The Botanical Review

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 205–260 | Cite as

Plant morphology in its nomothetical aspects

  • S. V. Meyen
Interpreting Botanical Progress

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Alvin, K. &. W. G. Chaloner 1970. Parallel evolution in leaf venation: an alternative view of angiosperm origins. Nature226: 662–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arber, A. 1950. The natural philosophy of plant form. Cambridge Univ. Press, xiv + 247 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Arnott, H. J. 1959. Anastomoses in the venation ofGinkgo biloba. Amer. J. Bot.46: 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashby, E. 1948. Studies in the morphogenesis of leaves, I. An essay on leaf shape. New Phytol.47: 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee, M. 1969.Senotheca murulidihensis, a new glossopteridian fructification from India associated withGlossopteris taeniopteroides Feistmantel.In: J. Sen Memor. Volume, Calcutta (pp. 359–368).Google Scholar
  6. Banks, H. P. 1968. The early history of land plants.In: Evolution and environment, New Haven & London (pp. 73–107).Google Scholar
  7. Barthel, M. 1968. “Pecopterisfeminaeformis (Schlotheim) Sterzel und “Araucaritesspiciformis Andrae in Germar —Coenopterideen des Stephans und Unteren Perm. Paläont. Abh.B 2: 727–742.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, C. B. 1967.Eddya sullivanensis, gen. et sp. nov., plant of Gymnospermic morphology from the Upper Devonian of New York. Palaeontographica121B: 1–22.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, C. B. 1970. The appearance of gymnospermous structure. Biol. revs. Cambridge Phil. Soc.45: 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beloussov, L. V. 1971. Problems of the embryonic raise of forms. Moscow Univ., 173 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  11. Berg, L. S. 1922. Nomogenesis or evolution determined by law. Trudy Geograph. Inst. 1, 306 pp. (in Russian; English translation, 1969, MIT Press, Mass.).Google Scholar
  12. Bharadwaj, D. C. 1960-1962. The miospore genera in the coals of Raniganj stage (Upper Permian), India. Palaeobotanist9: 68–106.Google Scholar
  13. Blacher, L. Ya. 1961. The so-called idealistic morphology and its place in the history of the morphological sciences. Trudy Inst. Istorii Estestvozn. i techniki Acad. Nauk SSSR36(8): 3–52 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  14. Bocheńsky, T. 1960. Evolution of pinnule venation in the Carboniferous seed ferns Alethopterides (Alethopteris andLonchopteris) and the meaning of pinnule venation analysis for diagnosis of species. Prace Inst. Geol. Warszawa20: 1–42 (English summary).Google Scholar
  15. Bonotto, S. & R. T. Kirchman 1971. Sur un type particulier de morphogenèse anormale chezAcetabularia crenulata. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg.104: 5–12.Google Scholar
  16. Boureau, Ed. 1964. Traité de paléobotanique. T. III, Sphenophyta. Noeggera-thiophyta. Masson & Cie, Paris, 544 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Boureau, Ed. 1971. Les Sphénophytes. Biologie et histoire évolutive. Librairie Vuibert, Paris, 167 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Bower, F. O. 1923–1928. The ferns (Filicales). V. 1–3. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Chaloner, W. G. 1970. The rise of the first land plants. Biol. revs. Cambridge Phil. Soc.45: 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cope, E. D. 1868. The origin of genera. Proc. Philad. Acad. Nat. Sci. 20.Google Scholar
  21. Cronquist, A. 1963. The taxonomic significance of evolutionary parallelism. SIDA Contribs. Bot.1: 109–116.Google Scholar
  22. Cronquist, A. 1965. The status of the general system of classification of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.52: 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cronquist, A. 1968. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Houghton Mifflin. Boston.Google Scholar
