Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Heterosis

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Alabouvette, L. And A. Titard. 1933. Sur la possibilité d’utiliser dans la culture de la tomate des hybrides de première génération. Sélectionneur2: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashby, E. 1930. Studies in the inheritance of physiological characters. I. A physiological investigation of the nature of hybrid vigour in maize. Ann. Bot.44: 457–467.

    Google Scholar 

  3. — 1932. Studies in the inheritance of physiological characters. II. Further experiments upon the basis of hybrid vigour and upon the inheritance of efficiency index and respiration rate in maize. Ann. Bot.46: 1007–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  4. — 1936. Hybrid vigour in maize. Am. Nat.70: 179–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. — 1937. Studies in the inheritance of physiological characters. III. Hybrid vigour in the tomato. I. Manifestations of hybrid vigour from germination to the onset of flowering. Ann. Bot.1: 11–41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beadle, G. W. And E. L. Tatum. 1941. Genetic control of biochemical reactions inNeurospora. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.27: 499–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beal, W. J. 1876–1882. Reports, Michigan Board of Agriculture, 1876, 1877, 1881, 1882.

  8. Bindloss, E. A. 1938. Nuclear size in plumular meristems of inbred and hybrid maize. Am. Jour. Bot.25: 738–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bobrow, A. And H. Friesen. 1931. Beiträge zur Genetik des Seidenspinners (Sericaria mori L.). Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.58: 222–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonhote, J. L. 1915. Vigor and heredity. XII + 263 pp.

  11. Bredemann, G. And W. Heuser. 1931. Beiträge zur Heterosis bei Roggen. Zeits. Zücht. Reihe A, Pflanzenzücht.16: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brink, R. A. And P. H. Senn. 1931. Heritable characters in maize. XL. Ragged, a dominant character, linked with A1Ts4 and D1. Jour. Hered.22: 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bruce, A. B. 1910. The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science32: 627–628.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Castle, W. E. 1926. The explanation of hybrid vigor. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.12: 16–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. — 1929. A further study of size inheritance in rabbits with special reference to the existence of genes for size differences. Jour. Exp. Zool.53: 421–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. -. 1930. Genetics and eugenics. VI+ 353 pp. Fourth Ed.

  17. — 1934. Body size of reciprocal hybrids in rabbit crosses. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.20: 621–625.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. -And S. Wright. 1916. Studies of inheritance in guinea pigs and rats. Carnegie Inst. Pub. No. 241.

  19. Clark, D. G.et al. 1941. Stomatal behavior in inbred and hybrid maize. Am. Jour. Bot.28: 537–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coffman, F, A. 1933. Heterosis: specific not general in nature. Science77: 114–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. —And L. L. Davis. 1934. Heterosis or hybrid vigor in oats. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.26: 318–327.

    Google Scholar 

  22. —And G. A. Wiebe. 1930. Hybrid vigor in oats. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 848–860.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Collins, G. N. 1910. The value of first generation hybrids in corn. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Bul.191: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  24. — 1921. Dominance and the vigor of first generation hybrids. Am. Nat55: 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. —And J. H. Kempton. 1913. Effects of cross-pollination on the size of seeds in maize. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Cir.124: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Copeland, F. C. 1940. Growth rates in inbred and hybrid corn embryos. Collecting Net15: 169.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Darwin, C. 1875 (1898). The variation of animals and plants under domestication. 2 v.

  28. -. 1877. The effects of cross- and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. VIII + 482 pp.

  29. Dickson, H. 1939. The inheritance of growth rate inNeurospora crassa with special reference to hybrid vigour and cytoplasmic inheritance. Ann. Bot.3: 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dobzhansky, Th.et al. 1942. Genetics of natural populations. VIII. Concealed variability in the second and the fourth chromosomes ofDrosophila pseudoöbscura and its bearing on the problem of heterosis. Genetics27: 463–490.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. —And M. L. Queal. 1938. Genetics of natural populations. II. Genic variation in populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura inhabiting isolated mountain ranges. Genetics23: 464–484.

