Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preventing plant disease introduction

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott, E. V. Stem rust infection of Khapli emmer and Hope wheat in Peru. Phytopathology20: 143. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, L. J. A new strain of the tomato leaf-mold fungus (Cladosporium fulvum). Phytopathology32: 901–904. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Phytopathological Society. Committee reports stressing the need for study of foreign diseases. Phytopathology18: 473. 1928;19: 521. 1929 ;20: 459. 1930 ;21: 567. 1931 ;22: 481. 1932 ;23: 496.1933;24: 570–571. 1934;25: 533. 1935;26: 498. 1936;29: 381. 1939;30: 358–359. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —. Committee reports suggesting that information on foreign pests might be obtained through foreign service representatives. Phytopathology23: 496. 1933;24: 570–571. 1934;30: 358–359. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bawden, F. C. Plant viruses and virus diseases. Ed. 2, rev. 1943.

  6. Beattie, R. K. The search for blight-resistant chestnuts in the Orient. North. Nut Growers’ Assoc., Proc. 1941.

  7. Bell, R. H. and Hartman, R. E. Further notes on chemical sterilization as a means of eradicating potato wart from the soil. Pa. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Rep. 1942. [Processed.]

  8. Bisby, G. R. Are living spores to be found over the [Atlantic] Ocean? Mycologia27:84–85. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bitancourt, A. A. And Jenkins, A. E. Sweet orange fruit scab caused byElsinoë australis. Jour. Agr. Res.54: 1–18. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boyce, J. S. Observations on forest pathology in Great Britain and Denmark. Phytopathology17: 1–18. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brandes, E. W. Important sugar cane diseases not present in the United States. Reference Book of the Sugar Industry of the World. Vol.2:79–82. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Braun, H. [Biological specialization inSynchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Perc. (Preliminary note).] [Abstract] Rev. Appl. Mycol.22:273. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buller, A. H. R. Researches on fungi. 1909.

  14. Butler, E. J. The dissemination of parasitic fungi and international legislation. India Dept. Agr. Mem., Bot. Ser.9: 1–73. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  15. —. International plant disease legislation as it affects the British Empire. Int. Cong. Pl. Sci., Proc. Vol.2: 1349–1353. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christensen, J. J. Long distance dissemination of plant pathogens.In Aerobiology, edited by F. R. Moulton, Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Pub. 17, pp. 78–87. 1942.

  17. Chupp, C. Manual of vegetable-garden diseases. 1925.

  18. Craigie, J. H. Aerial dissemination of plant pathogens. Pacific Sci. Cong., Proc. (6)4: 753–767. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Darker, G. D. A brief host index of some plant pathogens and virus diseases in eastern Asia. U. S. Dept Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Pl. Dis. Rep., Sup. 122, pp. [93]–123. 1940.

  20. Doolittle, S. P. And Beecher, F. S. A strain of tobacco-mosaic virus causing a necrosis and shriveling of tomato foliage. Phytopathology32:986–994. 1942.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Durham, O. C. Air-bome fungus spores as allergens.In Aerobiology, edited by F. R. Moulton, Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Pub. 17, pp. 48–54. 1942.

  22. Garcia-Rada, G. et al. An unusually virulent race of wheat stem rust, No. 189. Phytopathology32: 720–726. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gardner, M. W. The mode of dissemination of fungous and bacterial diseases of plants. Mich. Acad. Sci., Ann. Rep.20: [357]-423. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Glick, P. A. Insect population and migration in the air.In Aerobiology, edited by F. R. Moulton, Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Pub. 17, pp. 88–98. 1942.

  25. Goodey, T. Plant parasitic nematodes and the diseases they cause. 1933.

  26. Gratz, L. O. Disease and climate as pertaining to the Florida and Maine potato sections. Phytopathology20: 267–288. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gravatt, G. F. and Gill, L. S. Chestnut blight. U. S. Dept Agr., Bul. 1641. 1930.

  28. Güssow, H. T. Plant quarantine legislation-a review and a reform. Phytopathology26: 465–482. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Haenseler, C. M. Standardization of plant disease surveys. U. S. Dept Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Soils & Agr. Eng., Pl. Dis. Rep.28: 38–41. 1944. [Processed.]

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hahn, G. G. And Ayres, T. T. Failure ofDasyscypha willkommii and related large spore species to parasitize Douglas fir. Phytopathology28:50–57. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hartley, C. And Rathbun-Gravatt, A. Some effects of plant diseases on variability of yields. Phytopathology27: 159–171. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  32. —And Rands, R. D. Plant pathology in the Dutch East Indies. Phytopathology14: [8]-23. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heald, F. D. Manual of plant diseases. Ed. 2. 953 pp. 1933.

