The Botanical Review

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 387–406 | Cite as

Transmission of plant viruses by dodder

  • Robert M. Hosford


Sugar Beet Botanical Review Tobacco Mosaic Virus Cucumber Mosaic Virus White Clover 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Azad, R. N., andO. P. Sehgal. 1958. Some virus diseases of temperate fruits. Indian Phytopath.11: 159–164.Google Scholar
  2. Baldacci, E.,et al. 1962. Nuovi contributi alle ricerche sulle malattie da virus della Vite. (English summary.) Riv. Pat. Veg., Pavia, Ser. 3,2(1): 20–25. (Rev. Appl. Mycol.41: 692.)Google Scholar
  3. Banttari, E. E., andM. B. Moore. 1962. Virus cause of blue dwarf of oats and its transmission to barley and flax. Phytopathology52: 897–902.Google Scholar
  4. Bawden, F. C. 1956. Plant viruses and virus diseases. Chronica Botanica Company, Waltham, Mass., pp. 59–60.Google Scholar
  5. —. 1964. Plant viruses and virus diseases. Ronald Press Company, New York, pp. 88, 92, 284.Google Scholar
  6. Beiss, U. 1956. Untersuchungen über den Wirtspflanzenbereich der Vergilbungsvirus der Beta-Rüben (Coriutn betae). (Studies on the host plant range of the yellows virus of Beta beets [Corium betae].) Phytopath Zeitschr.27(1): 83–106.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, C. W. 1940. Acquisition and transmission of viruses by dodder (Cuscuta subinclusa). (Abstr.) Phytopathology30: 2.Google Scholar
  8. —. 1944a. Latent virus of dodder and its effects on sugar beet and other plants. Phytopathology34: 77–91.Google Scholar
  9. —. 1944b. Studies of dodder transmission of plant viruses. Phytopathology34:905–932.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1949. Recovery of plants from dodder latent mosaic. Phytopathology39: 637–646.Google Scholar
  11. —. 1955. Recovery of water pimpernel from curly top and the reaction of recovered plants to reinoculation with different virus strains. Phytopathology45: 531–536.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1956. Biological relations of plant viruses. Ann. Rev. Plant Phys.7: 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —. 1957. Interactions of sugar beet curly top virus and an unusual mutant. Virology3: 322–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. -. 1960. Sugar beet yellows disease in the U.S. U.S. Dep. Agr. Tech. Bull. 1218, 63 pp.Google Scholar
  15. —, andA. S. Costa. 1949. Tristeza disease of citrus. Jour. Agr. Res.78: 207–237.Google Scholar
  16. —, andJ. E. Duffus. 1957. Rosette disease of sugar beet. Plant Dis. Rep.41: 1001–1004.Google Scholar
  17. —, andC. Munck. 1946. Yellow wilt of sugar beet in Argentina. Jour. Agr. Res.73(2): 45–64.Google Scholar
  18. Bos, L.,et al. 1959. Investigations on white clover mosaic virus. Tijdschr. Planteziek.65:89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —, enP. Grancini. 1963. Een eigenaardige enatie-virusziekte bij witte klaver. (A strange enation virus disease in white clover.) Tijdschr. Planteziek.69: 151. (Rev. Appl. Mycol.42: 723.)Google Scholar
  20. Brierley, P., andF. F. Smith. 1957. Symptoms of chrysanthemum flower distortion, dodder transmission of the virus, and heat cure of infected plants Phytopathology47: 448–450.Google Scholar
  21. Canova, A. 1955. Rapporti traCuscuta e virus del diallume delta Barbabietola. (The relationships between dodder and beet yellows virus.) (English summary.) Ann. Sper. Agr., N. S.,9(3): 549–552. (Rev. Appl. Mycol.35: 804.)Google Scholar
  22. Carver, R. G. 1963. A study of the strawberry viruses in Louisiana. Diss. Abstr.23 (11): 4078–4079.Google Scholar
  23. Caudwell, A. 1965. Note sur un virus provoquant des proliférations des fleurs de cuscutes. (Note on a virus causing proliferation of dodder flowers.) Ann. Epiphyties16(1): 77–81.Google Scholar
  24. Chiykowski, L. N. 1962. Clover phyllody virus in Canada and its transmission. Can. Jour. Bot.40: 397–404.Google Scholar
  25. Cochran, G. W. 1946. The effect of shading techniques on transmission of tobacco mosaic virus through dodder. Phytopathology36: 396.Google Scholar
  26. —. 1947. The “dodder graft,” a new method of using dodder to transmit plant viruses. Phytopathology37: 5.Google Scholar