    Google Scholar 

  32. —And M. M. Rhoades. 1938. A possible method for locating favorable genes in maize. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.30: 668–675.

    Google Scholar 

  33. —And A. H. Sturtevant. 1938. Inversions in the chromosomes ofDrosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics23: 28–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dodge, B. O. 1942. Heterocaryotic vigor inNeurospora. Bul. Torrey Bot. Club69: 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dunn, L. C. 1927. The effect of inbreeding and crossbreeding on fowls. Ver. Int. Kong. Ver. Berlin 607–617. Suppl. I d. Zeit. Ind. Abst. Ver. 1928.

  36. — 1937. A third lethal in the T (Brachy) series in the house mouse. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.23: 474–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. East, E. M. 1908. Inbreeding in corn. Rept. Conn. Agr. Expt Sta. for 1907. 419–428.

  38. — 1909. The distinction between development and heredity in inbreeding. Am. Nat.43: 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. — 1935. Genetic reactions inNicotiana. I. Compatibility. II. Phenotypic reaction patterns. III. Dominance. Genetics20: 403–451.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. — 1936. Heterosis. Genetics21: 375–397.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. —And H. K. Hayes. 1912. Heterozygosis in evolution and in plant breeding. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Bul.243: 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Elvers, I. 1934. Interspecific hybridization inNicotiana. XIV. The cytology of F1glutinosa ×tomentosa. Univ. Calif. Pub. Bot.17: 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Emerson, R. A. and E. M. East. 1913. The inheritance of quantitative characters in maize. Neb. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 2.

  44. Engledow, F. L. And B. P. Pal. 1934. Investigation on yield in cereals. VIII. Hybrid vigour in wheat. Jour. Agr. Sci.24: 390–409.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fabergé, A. C. 1936. The physiological consequences of polyploidy. I. Growth and size in the tomato. Jour. Genet.33: 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. XIV + 272 pp.

  47. — 1939. Selective forces in wild populations ofParatettix texanus. Ann. Eugenics9: 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Focke, W. O. 1881. Die Pflanzen-Mischlinge. IV + 569 pp.

  49. Fortuyn, A. B. D. 1932. A case of hybrid vigor in the albinoMus musculus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Bjol. Med.29: 784–786.

    Google Scholar 

  50. — 1934. A remarkable cross inMus musculus. Genetics16: 321–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Frandsen, H. N. And O. Winge. 1931.Brassica napocampestris, a new constant amphidiploid species hybrid. Hereditas16: 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gartner, C. F. 1849. Versuche und Beobachtungen über die Bastarderzeugung im Pflanzenreich. XVI+ 791 pp.

  53. Gerschler, M. W. 1914. Über alternative Vererbung bei Kreuzung von Cyprinodontiden-Gattungen. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.12: 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Goodspeed, T. H. 1933. Chromosome number and morphology inNicotiana. VI. Chromosome numbers of forty species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.19: 649–653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Green, C. V. 1930. Size inheritance and growth in the mouse species cross (Mus musculus ×Mus bactrianus). I. Litter size. II. Birth weights. Jour. Exp. Zool.58: 237–246, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. — 1931. Size inheritance and growth in a mouse species cross (Mus musculus ×Mus bactrianus). III. Inheritance of adult quantitative characters. IV. Growth. Jour. Exp. Zool.59: 213–245, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gregory, F. G. And F. Crowther. 1928. A physiological study of varietal differences in plants. I. A study of the comparative yields of barley varieties with different manurings. Ann. Bot.42: 757–770.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. —— 1931. A physiological study of varietal differences in plants. II. Further evidence for the differential response in yield of barley varieties to manurial deficiencies. Ann. Bot.45: 579–592.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Grüneberg, H. 1939. Fertility in cross-bred mice. Jour. Hered.30: 83–84.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hatcher, E. S. J. 1939. Hybrid vigour in the tomato. Nature143: 523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. — 1940. Studies in the inheritance of physiological characters. V. Hybrid vigour in the tomato. Pt. III. A critical examination of the relation of embryo development to the manifestation of hybrid vigour. Ann. Bot.4: 735–764.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hiorth, G. 1940. Eine Serie multiplier Allele für Blotenzeichnungen beiGodetia amoena. Hereditas26: 441–453.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hubbs, C. L. And L. C. Hubbs. 1931. Increased growth in hybrid sunfishes. Papers Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts and Letters13: 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Huskins, C. L. 1930. The origin ofSpartina Townsendii. Genetica12: 531–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. —And S. G. Smith. 1934. A cytological study of the genusSorghum Pers. II. The meiotic chromosomes. Jour. Genet.28: 387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Jones, D. F. 1917. Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics2: 466–479.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. — 1918. The effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding upon development. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.207: 5–100.

