Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The cytological analysis of species hybrids. II

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature

  1. Abraham, P. Cytological studies inGossypium. I. Chromosome behavior in the interspecific hybridG. arboreum ×G. Stocksii. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.10: 285–298. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, E. An experimental study of hybridization in the genusApocynum. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.23: 159–167. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, E. And Sax, K. A cytological monograph of the American species ofTradescantia. Bot. Gaz.97: 433–476. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Avdulov, N. P. Karyo-Systematische Untersuchungen der Familie Gramineen. Bul. Appl. Bot. Suppt. Vol.44. 1931.

  5. Avery, P. Cytogenetic evidences ofNicotiana phylesis in the alata group. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.18: 153–194. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Babcock, E. B. And Emsweller, S. L. Meiosis in certain interspecific hybrids inCrepis, and its bearing on taxonomic relationship. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agr. Sci.6: 325–368. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  7. —And Cave, M. S. A study of intra- and interspecific relations ofCrepis foetida L. Zeits. Ind. Abst.- & Vererb.75: 124–160. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beasley, J. O. The origin of American tetraploidGossypium species. Am. Nat.74: 285–286. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. — Meiotic chromosome behavior in species, species hybrids, haploids and induced polyploids ofGossypium. Genetics27: 25–54. 1942.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. — AsynapticGossypium plants and their polyploids. Jour. Agr. Res.65: 421–427. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bergner, A. D. And Blakeslee, A. F. Cytology of theferox-quercifolia-stramonium triangle inDatura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18(2): 151–159. 1932.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. —— Chromosome ends inDatura discolor. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.21: 369–374. 1935.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. —— Chromosome ends inDatura pruinosa. PROC. Nat. Acad. Sci.29: 1–7. 1943.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. — Chromosomal interchange among six species ofDatura in nature. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 431–440. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boza-Barducci, T. and Madoo, R. M. Investigations acerca del parentesco de la especie peruana de algodoneroGossypium Raimondii, Ulbrich. Min. Fomento, Dir. Agr. y Ganad. Bol. 22. 1941.

  16. Cameron, D. R. The chromosomes and relationship ofCrepis syriaca (Bornm.). Univ. Calif. Publ. Agr. Sci.6: 257–286. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Catcheside, D. G. An asynapticOenothera. New Phytol.38: 323–334. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark, F. J. Cytogenetic studies of divergent spindle formation inZea mays. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 547–559. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Clausen, J.et al. Experimental taxonomy. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Year Book36: 209–214. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  20. —et al. The concept of species based on experiment. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 103–106. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. -et al. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ. 520. 1940.

  22. —et al. Experimental taxonomy. Ann. Rep. Div. Pl. Biol., Carnegie Inst. Wash., Year Book40: 160–170. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  23. -et al. Experimental studies on the nature of species. II. Plant evolution through amphiploidy and autoploidy, with examples from the Madiinae. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ. 564. 1945.

  24. Cleland, R. E. Some aspects of the cytogenetics ofOenothera. Bot. Rev.2: 316–348. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  25. — Analysis of wild American races ofOenothera (Onagra). Genetics25: 636–644. 1940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. — The problem of species inOenothera. Am. Nat.78: 5–28. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dark, S. O. S. Meiosis in diploid and tetraploidPaeonia species. Jour. Genet.32: 353–372. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Darlington, C. D. Recent advances in cytology. 2nd. ed. 1937.

  29. —And Gairdner, A. E. The variation system inCampanula persicifolia. Jour. Genet.35: 97–128. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  30. —And Thomas, P. T. The breakdown of cell division in aFestuca-Lolium derivative. Ann. Bot.1: 747–762. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Darrow, G. M. And Camp, W. H.Vaccinium hybrids and the development of new horticultural material. Bul. Torr. Bot. Club.72: 1–21. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Darwin, C. The origin of species. 1859.

