Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison ofEichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae) andSphagnum quinquefarium (Sphagnaceae) in treatment of acid mine water

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tests were conducted under greenhouse conditions to evaluate the ability of Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae) and Sphagnum quinquefarium (Sphagnaceae) to ameliorate acid mine water discharged from coal operations. In addition, the survivorship and growth rate ofE. crassipes (water-hyacinth), cultured in toxic acid mine water, were determined. The results of both short-and long-term studies indicated thatE. crassipes readily reduced levels of heavy metals in acid mine water while the plants exhibited few signs of toxicity. Patterns of reduction of pollutants, for bothE. crassipes andS. quinquefarium indicated that treatment efficiency could be improved by the periodic harvesting of plants. It is suggested that the ease with which water-hyacinths can be introduced into wetlands and harvested cannot be economically duplicated with other plants currently in use in treating acid mine water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • APHA (American Public Health Association). 1975. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 14th ed. APHA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, R. K., and R. C. Reed. 1979. Aquaculture systems for wastewater treatments: seminar proceedings and engineering assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 430/9-80-006.

  • Chan, E., T. A. Bursztynsk, W. Hantzsche, and Y. J. Litwin. 1982. The use of wetlands for water pollution control. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 600/2-82-086.

  • Chigbo, F. E., R. W. Smith, and F. L. Shore. 1982. Uptake of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury from polluted waters by the water hyacinthEichhornia crassipes. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A. 0143-1471/82/0027-0031.

  • Deason, T. R., and H. C. Bold. 1960. Phycological studies I. Exploratory studies of Texas soil algae. Univ. Texas Publ. 6022.

  • Dinges, R. 1976. Water hyacinth culture for wastewater treatment. Texas Dept. Health, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englemann, M. H., and T. E. Weaks. 1985. An analysis of the effects of strip-mining disturbance on bryophyte species diversity. Bryologist 88:344–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghin, Y. B. 1979. A preliminary study on the use of water hyacinth in the removal of heavy metals and BOD from industrial wastewaters. Presented at the Conference on Chemical Research in Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girts, M. A., and R. L. P. Kleinmann. 1986. Constructing wetlands for treatment of mine water: successes and failures. Pages 67-73in Symposium on surface mining, hydrology, sedimentology and reclamation. Univ. Kentucky, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, G. C. 1980. Use of water hyacinths in wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Health 43:80–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. E., and R. H. Kadlec. 1983. Design principles for wetland treatment systems. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 600/S2-83-026.

  • McDonald, R. C., and B. C. Wolverton. 1980. Comparative study of wastewater lagoon with and without water hyacinth. Econ. Bot. 34:101–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sculthorpe, C. D. 1967. The biology of aquatic vascular plants. Ballantyne and Co. Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C., and E. C. Aharrah. 1984. The influence of theTypha community on mine drainage. Pages 149-153in D. H. Graves, ed., Proceedings of 1984 symposium on surface mining, hydrology, sedimentology, and reclamation. University of Kentucky, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, J. E., and D. J. Wagner. 1984. Carbon balance for twoSphagnum mosses: Water balance resolves a physiological paradox. Ecology 65(6): 1765–1774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ueki, K., M. Ito, and Y. Oki. 1975. Water hyacinth and its habitats in Japan. Proceedings of the 5th Asian—Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Tokyo.

  • Villamil, J., R. Clements, M. Block, P. Weil, G. Garcia, W. Lao, L. Rosa, and F. Santos. 1979. Water hyacinths for the clarification of wastewaters and the production of energy. Report—Center for Energy and Environment Research. Univ. Puerto Rico, San Juan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitt, D. H., and N. G. Slack. 1975. An analysis of the vegetation ofSphagnum-dominated kettlehole bogs in relation to environmental gradients. Canad. J. Bot. 53(4):332–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieder, R. K., and G. E. Lang. 1982. Modification of acid mine drainage in a freshwater wetland. Pages 43-53in Symposium of wetlands of the unglaciated Appalachian Region, May 26–28. West Virginia Univ., Morgantown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, B. C. 1975. Water hyacinths and alligator weeds for final filtration of sewage. NASA Techn. Memorandum TM-X-72724.

  • —, and R. C. McDonald. 1979. Upgrading facultative wastewater lagoons with vascular aquatic plants. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 51:305–313.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, J. W., and J. D. Dodd. 1976. Growth of water hyacinths in treated sewage effluent. Econ. Bot. 30:29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falbo, M.B., Weaks, T.E. A Comparison ofEichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae) andSphagnum quinquefarium (Sphagnaceae) in treatment of acid mine water. Econ Bot 44, 40–49 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861065

Keywords

Navigation