  24. Darwin, Ch. 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. Vol. 1, 2. J. Murray, London, 411 + 486 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Esau, K. 1965. Plant anatomy. 2nd. ed., John Wiley, N.Y.Google Scholar
  26. Fedorov, Al. A. 1958. Teratogenesis and its significance for form and species formation in plants.In: Problema vida v botanike, I, Izdat. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad (pp. 213–292) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  27. Fedorov, Al. A. 1960. Peculiarities of flowering and degree of variation in some bell-flowers.In: Voprosy evolucii, biogeogr., genet. i select., Isdat. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Moskow-Leningrad (pp. 289–301) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  28. Filin, V. R. 1967. On intraspecific polymorphism of spores of pteridophytes. I. Species, showing deviations during spore formation. Vestnik Mosc. Univ., biol., potchvoved.4: 65–73 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  29. Florin, R. 1931. Untersuchungen zur Stammesgeschichte der Coniferales und Cordaiten. I. Morphologie und Epidermisstruktur der Assimilationsorgane bei den rezenten Koniferen. Kgl. sv. Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. Ser. 3,10: 1–588.Google Scholar
  30. George, T. N. 1958. The concept of homoeomorphy (a centenary lecture). Proc. Geologists’ Assoc.73: 9–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goebel, K. 1928. Organographie der Pflanzen insbesondere der Archegoniaten und Samenpflanzen. Teil I. Allgemeine Organographie. 3. Auflage, ix + 1–642 pp., Jena.Google Scholar
  32. Goebel, K. 1930. Organographie der Pflanzen insbesondere der Archegoniaten und Samenpflanzen. 2. Teil. Bryophyten-Pteridophyten. 3. Auflage, × + 643–1376 pp., Jena.Google Scholar
  33. Goebel, K. 1933. Organographie der Pflanzen insbesondere der Archegoniaten und Samenpflanzen. 3. Teil. Samenpflanzen. 3. Auflage, × + 1379–2078 pp., Jena.Google Scholar
  34. Groom, P. 1908. Longitudinal symetry in Phanerogamia. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 200B: 57–115.Google Scholar
  35. Gurwitsch, A. G. 1944. The theory of biological field. Sov. Nauka, Moscow, 155 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  36. Hall, J. W. & B. M. Stidd 1971. Ontogeny ofVesicaspora, a late Pennsylvanian pollen grain. Palaeontology4: 431–436.Google Scholar
  37. Harris, T. M. 1935. The fossil flora of Scoresby Sound, East Greenland. Pt. 4. Ginkgoales, coniferales, lycopodiales and isolated fructifications. Medd. om Grønland112: 1–176.Google Scholar
  38. Heidenhain, W. 1932. Die Spaltungsgesetze der Blätter. Jena.Google Scholar
  39. Hughes, S. J. 1971. Percurrent proliferations in fungi, algae, and mosses. Can. J. Bot.49: 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kanaev, I. I. 1963. Essay on the history of comparative anatomy before Darwin. Development of the problem of morphological type in zoology. Isdat. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 299 pp., (in Russian).Google Scholar
  41. Kanaev, I. I. 1966. Essay on the history of problem of morphological type since Darwin up to the present days. Nauka, Moscow, 210 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  42. Korobkov, A. A. & V. R. Filin 1967. Polymorphism of spores inLycopodium selago var.appressum Desv. Vestnik Mosc. Univ., biol., potchvoved.6: 76–83 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  43. Krassilov, V. A. 1971. Evolution and systematics of Coniferae (a critical review). Paleontol. J.1: 7–20 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  44. Kremp, G. O. W. 1965. Morphologic encyclopedia of palynology. Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  45. Krenke, N. P. 1933-1935. Somatische Indikatoren und Faktoren der Form-bildung.In: Phänogenetische Variabilität, Abh. Abt. für Phytomorphogenese, Inst. für Biol. I. Bd., Moskau (pp.411–415) (in Russian, German Summary).Google Scholar
  46. Kuprianova, L. A. 1969. On the evolutionary levels in the pollen and spore morphology. Bot. J.54: 1502–1512 (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
  47. Kuptsov, A. I. 1960. Parallelism in variation in systematically remote plant species.In: Voprosy evolucii, biogeogr., genet. i select., Isdat. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad (pp. 119–124) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  48. Laubenfels, D. J. de 1953. The external morphology of coniferous leaves. Phytomorphology3: 1–20.Google Scholar
  49. Leavitt, R. G. 1909. A vegetative mutant, and the principle of homoeosis in plants. Bot. Gaz.47: 30–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leisman, G. A. & J. L. Bucher 1971. Variability inCalam ocarpon insignis from the American Carboniferous. J. Paleontol.45: 494–501.Google Scholar
  51. Leppik, E. E. 1969a. Directional trend of floral evolution. Acta biotheoret.18: 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leppik, E. E. 1969b. Homologous and analogous series in the evolution of flower types. Genetics5(5): 12–23(in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
  53. Lubischew, A. A. 1925. On the nature of hereditary factors (a critical study). Bull. Inst. Rech. Biol. Univ. Perm, 4, suppl. 1, 142 pp. (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
  54. Lubischew, A. A. 1962. On the conception of comparative anatomy.In: Voprosy obschei zool. i med. parazitol., Biomedgiz, Moscow (pp. 189–214) (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
  55. Lubischew, A. A. 1963. On some contradictions in general taxonomy and evolution. Evolution17: 414–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lubischew, A. A. 1966. Systematics and evolution.In: Vnutrividovaia izmentchivost nazemnych pozvonochnych zhivotnych i microevolutsia. Sverdlovsk (pp. 45–57) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  57. Lubischew, A. A. 1968. Problems of systematics.In: Vorontsov N. N. (ed.) Problems of evolution, Novosibirsk (pp. 7–29) (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
  58. Luss, A. I. 1935. Vegetative mutations.In: Theoretitcheskie osnovy selekcii rastenij, 1, Moscow-Leningrad (pp. 215–292) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  59. Mamay, S. H. 1954. A new Sphenopsid cone from Jowa. Ann. Bot.18: 230–239.Google Scholar
  60. Mayr, E. 1965. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Harvard Univ. Press, L., Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  62. Melville, R. 1969. Leaf venation patterns and the origin of the angiosperms. Nature224: 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Melville, R. 1970. Reply to criticism of hypothesis of leaf venation and angiosperm origins. Nature226: 663–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Melville, R. 1971. Some general principles of leaf evolution. S. Afr. J. Sci.67: 310–316.Google Scholar
  65. Meyen, S. V. 1966. Cordaiteans of the Upper Paleozoic of North Eurasia (morphology, epidermal structure, systematics and stratigraphical significance). Trudy Geol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR150: 5–184 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  66. Meyen, S. V. 1969. Angara members of Gondwana genusBarakaria and its systematical position. Argumenta Palaeobotanica3: 1–14.Google Scholar
  67. Meyen, S. V. 1970a. Epidermisuntersuchungen an permischen Landpflanzen des Angaragebietes. Paläontol. Abh.B3: 523–552.Google Scholar
  68. Meyen, S. V. 1970b. Some theoretical problems of modern palaeobotany. Palaeont. J.4: 3–15 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  69. Meyen, S. V. 1971a. Modern paleobotany and the theory of evolution. Priroda2: 48–57 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  70. Meyen, S. V. 1971b. Parallelism and its significance for the systematics of fossil plants. Geophytology1: 34–47.Google Scholar
  71. Meyen, S. V. 1971c.Phyllotheca-like plants from the Upper Palaeozoic flora of Angaraland. Palaeontographica133B: 1–33.Google Scholar
