Skip to main content
Log in

The mis-measure of manioc (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae)

Medida Erronea de la Yuca (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae)

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distinction between “bitter” and “sweet” (toxic and non-toxic) varieties of the cyanide-containing food crop manioc (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae) has a long tradition in the tropical forest areas of South and Central America where it was first cultivated. Yet this distinction has no taxonomic basis. The levels of cyanogenic glucosides found in manioc varieties not only vary widely, but do not correspond with any other known morphological or ecological feature. Nonetheless, these two “varieties” are commonly reported to have distinct geographical and cultural distributions and each is associated with a particular traditional food complex. This paper reviews the literature regarding the nature, distribution, and traditional uses of manioc varieties and concludes that (1) the geographical and cultural distribution of bitter and sweet varieties of manioc may not be as distinct as has been thought; (2) traditional categories of bitter and sweet manioc may stem more from culturally derived belief systems than from actual known levels of toxicity; and (3) the choice of complex and labor intensive processing methods usually associated with bitter manioc may not be required for detoxification but rather for the derived food products, particularly manioc flour.

Resumen

La diferenciación entre las variedades de la yuca (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae) “amarga” y “dulce” (tóxico o no tóxico) han sido una tradición de muchos siglos para este articulo de cultivo principal (que contiene cianuro) de los habitantes autóctonos de las selvas tropicales de A mìrica del Sur y Central. Hasta ahora, la diferenciación no ha sido en bases a las caracterìsticas taxonomicas. Los nivel’s de glucósidos de cianuro encontrados en las variedades de la yuca no solamente varían mucho pero ni corresponden a las características morfológicas o ecológicas. Sin embargo, estas dos “variedades” han sido renombradas por tener distribuciónes geográficas y culturales diff’rentes según la ubicación, y cada una corresponde a un sistema de agricultura tradicional de las poblaciones Indigenas. Este trabajo revisa la literatura sobre las caracteristicas, distribución y usos tradicionales de las dos variedades de yuca y concluye que (1) la distribución geográfica y cultural de las variedades de; yuca amarga y dulce no son tan clams como la literatura ha presentado; (2) las categorías tradicional de la yuca amarga y dulce puede ser un producto más derivado de los sistemas de creencia culturalmente definidos que del grado real de toxicidad; y (3) la selección de los m’todos de procesamiento complejos y entensivos normalmente asociados con la yuca amarga parece que no es requerido para la destoxificación sino para el tipo de productos derivados de esta, particularmenta la harina de yuca.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Carneiro, R. L. 1983. The cultivation of manioc among the Kuikuru of the Upper Xingu. Pages 65–111in R. Hames and W. Vickers, ed., Adaptive responses of native Amazonians. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIAT. 1977. Proceedings of the 4th symposium tropical root crops. Centro International de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charavanapavan, C. 1944. Studies in manioc and lima-beans with special reference to their utilization as harmless food. Trop. Agric. (Ceylon) 100:164–168.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cock, J. H. 1973. Cyanide toxicity in relation to the Cassava Research Program of CIAT in Colombia. Pages 37–40in B. Nestel and R. MacIntyre, ed., Chronic cassava toxicity: proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. Cassava, new potential for a neglected crop. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, R. D. 1978. An enzymatic assay for the total cyanide content of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). J. Sci. Food Agric. 29:345–352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coursey, D. G. 1973. Cassava as food: toxicity and technology. Pages 27–36in B. Nestel and R. Maclntyre, ed., Chronic cassava toxicity: proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and D. Halliday. 1974. Cassava as animal feed. Outlook on Agriculture 8(l):10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn, G. H. 1973. The cyanogenic character of cassava (Manihot esculenta). Pages 43–48in B. Nestel and R. Maclntyre, ed., Chronic cassava toxicity: proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, G. 1978. The use of manioc among the Kuikuru: some interpretations. Pages 217–247in R. I. Ford, ed., The nature and status of ethnobotany. Anthropol. Pap. Mus. Anthropol. Univ. Michigan 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D. L. 1983. Nutrition in the northwest Amazon: household dietary intake and time-energy expenditure. Pages 329–355in R. Hames and W. Vickers, ed., Adaptive responses of native Amazonians. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. Manioc as a dietary staple: implications for the budgeting of time and energy in the northwest Amazon. Pages 1–20in D. J. Cattle and K. H. Schwerin, ed., Food energy in tropical ecosystems. Gordon and Breach, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. Cyanide content of cassava (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae) cultivars used by Tukanoan Indians in northwest Amazonia. Econ. Bot. 42:255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. R. 1975. Protein capture and cultural development in the Amazon Basin. Amer. Anthropol. 77(3):526–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. B., and W. T. Vickers. 1983. Introduction. Pages 1–26in R. B. Hames and W. T. Vickers, ed., Adaptive responses of native Amazonians. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, A. W. R., and D. G. Pandittesekere. 1944. Investigations on the hydrocyanic acid content of manioc. Trop. Agric. (Ceylon) 100:150–163.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, P. A., J. S. Ingram, M. Y. Lim, and D. G. Coursey. 1982. Traditional cassava-based foods: survey of processing techniques. Econ. Bot. 36:12–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. 1963. The use of wild plants in tropical South America. Pages 465–486in J. H. Steward, ed., Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. 6. Cooper Square, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowie, R. H. 1963. The tropical forests: an introduction. Pages 1–15in J. H. Steward, ed., Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. 3. Cooper Square, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. H., and G. Gomez. 1973. Implications of cyanide toxicity in animal feeding studies using high cassava rations. Pages 113–120in B. Nestel and R. Maclntyre, ed., Chronic cassava toxicity: proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. W., and R. M. Ruberte. 1979. Edible leaves of the tropics, 2nd ed. Mayaguez Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemoto, Y. 1940. Toxicity of bread prepared with grated manioc flour containing hydrocyanic acid. Rev. Aliment. Chim. Indust. 4:5–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onwueme, I. C. 1978. The tropical tuber crops. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purseglove, J. W. 1968. Tropical crops: dicotyledons. 2 vol. Longmans, Green, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, W. D., W. Jojo, and Z. Nicodemus. 1941. The nutritive value of some Tanganyika foods. II-Cassava. E. African Agric. J. 6:154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renvoize, B. S. 1972. The area of origin ofManihot esculenta as a crop plant: a review of the evidence. Econ. Bot. 26:352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. J. 1965. Some botanical and ethnological considerations ofManihot esculenta. Econ. Bot. 19:369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and H. S. Hemming. 1973. A monograph ofManihot esculenta—with an explanation of the taximetric methods used. Econ. Bot. 27:1–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, A. C. 1980. Parmana: prehistoric maize and manioc subsistence along the Amazon and Orinoco. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. 1963. Cultivated plants of South and Central America. Pages 487–543in J. H. Steward, ed., Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. 6. Cooper Square, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwerin, K. H. 1985. Food crops in the tropics. Pages 255–285in D. J. Cattle and K. H. Schwerin, ed., Food energy in tropical ecosystems. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seerley, R. W., D. J. Rogers, and F. C. Obioha. 1972. Biochemical properties and nutritive value of cassava. Pages 99–130in C. H. Hendershott, ed., A literature review and research recommendations on cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). University of Georgia, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. H. 1963. South American cultures. Pages 698–717in J. H. Steward, ed., Handbook of South’American Indians, Vol. 6. Cooper Square, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ed. 1963. Handbook of South American Indians. 7 vol. Cooper Square, New York. (First published 1946–1959 by U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaman, R. R., and P. M. Thomas. 1985. Cassava and change in Pacific Island food systems. Pages 189–218in D. J. Cattle and K. H. Schwerin, ed., Food energy in tropical ecosystems. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nye, M.M. The mis-measure of manioc (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae). Econ Bot 45, 47–57 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860049

Keywords

Navigation