Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic modalities for Gastroesophageal Reflux

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective : To evaluate commonly utilized diagnostic modalities to detecting Gastroesophageal Reflux (GER).Methods : Sixty children aged 1–72 months (mean age 14.7 months) with symptoms suggestive of Gastroesosphageal Reflux (GER) were investigated and subjected to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and esophageal biopsy (EB), gastroesophageal scintiscanning (GS) and 24 hour ambulatory pH monitoring.Result : GER was detected in 28 (46.7 %) cases by one or more diagnostic modalities. Ambulatory 24 hour pH monitoring was positive in higher proportion (43.3 %) of cases in comparison to other modalities, followed by EB (38.3%) and GS (30%). Considering 24 hour pH monitoring as the gold standard, esophageal biopsy was positive in 22/26 cases (84.6%) detected by 24 hour pH monitoring with a specificity of 97.1% as compared to 17/26 cases (65.4%) by gastroesophageal scintiscanning with a specificity of 97.1%. When compared with EB results, amongst various parameters measured during 24 hour pH monitoring, Reflux index (Rl) ranked highest (sensitivity 95.6 % and specificity 89.2 %) followed by duration of longest episode > 20 minutes and Euler Byrne score. Oscillatory index, calculated from tracings of pH monitoring, even though ranked lower because of its low sensitivity helped to pick up 2 cases missed by EB and Rl.Conclusion : Our results suggest that a combination of diagnostic modalities may be required to diagnose GER in young children. Ambulatory 24 hour pH monitoring appears to be the single best investigation and combining it with EB and/or GS can help to detect maximum number of cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simeone D, Caria MC, Miele E, Staiano A. Treatment of childhood peptic esophagitis: A double-blind placebocontrolled trial of Nizatidine.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 25 : 51–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher RS, Malmud LS, Roberts GS, Lobis IF. Gastroesophageal (GE) scintiscanning to detect and quantitate reflux.Gastroenterology 1976; 70: 301–308.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A standardized protocol for the methodology of esophageal pH monitoring and interpretation of the data for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Working Group of the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1992; 14 : 467–471.

  4. Vandenplas Y, Lepoudre R, Helven R. Dependability of esophageal pH-monitoring data in infants on cutoff limits: The Oscillatory Index.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1990; 11: 304–309.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Piepsz A, Georges B, Perlmutter N, Rodesch P, Cadranel S. Gastro-oesphageal Scintiscanning in children.Pediatr Radiol 1981; 11: 71–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Isaacs PE, Martins JC, Edwards S, Fagg NL, Maisey MN, Sladen GE. Assessment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: comparison of reflux scintigraphy with endoscopy biopsy and esophageal pH monitoring.Hepatogastroenterology 1990; 37: 198–200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tolia V, Kuhns L, Kauffrnan RE. Comparison of simultaneous Esophageal pH monitoring and Scintigraphy in infants with Gastroessophageal Reflux.Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 661–664.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Young MA, Reynolds JC. Respiratory complications of Gastrointestinal diseases.Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1998; 27: 721–746.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frierson HF. Histology in the diagnosis of Reflux Esophagitis.Gastrenterol Clin North Am 1990; 19: 631–643.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jolley SG, Johnson DG, Herbst JJ, Pena A, Gamier R. An assessment of gastroesophageal reflux in children by extended pH monitoring of distal esophagus.Surgery 1978; 84: 16–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Euler AR, Byrne WJ. Twentyfour hour esophageal intraluminal pH probe testing: a comparative analysis.Gastroenterology 1981; 80: 957–961.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Newman LJ, Berezin S, San Fillipo JA, Halata M, Medow MS, Schwarz SM. A new ambulatory system for extended esophageal pH monitoring.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1985; 4: 707–710.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Saraswat VA, Dhiman RK, Mishra A, Naik SR. Correlation of 24-hour esophageal patterns with clinical features and endoscopy in gastroesophageal reflux disease.Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39: 199–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Twenty -four hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of acid refluxrelated cough.South Med J 1997; 90: 305–311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Andze GO, Brandt ML, St Vil D, Bensoussan AL, Blanchard H. Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in 500 children with respiratory symptoms: The value of pH monitoring.J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26: 295–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sondheimer JM. Continuous monitoring of distal esophageal pH: A diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux in infants.J Pediatr 1980; 96: 804–807.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bollschweiler E, Feussner H, Holscher AH, Siewert JR. pH monitoring: the gold standard in detection of gastrointestinal reflux disease?Dysphagia1993; 8 : 118–121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A K Patwari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patwari, A.K., Bajaj, P., Kashyp, R. et al. Diagnostic modalities for Gastroesophageal Reflux. Indian J Pediatr 69, 133–136 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859372

Key words

Navigation