  27. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization. 1951. Third annual report for the year ending 30th June, 1951. Canberra, Australia, 167 pp. (p. 18.)Google Scholar
  28. Costa, A. S. 1944. Multiplication of virus in dodder,Cuscuta campestris. Phytopathology34: 151–162.Google Scholar
  29. Frazier, N. W. 1955. Strawberry vein banding virus. Phytopathology45: 307–312.Google Scholar
  30. —, andA. F. Posnette. 1956. Leafhopper transmission of a clover virus causing green petal disease in strawberry. Nature177: 1040–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ——. 1957. Transmission and host-range studies of strawberry green-petal virus. Ann. Appl. Biol.45: 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frederiksen, R. A. 1962. Studies on the transmission, effect and control of two viruses onLinum usitatissimum L. Diss. Abstr.22: 3800–3801.Google Scholar
  33. —, andR. W. Goth. 1959. Crinkle, a new virus disease of flax. (Abstr.) Phytopathology49: 538.Google Scholar
  34. Fuchs, W. M., undU. Beiss. 1954. Übertragung der Rübengelbsucht-Virus (Corium betae) mit Hilfe vonCuscuta. (Transmission of sugar beet yellows virus [Corium betae] with the aid ofCuscuta.) Naturwissenschaften41(21): 506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fukushi, T., andE. Shikata. 1955. Transmission of potato witches broom by the dodders,Cuscuta jafonica Chois. andC. chinensis Lam. (Japanese, with English summary.) Mem. Fac. Agr. Hokkaido Univ.2(3): 47–51.Google Scholar
  36. Fulton, R. W. 1964. Transmission of plant viruses by grafting, dodder, seed, and mechanical inoculation.In: “Plant Virology,” ed. byM. K. Corbett andH. D. Sisler. Univ. Florida Press, Gainesville, pp. 42–44, 60–61.Google Scholar
  37. Gehring, F. 1957. Uber ein Auftreten des Strengelbuntvirus der Kartoffel in Deutschland. (On an occurrence of potato stem mottle virus in Germany.) Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzdienstes (Braunschweig), Stuttgart,9: 172–174. (Rev. Appl. Mycol.37: 245.)Google Scholar
  38. Giddings, N. J. 1947. Dodder as an aid in testing some plant species for curly-top virus. Phytopathology37: 278–280.Google Scholar
  39. Gualaccini, F. 1956. Transmissibilita del virus producente il mosaico del Peperone, mediante laCuscuta, e prove di identificazione di esso. (Transmissibility of the virus causing chilli mosaic by means ofCuscuta, and tests of its identification.) (English summary.) Boll. Sta. Pat. Veg. Roma, Ser. 3(1955),13: 79–101. (Rev. Appl. Mycol.36: 81–82.)Google Scholar
  40. Haeske, Erhard. 1958. Untersuchungen über das Blattnervenmosaik des Salats. Doctoral Dissertation, Justus Liebig Universitat, Giessen, 86 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Hildebrand, E. M. 1945. The dodder vector of woody plant viruses. Plant Dis. Rep.29: 196–197.Google Scholar
  42. Hill, A. V., andM. Mandryk. 1954. A study of the virus diseases “big bud” of tomato and “yellow dwarf” of tobacco. Australian Jour. Agr. Res.5: 617–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hollings, M. 1960. Chrysanthemum. Glass House Crops Res. Inst. 1959 Ann. Rep., Littlehampton (Sussex), England, pp. 67–68.Google Scholar
  44. Horn, N. L., andM. W. Woods. 1949. Transmission of the mild streak virus of blackraspberry. Phytopathology39(5): 377–385.Google Scholar
  45. Hutchinson, M. T.,et al. 1960. Wild sources of blue-berry stunt virus in New Jersey. Phytopathology50: 308–312.Google Scholar
  46. Jensen, S. G. 1963. Studies on infection and systemic spread of plant viruses. Diss. Abstr.23:2672–2673.Google Scholar
  47. Johnson, F. 1941a. Transmission of viruses by the parasitic activities of dodder. Phytopathology31: 13.Google Scholar
  48. —. 1941b. Transmission of plant viruses by dodder. Phytopathology13: 649–656.Google Scholar
  49. Jones, J. P. 1959. Failure of thrips to transmit an isolate of tomato spotted wilt virus. Phytopathology49: 452–453.Google Scholar
  50. Keller, J. R. 1953. Investigations on chrysanthemum stunt virus and chrysanthemum virus. Quart. Mem. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta. 324, 33 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station. 1942. Fifty-fourth Annual Report for the year 1941, p. 15.Google Scholar
  52. Kunkel, L. O. 1942. False blossom in periwinkles and its cure by heat. Science, N. S.,95(2642): 252.Google Scholar
  53. -. 1943a. New hosts as a key to progress in plant virus disease research.In: “Plant Virus Diseases”, Cornell University Press, 170 pp. (pp. 63–82).Google Scholar
  54. —. 1943b. Potato witches-broom transmission by dodder and cure by heat. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc.86: 470–475.Google Scholar
  55. —. 1943c. Transmission of cranberry false blossom from tomato to cranberry plants by dodder (Cuscuta campestris). Phytopathology33: 19.Google Scholar
  56. —. 1944. Transmission of virus from X-diseased peach trees to herbaceous plants. Phytopathology34: 1006.Google Scholar
  57. —. 1945. Studies on cranberry false blossom. Phytopathology35: 805–821.Google Scholar
  58. —. 1950. Asclepias yellows. Phytopathology40: 16.Google Scholar
  59. —. 1951. Identification of bolting disease of carrots. Phytopathology41: 22.Google Scholar
  60. —. 1952. Transmission of alfalfa witches broom to nonleguminous plants by dodder, and cure in periwinkle by heat. Phytopathology42: 27–31.Google Scholar
  61. Lackey, C. F. 1941. Histological studies on the relationship of dodder to healthy and curly-top-infected sugar beets and tobacco. Phytopathology31: 861.Google Scholar
  62. —. 1946. Reactions of dodders to stems of other dodders and their own stems. Phytopathology36: 386–388.Google Scholar
  63. —. 1965. Pokeweed crinkle leaf, caused by a virus transmitted by dodder from desert shrubs in Southern California. Plant Dis. Rep.49(12): 1002–1005.Google Scholar
  64. —, andC. W. Bennett. 1949. Pathological effects of curly-top virus on dodder. Phytopathology39: 860.Google Scholar
  65. Maramorosch, K. 1956. Vinca yellows in Mexico. Plant Dis. Rep.40: 1109–1111.Google Scholar
  66. —. 1963. Corn stunt virus transmission and attenuation in a new host. Phytopathology53: 350.Google Scholar
  67. Miller, L. I., andJ. L. Troutman. 1966. Stunt disease of peanuts in Virginia. Plant Dis. Rep.50: 139–143.Google Scholar
  68. Mišiga, S. 1961. Prenos niektorých zltačkových vírusov kukučinou. (Transmission of some yellows-type viruses of dodder.) (Russian, German summary.) Biológia, Bratislava,16(5): 340–350. (Rev. Appl. Mycol.43: 244.)Google Scholar
  69. —,et al. 1960. Niektoré hostitel’ské rastliny vírusu zelenokvetosti dataliny. (Some host plants of the clover phyllody virus.) (English summary.) Biológia, Bratislava,15(7): 538–542.Google Scholar
  70. —, andV. Valenta. 1957. Prenos vírusu stolburu prostredníctvom nietorých druhov kukučín. (Transmission of stolbur virus with the aid of some species of dodder.) (English summary.) Biológia, Bratíslava,12(9): 652–660.Google Scholar
  71. Miyakawa, T., andH. Yoshii. 1951. Transmission of tobacco mosaic virus by the dodder,Cuscuta japonica and its inhibitory effect on the virus activity. (Japanese, with English summary.) Sci. Bull. Fac. Agr. Kyushu Univ.12: 143–154.Google Scholar
  72. Mokra, Vera. 1964. Studie o virové povaze zelenokvetosti Primuli. (Studies on the green petal virus disease of primroses.) (English summary.) Rozpravy Ceskoslovenske Akad. Ved.74(3), 37 pp.Google Scholar
  73. Mooi-Bok, M. 1949. Uit de literatuur. Het overbrengen van viren met behulp vanCuscuta-sootten. (Review of current literature on the transmission of viruses by means ofCuscuta species.) Tijdschr. Planteziek.55: 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ochs, Gertrude. 1958. Uber drei Viren als Erreger von Rebkrankheiten. (Concerning three viruses as agents of vine diseases.) Zeitschr. Pflanzenkrankh.65(1): 11–17.Google Scholar
  75. —. 1960. Uber elf Stamme des Panachürevirus der Weinrebe. (On eleven strains of the “panachure” virus of vine.) (In German.) Phyton, Vicente Lopez,14(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
  76. Pratt, M. J. 1961. Studies on clover yellow mosaic and white clover mosaic virus. Can. Jour. Bot.39: 655–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Price, W. C. 1963. The nature of virus diseases of citrus and their interrelationships with other plant virus diseases. Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rep., pp. 148–149.Google Scholar
  78. Protsenko, A. E. 1958. The relation between tomato stolbur (Leptomotropus solani) and aster yellows (L. callistephi). Vopr. Virusol. (USSR)3(5): 292–296.Google Scholar