  33. Dermen, H. Cytological study and hybridization in two sections ofVerbena. Cytologia7: 160–175. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dobzhansky, Th. Genetics and the origin of species. Rev. ed. 1941.

  35. Eghis, S. A. On the problem of the origin ofNicotiana rustica. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS26: 952–956. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Emsweller, S. L. And Jones, H. A. Meiosis inAllium fistulosum, A. cepa, and their hybrid. Hilgardia9: 277–288. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  37. —— Crossing over, fragmentation, and formation of new chromosomes in anAllium species hybrid. Bot. Gaz.99: 729–772. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ernst, H. Zytogenetische Untersuchungen anAntirrhinum majus L. Zeits. Bot.34: 81–111. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fabergé, A. C. Genetics of the scapiflora section of Papaver. III. Interspecific hybrids and genetic homology. Jour. Genet.46: 125–149. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Geitler, L. Weitere cytogenetische Untersuchungen an natürlichen Populationen vonParis quadrifolia. Zeits. Ind. Abst. u. Vererb.75: 161–190. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gentscheff, G. J. Experimental and caryological investigation of the relationships among the species of the genusDianthus L. Sofia Univ. Fac. Agr., Diss. 1937.

  42. Gerassimova, H. Chromosome alterations as a factor of divergence of forms. I. New experimentally produced strains ofC. tectorum which are physiologically isolated from the original forms owing to reciprocal translocation. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. URSS25: 148–154. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Goodspeed, T. H.Nicotiana phylesis in the light of chromosome number morphology. and behavior. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.17(13): 369–398. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  44. —Nicotiana Arentsii—a new naturally occurring amphidiploid species. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci.25(12): 291–306. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  45. —And Avery, P. Trisomie and other types inNicotiana sylvestris. Jour. Genet.38: 382–427. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  46. —And Bradley, M. V. Amphidiploidy. Bot. Rev.8: 271–316. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Goodwin, R. H. The cytogenetics of two species ofSolidago and its bearing on their polymorphy in nature. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 425–432. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Graze, H. Weiter Chromosomenuntersuchungen beiVeronica-Arten der SektionPseudolysimachia. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.81(4): 609–662. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Håkansson, A. Die Reduktionsteilung in einigen Artbastarden vonPisum. Hereditas21: 215–222. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  50. — Zytologische Studien an Salix-Bastarden. Hereditas24: 1–32. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  51. — Zur Zytologie von Godetia-Arten und-Bastarden. Hereditas27: 319–336. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hiorth, G. Genetische Versuche mitCollinsia. IV. Die Analyse eines nahezu sterilen Artbastardes. Pt. 1. Die diploiden Bastarde zwischenCollinsia bicolor undC. bartsiaefolia. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.66: 106–157. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. — Zur Genetik und Systematik der GattungGodetia. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.79(2): 199–219. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Howard, H. W. The fertility of amphidiploids from the crossRaphanus sativusxBrassica oleracea. Jour. Genet.36: 239–273. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Humphrey, L. M. A cytological and morphological analysis of the tomato species. Cytologia8 306–318. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hutchinson, J. B. The application of genetics to plant breeding. Jour. Genet.40: 271–282. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Huxley, J. S. Towards the new systematics,in Huxley, Julian (ed.) The New Systematics. 1940.

  58. Janaki-Ammal, E. K. Intergeneric hybrids ofSaccharum. Jour. Genet.41: 217–253. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  59. — The breakdown of meiosis in a male-sterileSaccharum. Ann. Bot.5: 83–88. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jenkin, T. J. And Thomas, P. G. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. III.Lolium loliaceum andL. rigidum. Jour. Genet.37: 255–286. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jenkins, J. A. The cytogenetic relationships of four species ofCrepis. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agr. Sci.6: 369–400. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Jones, K. L. Studies onAmbrosia. III. PistillateAmbrosia ela- tiorxA.trifida and its bearing on matroclinic sex inheritance. Bot. Gar.105: 226–231. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Kihara, H. Verwandtschaft derAegilops-Arten im Lichte der Genomanalyse. Ein Überblick. Zuchter12: 49–62. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. —And Lilienfeld, F. Genomanalyse beiTriticum undAegilops VI. Weiter Untersuchungen anAegilops ×Triticum undAeagi- lopsxAegilops Bastarden. Cytologia6: 195–216. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  65. - andNishiyama, I. 1937. Possibility of crossing over between semihomologous chromosomes from two different genoms. Cytologia, Fujü Jubl. Vol.: 654–666. 1937.

