Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 397–408 | Cite as

Use of paintings from the 16th to 19th centuries to study the history of domesticated plants

  • A. C. Zeven
  • W. A. Brandenburg
Article

Abstract

Paintings produced in Flanders and Holland from the 16th to the 19th centuries are useful sources for a study of the evolution of domesticated crops. They show many types of vegetables, fruits, and ornamentals that are either not described or scantly mentioned in the literature of that period. So we come across “really red” cabbage, which may have been calledroosken, and cauliflower with stems some 25 cm long. We further notice many colour variants of grapes, study of which may well provide information on the variation present in the crop at the time. Spikes of wheat and barley were rarely depicted. The few spikes of wheat shown resemble the varietyZeeuwse Witte, a landrace replaced around 1900 Many paintings and illustrations by Flemish and Dutch artists have been distributed all over the world. These works can therefore be investigated in many places for information on the history of domesticated crops.

Keywords

Economic Botany Brassica Oleracea Domesticate Plant Cucurbita Pepo Juglans Regia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Banga, O. 1957 Origin of the European cultivated carrot; the development of the original European carrot material. Euphytica 6: 64–76.Google Scholar
  2. —. 1963 Main Types of the Western Carotene Carrot and Their Origin. Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle.Google Scholar
  3. Blunt, W. 1955 A tulip drawing of the twelfth century. The Daffodil and Tulip Yearbook 1955 p. 119 and reproduction. Collins, London.Google Scholar
  4. —. 1958 Early illustration of tulip. J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 83: 81–82.Google Scholar
  5. Brandenburg, W. A. 1981 Possible relationships between wild and cultivated carrots(Daunts carota L.) in the Netherlands. Kulturpflanze 29: 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodoens, R. 1554 Cruydeboeck. Antwerpen.Google Scholar
  7. Jongh, E. de. 1974 Grape symbolism in paintings of the 16th and 17th centuries. Simiolus 7: 166–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keimer, L. 1924 Die Pflanzen des Gottes Mir. Z. Aegypt. Sprache und Altertumskunde 59: 141–143.Google Scholar
  9. Piercy, H. J. B. 1963 The use and arrangement of daffodils and tulips in flower decoration. The Daffodil and Tulip Yearbook 1963 49–56.Google Scholar
  10. Segal, S. 1970 Boeket in Willet; Nederlandse Bloemstillevens in de Achttiende en Eerste Helft van de Negentiende Eeuw. Museum Willet Holthuysen, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. -. 1979 Jan Breughel de Oude—Bloemen in een Houten Kuip. Information paper of Museum Boymans-van Beuningen, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1980In M. van Boven, and S. Segal, Gerard en Cornells van Spaendonck; twee Brabantse bloemenschilders in Parijs. G. Schwartz, Maarssen.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1982. Een Bloemrijk Verleden; Overzicht van de Noord-en Zuid-Nederlandse Bloem-schilderkunst, 1600-Heden. Kunsthandel P. de Boer, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  14. -. 1982. The flower pieces of Roelandt Savery. Leids Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek—1982: 309–337.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1983. A Fruitful Past. A Survey of the Fruit Still-lifes of the Northern and Southern Netherlands from Brueghel till van Gogh. Gallery P. de Boer, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. —. 1983. Joris van Son, Nicolaes van Veerendael, Jan Weenix, p. 76–81, 86–93, 106–111.In Catalogue Gallery Hoogsteder-Naumann, the Hague-New York.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1983. Un bouquet de fleurs par Hans Bollongier. Revue Louvre et des Musùes de France 33: 370–372.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1984 Still-life by Middelburg painters.In N. Bakker, I. Bergstrom, G. Jansen, S. H. Levie, and S. Segal, Masters of Middleburg, p. 25–95. K. & V. Waterman, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. Small, E. 1978 A numerical taxonomic analysis of theDaucus carota complex. Canad. J. Bot. 56: 248–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilhelm, S., and J. E. Sagen. 1974 A History of the Strawberry, from Ancient Gardens to Modern Markets. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Zeven, A. C. 1979 Collecting genetic resources in highly industrialized Europe, especially the Netherlands.In A. C. Zeven and A. M. van Harten, ed, Broadening the Genetic Base of Crops, p. 49–58. Publication and Documentation Centre-PUDOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  22. —. 1984 Het gebruik van afbeeldingen voor de studie van gewashistorie. Tussen Rijn en Lek 18(3): 25–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Zeven
    • 1
  • W. A. Brandenburg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant BreedingAgricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Plant TaxonomyAgricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations