Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Root-rots of certain non-cereal crops

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Adam, D. B. andPrescott, R. T. M. Strawberry culture. Jour. Agr., Victoria, Australia30: 21–22. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alcock, (Mrs.)N. L. A root disease of the strawberry. Gard. Chron.86: 14. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —et al. Strawberry disease in Lanarkshire. Scot. Jour. Agr.13: 242. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —. ThePhytophthora disease of strawberry. I. Pathological investigations. Sci. Hort.4: 52–56. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, H. W. Black stele root rot of strawberry. [Abstr.] Phytopath.25: 5. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, P. J. Soil reaction and black root rot of tobacco. [Abstr.] Phytopath.18: 131. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  7. — andMorgan, M. F. Black root rot and soil reaction. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tobacco Sta. Bull.6: 59T-66T. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —et al. Soil reaction and black root rot of tobacco. Mass. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.229: 117–136. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andrews, F. W. and Clouston, T. W. Rep. Dep. Agr. Sudan Govt., 1936, Part II, pp. 26–35.

  10. Appel, O. Neue Erfahrungen und Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der Rübenkrankheiten. Deuts. Zuckerind.54: 845–849. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arrhenius, O. Försök till bekämpande av Betrotbrand. III. Betning av utsädet. Kungl. Landtbr.-Akad. Handl. och Tidskr.63: 901–909. 1924.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey, F. D. Notes on potato disease from the Northwest. Phytopath.5: 321–322. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barker, H. D. A study of wilt resistance in flax. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 20. 1923.

  14. Basss, H. P. Mushroom root rot of fruit trees. Or. Bd. Hort., 17th Bien. Rep. 171–176. 1923.

  15. Beaumont, A. B. A hypothesis to explain brown root rot of Havana seed tobacco. Science84: 182–183. 1936.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berkeley, G. H. In Rep. Dom. Bot. 1927, Can. Dept. Agr., 35–36.

  17. -. The “degeneration” of the strawberry. III. Root rot. Imp. Bur. Fruit Prod., Tech. Bull. 5. 1934.

  18. —. Root rot of the raspberry. Can. Jour. Res., C14: 306–317. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  19. -. Root rots of ornamental plants. Can. Florist, Oct. 11, 1938.

  20. — andLauder-Thomson, Isabel. Root rots of strawberry in Britain. The “black lesion” type of strawberry root rot. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.12: 222–246. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  21. -and Koch, L. W. Diseases of tobacco in Canada. Dom. Dept. Agr., Publ. No. 667. 1940.

  22. Berlese, A. N. Rapporti traDematophora eRosellinia. Rev. Pat. Veg.1: 5–17, 33–44. 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bertrand, H. W. R. andMinor, E. C. K. A method of controllingFomes and other root diseases in replanted rubber areas. Trop. Agr.89: 135–140. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bewley, W. F. and Oyler, E. A disease of cultivated heaths. Exp. & Res. Sta. Cheshunt, 20th Ann. Rep. 1934: 55–60.

  25. Blank, L. M. andTalley, P. J. Are ammonium salts toxic to cotton root rot fungus ? Phytopath.31: 926–935. 1941.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bliss, D. E. Relation of soil temperature toArmillaria root rot in California. [Abstr.] Phytopath.31: 3. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bodnar, J. Beiträge zur biochemischen Kenntnis der Rübenschwanz-fäule der Zuckerrübe. Zeits. Pflanzenkr.25: 321–25. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bourne, B. A. Researches on the root disease of sugar cane. (Bridgetown) Barbados, 1922. Publ. 1923.

  29. Boyle, L. W. Histological characters of flax roots in relation to resistance to wilt and root rot. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 458. 1934.

  30. Branstetter, B. B. Corn root rot. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 117. 1924.

  31. Breazeale, J. F. The injurious after-effects of sorghum. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.16: 689–700. 1924.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brien, R. M. Black root rot of hops. New Zealand Jour. Sci. Tech. A,20: 62–64. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Broadfoot, W. C. Studies on foot and root rot of wheat. I. Can. Jour. Res.8: 483–491. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  34. —. Studies on foot and root rot of wheat. II. Can. Jour. Res.8: 545–552. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Brooks, A. N. and Nolan, R. E. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Rep. 1933–34.

  36. Brown, Nellie A. Control of crown and root rot of paeonies in America. Gard. Chron.95: 114. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Buchholtz, W. F. A severe case ofRhizoctonia root rot of sugar beets after potatoes. Phytopath.27: 1180. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  38. —. Factors influencing the pathogenicity ofPythium de-Baryonum on sugar beet seedlings. Phytopath.28: 448–474. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Buddin, W. Root rot, shoot rot and shanking of tulip caused byPhytophthora cryptogea Pethybr. & Laff., andP. erythroseptica Pethybr. Ann. Appl. Biol.25: 705–729. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Buisman, C. J. Root rots caused by Phycomycetes. Mededeelingen van het Phytopathologisch Laboratorium “Willie Commelin Scholten”, Baarn,11: 1–51. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Burkholder, W. H. Effect of the hydrogen-ion concentration of the soil on the growth of the bean and its susceptibility to dry root rot. Jour. Agr. Res.44: 175–181. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Campbell, L. Black root of sugar beets in the Puget Sound section of Washington. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.379: 5–14. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Carne, W. M. Root rot of fruit trees due toArmillaria mellea. Dept. Agr., West. Australia, Leaflet No. 192. 1926.

  44. Carpenter, C. W. Preliminary report on root rot in Hawaii (Lahaina cane deterioration, pineapple wilt, taro rot, rice root rot, banana root rot). Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta., Press Bull. 54. 1919.

  45. Cheney, G. M. Pythium root rot of broad beans in Victoria. Australian Jour. Exp. Biol. & Med. Sci.10: 143–155. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cherewick, W. J. Rhizoctonia root rot of sweet clover. Phytopath.31: 673–674. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chesters, C. G. C. andHickman, C. J. Preliminary report on stem and root rot ofViola and pansy. Nat. Viola & Pansy Soc., Yearb. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cholodny, N. Über eine neue Methode zur Untersuchung der Bodenmikroflora. Arch. Mikrobiol. 620–652. 1930.

  49. Ciferri, R. Mycorrhiza in sugar cane. Phytopath.18: 249–261. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Clayton, E. E. et al. Soil treatments for tobacco plant beds. [Abstr.] Phytopath31: 6. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Collison, R. C. The presence of certain organic compounds in plants and their relation to the growth of other plants. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.17: 58–68. 1925.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Cooke, D. A. The relation ofPythium to growth failure on phosphatefixing soils. Assoc. Hawaiian Sugar Technol., Rep.12: 169–198. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cooley, J. S. Relation of host vigor to apple infection withXylaria mali. [Abstr.] Phytopath.25: 12–13. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  54. —.Sclerotium rolfsii as a disease of nursery apple trees. Phytopath.26: 1081–1083. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  55. — andDavidson, R. W. A white root rot of apple trees, caused byCorticium galactinum. Phytopath.30: 139–147. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Coons, G. H. Black root of strawberry. Mich. Quart. Bull.7: 25–26. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  57. —et al. Black root investigations in Michigan and Ohio. Proc. Am. Soc. Sug. Beet Technol., East. U. S. & Can., 1941. [Abstr. in Sugar36: 41–42. 1941.]

    Google Scholar 

  58. -—et al. Sugar-beet diseases. (ex sugar-beet culture in the humid area of the United States.) U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm Bull.1637: 38–44. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cormack, M. W. Phytophthora cactorum as a cause of root rot in sweet clover. Phytopath.30: 700–701. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  60. —. Varietal resistance of alfalfa and sweet clover to root- and crown-rotting fungi in Alberta. Sci. Agr.22: 775–786. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Crandall, B. S. Phytophthora cinnamomi causing tree disease.In Plant Diseases in the United States in 1934. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Plant Ind., Plant Dis. Rep. Supp.90: 101. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Crawford, R. F. Root rot and its control. N. M. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 283. 1941.

  63. Curzi, M. L’Eziologia della “Cancrena Pedale” delCapsicum annuum L. Riv. Pat. Veg.17: 1–19. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Davis, Glenn N. andHenderson, W. J. The interrelation of the pathogenicity of aPhoma and aFusarium on onions. Phytopath.27: 763–772. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Day, W. R. Root rot of sweet chestnut and beech caused by species ofPhytophthora. I. Cause and symptoms of disease; its relation to soil conditions. Forestry12: 101–116. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  66. —. Root rot of sweet chestnut and beech caused by species ofPhytophthora. II. Inoculation experiments and methods of control. Forestry13: 46–58. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Delwiche, E. J. et al. Canning peas in Wisconsin. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 444. 1939.

  68. Demaree, J. B. andBain, H. F. Inspect strawberry fields now for the red-stele root disease. Plant Dis. Rept.22: 108–109. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Diddens, Harmanna A. Onderzoekingen over den Vlasbrand, veroorzaakt doorPythium megalacanthum de Bary. Thesis, Univ. Amsterdam. 1931.

  70. Doran, W. L. Relation of the adjustment of soil reaction to black root rot of tobacco. Science66: 661–662. 1927.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. —. The growth of tobacco and brown root rot of tobacco as affected by timothy infusions of different ages. Jour. Agr. Res.36: 281–287. 1928.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. —. Effects of soil temperature and reaction on growth of tobacco infected and uninfected with black root rot. Jour. Agr. Res.39: 853–872. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  73. — Increasing soil acidity as a means of controlling black root rot of tobacco. Mass. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.276: 118–146. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Drechsler, C. Root-rot of peas in the Middle Atlantic States in 1924. Phytopath.15: 110–114. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  75. —. APythium species of the megalacanthum type in cineraria roots and the relation of putrefaction to parasitism among thePythiaceae. Phytopath.25: 14. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  76. —. Two hyphomycetes parasitic on oospores of root-rotting oomycetes. Phytopath.28: 81–103. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Edgerton, C. W. et al. Relation of species ofPythium to the root rot disease of sugar cane. Phytopath.19: 549–565. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Eisenmenger, W. S. The forms of nitrogen in infusions of corn, timothy, red clover, tobacco and red top. Jour. Agr. Res.49: 375–378. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. —. Some correlations in plant-tissue composition, decomposition products and effect upon crop rotation with tobacco. Jour. Agr. Res.56: 309–316. 1938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Elliott, Charlotte et al. Pythium rot of Milo. Jour. Agr. Res.54: 797–834. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Esmarch, F. Der Wurzeltöter (Rhizoctonia violacea Tul.). Die Kranke Pflanze4: 4–6. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ezekiel, W. N. andFudge, J. F. Studies on the cause of immunity of monocotyledonous plants toPhymatotrichum root rot. Jour. Agr. Res.56: 773–786. 1938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. —et al. Nutritional requirements of the root rot fungus,Phymatotrichum omnivorum. Plant Physiol.9: 187–216. 1934.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Faris, J. A. andAllison, R. V. Sugar cane root disease in Cuba. A progress report upon the root disease situation in 1925. Phytopath.17: 61–82. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Fawcett, H. S. Report of former plant pathologists. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rept. 1912, 64–92. 1913.

  86. —. Gummosis of citrus. Jour. Agr. Res.24: 205. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  87. -and Lee, H. A. Citrus diseases and their control. p. 100. 1926.

  88. -,-. Citrus diseases and their control. p. 103. 1926.

  89. -,-. Citrus diseases and their control. p. 105. 1926.