  72. Meyen, S. V. 1972. The main problems of the paleofloristics of the Carboniferous and Permian.In: Itogi nauki i techniki. Stratigr. i paleontol. 3, Moscow (pp. 94–107) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  73. Meyen, S. V. & A. V. Gomanjkov 1971. New data on systematics ofPhylladoderma and its geographical distribution. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR,198(3): 182–185 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  74. Mogutcheva, N. K. 1969. On elements of the Mesophyte in the Early Triassic flora of Tungusska depression. Trudy Sibirsk. nauchno-issled. Inst. geol., geophys. i miner. syria84: 91–93 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  75. Muller, H. J. 1939. Reversibility ih evolution considered from the standpoint of genetics. Biol. Revs. Cambridge Philos. Soc.14: 161–280.Google Scholar
  76. Namboodiri, K. K. & Ch. B. Beck 1968. A comparative study of the primary vascular system of Conifers. I. Genera with helical phyllotaxis. II. Genera with opposite and whorled phyllotaxis. III. Stelar evolution in Gymnosperms. Amer. J. Bot.55: 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pant, D. D. 1958. The structure of some leaves and fructifications of the Glossopteris flora Tanganyika. Bull. Brit. Mus. (nat. hist.),3: 125–175.Google Scholar
  78. Pant, D. D. 1965. On the ontogeny of stomata and other homologous structures. Plant Science Series, 1, Allahabad, 24 pp.Google Scholar
  79. Pant, D. D. & B. Mehra 1962. Studies in Gymnospermous plants.Cycas Allahabad, 179 pp.Google Scholar
  80. Pant, D. D. & B. Mehra 1963. On a cycadophyte leaf,Pteronilssonia gopalii gen. et sp. nov., from the Lower Gondwanas of India. Palaeontographica113B: 126–134.Google Scholar
  81. Pant, D. D., B. Mehra, & G. K. Srivastava 1962. The genusIsoetes in India. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India28: 242–280.Google Scholar
  82. Penzig, O. 1921–1922. Pflanzen-Teratologie. Bd. I. 1921. iii-xvi + i-xi + 283 pp. Bd. II. 1921. 548 pp. Bd. III. 1922. 624 pp.Google Scholar
  83. Pettitt, J. M. 1966. Exine structures in some fossil and recent spores and pollen as revealed by light and electron microscopy. Bull. Brit. Mus. (nat. hist.), Geol.13: 221–257.Google Scholar
  84. Philiptschenko, J. A. 1924. On parallelism in living nature. Uspechi experiment. biol.3(3-4): 242–258.Google Scholar
  85. Potonie, H. 1912. Grundlinien der Pflanzen-Morphologie im Lichte der Paläontologie. Gustav Fischer, Jena. vii + 259 pp.Google Scholar
  86. Rosanova, M. A. 1932. An attempt of the analytical monograph of the conspeciesRanunculus auricomus Korsch. Trav. Inst. Sci. Nat. Peterhof,8: 18–148 (in Russian, German summary).Google Scholar
  87. Roy, S. K. 1963. The variation of organs of individual plants. J. Genet.58: 147–176.Google Scholar
  88. Sahni, B. 1933. On some abnormal leaves ofGinkgo. J. Ind. Bot. Soc.12: 50–55.Google Scholar
  89. Scheckler, S. E. & H. P. Banks 1971. Anatomy and relationships of some Devonian progymnosperms from New York. Amer. J. Bot.58: 737–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schweitzer, H.-J. 1972. Die Mitteldevon-Flora von Lindlar (Rheinland). 3. Filicinae —Hyenia elegans Kräusel & Weyland. Palaeontographica137B: 154–175.Google Scholar
  91. Serebrjakov, I. G. 1952. Morphology of vegetative organs of higher plants. Sov. Nauka, Moscow, 391 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  92. Seybold, A. 1927. Untersuchungen über die Formgestaltung der Blätter der Augiospermen. I. Bibliotheca genetica 12.Google Scholar
  93. Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia Univ. Press, N.Y., xii + 247 pp.Google Scholar
  94. Sinnott, E. W. 1960. Plant morphogenesis. McGraw-Hill. N.Y.-Toronto-L.Google Scholar
  95. Sladkov, A. N. 1967. Introduction to spore and pollen analysis. Nauka, Moscow, 269 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  96. Stebbins, G. L.Jr. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columb. Univ. Press, N.Y., xx + 643 pp.Google Scholar
  97. Stockmarr, J. 1970. Species identification ofUlmus pollen. Dan geol. unders. (4)4: 1–19.Google Scholar
  98. Svetlov, P. G. 1962. Contribution to an analysis of the concepts of parallelism and convergence.In: Voprosy obschei zool. i med. parazitol., Biomedgiz, Moscow (pp. 215–228) (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