  66. Knowles, P. F. Interspecific hybridizations ofBromus. Genetics29: 128–140. 1944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Koller, P. C. Asynapsis inPisum sativum. Jour. Genet.36: 275–306. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kostoff, D. Studies on polyploid plants. XXI. Cytogenetic behavior of the allopolyploid hybridsNicotiana glauca Grah xNico-tiana Langsdorffii Weinm and their evolutionary significance. Jour. Genet.37: 129–209. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lamprecht, H. Die Artgrenze zwischenPhaseolus vulgaris L undmultiflorus Lam. Hereditas27: 51–175. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  70. -. The limit betweenPhaseolus vulgaris andP. multiflorus from the genetical point of view. Proc. VII Int. Genet. Congr. Edinburgh. (1939). p. 179. 1941.

  71. Lebedev, V. N. The phenomena of autosyndesis in the interspecific hybrids of vulgare wheat and their significance for the problem of phylogenesis of wheat. All-Union Inst. of the Sugar Industry, separate publ. 1933.

  72. -. The new phenomena in wheat-rye hybrids. Ukrainian Sci. Res. Inst., Sugar Ind. Publ. 1932.

  73. Lesley, M. M. And Lesley, J. W. Hybrids of the Chilean tomato. Jour. Hered.34: 199–205. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Levan, A. Die Zytologie vonAllium cepaxfistulosum. Hereditas21: 195–214. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. — The cytology ofAllium amplectens and the occurrence in nature of its asynapsis. Hereditas26: 353–394. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  76. — The cytology of the species hybridAllium cepaxfistu-losum and its polyploid derivatives. Hereditas27: 253–272. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Li, C. H.,et al. Interspecific crosses inSetaria, II. Cytological studies of interspecific hybrids involving: 1)S. faberii andS. italica, and 2) a 3-way cross, F2 ofS. italicaxS.viridis andS. faberii. Jour. Hered.33: 351–355. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  78. —et al. Desynapsis in the common wheat. Am. Jour. Bot.32: 92–101. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. —et al. Cytological and genetical studies of the interspecific cross of the cultivated foxtail millet,Setaria italica (L.) Beauv., and the green foxtail millet,S. viridis L. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.37 (1): 32–54. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Lutkov, A. Interspecific hybrids ofPisum humilis Boiss. ×P. sativum L. Proc. USSR Congr. Genet. Pl. Anim. Breed.2: 353–367. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  81. McMinn, H. E. A systematic study of the genusCeanothus. Santa Barbara Botanic Garden Publ. 131–279. 1942.

  82. — The importance of field hybrids in determining species in the genusCeanothus. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. IV.25(14): 323–356. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Maeda, T. Chiasma studies inAllium fistulosum, A. cepa, and their F1, F2 and backcross hybrids. Jap. Jour. Genet.13: 146–159. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Manton, Irene. Introduction to the general cytology of the Cruciferae. Ann. Bot.46: 509–556. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Mayr, E. Systematics and the origin of species. 1942.