  90. Fellows, H. Studies of certain soil phases of the wheat take-all problem. [Abstr.] Phytopath.19: 103. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Flor, H. H. Relation of environmental factors to growth and pathogenicity ofPythium isolated from roots of sugar cane. Phytopath.20: 319–328. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Forbes, A. P. S. Some tung oil diseases in Nyasaland. Nyasald Tea Ass. Quart. Jour.4: 6–10. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Fromme, F. D. andSchneiderhan, F. J. Studies on black root rot of apple. Phytopath.28: 483–490. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Gadd, C. H. Report of the mycologist for 1936. Tea Res. Inst. Ceylon, Bull.17: 23–30. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  95. —. Ring-barking of trees, and root diseases. Tea Quart.13: 117–123. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Gard, M. Pourridie du Noyer cultivé (Juglans regia L.) et carbonate de chaux. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci.186: 1373–1375. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  97. —. Pourridie et carbonate de chaux. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci.189: 497–498. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Garner, W. W. et al. Superior germ plasm in tobacco. U. S. Dept. Agr., Year Book, 1936, p. 829.

  99. Garrett, S. D. Factors affecting the pathogenicity of cereal foot-rot fungi. Biol. Rev.9: 351–361. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  100. —. Soil conditions and the take-all disease of wheat. Ann. Appl. Biol.23: 667–699. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. —. Soil conditions and the take-all disease of wheat. II. Ann. Appl. Biol.24: 747–751. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. —. Soil conditions and the take-all disease of wheat. III. Ann. Appl. Biol.25: 742–766. 1938a.

    Google Scholar 

  103. —. Soil conditions and the root-infecting fungi. Biol. Rev.13: 159–185. 1938b.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. -. Soil-borne fungi and the control of root disease. Tech. Comm. Bur. Soil Sci., Harpenden, 38, 54 pp. 1939.

  105. Geach, W. L. Root rot of grey peas in Tasmania. Jour. Coun. Sci. Ind. Res. Australia9: 77–87. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Gehring, A. and Brothuhn, G. Ueber die Einwirkung der Beizung von Rübenknäueln auf die biologischen Vorgänge des Bodens. Centralbl. Bakt., Ab. 2, 63, 1–8, pp. 67–101. 1924.

  107. Gerrard, E. H. andLochhead, A. G. Relationships between soil microorganisms and soil-borne plant pathogens. A review. Sci. Agr.18: 719–737. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Godfrey, G. H. A. Phytophthora foot rot of rhubarb. Jour. Agr. Res.23: 1–26. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  109. —. Control of soil fungi by soil fumigation with chloropicrin. Phytopath.26: 246–255. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Godoy, E. F. El “Mildew” O “Tizon” del pimiento producido por la“Phytophthora capsici” en la Republica. Argentina La Plata Univ. Nac. Facultat Agron. Rev.24: 238–280. [Eng. summary p. 280.] 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Gottlieb, M. andButler, K. D. A. Pythium root rot of cucurbits. Phytopath.29: 624–628. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Greathouse, G. A. Suggested rôle of alkaloids in plants resistant toPhymatotrichum omnivorum. Phytopath.28: 592–593. 1938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. —. Alkaloids fromSanguinaria canadensis and their influence on growth ofPhymatotrichum omnivorum. Plant Physiol.14: 377–380. 1939.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. — andRigler, N. E. The chemistry of resistance of plants toPhymatotrichum root rot. IV. Toxicity of phenolic and related compounds. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 99–108. 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. — andWatkins, G. M. Berberine as a factor in the resistance ofMahonia trifoliolata andM. swaseyi toPhymatotrichum root rot. Am. Jour. Bot.25: 743–748. 1938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Greis, H. Macrosporium cladosporioides, ein Erreger des Wurzel-brandes an der Zuckerrübe. Phytopath. Zeits.12: 360–365. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Grooshevoy, S. E. Root rot disease of the seedlings of sugar beet. Proc. Exp. Select. Stat. Mironovka, Kieff, pp. 1–49. 1931.

  118. Gropp. Beobachtungen über den Zusammenhang von Bodenreaktionen und Zuckerrübenaufgang im Jahre 1929. Deuts. Zuckerind.54: 1065–1068. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Haenseler, C. M. Pea root rot investigation. N. J. Agr. Exp. Sta., 44th Ann. Rept., 366–375. 1925.

  120. -. Pea root rot studies. N. J. Agr. Exp. Sta., 47th Ann. Rept., 334–339. 1927.

  121. —. The use of fertilizer in reducing losses from pea root rot caused byAphanomyces euteiches. [Abstr]. Phytopath.21: 116–117. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Hansen, H. N. Pink root of onions caused byPhoma sp. Science64: 525. 1926.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. —. Etiology of the pink-root disease of onions. Phytopath.19: 691–704. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  124. —et al. The connexion betweenDematophora necatrix andRosellinia necatrix. Hilgardia10: 561–564. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Harris, M. R. Rosellinia root rot of alfalfa in California. Pl. Dis. Reptr.25: 407. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Harter, L. L. A root rot of peas caused byFusarium coeruleum. Phytopath.28: 432–438. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Hartig, R. Wichtige Krankheiten der Waldbäume, pp. 12–42. 1874.

  128. -. Die Zersetzungserscheinungen des Holzes der Nadelholzbäume und der Eiche. 1878.

  129. —.Rhizomorpha (Dematophora) necatrix n. sp. Untersuch. Forstbot. Inst. München3: 95–153. 1883.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Hartley, C. Damping-off in forest nurseries. U. S. Dept. Agr., Dept. Bull. 934. 1921.

  131. Henderson, R. G. Treatment of tobacco plant bed soil with nitrogenous fertilizers. Agr. News Lett.9: 72–78. 1941. [Abstr. in Chem. Abstr. 35: 8187. 1941.]

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Henry, A. W. The natural microflora of the soil in relation to the footrot problem in wheat. Can. Jour. Res.4: 69–77. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  133. —. The influence of soil temperature and soil sterilization on the reaction of wheat seedlings toOphiobolus graminis. Can. Jour. Res.7: 198–203. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Hickman, C. J. The red core root disease of the strawberry caused byPhytophthora Fragariae n. sp. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.18: 89–118. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Hildebrand, A. A. Recent observations on strawberry root rot in the Niagara peninsula. Can. Jour. Res.11: 18–31. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  136. —. Root rot of ginseng in Ontario caused by members of the genusRamularia. Can. Jour. Res.12: 82–114. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  137. -. Strawberry root rot in Ontario. Can. Hort. & Home Mag., April. 1937.

