Skip to main content
Log in

Accurate documentation of Germplasm: The lost guatemalan teosintes (Zea, Gramineae)

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The great need for adequate documentation of germplasm collections, including accurate geographic location, needs again to be stressed. We discuss 3 reported stations for teosinte (Zea spp., Gramineae) in Guatemala. The first was discovered by Melhus and Chamberlain in 1949; an attempt by the senior author to relocate this station in 1976 was unsuccessful, but we now have a good idea of where this population (probablyZ. luxurians) may occur. The second, that of Rojas in 1942, lies well outside the known ranges of either of the 2 Guatemalan teosintes, Z.luxurians andZ. mays subsp.parviglumis var.huehuetenangensis. The third, a collection of Steyermark’s, turns out to be aTripsacum. We urge plant scientists, applied botanists, geographers, anthropologists, and others to provide voucher specimens with accurate location data for all plant populations that they study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Brenan, J. P. M. 1973. The value of herbaria for cultivated plants.In P. S. Green, ed, Plants: Wild and Cultivated, p. 38–47. Classey, Middlesex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunting, A. H., and H. Kuckuck. 1970. Ecological and agronomic studies related to plant exploration.In O. Frankel and E. Bennett, ed, Genetic Resources in Plants-Their Exploration and Conservation. Int. Biol. Programme Handbook No. 11, p. 181–188. Davis, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G. N. 1932. The rediscovery of teosinte in Guatemala. J. Heredity 23: 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley, J. F., and H. H. Iltis. 1980. Taxonomy ofZea (Gramineae). I. A subgeneric classification with key to taxa. Amer. J. Bot. 67: 982–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fosberg, F. R. 1950. Remarks on the factual basis of ecology. Ecology 31: 653–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, M. R. 1978a. Redescubrimiento deZea perennis (Gramineae). Phytologia 38: 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1978b. Una nueva localidad para el teosinteZea perennis y primer reporte deZea mexicana para Jalisco. Bol. Inform. Inst. Bot., Univ. Guadalajara 6: 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. El teosinte en Jalisco: Su distribucion y ecología. Tésis, Univ. Guadalajara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshaw, R. W. 1983. Systematics of the Zygnemataceae (Chlorophyceae). III. Transeau collection of the Zygnemataceae: An old collection with modem uses. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden C., 1985. New directions for the Smithsonian. Science 228: 1512–1513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, H. L. 1970. Description and evaluation of wild and primitive introduced plants.In O. Frankel and E. Bennett, ed, Genetic Resources in Plants-Their Exploration and Conservation. Int. Biol. Programme Handbook No. 11, p. 413–420. Davis, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis, H. H., and J. F. Doebley. 1980. Taxonomy ofZea (Gramineae). II. Subspecific categories in theZea mays complex and a generic synopsis. Amer. J. Bot. 67: 994–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and —. 1984.Zea-A. biosystematical Odyssey.In W. Grant, ed, Plant Biosystematics, p. 587–616. Academic Press, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, R. Guzman M., and B. Pazy. 1979.Zea diploperennis (Gramineae): A new teosinte from Mexico. Science 203: 186–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —-, and W. M. Shaughnessy. 1960. Preliminary reports on the flora of Wisconsin. No. 43. Primulaceae-primrose family. Trans. Wisconsin Acad. Sei. 49: 113–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melhus, I. E., and I. M. Chamberlain. 1953. A preliminary study of teosinte in its region of origin. Iowa St. Coll. J. Sei. 28: 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. de S. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, U. 1942. Hibridaciones sobre “Euchlaena mejicana” [sic] Schrad. Flora (Quito, Ecuador) 2: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, J. D. 1953. Herbarium specimens as records of genetic research. Amer. Naturalist 87: 155–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafleu, F.A. et al., ed. 1978. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature Adopted by the Twelfth International Botanical Congress, Leningrad, July 1975. Bonn, Scheltema and Holkema, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherwax, P. 1935. The phylogeny ofZea mays. Amer. Midi. Naturalist 16: 1–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, H. G. 1967. Teosinte: The closest relative of maize. Bussey Inst., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1977. Hybridization of maize and teosinte, in Mexico and Guatemala and the improvement of maize. Econ. Bot. 31: 254–293.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iltis, H.H., Kolterman, D.A. & Benz, B.F. Accurate documentation of Germplasm: The lost guatemalan teosintes (Zea, Gramineae). Econ Bot 40, 69–77 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858948

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858948

Keywords

Navigation