    Google Scholar 

  68. — 1918. Bearing of heterosis upon double fertilization. Bot. Gaz.65: 324–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. — 1921. The indeterminate growth factor in tobacco and its effect upon development. Genetics6: 433–444.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. — 1939. Continued inbreeding in maize. Genetics24: 462–473.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. — 1942. Chromosome degeneration in relation to growth and hybrid vigor. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.28: 38–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Jost, L. 1907. Lectures on plant physiology. [Trans, by R. J. H. Gibson].

  73. Jull, M. A. 1930. Studies in hatchability. IV. The effect of intercrossing inbred strains of chickens on fertility and hatchability. Poultry Sci.9: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  74. — 1933. Inbreeding and intercrossing in poultry. The effects, on various characters, of close inbreeding and of intercrossing closely inbred lines in white leghorns. Jour. Hered.24: 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Karper, R. E. And J. R. Quinby. 1937. Hybrid vigor in sorghum. Jour. Hered.28: 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Keeble, F. And C. Pellew. 1910. The mode of inheritance of stature and of time of flowering in peas (Pisum sativum). Jour. Genet.1: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kempton, J. H. And J. W. McLane. 1942. Hybrid vigor and weight of germs in the seeds of maize. Jour. Agr. Res.64: 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kiesselbach, T. A. And R. M. Weihing. 1935. The comparative root development of selfed lines of corn and their F1 and F2 hybrids. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.27: 538–541.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Knight, T. A. 1799. An account of some experiments on the fecundation of vegetables. Phil. Trans, Roy. Soc. London89: 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kölreuter, J. G. 1766. Dritte Fortesetzung der voraufigen Nachricht von einigen das Geschlecht der Pflanzen betreffenden Versuchen und Beobachtungen. Gleditschen Handlung. 1766. [Reprinted 1893 in Ostwald’s Klassiker der Exakten Wissenschaften, No. 41.]

  81. Kostoff, D. And N. S. Arutiunova. 1936. Die Grösse der Zellen in den F1-Bastarden und deren Eltern in Zussamenhang mit der Grösse der Bastarde. (Ein Beitrag zum Problem von Heterosis.) Zeits. Zellf. Mikr. Anat.24: 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Kushner, H. F. 1938. The blood composition in yaks, in cattle, and in their hybrids in connection with the heterosis of the hybrids. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS.19: 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lindstrom, E. W. 1925. Heritable characters in maize. XVI (XXI) -A new dominant hereditary character-teopod. Jour. Hered.16: 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  84. — 1935. Genetic experiments on hybrid vigor in maize. Am. Nat.69: 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. -. 1939. Analysis of modern maize breeding principles and methods. Proc. 7th Int. Genet. Cong.: 191–196.

  86. Little, C. C. And E. E. Tyzzer. 1916. Further experimental studies on the inheritance of susceptibility to a transplantable tumor of the Japanese waltzing mouse. Jour. Med. Res.33: 393–453.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Livesay, E.A. 1930. An experimental study of hybrid vigor or heterosis in rats. Genetics15: 17–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Luckwill, L. C. 1937. Studies in the inheritance of physiological characters. IV. Hybrid vigour in the tomato. Pt. 2. Manifestations of hybrid vigour during the flowering period. Ann. Bot.1: 379–408.