  138. — andKoch, L. W. A microscopical study of infection of the roots of strawberry and tobacco seedlings by microorganisms of the soil. Can. Jour. Res.14: 11–28. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  139. — andWest, P. M. Strawberry root rot in relation to microbiological changes induced in root rot soil by the incorporation of certain cover crops. Can. Jour. Res. C19: 183–198. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Ho, Wen-Chun. Succession of soil-inhabiting fungi attacking the roots of maize. [Abstr]. Phytopath.30: 10. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  141. —. Soil-inhabiting fungi attacking the roots of maize. Iowa State Coll. Jour. Sci.16: 72–74. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Hoffer. G. N. Testing cornstalks chemically to aid in determining their plant food needs. Ind. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 298. 1926.

  143. — andCarr, R. H. Accumulation of aluminium and iron compounds in corn plants and its probable relation to rootrots. Jour. Agr. Res.23: 801–824. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  144. — andTrost, J. F. The accumulation of iron and aluminium compounds in corn plants and its probable relation to root rots. II. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.15: 323–331. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Hoffmaster, D. E. The sorghum root- and-stalk-rot complex in Oklahoma. [Abstr.] Phytopath.32: 9. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Hopkins, J. C. F. Southern Rhodesia: new records of fungus diseases for the year ending May 31st, 1934. Int. Bull. Pl. Prot.9: 30–32. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Horne, W. T. Root rot of citrus trees. Proc. 37th Fruit Growers Conv., Cal. Com. Hort. 93–97. 1910.

  148. —. Fungus root rot. Cal. Com. Hort Mon. Bull.1: 216–225. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Horsfall, J. G. andZentmyer, G. A. Antidoting the toxins of plant diseases. [Abstr.] Phytopath.32: 22. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Howells, D. V. Phytophthora disease of tomatoes (toe rot). Scot. Jour. Agr.19: 47–50. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. —. ThePhytophthora disease of strawberry. II, ThePhytophthora disease in the field. Sci. Hort.4: 56–58. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Jackson, L. W. R. andCrandall, B. S. A. Phytophthora root and collar rot ofPinus resinosa seedlings. Phytopath.25: 22. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  153. Jeffers, W. F. andDarrow, G. M. Promising strawberry crosses resistant to the red stele disease. Peninsula Hort. Soc., Trans.31: 20–23. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  154. Johann, Helen et al. A Pythium seedling blight and root rot of dent corn. Jour. Agr. Res.37: 443–464. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Johnson, James. Resistance in tobacco to the root rot disease. Phytopath.6: 161–181. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  156. -. Breeding tobacco for resistance toThielavia root rot. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bull. 175. 1930.

  157. —. Studies on the nature of brown root rot of tobacco and other plants. Jour. Agr. Res.58: 843–863. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. — andHartman, R. E. Influence of soil environment on the root-rot of tobacco. Jour. Agr. Res.17: 41–86. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  159. -et al. The brown root rot of tobacco and other plants. U. S. Dept. Agr., Dept. Bull. 1410. 1925.

  160. Johnson, M. O. The pineapple. Paradise of the Pacific Press, 12, 306 pp. 1935.

  161. Johnson, T. H. Notes on a fungus found destroying potatoes. Agr. Gaz. N. S. Wales21: 699. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Jones, F. R. Stem and root rot of peas in the United States caused by species ofFusarium. Jour. Agr. Res.26: 459–475. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  163. —. Evidence of resistance in sweet clover to aPhytophthora root rot. Phytopath.29: 909–911. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  164. — andDrechsler, C. Root rot of peas in the U. S. A. caused byAphanomyces euteiches (n. sp.). Jour. Agr. Res.30: 293–325. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Jones, J. P. Influence of cropping systems on root rots of tobacco. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.20: 679–685. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Jones, L. R. andGilman, J. C. The control of cabbage yellows through disease resistance. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull.38: 325–328. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Jordan, H. V. et al. The relation of fertilizers to the control of cotton root rot in Texas. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bull. 426. 1934.

  168. —et al. Relation of fertilizers, crop residues and tillage to yields of cotton and incidence of root rot. Proc. Soil Sci. Am.4: 325–328. 1939. [Abstr. in Chem. Abstr.35: 259. 1941.]

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Kesseler, E. v.. A preliminary study of varietal resistance in the pineapple to the root rot fungusNematosporangium rhizophthoron. Am. Jour. Bot.21: 251–260. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Killebrew, J. B. Report on the culture and curing of tobacco in the United States. U. S. Dept Int. Census Office. 1884.

  171. King, C. J. A method for the control of cotton root rot in the irrigated south-west. U. S. Dept. Agr., Circ. 425. 1937.

  172. —et al. Some microbiological activities affected in manurial control of cotton root rot. Jour. Agr. Res.49: 1093–1107. 1934a.

    Google Scholar 

  173. — andLoomis, H. F. Further studies of cotton root-rot in Arizona with a description of the sclerotium stage of the fungus. Jour, Agr. Res.39: 641–676. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  174. Koch, L. W. Recent investigations on tobacco root rot in Canada. Can. Jour. Res., C13: 174–186. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  175. -and Haslam, R. J. The prevention of brown root rot and black root rot of tobacco in Canada. Dom. Dept. Agr., Publ. 700. 1940.

  176. Kreutzer, W. A. A. Phytophthora rot of cucumber fruit. [Abstr]. Phytopath.27: 955. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  177. —. Host-parasite relationships in pink root ofAllium cepa. II. The action ofPhoma terrestris onAllium cepa and other hosts. Phytopath.31: 907–915. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Kuster, A. Rübenbeizen gegen Wurzelbrand. Deuts. Landw. Preuss.54: 688. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  179. Kuyper, J. Het Wortelrot op Java, speciaal in verband met de Riet-soort EK 28. Meded. Proefstat. Java Suikerind.4: 117–161. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Labrousse, F. Apoplexie du Fraisier. Rev. Path. Veg. Ent. Agr.20: 76. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Laurent, P. La pourridie di la vigne. Rev. Vit.88: 159–165. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  182. Leach, L. D. GombatingSclerotium root rot. Facts about sugar30: 70. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  183. —. Root rot diseases of sugar beets in California. Sugar Bull.5: 56–57. 1941. [Abstr. in Sugar36: 43. 1941.]

    Google Scholar 

  184. —. Multiple beets more susceptible to rot than singles. Sugar Beet Bull.6: 16. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  185. — andDavey, A. E. Toxicity of low concentrations of ammonia to mycelium and sclerotia ofSclerotium rolfsii. Phytopath.25: 957–959. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  186. —— Reducing southernSclerotium rot of sugar beets with nitrogenous fertilizers. Jour. Agr. Res.64: 1–18. 1942.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. Leach, R. Observations on the parasitism and control ofArmillaria mellea. Proc. Roy. Soc., B121: 561–573. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  188. —. Biological control and ecology ofArmillaria mellea (Vahl.) Fr. Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc.23: 320–329. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Le Beau, F. J. The relation of environmental factors and antagonistic organisms to root rot of sugarcane and corn. Proc. VIth Congr. Int. Soc. Sug. Cane Tech., 1938, pp. 342–347.

  190. LeClerg, E. L. Parasitism ofRhizoctonia solani on sugar beet. Jour. Agr. Res.49: 407–431. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  191. —. Studies on dry-rot canker of sugar beets. Phytopath.29: 793–800. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  192. —. Pathogenicity studies with isolates ofRhizoctonia solani obtained from potato and sugar beet. Phytopath.31: 49–61. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Lehman, S. G. andWolf, F. A. Pythium root rot of soybean. Jour. Agr. Res.33: 375–380. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  194. Leukel, R. W. Chloropicrin as a disinfectant for plant beds. Phytopath.32: 1034–1036. 1942.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  195. Lewcock, H. K. Pineapple wilt disease and its control. Queensland Agr. Jour.43: 9–17. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  196. Linford, M. B. and Vaughan, R. E. Root rot of peas. Some ways to avoid it. Wis. Agr. Coll. Ext. Serv., Circ. 188. 1925.

  197. Luijk, A.Van. Antagonism between various microorganisms and different species of the genusPythium, parasitising upon grasses and lucerne. Meded. Phytopath. Lab. Scholten.14: 45–83. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  198. Luthra, J. C. andVasudeva, R. S. Studies on the root-rot disease of cotton in the Punjab. V. Confirmation of the identity ofRhizoctonia bataticola. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.8: 727–734. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  199. Manns, T. F. andPhillips, C. E. Corn root rot studies. Jour. Agr. Res.27: 957–964. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  200. Marchal, Em. Recherches biologiques sur une Chytridinee parasite du lin. 1900.

  201. —. Les maladies cryptogamiques de la betterave. Sucrerie Belge48: 449–457. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  202. Martin, W. H. [In 46th Ann. Rep. N. J. Agr. Exp. Sta., 1925.]

  203. Massey, R. E. Section of botany and plant pathology, A.R.S. Report by Mr. R. E. Massey on experimental work carried out by the staff section during season 1934–35. Rep. (Gezira) Agr. Res. Serv., 1935, pp. 34–55. [1936. Mim.] (R.A.M. 16, p. 173. 1937.)

  204. Matthews, E. D. et al. Soil studies on the causes of the brown root rot of tobacco. Jour. Agr. Res.58: 673–684. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  205. Matz, Julius. Investigations of root disease of sugar cane. Jour. Dept. Agr. Porto Rico4: 28–40. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  206. Maxson, A. C. Root rots of sugar beet. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol., Proc. 1938: 60–66. [Abstr. in Facts about sugar338: 36. 1938.]

    Google Scholar 

  207. -. Beet root rot caused byRhizoctonia solani. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol., Proc. 1939: 38–45.

  208. McDonald, J. [In Ann. Rep. Mycol. 1924. Ann. Rep. Kenya Dept. Agr. 1924.]

  209. McGeorge, W. T. The root rot problem of sugar cane. Haw. Sect. Am. Chem. Soc., Proc. Honolulu, Nov. 1, 1924. [In Facts about sugar20: 730–732. 1925.]

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  210. McLaughlin, J. H. andMelhus, I. E. The response of some field crops on soils treated with chloropicrin. [Abstr.] Phytopath.32: 15. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  211. McNamara, H. C. Behavior of cotton root-rot at Greenville, Texas, including an experiment with clean fallows. Jour. Agr. Res.32: 17. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  212. -and Hooton, D. R. Studies of cotton root rot at Greenville, Tex. U. S. Dept. Agr., Circ. 85. 1929.

  213. —— Sclerotia-forming habits of the cotton root-rot fungus in Texas blackland soils. Jour. Agr. Res.46: 807–819. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  214. Mehrlich, F. P. Physiology and pathogenicity of species ofPhytophthora that cause heart rot of pineapple plants. Phytopath.22: 1001–1002. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  215. Melhus, I. E. et al. Cabbage yellows caused byFusarium conglutinans in Iowa. Ia. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.235: 187–216. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  216. Milbrath, J. A. A. Phytophthora disease of Chamaecyparis. [Abstr]. Phytopath.30: 788. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  217. Milburn, M. andGravatt, G. F. Preliminary note on aPhytophthora root disease of chestnut. Phytopath.22: 977–978. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  218. Millard, W. A. Rep. Univ. Leeds and Yorks Coun. Agric. Ed.118: 8–20. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  219. — andTaylor, C. B. Antagonism of microorganisms as the controlling factor in the inhibition of scab by green manuring. Ann. Appl.Biol.14: 202–215. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  220. Mitchell, R. B. et al. Soil bacteriological studies on the control of thePhymatotrichum root rot of cotton. Jour. Agr. Res.63: 535–547. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  221. Morgan, M. F. andAnderson, P. J. Relation of soil reaction to black root rot and good tobacco. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tobacco Sta. Bull.8: 47T-58T. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  222. Nakata, K. andTakimoto, S. Studies on ginseng diseases in Korea. [Abstr]. Jap. Jour. Bot.1: 43. 1922-23.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Napper, R. P. N. [In Ann. Rep., Path. Div. Rep. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya, 1938, pp. 115–143. 1939.]

