Advertisement

The Botanical Review

, Volume 65, Issue 4, pp 303–316 | Cite as

The inflorescence: Introduction

  • Shirley C. Tucker
  • James Grimes
Interpreting Botanical Progress

Keywords

Botanical Review Apical Meristem Floral Development Cyme Inflorescence Meristem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Barfod, A. 1988. Inflorescence morphology of some South American Anacardiaceae and the possible phylogenetic trends. Nord. J. Bot. 8: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard, C. 1955. Histogenesis of the inflorescence and flower ofTriticum aeslivum. Austral. J. Bot. 3: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. 1957a. Floral histogenesis in the Monocotyledons. I. The Gramineae. Austral. J. Bot. 5: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. —. 1957b. Floral histogenesis in the Monocotyledons. II. The Cyperaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 5: 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. —. 1958. Floral histogenesis in the Monocotyledons. III. The Juncaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 6: 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. —. 1960. Floral histogenesis in the Monocotyledons. IV. The Liliaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 8: 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentham, G. 1892. Handbook of the British Flora. Ed. 6, rev. by J. D. Hooker. L. Reeve, London.Google Scholar
  8. Bernier, G. 1962. Evolution of the apical meristem inSinapis alba (long-day plant) in long days, in short days, and during the transfer from short days to long days. Caryologia 15: 303–325.Google Scholar
  9. Boke, N. H. 1947. Development of the adult shoot apex and floral initiation inVinca rosea. Amer. J. Bot. 34: 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Briggs, B. G. &L. A. S. Johnson. 1979. Evolution in the Myrtaceae—Evidence from inflorescence structure. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 102: 157–256.Google Scholar
  11. Burger, W. C. 1977. The Piperales and the Monocots: Alternative hypotheses for the origin of mono-cotyledonous flowers. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 43: 345–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derstine, K. S. &S. C. Tucker. 1991. Organ initiation and development of inflorescences and flowers ofAcacia baileyana. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 816–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Douglas, A. W. &S. C. Tucker. 1996a. Inflorescence ontogeny and floral organogenesis in Grevilleoideae (Proteaceae), with emphasis on the nature of the flower pairs. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 157: 341–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ——. 1996b. Comparative floral ontogenies among Persoonioideae includingBellendena (Proteaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 1528–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eames, A. J. 1961. Morphology of the angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Eichler, A. W. 1878. Blüthendiagramme. Pts. 1,2. W. Engelmann, Leipzig. Reprinted 1954, O. Koeltz, Eppenhain.Google Scholar
  17. Endress, P. K. 1987. The Chloranthaceae: Reproductive structures and phylogenetic position. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 109: 153–226.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1993. Cercidiphyllaceae. Pp. 250–252in K. Kubitski, J. G. Rohwer & V. Bittrich (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. II. Flowering plants: Dicotyledons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  19. —. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. —. 1995. Major evolutionary traits of monocot flowers. Pp. 43–79in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler & C. J. Humphries (eds.), Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution. Vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  21. —. 1996. Structure and function of female and bisexual organ complexes in Gnetales. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 157:(Suppl.): S113-S125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esau, K. 1965. Plant anatomy. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Evans, M. M. S. &M. K. Barton. 1997. Genetics of angiosperm shoot apical meristem development. Annual Rev. Pl. Phys., Molec. Biol. 48: 673–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher, J. B. &H. E. Moore Jr. 1977. Multiple inflorescences in palms (Arecaceae): Their development and significance. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 98: 573–611.Google Scholar
  25. Foster, A. S. 1941. Comparative studies on the structure of the shoot apex in seed plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 68: 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frijters, D. 1978. Principles of simulation of inflorescence development. Ann. Bot. 42: 549–560.Google Scholar
  27. Gifford, E. M., Jr. 1954. The shoot apex in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 20: 477–529.Google Scholar