  34. Holmes, F. O. Handbook of pathogenic viruses. 1939.

  35. Holton, C. S. And Johnson, A. G. Physiologic races inUrocystis tritici. Phytopathology33: 169–171. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  36. —And Rodenhiser, H. A. New physiologic races ofTilletia tritici andT. levis. Phytopathology32: 117–129. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hunt, N. R. Emphasis on the study of foreign diseases. Phytopathology34: 995. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  38. -and Lohr, A. L. Foreign diseases of Malus, Pyrus, and Cydonia (apple, pear, and quince) with incidental notes on diseases of related hosts. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent. & Pl. Quar., For. Pl. Quar. Memo. 330–333. [Processed.] 1943.

  39. -and Lohr, A. L. Foreign diseases of Solanaceae, in part. Notes on foreign diseases ofCapsicum, Lycopersicon, Nicotiana, andSolatium and incidental notes on other Solanaceae. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent & Pl. Quar., For. Pl. Quar. Memo. 330–334. [Processed.] 1943.

  40. Keitt, G. W. Local aerial dissemination of plant pathogens.In Aerobiology, edited by F. R. Moulton, Assoc. Adv. Sci., Pub. 17, pp. 69–77. 1942.

  41. Langford, M. H. And Keitt, G. W. Heterothallism and variability inVenturia pirina. Phytopathology32: 357–369. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Marlatt, C. L. Memorandum concerning Quarantine No. 37, restricting the importation of nursery stock and other plants and seeds after June 1, 1919. Fed. Hort. Bd., Serv. Reg. Announc. pp. 4–9.

  43. -. Statement in explanation of Quarantine 37 presented by the chairman at the opening of the conference, May 15,1922. Fed. Hort. Bd. Serv., Reg. Announc, Jan.-June, 1922, pp. 5–17.

  44. -. Explanation of the provisions for entry of plant novelties and propagating stock under Regulation 14, Quarantine 37, Fed. Hort. Bd., Serv. Reg. Announc., Jan-Mar, 1923, pp. 18–26.

  45. Martin, W. J. A study of the genetics ofSorosporium syntherismae andSphacelotheca ponici-miliacei. Phytopathology33: 569–585. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Massee, G. E. Some observations on the study of plant pathology. Jour. Econ. Biol.10: 29–48. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  47. McCubbin, W. A. Analysis of typical plant diseases from the quarantine standpoint. Phytopathology26: 991–1006. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  48. —. Relation of spore dimensions to their rate of fall. Phytopathology34: 230–234. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  49. —. Air-borne spores and plant quarantines. Sci. Monthly19: 149–152. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  50. —. Introductory review. Phytopathology34: 994. 1944. (Presented at the Pl. Quar. Sess. of the meeting of the Potomac Div. of the Am. Phytopath. Soc., Feb. 23–24.)

    Google Scholar 

  51. —. The lima bean scab situation. Jour. Econ. Ent.26: 625–630. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Meier, F. C. Collecting micro-organisms from winds above the Caribbean Sea. Phytopathology26: 102. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  53. —. Collecting micro-organisms from the arctic atmosphere. With field notes and material by Chas. A. Lindbergh. Sci. Monthly40: 5–20. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  54. -. Effects of conditions in the stratosphere on spores of fungi. Natl. Geog. Soc, Stratosphere Ser. No.2: 152–153. 1936.

  55. Metcalf, H. Chestnut blight in Europe (Endothia parasitica Murr.) A and A; and observations on the Douglas fir canker (Phomopsis pseudotsugae Wilson) in Great Britain. Phytopathology14: 52. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Moulton, F. R., ed. Aerobiology. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Pub. 17. 1942.

  57. Newton, M. The cereal rusts in Canada. Empire Jour. Exp. Agr.6: [123]-140. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Orton, C. R. Seed-borne parasites-a bibliography. W. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta, Bul. 245. 1931.

  59. —. Ch. report of committee on foreign plant diseases. Phytopathology25: 533. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Orton, W. A. The biological basis of international phytopathology. Phytopathology4: 11–19. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  61. —And Beattie, R. K. The biological basis of foreign plant quarantines. Phytopathology13: [295]-306. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Pennington, L. H. Relation of weather conditions to spread of whitepine blister rust in the Pacific Northwest. Jour. Agr. Res.30: 593–607. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ryker, T. C. Physiologic specialization inCercospora oryzae. Phytopathology33: 70–74. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sasscer, E. R. Influence of the war on plant quarantine. Jour. Econ. Ent.37: 356–359. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Shear, C. L. et al. Endothia parasitica and related species. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul. 380. 1917.