    Google Scholar 

  89. — 1939. Observations on heterosis inLycopersicum. Jour. Genet37: 421–440.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Lus, IA, IA. 1929. K genetike iaka i ego gibridov s krumpnym rogatym skotom. [On the genetics of yak and its hybrids.] [In Russ. with Eng. summ.] Izvestiia Biuro po Genetike Adkadmii Nauk SSSR. (Bul. Bureau of Genetics, Acad. Sci. USSR.)7: 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Malinowski, E. 1928. A peculiar case of heterosis inPhaseolus vulgaris L. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver., Suppl. 2: 1090–1093.

  92. — 1935. Studies on hybrid vigour inPhaseolus vulgaris (L.) Savi. Pt. I. Vigorous sizes and photoperiodic response of the F1 plants. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.70: 96–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Marshak, A. 1936. Growth differences in reciprocal hybrids and cytoplasmic influence on growth in mice. Jour. Exp. Zool.72: 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Mather, K. 1943. Polygenic inheritance and natural selection. Biol. Rev.18: 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Mendel, G. 1865(1866). [Experiments in plant hybridization.] Vehr. Nat. Ver. Brunn, Abh., IV. 1926.

  96. Morgan, T. H.et al. 1915. Mechanism of Mendelian heredity. XIII + 262 pp.

  97. Murdoch, H. A. 1940. Hybrid vigor in maize embryos. Jour. Hered.31: 361–363.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Murphy, R. P. 1942. Convergent improvements with four inbred lines of corn. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.34: 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Paddick, M. E. And H. B. Sprague. 1939. Maize seed characters in relation to hybrid vigor. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.31: 743–750.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Painter, T. S. 1928. Cell size and body size in rabbits. Jour. Exp. Zool.50: 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Passmore, S. F. 1934. Hybrid vigour in reciprocal crosses inCucurbita pepo. Ann. Bot.48: 1029–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Pearl, R.et al. 1923. Experimental studies on the duration of life. VII. The Mendelian inheritance of duration of life in crosses of wild type and quintuple stocks ofDrosophila. Am. Nat.57: 153–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Pease, M. S. 1928. Experiments on the inheritance of weight in rabbits. Jour. Genet.20: 261–309.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Powers, Leroy. 1941. Inheritance of Quantitative Characters in Crosses Involving Two Species of Lycopersicon. Jour. Agr. Res.63: 149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Powers, Leroy. 1944. An Expansion of Jones’ Theory for the Explanation of Heterosis. Am. Nat.78: 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Rasmusson, J. 1933. A contribution to the theory of quantitative character inheritance. Hereditas18: 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Richey, F. B. 1927. The convergent improvement of selfed lines of corn. Am. Nat.61: 430–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. -. 1935. Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Dept. Agr.

  109. —And G. F. Sprague. 1931. Experiments on hybrid vigor and convergent improvement in corn. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul.267: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Robbins, Wm. J. 1940. Growth substances in a hybrid corn and its parents. Bul. Torrey Bot. Club67: 565–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. — 1941. Growth of excised roots and heterosis in tomato. Am. Jour. Bot28: 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. — 1941. Factor Z in hybrid maize. Bul. Torrey Bot. Club68: 222–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Roberts, E. And R. J. Laiple. 1925. Heterosis in pigs. Jour. Hered.16: 383–385.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Robertson, W. R. B. 1931. Hybrid vigor-a factor in tettigid parthenogenesis ? Am. Nat.65: 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Rosenquist, C. E. 1931. Hybrid vigor in wheat (Triticum vulgare). Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.23: 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Schlösser, L. 1935. Beitrag zu einer physiologischen Theorie der plasmatischen Vererbung. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.69: 159–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Shearer, P. S.et. al. 1926. Cross-breds versus purebreds in producing market hogs. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta., Lft.20: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Shull, A. F. 1912. The influence of inbreeding on vigor inHydatina senta. Biol. Bul.24: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Shull, G. H. 1908. The composition of a field of maize. Rept. Am. Breeder’s Assoc.4: 296–301.

