Skip to main content
Log in

Nonfood uses of plants in Usambara

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The attempt here has been to discuss Shambaa use of wild nonfood plants primarily in terms of utility, but also with some attention to principles of classification and of the effects of human use of plants on the wider environment. The local system of classification emphasizes those plants which are useful to people. There are many of these, which may be surprising in an area that has been undergoing commercialization and socio-economic change since the early years of this century (P. Fleuret, 1979). Natural systems still provide the Shambaa with many useful, even essential products. But those plants that are useful are also being used up, and continued exploitation has ramifications for the other components of the ecosystem: fish vanished from the streams, wild date palms and tree ferns vanishing, deforestation, erosion, fuelwood shortages, increasing prices for many natural products. By all indications, the most crucial effects of human exploitation have occurred within the last 100 years. Contemporary accounts by missionaries and explorers describe the area as “... abound[ing] in forests of fine timber ...” (Krapf, 1860) or cite oral traditions indicating that the most seriously deforested areas of today were under forest just prior to the turn of the century. (Data obtained from Lushoto District files lodged at the Tanzania National Archives, Dar es Salaam.)

As recently as 1975, one author, in writing of Usambara, suggested that a solution to agricultural crisis (especially land shortage) was to open the remaining forest reserve to human settlement and cultivation (Cliffe, 1975, pp. 149–150). This suggestion does not take into account the fact that the natural vegetation of Usambara continues to provide its residents with a great many vital materials and implements, even though human use of these resources is approaching, or has even reached, a critical point in terms of ecological consequences. Efforts should be made to preseve, not destroy, this vital natural resource.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, E. 1952. Plants, Man and Life. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. Third printing, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, D. 1900. Ethno-botany of the Coahuilla Indians. Univ. Chicago Press. Reprinted 1967. Malki Museum Press, Banning, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., D. Breedlove, and P. Raven. 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. Amer. Anthropol. 75: 214–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodley, J. 1978. Resource depletion and territorial requirements of the Shipibo of Peru. Proc. of conference entitled Amazonia, Extinction or Survival? Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha, D., and B. Riley. 1978. Forest, foraging, fences and fuel in a marginal area of Kenya. Paper prepared for USAID Africa Bureau Firewood Workshop, Washington, D. C.

  • Brown, C. 1977. Folk botanical life-forms: their universality and growth. Amer. Anthropol. 79: 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1979. Folk zoological life-forms: their universality and growth. Amer. Anthropol. 81: 791–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliffe, L., ed. 1975. Rural Co-operation in Tanzania. Tanzania Publishing House, Dar es Salaam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, H. 1954. The Relation of Hanunoo Culture to the Plant World. Unpublished Ph.D. Diss., Yale Univ.

  • Dalziel, J. 1937. The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa. Crown Agents for the Colonies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn, A. 1911. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Waschambaa. Nach hinterlassenen Aufzeichnungen von A. Karasek. I. Baessler-Archiv 1: 155–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1913. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Waschambaa. Nach hinterlassenen Aufzeichnungen von A. Karasek. II. Baessler-Archiv 3: 69–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1918–1922. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Waschambaa. Nach hinterlassenen Aufzeichnungen von A. Karasek. III. Baessler-Archiv 7: 56–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1923–1924. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Waschambaa. Nach hinterlassenen Aufzeichnungen von A. Karasek. IV. Baessler-Archiv 8: 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A. 1895. Die Pflanzenwelt Ost-Afrikas und der Nachbargebiete. Geographische Verlagshandlung Dietrich Reimer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feierman, S. 1968. The Shambaa.In A. Roberts, ed. Tanzania Before 1900. East African Publishing House, Dar es Salaam.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1974. The Shambaa Kingdom. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleuret, A. 1977. The role of women in rural markets: a case study from Lushoto, Tanzania. Proc. First Women and Anthropol. Symp., Sacramento Anthropol. Soc.

  • — 1979a. The role of wild foliage plants in the diet: a case study from Lushoto, Tanzania. Ecol. Food Nutr. 8: 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1979b. Methods for evaluation of the contribution of wild foods and fruits to the diet: a case study. Med. Anthropol. 3: 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleuret, P. 1979. Farm and Market: A Study of Society and Agriculture in Northern Tanzania. Unpublished Ph.D. Diss., Univ. California.

  • Fleuret, P., and A. Fleuret. 1978. Fuelwood use in a peasant community: a Tanzanian case study. J. Develop. Areas 12: 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Fleuret, P., and -A. Fleuret. 1980. Nutritional implications of staple food crop successions in Usambara, Tanzania. Human Ecology. In press.

  • Ford, R., ed. 1978. The Nature and Status of Ethnobotany. Anthropol. Papers No. 67. Museum of Anthropol., Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, M. 1919. Uses of Plants by the Indians of the Missouri River Region. Thirty-third Annual Rep., Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Reprinted 1967. Univ. Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunn, E. 1976. Toward a perceptual model of folk biological classification. Amer. Ethnol. 3: 508- 524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, F. 1948. Indigenous food plants of West Africa. J. New York Bot. Gard. 49: 225–236, 254–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Irvine, F. 1961. Woody Plants of Ghana, with Special Reference to Their Uses. Oxford Univ. Press.

  • Kokwaro, J. 1976. Medicinal Plants of East Africa. East African Literature Bureau, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapf, J. 1860. Travels, Researches and Missionary Labours during an Eighteen Years’ Residence in Eastern Africa. Cass, London.

  • Logan, M. 1978. Digestive disorders and plant medicinals in highland Guatemala.In M. Logan and E. Hunts, eds. Health and the Human Condition. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiden, J. 1889. The Useful Native Plants of Australia. Trubner, London.

  • Scudder, T. 1971. Gathering among African Woodland Savannah Cultivators. Inst. African Stud., Univ. Zambia. Zambian Papers No. 5.

  • Soper, R. 1967. Iron age sites in North-Eastern Tanzania. Azania 2: 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, W. 1964. Studies in ethnoscience.In A. Romney and R. D’Andrade, ededs. Transcultural Studies in Cognition. Amer. Anthropol. 66: 99–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, J., and E. Breyer-Brandwijk. 1962. Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Eastern and Southern Africa. Livingstone, London.

  • Williams, G. 1963. Dictionary of Plant Names in the Shambaa, Zigua, Bondei, and Swahili Languages. East African Herbarium, Nairobi.

  • Williamson, J. 1955. Useful Plants of Malawi. 2nd. edit., 1974. Montfort Press, Limbe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleuret, A. Nonfood uses of plants in Usambara. Econ Bot 34, 320–333 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858305

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858305

Keywords

Navigation