  224. -. [In Ann. Rep., Path. Div. Rep. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya, 1939, pp. 156–195. 1940.]

  225. -. [In Ann. Rep., Path. Div. (Abridged) Rep. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya, 1940, pp. 10–12. 1941.]

  226. Neal, D. C. et al. Treatment of cotton root rot with ammonia. Science75: 139–140. 1932.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  227. —et al. Growth of the cotton root-rot fungus in synthetic media, and the toxic effect of ammonia on the fungus. Jour. Agr. Res.47: 107–118. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  228. Nolan, R. E. A root rot of strawberry caused by a species ofDiplodia [Abstr]. Phytopath.25: 974. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  229. Oyler, E. and Bewley, W. F. A disease of cultivated heaths. Exp. & Res. Sta., Cheshunt, 21st Ann. Rep. 1935: 50–56. 1936.

  230. Pammell, L. H. Root rot of cotton or “Cotton blight”. Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 4. 1888.

  231. Peglion, G. Marciume radicale delle piantine de tabacco causato dellaThielavia basicola Zopf. Atti Accad. Lincei, an. 294. S. 5. Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis., Vol. 6, semestre 2, fasc. 2, pp. 52–56. Roma, 1897.

  232. Peters, L. Rübenwurzelbrand und Saatgutbeize. Deuts. Zuckerind. 1924: 36. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  233. Pethybridge, G. H. andLafferty, H. A. A disease of tomato and other plants caused by a new species ofPhytophthora. Royal Dublin Soc. Sci., Proc.15: 487–505. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  234. -et al. Investigations on flax diseases. (Third Report.) Rep. Jour. Dep. Agr. & Techn. Inst. Ireland, 22, 2. 1922.

  235. Petri, L. Richerche sulla morphologia e biologia dellaBlepharospora cambivora, parassita del castagna. Atti. R. Acc. Naz. Lincei, Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis., Mat. 3 Nat. V, 26, II: 297–299. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  236. —. I metodi di cura del marciume radicale degli Agrumi. Boll. R. Staz. Pat. Veg., N. S.9: 255–272. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  237. Plakidas, A. G. Pythium root rot of strawberries in Louisiana. [Abstr]. Phytopath.20: 121–122. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  238. -. Report Louisiana Agr. Exp. Sta. for the years 1929–31. 1933.

  239. —. Infection with pure cultures ofClitocybe tabescens. Phytopath.31: 93–95. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  240. Poole, R. F. A root rot of Lucretia dewberry caused by a variety ofCollybia dryophila Fr. Jour. Agr. Res.35: 453–464. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  241. Porter, R. H. and Rice, W. N. Laboratory and field germination of treated and untreated beet seed. Ass. Off. Seed Anal. North Amer., Proc. 1939, pp. 127–130. 1940.

  242. Pugsley, A. T. Root rot of onions. Jour. Dept. Agric. Victoria36: 320. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  243. Ramakrishnan, T. S. Root rot of sugar cane. Curr. Sci.10: 254–255. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  244. Rands, R. D. Streepkanker von kaneel, veroorzaakt doorPhytophthora cinnamomi, n. sp. Meded. Inst. Plantenziekten 54. 1922.

  245. — andAbbott, E. V. Root rot disease of C.P. 28/19. Sug. Bull. New Orleans15: 3–6. 1937. [Abstr. in Facts about sugar32: 483. 1937.]

    Google Scholar 

  246. — andDopp, E. Variability inPythium arrhenomanes in relation to root rot of sugar cane and corn. Jour. Agr. Res.49: 189–222. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  247. -,-.Pythium root rot of sugar cane. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bull. 666. 1938.

  248. —— Influence of certain harmful soil constituents on severity ofPythium root rot of sugar-cane. Jour. Agr. Res.56: 53–67. 1938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  249. Rawlings, R. E. Observations on the cultural and pathogenic habits ofThielaviopsis basicola (Berk. & Br.) Ferraris. Ann. Mo. Bot. Garden27: 561–598. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  250. Rea, H. E. The control of cotton root rot in the Blackland region of Texas. Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 573. 1939.

  251. Reddick, D. A. fourthPhytophthora disease of tomato. Phytopath.10: 528–534. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  252. Reid, R. D. Red core disease of strawberry. Scot. Jour. Agr.23: 264–272. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  253. Reinking, O. A. Distribution and relative importance of various fungi associated with pea root rot in commercial pea-growing areas in New York. N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 264. 1942.

  254. Rhoads, A. S. Root rot of the grapevine in Missouri caused byClito-cybe tabescens (Scop.) Bres. Jour. Agr. Res.30: 341–364. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  255. —.In Ann. Rep. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta. for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1933: 110–126. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  256. -.Clitocybe mushroom root rot of citrus and other woody plants in Florida. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rep. 1938. p. 116.

  257. Richards, B. L. Relation of rainfall to the late blight orPhoma rot of the sugar beet. [Abstr]. Phytopath.12: 443. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  258. — andMcKay, H. H. Strawberry root rot in Utah. Utah Acad. Sci., Proc.13: 17–19. 1936. [Abstr. in Exp. Sta. Rec.77: 354. 1937.]