  86. Melchers, F. Genetik und Evolution. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.76: 229–259. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Morinaga, T. Interspecific hybridization inBrassica VI. The cytology of F1 hybrids ofB. juncea andB. nigra. Cytologia6: 62–67. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Moriya, A. Contributions to the cytology of the genusSaccharum I. Observations on the F1 progeny of sugar cane-sorghum hybrids. Cytologia11: 117–135. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Müntzing, A. Cases of partial sterility in crosses within a Linnean species. Hereditas12: 297–319. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  90. — Outlines to a genetic monograph ofGaleopsis. Hereditas13: 185–341. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  91. — Cytogenetic studies on hybrids between twoPhleum species. Hereditas20: 103–136. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  92. — Chromosome behavior in someNicotiama hybrids. Hereditas20: 251–272. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  93. — Sterility and chromosome pairing in intraspecificGaleopsis hybrids. Hereditas24: 117–188. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  94. —And Prakken, R. The mode of chromosome pairing inPhleum twins with 63 chromosomes and its cytogenetic consequences. Hereditas26: 463–501. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  95. — Chromosomal aberrations in rye populations. Hereditas27: 273–308. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Myers, W. M. Cytological and genetic analysis of chromosomal association and behavior during meiosis in hexaploid timothy (Phleum pratense). Jour. Agr. Res.68(1): 21–33. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Natividade, V. J. Recherches cytologiques sur quelques espèces et hybrides du genreQuercus. Bol. Soc. Broteriana12(2): 21–85. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Navashin, M. The dislocation hypothesis of evolution of chromosome numbers. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.63: 224–231. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Nordenskiold, H. Intra- and interspecific hybrids ofPhleum pratense andP. alpinum. Hereditas23: 304–316. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  100. — Cytological studies in triploidPhleum. Bot. Not.1941: 12–32. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Offerijns, F. J. M. Meiosis in the pollen mother cells of some cannas. Genetica18: 1–60. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Ono, H. And Sato, D. Intergenra hibridigo en Cichorieae. II. Hibridoj deCrepidiastrum lanceolatum var.latifolium kakParaixeris denticulata. Jap. Jour. Genet.11: 169–179. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Intergeneric hybridisation in Cichorieae. III. Fertility and chromosome variations in F1 and F2 progeny ofParoixeris denticulata andCrepidiastrum lanceolatum var.latifolium. Cytologia, Fujii Jubl. Vol.: 535–539. 1937.

  104. — Intergeneric hybridization in Cichorieae V. Variation in karotypes and fertility of Crepidiastrixeris denticulato-platyphylla. Cytologia11(3): 338–352. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ostergren, G. A hybrid betweenTriticum turgidum andAgropyron junceum. Hereditas26: 395–398. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  106. — Cytology ofAgropyron junceum, A. repens, and their spontaneous hybrids. Hereditas26: 305–316. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Paddock, E. F. The backcross transmission of an inversion in an interspecific hybrid ofSolanum (abstr.) Genetics Soc. Am. Rec.11: 85. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Peterson, D. Stellaria-Studien. Zur Zytologie, Genetik, Ökologie, und Systematik der GattungStellaria, insbesondere der mediagruppe. Bot. Not.1936: 281–419. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Peto, F. H. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron II. Cytology of the male parents and F1 generation. Canad. Jour. Res. C14: 203–214. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  110. — Cytology of poplar species and natural hybrids. Canad. Jour. Res.16: 445–455. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  111. —And Boyes, J. W. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. VI. Induced fertility in vernal emmer ×A. glaucum. Canad. Jour. Res. C18: 230–239. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Poddubnaja-Arnoldi, V. Development of pollen and embryosac in interspecific hybrids ofTaraxacum. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS24: 374–377. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Popowa, G. I. Cytologische Untersuchungen eines neuen BastardesTriticum TimopheevixAgropyron elongatum. Cytologia9: 495–498. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Propach, H. Cytogenetische Untersuchungen in der GattungSolanum, sect.Tuberarium. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.72: 555–563. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. — Cytogenetische Untersuchungen in der GattungSolanum, sect.Tuberarium V. Diploide Artbastarde. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.78: 115–128. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Ramaer, H. Cytology ofHevea. Genetica17: 193–236. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Ramanujam, S. Cytogenetical studies in the Oryzeae. III. Cytogenetical behavior of an interspecific hybrid inOrysa. Jour. Genet.35: 223–258. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Ribbands, C. R. The consequences of structural hybridity at meiosis in Lilium × testaceum. Jour. Genet.35: 1–24. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Richardson, M. M. Structural hybridity inLilium Martoyon album ×L. Hansonii. Jour. Genet.32: 411–450. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Richharia, R. H. Cytological investigation of 10-chromosome species ofBrassica and their F1 hybrids. Jour. Genet.34(1): 45–55. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  121. — Cytological investigations ofRaphanus sativus. Brassica oleracea, and their F1 and F2 hybrids. Jour. Genet.34(1): 19–44. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Sansome, E. R. Cytological study of an F1 betweenPisum sotivum andP. humile, and of some types from the cross. Jour. Genet.36: 469–499. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Sapehin, A. C. Cytological investigation of TriticumxAgropyron hybrids. Bot. Zhurnal20: 119–125. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Saunders, A. P. And Stebbins, G. L. Cytogenetic Studies inPaeonia. I. The compatibility of the species and the appearance of the hybrids. Genetics28: 65–82. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Sax, K. Species hybrids inPlatanus andCampsis. Jour. Arn. Arb.14: 274–278. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  126. — The cytological analysis of species hybrids. Bot. Rev.1: 100–117. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Sears, E. R. Chromosome pairing and fertility in hybrids and amphidiploids in the Triticinae. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 337.

