Skip to main content

Origin(s), evolution, and systematics ofCucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae)

Abstract

Numerical studies of morphological data and starch gel electrophoresis have provided a new perspective on important issues pertinent to the origin(s) and subsequent evolution of domesticatedCucurbita pepo. Wild C.texana and/orC. fraterna appear to be the most likely candidates for progenitor(s) of the domesticate. Populations of texana-like plants from beyond Texas share various attributes with Texas populations, suggesting that C. texana once had a more widespread distribution to the northeast. The possibility exists thatC. pepo was domesticated independently in eastern U.S., as well as in Mexico, which is in line with recent archeological findings. Multiple domestications are also supported by allozyme data indicating a substantial divergence within the species. A new classification consisting of C.pepo ssp.pepo (origins in Mexico),C. pepo ssp.ovifera var. ovifera (origins in eastern U.S.), and C.pepo ssp.ovifera var. texana (spontaneous populations in eastern U.S.) is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literature Cited

  • Alefeld, F. 1866. Landwirtschaftliche Flora. Wiegandt and Hempel, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, T. C., M. Nee, N. F. Weeden, and J. Wyland. 1986. Rediscovery ofCucurbita fraterna Bailey, the alleged “brother” toC. texana. Paper presented at the 27th annual meeting of the Soc. Econ. Bot.

  • Asch, D. L., and N. E. Asch. 1985. Prehistoric plant cultivation in west-central Illinois. Pages 149–204in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Pap. Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Michigan 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, L. H. 1929. The domesticated cucurbitas. Gentes Herb. 2:62–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1937. The garden of gourds. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1943. Species of Cucurbita. Gentes Herb. 6:267–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bemis, W. P., A. M. Rhodes, T. W. Whitaker, and S. G. Carmer. 1970. Numerical taxonomy applied toCucurbita relationships. Amer. J. Bot. 57:404–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess-Terrel, M. E. 1979. A study ofCucurbita material from Salmon Ruin, New Mexico. M.S. thesis, Eastern New Mexico Univ., Portales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolle, A. P. de. 1828. Prodromus 3:316–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, G. F. 1945. Plant geography and culture history in the American Southwest. Viking Fund Publ. in Anthropol. 5, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castetter, E. F. 1925. Horticultural groups of cucurbits. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 22:338–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomko, S. A., and G. W. Crawford. 1978. Plant husbandry in prehistoric eastern North America: new evidence for its development. Amer. Antiquity 43:405–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conard, N., D. L. Asch, N. B. Asch, D. Elmore, H. Gove, M. Rubin, J. A. Brown, M. D. Wiant, K. B. Farnsworth, and T. G. Cook. 1984. Accelerator radiocarbon dating of evidence for prehistoric horticulture in Illinois. Nature 308:443–446.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, D. S., and M. C. Johnston. 1979. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Univ. Texas, Dallas. (Reprint of a work first published in 1970.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, C. W. 1985. Understanding the evolution of plant husbandry in eastern North America: lessons from botany, ethnography and archaeology. Pages 205–244in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Pap. Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Michigan 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, H. C., and T. W. Whitaker. 1961. History and distribution of the cultivated cucurbits in the Americas. Amer. Antiquity 26:469–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, F. 1983. Cucurbits. Pages 369–390in S. D. Tanksley and T. J. Orton, eds., Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, Part B. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, D. S. 1985. Numerical analysis of allozyme variation inCucurbita pepo. Econ. Bot. 39:300–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1986. A biosystematic study ofCucurbita pepo. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M Univ., College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, and L. A. Newsom. n.d. Numerical analysis of archaeologicalCucurbita seeds from Hontoon Island, Florida. (Submitted to J. Ethnobiol. in Mar. 1987.)

  • —, and H. D. Wilson. 1986. Numerical analysis of seed morphology inCucurbita pepo. Syst. Bot. 11:595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. Allozyme variation in theCucurbita pepo complex:C. pepo var.ovifera vs.C. texana. Syst. Bot. 12:263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denna, D. W., and M. B. Alexander. 1975. The isoperoxidases ofCucurbita pepo L. Pages 851–864in C. L. Markert, ed., Isozymes II: Physiological function. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, A. T. 1938. An interesting Texas cucurbit. Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 12:253–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and E. W. Haber. 1929. Species and varietal crosses in cucurbits. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 263:344–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. I. 1980. ‘Artifacts’ that grew: their roots in Mexico. Early Man 2:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. Patterns of prehistoric food production in North America. Pages 341–364in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Pap. Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Michigan 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golf, E. S. 1888. Report of the horticulturist. New York Agric. Exp. Sta. Annual Rep. 6:76–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. 1868. Field, forest and garden botany. American Book, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J. R. 1951a. Anatomy of gene centers. Amer. Naturalist 85:97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1951b. New World crop plants in Asia Minor. Sci. Monthly 72:87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., L. R. Oliver, and O. Bell. 1977. Control on Texas gourd in soybeans. Abstract. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. 30:46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. B., Jr. 1979. The gourd book. Univ. Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985a. Of plants and people. Univ. Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985b. Some botanical considerations of the early domesticated plants north of Mexico. Pages 57–72in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Pap. Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Michigan 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. D., Jr., E. G. Linsley, and T. W. Whitaker. 1971. Squash and gourd bees (Peponapis, Xenoglossa) and the origin of the cultivatedCucurbita. Evolution 25:218–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignart, F., and N. F. Weeden. 1984. Allozyme variation in cultivars ofCucurbita pepo L. Euphytica 33:779–785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King, F. B. 1985. Early cultivated cucurbits in eastern North America. Pages 73–98in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Pap. Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Michigan 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, K. J. 1983. Gene flow inCucurbita. Texas A&M Archives, College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. The relationship between isozyme phenotype and morphological variation inCucurbita. M.S. thesis, Texas A&M Univ., College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, D. S. Decker, and H. D. Wilson. 1985. Allozyme differentiation in theCucurbita pepo complex:C. pepo var.medullosa vs.C. texana. Econ. Bot. 39:289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Impensis Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm.