  79. —. 1959. Electron microscopy of the aster yellows virus (Leptomotropus callistephi Ryzhkov). Biol. Plant Acad. Sci. Bohenosl1(3): 187–191.Google Scholar
  80. Quebec Society for the Protection of Plants. 1952. Symposium-Viruses and the protection of the plant kingdom. Supplement to 34th Ann. Rep., p. 92.Google Scholar
  81. Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Stock. 1962. 1961–1962 Report (Brisbane), pp. 23–25.Google Scholar
  82. Raychaudhuri, S. P. 1953. Studies on bayberry yellows. Phytopathology43: 15–20.Google Scholar
  83. Sakimura, K. 1947. Virus transmission byCuscuta sandwichiana. Phytopathology37: 66–67.Google Scholar
  84. Schmelzer, K. 1955. Die Übertragbarkeit des Tabakmauche-Virus durchCuscuta-Arten. (The transmissibility of the tobacco stem mottle virus by species ofCuscuta.) Naturwissenschaften42: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. —. 1956a. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Übertragbarkeit von Viren durchCuscuta- Arten. (Contributions to the knowledge of the transmissibility of virus byCuscuta species.) Phytopath. Zeitschr.28: 1–56.Google Scholar
  86. —. 1956b. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Virushemmstoffe inCuscuta-Arten. (Contributions to the knowledge of virus-inhibitors in Ciwcuta-species.) Zentralbl. Bakt., II,109(20-22): 482–515. (Rev. Appl. Mycol.35: 173.)Google Scholar
  87. —. 1957. Versuche zur Übertragung des Tomatensasperme-Virus mitCuscuta- Arten. (Experiments on the transmission of tomato aspermy virus byCuscuta species.) Phytopath. Zeitschr.30: 449–452.Google Scholar
  88. —. 1962. (Studies on viruses of ornamental and wild woody plants. 2nd Part. Viroses ofForsythia, Lonicera, Ligustrum, andLaburnum.) (German, Englishsummary.) Phytopath. Zeitschr.46(2): 105–138.Google Scholar
  89. Sibilia, C. 1951. Le cuscute e le virosi. Boll. Staz. Pat. Veg., Roma, Serie terza,7: 205–215.Google Scholar
  90. Thouay (Sykes), Mary G. 1911. On the histological relations betweenCuscuta and its host. Ann. Bot.25: 655–682.Google Scholar
  91. Thung, T. H., enT. Hadiwidjaja. 1950. Het overbringen van viren met behulp vanCuscuta australis R. Br., 1. (The transmission of viruses with the aid ofCuscuta australis R. Br., 1.) (English summary.) Tijdschr. Planteziek.56: 349–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Timian, R. G. 1964. Dodder transmission of barley yellow dwarf virus. Phytopathology54: 910.Google Scholar
  93. Tomlinson, J. A., andR. G. Garrett. 1964. Studies on the lettuce big-vein virus and its vectorOlpidium brassicae (Wor.) Dang. Ann. Appl. Biol.54: 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Valenta, V. M. 1958. A new yellows virus causing flower proliferations in the dodder,Cuscuta campestris Yunck. Phytopath. Zeitschr.33: 316–318.Google Scholar
  95. —,S. Mišiga, andM. Musil. 1961. Investigations on European yellows-type viruses. I. The stolbur virus. Phytopath. Zeitschr.42: 1–38.Google Scholar
  96. —, andM. Musil. 1963. Investigations on European yellows-type virus. II. The clover dwarf and parastolbur viruses. Phytopath. Zeitschr.47(1): 38–65.Google Scholar
  97. Van der Want, J. P. H. 1955. Transmission of tobacco-rattle virus by means of dodder. Plant Dis. Rep.39: 553–554.Google Scholar
  98. Van Velsen, R. J., andN. C. Crowley. 1961. Centrosema mosaic: a plant virus disease transmitted by both aphids and plant bugs. Nature189: 858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Weathers, L. G. 1965. Transmission of exocortis virus of citrus byCuscuta subinclusa. Plant Dis. Rep.49(3): 189–190.Google Scholar
  100. —, andM. K. Harjung. 1964. Transmission of citrus viruses by dodder,Cuscuta subinclusa. Plant Dis. Rep.48(2): 102–103.Google Scholar
  101. ——, andF. C. Greer. 1965. Dodder as a means of transmitting citrus viruses. Calif. Citrograph51(2): 83–84.Google Scholar
  102. Williams, W. L. 1957. Experiments on the transmission of potato leaf roll virus. Diss. Abstr.17:2784–2785.Google Scholar
  103. Yarwood, C. E. 1955. Mechanical transmission of an apple mosaic virus. Hilgardia23(15): 613–628.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Hosford
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyNorth Dakota State UniversityFargo

Personalised recommendations