  128. Sherman, M. Karyotype evolution: A cytogenetic study of seven species and six interspecific hybrids ofCrepis. Thesis filed in the Archives, Univ. Calif. Library (Berkeley).

  129. Showalter, H. A study of the chromosomes and degenerating; microspore tissue inMirabilis. Am. Jour. Bot.22: 594–608. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Silow, R. A. The genetics of species development in the Old World cottons. Jour. Genet.46: 62–77. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  131. — The comparative genetics ofGossypium anomalum and the cultivated Asiatic cottons. Jour. Genet.42: 259–358. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Skalinska, M. Cytogenetic investigations of an allotetraploidAquilegia. Bul. Acad. Pol. Sci. et Lettres. B: 33–63. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Skirm, George W. Bivalent pairing in an induced tetraploid ofTradescantia. Genetics27: 635–640. 1942.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Skovsted, A. Cytological Studies in Cotton II. Two interspecific hybrids between Asiatic and New World cottons. Jour. Genet.28: 407–424. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. — Cytological Studies in Cotton IV. Chromosome conjugation in interspecific hybrids. Jour. Genet.34: 97–134. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Smith, E. C. Chromosome behavior inCatalpa hybrida Spaeth. Jour. Arn. Arb.22: 219–221. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Stebbins, G. L., Jr. Cytogenetic studies inPaeonia. II. The cytology of the diploid species and hybrids. Genetics23: 83–110. 1938.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. — The role of isolation in the differentiation of plant species. Biol. Symposia6: 217–233. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  139. —And Ellerton, S. Structural hybridity inPaeonia californica andP. Brownii. Jour. Genet.38: 1–36. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  140. —And Tobgy, H. A. The cytogenetics of hybrids inBromus I. Hybrids within the section Ceratochloa. Am. Jour. Bot.31: 1–11. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. —et al. The cytogenetics of hybrids inBromus II.Brotnus carinatus andB. arizonicus. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci.25: 307–3322. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Stephens, S. G. Colchicine-produced polyploids inGossypium I. An autotetraploid Asiatic cotton and certain of its hybrids with diploid species. Jour. Genet.44: 272–295. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  143. — Colchicine-produced polyploids inGossypium, II. Old World triploid hybrids. Jour. Genet.46: 303–312. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Sturtevant, A. H. Essays on Evolution. III. On the origin of interspecific sterility. Quart. Rev. Biol.13: 333–335. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Sveshnikova, I. N. Translocations in hybrids as an indicator of karyotype evolution. Biol. Zhurn.5: 303–326. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  146. —And Belekhova, J. P. Translocations in an interspecific hybrid. Bul. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Breed. II,9: 63–70. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Swanson, C. P. And Nelson, Ray. Spindle abnormalities inMentha. Bot. Gaz.104: 273–280. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Tatebe, T. Genetic and cytological studies on the F1 hybrid of scarlet or tomato eggplant (Solanum integrifolium Poir.) × eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Bot. Mag. [Tokyo]50: 457–462. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Terao, H. And U, Midusima. Some considerations on the classification ofOryza sativa L. into two subspecies, so-called “japonica” and “indica”. Jap. Jour. Bot.10: 213–258. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Tobgy, H. A. A cytological study ofCrepis fuliginosa, C. neglecta, and their F1 hybrid, and its bearing on the mechanism of phylogenetic reduction in chromosome number. Jour. Genet.45: 67–111. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  151. U, Nagaharu. Genome analysis inBrassica with special reference to the experimental formation ofB. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jap. Jour. Bot.7: 389–452. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  152. -et al. A report on meiosis in the two hybridsBrassica alba Rabh. Φ ×B. oleracea L. M andEruca sativa Lam. Φ ×B. oleracea L. M. Cytologia Fujii Jubl. Vol.: 437–440. 1937.