  • -. 1767. Mantissa plantarum. Impensis Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm.

  • Mohlenbrock, R. H., and D. M. Ladd. 1978. Distribution of Illinois vascular plants. Southern Illinois Univ. Press, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudin, C. 1856. Nouvelles recherches sur les caracteres specifiques et les varietes des plantes du genreCucurbita. Ann. Sci. Nat. IV. Bot. 6:5–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsom, L. A. 1986. Plants, human subsistence, and environment: a case study from Hontoon Island (8-VO-202), Florida. M.S. thesis, Univ. Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchalski, J. T., and R. W. Robinson. 1978. Comparative electrophoretic analysis of isozymes inCucurbita species. Cucurbit Gen. Coop. Rep. 1:28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, A. M., W. P. Bemis, T. W. Whitaker, and S. G. Carmer. 1968. A numerical taxonomic study ofCucurbita. Brittonia 20:251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. B. 1978. An atlas and annotated checklist of the vascular plants of Arkansas. Univ. Arkansas Press, Fayetteville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyermark, J. A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Story, D. A. 1985. Adaptive strategies of Archaic cultures of the West Gulf Coastal Plain. Pages 19–56in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Pap. Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Michigan 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struever, S., and K. D. Vickery. 1973. The beginnings of cultivation in the Midwest-Riverine area of the United States. Amer. Anthropol. 75:1197–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, E. L. 1890. The history of garden vegetables. Amer. Naturalist 24:719–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapley, W. T., W. D. Enzie, and G. P. van Eseltine. 1937. The vegetables of New York, Vol. 1, Part IV, The cucurbits. N.Y. Agric. Exp. Sta., Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov, N. I. 1949–1950. The origin, variation, immunity, and breeding of cultivated plants. Chron. Bot. 13.

  • Wall, J. R. 1969. A partial survey of the genusCucurbita for electrophoretic variants of esterase and leucine aminopeptidase. Southw. Naturalist 14:141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and T. W. Whitaker. 1971. Genetic control of leucine aminopeptidase and esterase isozymes in the interspecific crossCucurbita equadorensis x C. maxima. Biochem. Genet. 5:223–229.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J. 1985. The impact of early horticulture in the upland drainages of the Midwest and Midsouth. Pages 99–148in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Pap.n Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Michigan 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, T. W. 1947. American origin of the cultivated cucurbits. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 34:101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968. Ecological aspects of the cultivatedCucurbita. HortScience 3:9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974.Cucurbita. Pages 135–144in R. C. King, ed., Handbook of genetics, Vol. 2. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and W. P. Bemis. 1964. Evolution in the genusCucurbita. Evolution 18:553–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975. Origin and evolution of the cultivatedCucurbita. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 102:362–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and G. F. Carter. 1946. Critical notes on the origin and domestication of the cultivated speciesof Cucurbita. Amer. J. Bot. 33:10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and H. C. Cutler. 1965. Cucurbits and cultures in the Americas. Econ. Bot. 19:344–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1971. Prehistoric cucurbits from the Valley of Oaxaca. Econ. Bot. 25:123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and R. S. MacNeish. 1957. Cucurbit materials from three caves near Ocampo, Tamaulipas. Amer. Antiquity 22:352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and G. N. Davis. 1962. Cucurbits. Interscience Publ., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and I. C. Jagger. 1937. Breeding and improvement of cucurbits. Yearb. Agric. 1937:207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and R. J. Knight, Jr. 1980. Collecting cultivated and wild cucurbits in Mexico. Econ. Bot. 34:312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willdenow, C. L. 1805. Species plantarum, 4th ed., vol. 4. Impensis G. C. Nauk, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhiteneva, N. E. 1930. The world’s assortment of pumpkins. Trudy Prikl. Bot. 23(3): 157–207. (In Russian with three-page summary in English.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Decker, D.S. Origin(s), evolution, and systematics ofCucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Econ Bot 42, 4–15 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859022

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859022

Keywords

  • Economic Botany
  • Cucurbita Pepo
  • Fruit Type
  • Aurantia
  • Leucine Amino Peptidase