    Google Scholar 

  259. Richardson, J. K. Studies on root rot of corn in Ontario. Can. Jour. Res., C20: 241–256. 1942.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  260. Richardson, L. T. A. Phytophthora tomato disease new to Ontario. Can. Jour. Res., C19: 446–483. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  261. Rogers, C. H. The effect of three- and four-year rotations on cotton root rot in the central Texas Blacklands. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.29: 668–680. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  262. —. The relation of moisture and temperature to growth of the cotton root rot fungus. Jour. Agr. Res.58: 701–709. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  263. — andRich, H. Persistence of cotton-root-rot sclerotia following certain cropping practices. [Abstr]. Phytopath.32: 23. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  264. Roland, G. Disinfection experiments on beet seed conducted in 1938. Publ. Inst. Belge Amelior. Better.7: 543–547. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  265. Rosen, H. R. andShaw, L.. Studies onSclerotium rolfsii, with special reference to the metabolic interchange between soil inhabitants. Jour. Agr. Res.39: 41–61. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  266. Ruehle, G. D. A. Xylaria tuber rot of potato. Phytopath.31: 936–939. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Sadasivan, T. S. Succession of fungi decomposing wheat straw in different soils, with special reference toFusarium culmorum. Ann. Appl. Biol.26: 497–508. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  268. Salmon, E. S. andWare, W. M. Root rot of calla lilies. Gard. Chron.81: 234–235. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  269. Sanford, G. B. Some factors affecting the pathogenicity ofActinomyces scabies. Phytopath. 16: 525–547. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  270. —. Some soil microbiological aspects of plant pathology. Sci. Agr.13: 638–641. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  271. — andBroadfoot, W. C. Studies of the effects of other soilinhabiting microorganisms on the virulence ofOphiobolus graminis. Sci. Agr.11: 512–528. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  272. Sardina, J. R. and Landaluce, P. U. La podredumbre de la raiz de la Vina. Bol. Pat. Veg. y Ent. Agric.7, 27–30, pp. 208–216. 1934.

  273. Sarejanni, J. A. La Pourriture du Collet de Solanées Cultivées et la Classification du Genre Phytophthora (Athens) Inst. Phytopath. Benald Ann.2: 35–52. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  274. Schlick, R. W. Pythium injury to flax. [Abstr]. Phytopath.32: 24. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  275. Schreiner, O. and Shorey, E. C. The isolation of harmful organic substances in soils. U. S. Bur. Soils, Bull. 53. 1909.

  276. Selby, A. D. Tobacco diseases and tobacco breeding. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 156. 1904.

  277. Sherbakoff, C. D. Tenn. Agr. Exp. Sta., 46th Ann. Rep. 1933.

  278. Shekwin, M. E. Soil treatments to overcome the injurious effects of toxic materials in eastern North Carolina swamp land. Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.39: 43–48. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  279. Sideris, C. P. Rhizidiocystis ananasi Sideris nov. gen. et. sp., a root hair parasite of pineapples. Phytopath.19: 367–382. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  280. —. Pineapple root rot caused by species ofFusarium. [Abstr.] Phytopath.19: 1146. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  281. —. Stem rot of pineapple plants. Phytopath.19: 1146. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  282. —. Pathological and histological studies on pythiaceous root rots of various agricultural plants. Phytopath. Ztschr.3: 137–161. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  283. — andPaxton, G. E. Heart rot of pineapple plants. Phytopath.20: 951–958. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  284. ——. Pathological, histological and symptomatological studies on pineapple root rots. Am. Jour. Bot.18: 465–498. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  285. Simmonds, J. H. Diseases of pineapple. Queensland Agr. Jour.32: 398–408. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  286. Simmonds, P. M. Report of the Dominion Botanist Dept. Agr. Can., Rep. 1927. Div. Bot., 98–12. 1928.

  287. — Rootrots of cereals. Bot. Rev.7: 308–332. 1941.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  288. Smith, P. G. andWalker, J. C. Certain environal and nutritional factors affectingAphanomyces root rot of garden pea. Jour. Agr. Res.63: 1–20. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  289. Stewart, G. andPittman, D. W. Predisposition of sugar-beets to late root rot. Phytopath.18: 263–276. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  290. Stirrup, H. H. Sugar beet diseases. Ann. Appl. Biol.26: 402–404. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  291. Stone, R. E. Root rot and blight of canning peas. [Abstr]. Phytopath.13: 293. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  292. —. Preliminary investigations on the root rot and blight of canning peas. Sci. Agr.4: 239–241. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  293. Streets, R. B. Phymatotrichum (Cotton or Texas) root rot in Arizona. Ariz. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull.71: 299–410. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  294. Strong, F. C. andStrong, M. C. Investigations on the black root of strawberry. Phytopath.21: 1041–1061. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  295. Taubenhaus, J. J. and Dana, B. F. The influence of moisture and temperature on cotton root rot Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 386.

  296. -et al. Relation of cotton root rot andFusarium wilt to the acidity and alkalinity of the soil. Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 389. 1928.

  297. —— Sulphur barriers and graminaceous crop barriers to prevent spread ofPhymatotrichum root rot [Abstr.] Phytopath.22: 26. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  298. -,- A rating of plants with reference to their relative resistance or susceptibility toPhymatotrichum root rot. Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 545. 1937.

  299. -.and Killough, D. F. Texas root rot of cotton and methods of its control. Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 306. 1923.

  300. Thomas, H. E. Root and crown injury of apple trees. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 448. 1926.

  301. -. Production of strawberriea in California. Cal. Circ. 113. 1939.