  66. Smith, H. S. et al. Efficacy and economic effects of plant quarantines in California. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta., Bul. 553. 1933.

  67. Spaulding, P. White-pine blister rust: A comparison of European with North American conditions. U. S. Dept. Agr, Tech. Bul.87. 1929.

  68. Stakman, E. C. Epidemiology of cereal rusts. V. Pacific Sci. Cong., Proc. Vol.4: 3177–3184. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  69. —. Plant disease fungi constantly evolving new types. Science88: 438–439. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  70. —,Loegering, W. Q. et al. Population trends of physiologic races ofPuccinia graminis tritici in the United States for the period 1930 to 1941. Phytopathology33: 884–898. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Steiner, G. The problem of host selection and host specialization of certain plant-infesting nemas and its application in the study of nemic pests. Phytopathology15: 499–534. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Stevens, N. E. Some significant estimates of losses from plant diseases in the United States. Phytopathology23: 975–984. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  73. —. Botanical research by unfashionable technics. Science93: 172–176. 1941.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Stevenson, J. A. Foreign plant diseases. U. S. Dept. Agr., Fed. Hort. Bd. 1926.

  75. —And Rands, R. D. An annotated list of the fungi and bacteria associated with sugarcane and its products. Hawaiian Planters Record42: 247–313. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Stevenson, F. J. et al. Potato-scab gardens in the United States. Phytopathology32: 965–971. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Tisdale, W. H. et al. Further studies on flag smut. U. S. Dept. Agr., Dept. Cir. 424. 1927.

  78. United States Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine. Nursery Stock, Plant, and Seed Quarantine No. 37 ; Reg. 7. U. S. Bur. Ent. & Plant Quar., Serv. Reg. Announc, p. 19. 1936.

  79. -. List of intercepted plant pests, 1940. U. S. Bur. Ent. & Plant Quar., Serv. Reg. Announc., 71 pp. 1941.

  80. -. List of current quarantine and other restrictive orders and miscellaneous regulations. U. S. Bur. Ent & Plant Quar., Serv. Reg. Announc, pp. 86–92. 1942.

  81. -. Summary of the more important plant diseases taken in connection with the insect and plant disease survey in the general vicinity of ports of entry from June, 1943, to December31, 1943. U. S. Bur. Pl. Ind., Soils, & Agr. Eng., Pl. Dis. Rep. 28: 274–275. 1944. [Processed.]

  82. United States Bureau of Plant Industry. Crop losses from plant diseases in the United States in 1938, 1939. Bur. Pl. Ind., Pl. Dis. Rep., Sups. 118, pp. [84]–118; 127, pp. [176]–209. 1940–1941.

  83. United States Congress. [Public Resolution No. 20, 75th Congress.] Joint Resolution approved Apr. 6, 1937, as amended May 9, 1938. An act for the control of incipient or emergency outbreaks of insect pests or plant diseases. 50 Stat. 57. (7 U.S.C. 1940 ed., sec. 148.)

  84. -. The plant quarantine act of Aug. 20, 1912, as amended.37 Stat. 315. (7 U.S.C. 1940 ed., sec. 151 et seq.)

  85. United States Department of Agriculture. Hearings before the subcommittee of the committee on appropriations, House of Representatives, 78th Congress, first session, on the Agr. Dept. App. Bill for 1944. 1802 pp. 1943.

  86. Weir, J. R. A pathological survey of the Para rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) in the Amazon Valley. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul. 1380. 1926.

  87. Wellman, F. L. And Blaisdell, D. J. Pathogenic and cultural variation among single-spore isolates from strains of the tomato-wilt fusarium. Phytopathology31: 103–120. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Weston, W. H., Jr. Significant points in the life history of the Philippine maize mildew. Phytopathology11: 32. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Yu, T. F. et al. Varietal resistance and susceptibility of wheats to flag smut (Urocystis tritici Koern) III. Physiologic specialization inUrocystis tritici Koern. [Abstract] Rev. Appl. Mycol.16: 305. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, Agricultural Research Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture, USA

    W. A. McCubbin

Authors
  1. W. A. McCubbin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCubbin, W.A. Preventing plant disease introduction. Bot. Rev 12, 101–139 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861145

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861145

Keywords

Search

Navigation