4–40. 1934. [Rev. Appl. Myc. 14: 291–292. 1935.]

    Google Scholar 

  219. Treboux, O. Infektionsversuche mit parasitischen Pilzen, III. Annales Mycologici10: 557–563. 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  220. Tscholakow, J. W. Ein Beitrag zur physiologischen Specialisierung des Weizenbraunrostes,Puccinia triticina Erikss. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.19: 407–411. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  221. Tulasne, L. R. Note sur la germination des spores des Urédinées. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris36: 1093–1095. 1853.

    Google Scholar 

  222. — Sur le dimorphisme des Urédinées. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris38: 761–765. 1854.

    Google Scholar 

  223. — Second mémoire sur les Urédinées et les Ustilaginées. Ann. Sci. Nat., IV Ser. Bot.2: 77–196. 1854.

    Google Scholar 

  224. Vallega, J. Especialización fisiológica dePuccinia coronata avenue, en Argentina. An. Inst. Fitotécnico Santa Catalina2: 53–82. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  225. — Especialización fisiológica dePuccinia graminis tritici en la Argentina, Chile y Uruguay. Rev. Argent. Agron.7: 196–220. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  226. — Especialización fisiológica dePuccinia graminis tritici en Brasil. An. Inst. Fitotécnico Santa Catalina3: 29–36. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  227. — Razas fisiológicas dePuccinia graminis avenae halladas en Argentina. Rev. Fac. Agron., Buenos Aires10: 517–529. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  228. Verwoerd, Len. Die fisiologiese vorms vanPuccinia graminis Pers. wat in Suid-Afrika voorkom. So. Afr. Jour. Sci.28: 274–279. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  229. -. The distribution and prevalence of physiologie forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici in the Union of South Africa, 1930–1934. Ann. Univ. Stellenbosch13, A, (3), 7 pp. 1935.

  230. —. Die physiologiese Rasse vanPuccinia triticina Eriks. wat in Suid-Afrika voorkom. So. Afr. Jour. Sci.33: 648–652. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  231. Vohl, Gerhard Johann. Untersuchungen über den Braunrost des WeizensPuccinia triticina Erikss. Zeit. Zuchtg. A,22: 233–270. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  232. Wallace, James M. Physiologie specialization as a factor in the epiphytology ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Phytopathology22: 105–142. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  233. Waterhouse, W. L. A preliminary account of the origin of two new Australian physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.54: 96–106. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  234. — Australian rust studies I. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.54: 615–680. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  235. — Australian rust studies. II. Biometrical studies of the morphology of spore forms. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.55: 159–178. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  236. — On the production in Australia of two new physiologic forms of leaf rust of wheat,Puccinia triticina Erikss. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.57: 92–94. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  237. — Australian rust studies V. On the occurrence of a new physiologic form of wheat stem rust in New South Wales. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.60: 71–73. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  238. — Some observations on cereal rust problems in Australia. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.61: 3–38. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  239. — Presidential Address. Part I. General. Part II. Some aspects of problems in breeding for rust resistance in cereals. Jour. & Proc. Roy. Soc. N.S.W.72: 1–54. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  240. — Some aspects of plant pathology. Rep. Austral. and N. Z. Assoc. Adv. Sci.24: 234–259. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  241. Wellensiek, S. J. Oriëntierend onderzoek omtrent physiologiese specialisatie vanPuccinia triticina Eriks. in Nederland. (English summary.) Tidjschr. Plantenziekten36: 1–12. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  242. Wilhelm, W. Studien zur Spezialisierungsweise des Weizengelbrostes,Puccinia glumarum f. sp.tritici (Schmidt) Erikss. et Henn. und zur Keimungsphysiologie seiner Uredosporen. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.19: 95–133. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 812 from the Division of Botany and Plant Pathology, Science Service, Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, T., Newton, M. Specialization, hybridization, and mutation in the cereal rusts. Bot. Rev 12, 337 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861524

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861524

Keywords

Navigation