Skip to main content
Log in

Critique on apomixis in sugarcane

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bremer, G. De cytologie van soortsbasta arden bijSaccharum. Vakblad v. Biolo gen26: 3–10. 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Darlington, C. D. Chromosome botany. London. 1956.

  3. Dutt, N. L., and J. T. Rao. Coimbatore canes in cultivation. 2nd ed. Indian Central Sugarcane Committee, New Delhi. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —, and K. S. Subba Rao. Observations on the cytology of the sugar cane. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 37–56. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Janaki Ammal, E. K. Intergeneric hybrids ofSaccharum. Jour. Genet.41: 217–253. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jayasekera, E. W. H. Techniques of seed and seedling production with sugar cane. Tropical Agr.112: 262–266. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Narayanaswami, S. Megasporogenesis and origin of triploids inSaccharum. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.10: 534–551. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nygren, A. Apomixis in the angiosperms. II. Bot. Review20: 577–649. 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parthasarathy, N. The probable origin of North Indian sugarcanes. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc. (M.O.P. Iyengar Coram. Vol.) : 133–150. 1946.

  10. Price, S. Cytological studies inSaccharum and allied genera. III. Chromosome numbers in interspecific hybrids. Bot. Gaz.118: 146–159. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raghavan, T. S. Cytogenetics in relation to sugarcane breeding. Cytologia19: 133–143. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  12. —. The bearing of certain recent cyto genetical findings on sugarcane breeding. Indian Acad. Sci., Sec. B., Proc.43: 100–109. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stevenson, G. C. The use of selfing and inbreeding with sugarcane. Internat. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. Cong., British West Indies, 1953. Proc.8: 509–520. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Subramanian, C. L. Cytological behaviour of certain parthenogenetic sugarcanes. Thesis submitted to Univ. of Madras [cited from Parthasarathy (9)].

  15. Yusuf, N. D., and N. L. Dutt. Photoperiod in relation to flowering in sugarcane. Current Sci. 14: 304–306. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution from a cooperative project of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Association and the United States Department of Agriculture. Published with the approval of the Director as Paper No. 54 in the Journal Series of the Experiment Station, H.S.P.A., Honolulu, Hawaii.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, S. Critique on apomixis in sugarcane. Econ Bot 13, 67–74 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860126

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860126

Keywords

Navigation