  99. Takhtajan, A. L. 1954. The problems of the evolutionary morphology of plants. Leningr. Univ., 214 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  100. Takhtajan, A. L. 1956. Higher plants. I. From psilophytes to conifers. Isdat. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 488 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  101. Takhtajan, A. L. 1964. Foundations of the evolutionary morphology of angiosperms. Nauka, Moscow-Leningrad, 236 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  102. Takhtajan, A. L. 1970. The origin and dispersion of flowering plants. Nauka, Leningrad, 146 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  103. Tansley, A. G. 1948. The nature and range of variation in the floral symmetry ofPotentilla erecta (L.) Hampe. New Phytol.47: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Thompson, D’Arcy W. 1942. On growth and form. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1116 pp.Google Scholar
  105. Townrow, J. A. 1969. Some Lower Mesozoic Podocarpaceae and Araucariaceae.In: Gondwana Stratigr. IUGS Symposium, Buenos Aires, 1967, UNESCO, Paris (pp. 159–184).Google Scholar
  106. Troll, W. 1935. Vergleichende Morphologie der Fiederblätter. Nova Acta Leopold., N. F.2: 315–455.Google Scholar
  107. Troll, W. 1937-1939. Vergleichende Morphologie der höhern Pflanzen. I. Bd. Vegetationsorgane. Teil I. 1937, xii + 955 pp.; Teil II, 1939, v + 2005 pp. 946. Verl. V. G. Borntraeger. Berlin.Google Scholar
  108. Urmantsev, Y. A. 1968. Polymorphism and isomorphism in living and inanimate nature. Voprosy philosophii12: 77–88.Google Scholar
  109. Urmantsev, Y. A. 1970. Isomery in living nature. I. Theory. Bot. J.55: 153–169. (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
  110. Urmantsev, Y. A. 1971. Symmetry. Biological space.In: Prostranstvo, vremja, dvizhenie, Nauka, Moscow (pp. 126–166, 216–231) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  111. Urmantsev, Y. A. 1972a. An attempt of an axiomatic construction of the General System Theory.In: Systems Research, Yearbook 1971, Nauka, Moscow (pp. 128–152) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  112. Urmantsev, Y. A. 1972b. What must be, what may be, what may not be for systems.In: Razvitie koncepcii structurnych urovnej v biologii, Nauka, Moscow (pp. 294–304) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  113. van Steenis, C. G. G. J. 1969. Plant speciation in Malesia with special reference to the theory of non-adaptive, saltatory evolution. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.1: 97–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Vassilczenko, I. T. 1970. On genetic and taxonomic significance of modifications in plants. Bot. J.55: 357–363 (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
  115. Vavilov, N. I. 1922. The law of homologous series in variation. J. Genet.12: 47–89 (Amplified Russian editionin: 1967. Selected papers, I, Nauka, Leningrad, pp. 7–61).Google Scholar
  116. Vavilov, N. I. (1931) 1967. Linnean species as a system.In: Selected papers, I, Nauka, Leningrad (pp. 62–87) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  117. Velenovský, J. 1905–1907. Vergleichende Morphologie der Pflanzen. Teil I-III. Prag, 1211 pp.Google Scholar
  118. Vernadsky, V. I. 1965. Chemical structure of the Earth’s biosphere and its surroundings. Nauka, Moscow, 355 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  119. Waddington, C. H. 1962. New patterns in genetics and development. Columb. Univ. Press. N.Y. & L.Google Scholar
  120. Wardlaw, C. W. 1952. Morphogenesis in plants. Methuen’s Monogr. Biol. Subjects, L. & N.Y., xi + 175 pp.Google Scholar
  121. Went, F. W. 1971. Parallel evolution. Taxon20: 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zavarzin, G. A. 1969. Incompatibility of characters and theory of biological system. Zhurnal obschei biologii30: 33–41 (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
  123. Zimmermann, W. 1959. Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, xxiv + 777 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. V. Meyen
    • 1
  1. 1.Geological InstituteUSSR Academy of ScienceMoscow 17

Personalised recommendations