    Google Scholar 

  120. — 1909. A pure line method of corn breeding. Rept. Am. Breeder’s Assoc.5: 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  121. — 1910. Hybridization methods in corn breeding. Am. Breeder’s Mag.1: 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  122. — 1911. The genotypes of maize. Am. Nat.45: 234–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. — 1914. Duplicate genes for capsule form inBursa bursa pastoris. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.12: 97–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Singleton, W. R. 1941. Hybrid vigor and its utilization in sweet corn breeding. Am. Nat.75: 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. — 1943. Breeding behavior of G30 a diminutive P30 mutant whose hybrids show increased vigor. [Abstract.] Genetics28: 89.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Smith, H. H. 1944. Recent studies bearing on the inheritance of quantitative characters in plants. Bot. Rev. [In press.]

  127. Sprague, G. F. 1936. Hybrid vigor and growth rates in a maize cross and its reciprocal. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 819–830.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Strong, L. C. 1926. A genetic study of the growth of a transplantable tumor (Adenocarcinoma dBrB). Jour. Exp. Zool.45: 231–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Stubbe, H. And K. Pirschle. 1940. Über einen monogen bedingten Fall von Heterosis beiAntirrhinum majus. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.58: 546–558.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Sturtevant, A. H. 1937. Autosomal lethals in wild populations ofDrosophila pseudoöbscura. Biol. Bul.73: 542–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. —And K. Mather. 1938. The interrelations of inversions, heterosis and recombination. Am. Nat.72: 447–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Tatum, E. L. And G. W. Beadle. 1942. The relation of genetics to growth-factors and hormones. Growth6: 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Umeya, Y. 1930. Studies on the vigor of silkworms,Bombyx mori L. Genetics15: 189–203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Veatch, C. 1930. Vigor in soybeans as affected by hybridity. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Vicari, E. M. 1929. Mode of inheritance of reaction time and degrees of learning in mice. Jour. Exp. Zool.54: 31–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Ware, J. O. 1931. Hybrid vigor in cotton. Ark. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.268: 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Warren, D. C. 1927. Hybrid vigor in poultry. Poultry Sci.7: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  138. — 1928. Hybrid vigor in poultry. Anat. Rec.41: 105.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Waters, N. F. 1931. Inheritance of body weight in domestic fowl. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.17: 440–444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. — 1931. Inheritance of body weight in domestic fowl. R. I. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.228: 3–105.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Whaley, W. G. 1939. A developmental analysis of heterosis inLycopersicon. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 609–616, 682–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. —And Alice Long. 1944. The behavior of excised roots of heterotic hybrids and their inbred parents in culture. Bul. Torrey Bot. Club71: 267–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. -et al. The growth of hybrid and inbred maize embryos in light and in darkness. [Unpublished].

  144. White, P. R. 1939. Glycine in the nutrition of excised tomato roots. Pl. Physiol.14: 527–538.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Wolfe, T. K. 1915. Further evidence of the immediate effect of crossing varieties of corn on the size of the seed produced. Tour, Am. SocAgron.7: 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Wright, S. 1922. The effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding on guinea pigs. I. Decline in vigor. II. Differentiation among inbred families. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul.1090: 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  147. — 1922. The effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding on guinea pigs. III. Crosses between highly inbred families. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul.1121: 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Zawdowsky, M. M. 1931. Zebu-Yak hybrids. Jour. Hered.22: 296–313.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Zorn, W., H. F. Khallinger, andH. Eckhoff. 1932. Beiträge zur Technik der Züchtung von Fleischschafen. I. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über das Wachstum yon Merinofleischaf- und Kreuzungslämmern zwischen Hampshiredown und Merinofleischschafmuttern in der Jungmast und über ihre Schlachtqualität. Züchtungskunde7: 440–451.

    Google Scholar 

  150. —And H. F. Kraixinger. 1934. Die Legeleistung von Bastarden zwischen Weissen, Einfachkämmingen Leghorns und Lachshühnern. Arch. Geflügelk.8: 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils, and Agricultural Engineering, United States Department of Agriculture, USA

    W. Gordon Whaley

Authors
  1. W. Gordon Whaley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whaley, W.G. Heterosis. Bot. Rev 10, 461–498 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861125

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861125

Keywords

Search

Navigation