  153. Upcott, M. Timing unbalance at meiosis in the pollen-sterileLathyrus odoratus. Cytologia, Fujii Jubl. Vol.: 299–310. 1937.

  154. — The nature of tetraploidy inPrimula kewensis. Jour. Genet.39: 79–100. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Wakar, B. A. Cytologische Untersuchung über F1 der Weizen-Queckengras Bastarde. Cytologia7: 293–312. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  156. — Cytologische Untersuchung der selbstfertilen ersten Generation der Weizen-Queckengras Bastarde. Cytologia8: 67–90. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Wahl, H. A. Chromosome number and meiosis in the genusCarex. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 458–470. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Walters, J. L. Distribution of structural hybrids inPaeonia californica. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 270–275. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Webber, J. M. Interspecific hybridization inGossypium and the meiotic behavior of F1 plants. Jour. Agr. Res.51: 1047–1070. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  160. — Relationships in the genusGossypium as indicated by cytological data. Jour. Agr. Res.58: 237–261. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Wetmore, R. H. And Delisle, A. L. Studies in the genetics and cytology of two species in the genusAster and their polymorphy in nature. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 1–12. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Whitaker, L. W. And Thompson, R. C. Cytological studies inLactuca. Bul. Torrey Bot. Club.68: 388–394. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Winge, Ö. Inheritance of species characters inTragopogon. A cytogenetic investigation. Carlsberg Lab. Compt. Rend. Trav. Sér. Physiol.22: 155–193. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  164. —. Taxonomic and evolutionary studies inErophila based on cytogenetic investigations. Carlsberg Lab. Compt. Rend. Trav. Sér. Physiol.23: 17–39. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Wright, S. Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. Am. Nat.74: 232–248. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Yamamoto, Y. Reifungsteilungen bei einer asynaptischen Pflanze vonRumex acetosa L. Bot. & Zool.2: 1160–1168. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Yasui, K. Cytogenetic studies in artificially raised interspecific hybrids ofPapaver VIII. F1 plants ofP. bracteata ×P. lateritium. Cytologia11: 452–463. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, USA

    G. Ledyard Stebbins

Authors
  1. G. Ledyard Stebbins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supplement to article in The Botanical Review 1: 100–118. 1935.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stebbins, G.L. The cytological analysis of species hybrids. II. Bot. Rev 11, 463–486 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861140

Keywords

Search

Navigation