  302. —et al. Dematophora root rot. [Abstr]. Phytopath.24: 1145. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  303. — andLawyer, L. O. The use of carbon disulphide in the control ofArmillaria root rot. [Abstr]. Phytopath.29: 827–828. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  304. Thornberry, H. H. andAnderson, H. W. Pink-root disease of onions on tomatoes. Plant Dis. Rep.24: 383–384. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  305. Tilford, P. E. Calla lily root rot and its control. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bi. Bull.157: 138–140. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  306. Tims, E. C. An actinomycete antagonistic to aPythium root parasite of sugar cane. Phytopath.22: 27. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  307. Tompkins, C. M. andMiddleton, J. T. Root rot ofRanunculus asiaticus caused byPythium deBaryanum. [Abstr]. Phytopath.29: 828. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  308. —et al. Phytophthora rot of sugar beet. Jour. Agr. Res.52: 205–216. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  309. —et al. A Phytophthora root rot of cauliflower. [Abstr]. Phytopath.25: 893–894. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  310. —et al. Phytophthora root rot of cauliflower. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 685–692. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  311. ——. Foot rot of China aster, annual stock and Transvaal daisy caused byPhytophthora cryptogea. Jour. Agr. Res.55: 563–574. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  312. Tompkins, C. M. andMiddleton, J. T. Root rot of pepper and pumpkin caused byPhytophthora capsici. Jour. Agr. Res.63: 417–426. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  313. Trotter, A. “Cancrena Pedale” del Peperone e Melanzana Nella Campania (Capsicum annuum e Solanum Melongena). Riv. Pat. Veg.14: 125–130. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  314. Truscott, J. H. L. Fungous root rots of the strawberry. Can. Jour. Res.11: 1–17. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  315. Tucker, C. M. Report of the plant pathologist. Puerto Rico Agr. Exp. Sta., Rep. 1927: 25–27.

  316. -. Report of the plant pathologist. Puerto Rico Agr. Exp. Sta., Rep. 1928: 29–35.

  317. -. Report of the plant pathologist. Puerto Rico Agr. Exp. Sta., Rep. 1929: 24–25.

  318. -. The distribution of the genusPhytophthora. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 184. 1933.

  319. Tunstall, A. C. Notes on some fungus diseases prevalent during season of 1922. Quart. Jour. Sci. Dept. Indian Tea Assoc.3: 115–123. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  320. Turner, T. W. Pathogenicity ofSclerotium rolfsii for young apple trees. [Abstr]. Phytopath.26: 11. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  321. Valleau, W. D. et al. Root rot of tobacco in Kentucky and its control. Ky. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.262: 157–180. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  322. Vasudeva, R. S. Studies on the root-rot disease of cotton in the Punjab. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.5: 496–512. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  323. —. Studies on the root disease of cotton in the Punjab. II. Some studies in the physiology of the causal fungi. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.6: 904–916. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  324. —. Studies on the root-rot disease of cotton in the Punjab. III. The effect of some physical and chemical factors on sclerotia formation. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.7: 259–270. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  325. — Studies on the root-rot disease of cotton in the Punjab. IV. The effect of certain factors influencing incidence of the disease. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.7: 575–587. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  326. — andRafique, M. Studies on the root-rot disease of cotton in the Punjab. VI. Chemical composition of healthy and diseased cotton plants. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.9: 331–342. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  327. —andAshraf, M. Studies on the root-rot disease of cotton in the Punjab. VII. Further investigation of factors influencing incidence of the disease. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.9: 595–608. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  328. Von Schrenk, H. A root rot of apple trees caused byThelephora galactina Fr. Bot. Gaz.34: 65. 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  329. -and Spaulding, P. Diseases of deciduous forest trees. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Bull. 149. 1909.

  330. Wager, V. A. Diseases of plants in South Africa due to members of the Pythiaceae. So. African Dept. Agr., Bull. 105. 1931.

  331. Walker, J. C. andMusbach, F. L. Effect of moisture, fertility and fertilizer placement on root rot of canning peas. Jour. Agr. Res.59: 579–590. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  332. -and Snyder, W. C. Pea wilt and root rots. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 424. 1933.

  333. Walters, E. A. Report on the Agricultural Department, St. Lucia, 1934.

  334. Weber, G. F. Blight of peppers in Florida caused byPhytophthora capsici. Phytopath.22: 775–780. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  335. Weimer, J. L. Root rot of Austrian winter peas and vetches. [Abstr]. Phytopath.30: 708. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  336. Weindling, R. Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other soil fungi. Phytopath.22: 837–845. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  337. — andFawcett, H. S. Experiments in the control ofRhizoctonia damping-off of citrus seedlings. Hilgardia10: 1–16. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  338. West, P. M. andHildebrand, A. A. The microbiological balance of strawberry root rot soil as related to the rhizosphere and decomposition effects of certain cover crops. Can. Jour. Res. C19: 199–210. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  339. White, R. P. Rhododendron wilt and root rot. N. J. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 615. 1937.

  340. Wilcox, E. M. A rhizomorphic root rot of fruit trees. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 49. 1901.

  341. Woodward, R. C. andDillon-Weston, W. A. R. Treatment of sugar beet seed to prevent seedling diseases. Ann. Appl. Biol.16: 542–566. 1929.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  342. Wright, J. Root rot of coco-yams. Gold Coast Dept. Agr., Year-Book 1930 (Bull.23): 184–197.

  343. Young, H. C. Soil conditions affecting sugar beets. Sugar Beet Jour.5: 127–129. 1940. [Abstr. in Facts About Sugar35: 36. 1940.]

    Google Scholar 

  344. Young, P. A. Soil fumigation with chloropicrin and carbon bisulfide to control tomato root knot and wilt. Phytopath.30: 860–865. 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  345. Young, W. J. Clover root rots and powdery mildew. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Mo. Bull.8: 157–160. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  346. Zeller, S. M. A strawberry disease caused byRhizoctonia. Ore. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 295. 1932.

  347. Zinssmeister, C. L. Ramularia root rot of ginseng. Phytopath.8: 557–571. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  348. Zutavern. Wurzelbrand bei Rüben. Deuts. Landw. Preuss.53: 342. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dominion Laboratory of Plant Pathology, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

    G. H. Berkeley

Authors
  1. G. H. Berkeley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Contribution No. 727, Botany and Plant Pathology, Science Service, Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berkeley, G.H. Root-rots of certain non-cereal crops. Bot. Rev 10, 67–123 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861087

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861087

Keywords

Search

Navigation