  28. — &G. E. Corson Jr. 1971. The shoot apex in seed plants. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 37: 143–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. — &K. D. Stewart. 1965. Ultrastructure of vegetative and reproductive apices ofChenopodium album. Science 149: 75–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. — &H. B. Tepper. 1961. Ontogeny of the inflorescence inChenopodium album. Amer. J. Bot. 48: 657–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ——. 1962a. Histochemical and autoradiographic studies of floral induction inChenopodium album. Amer. J. Bot. 49: 706–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ——. 1962b. Ontogenetic and histochemical changes in the vegetative shoot tip ofChenopodium album. Amer. J. Bot. 49: 902–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gottsberger, G. 1974. The structure and function of the primitive angiosperm flower—A discussion. Acta Bot. Neerl. 23: 461–471.Google Scholar
  34. Grégoire, V. 1938. La morphogénese et l’autonomie de l’appareil floral. I. Le carpelle. Cellule 47: 287–452.Google Scholar
  35. Grimes, J. W. 1992. Metamerism, heterochrony, and inflorescence morphology of thePithecellobium- complex (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae: Ingeae). Brittonia 44: 140–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. —. 1995. Generic relationships of Mimosoideae tribe Ingeae, with emphasis on the New WorldPithecellobium-complex. Pp. 101–121in M. D. Crisp & J. J. Doyle (eds.), Advances in legume systematics 7: Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  37. Hagemann, W. 1963. Weitere Untersuchungen zur Organisation des Sproszscheitelmeristems: Der Vegetionspunkt traubiger Floreszenzen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 82: 273–315.Google Scholar
  38. Hallé, F. &R. A. A. Oldeman. 1970. Essai sur l’architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
  39. Harris, E. M. 1994. Developmental evidence for the derivation of syncephalia inLagascea (Heliantheae; Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1139–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. —. 1995. Inflorescence and floral ontogeny in Asteraceae: A synthesis of historical and currentconcepts. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 61 (2,3): 93–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. —,S. C. Tucker &L. E. Urbatsch. 1991. Floral initiation and early development inErigeron philadelphicus (Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 78: 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heywood, V. H. (ed.). 1985. Flowering plants of the world. Mayflower Books, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Horridge, J. S., J. E. Pegler &P. T. Atkey. 1985. A study of leaf and inflorescence initiation and development inChrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Snowdon by scanning electron microscopy. Rep. Glasshouse Crops Research Institute 1985: 170–183.Google Scholar
  44. Huijser, P., J. Klein, W.-E. Lonnig, H. Meijer, H. Saedler &H. Sommer. 1992. Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa inAntirrhinum majus. EMBO Jour. 11: 1239–1249.Google Scholar
  45. Kaul, R. B. 1970. Evolution and adaptation of inflorescences in the Hydrocharitaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 57: 708–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kirchoff, B. K. 1986. Inflorescence structure and development in the Zingiberales:Thalia geniculata (Marantaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 64: 859–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. —. 1988. Inflorescence and flower development inCostus scaber (Costaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 66: 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. —. 1990. The phyllotaxy ofCostus (Costaceae). Bot. Gaz. 15: 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. —. 1997. Inflorescence and flower development in the Hedychieae (Zingiberaceae):Hedychium. Canad. J. Bot. 75: 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. —. 1998. Inflorescence and flower development in the Hedychieae (Zingiberaceae):Scaphochlamys kunstleri. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 159: 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. — &H. Kunze. 1995. Inflorescence and floral development inOrchidantha maxillarioides (Lowiaceae). Int. J. PL Sci. 156: 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kuijt, J. I. 1978. Inflorescence morphology of Loranthaceae—An evolutionary synthesis. Blumea 27:1–73.Google Scholar
  53. Macdonald, A. D. 1971. Floral development in the “Amentiferae.” Ph.D. diss., McGill University.Google Scholar
  54. —. 1978. Organogenesis of the male inflorescence and flowers ofMyrica esculenta. Canad. J. Bot. 56: 2415–2423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. —. 1979a. Development of the female flower and gynecandrous partial inflorescenceof Myrica californica. Canad. J. Bot. 57: 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. —. 1979b. Inception of the cupuleof Quercus macrocarpa andFagus grandifolia. Canad. J. Bot. 57:1777–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. —. 1980. Organogenesis of the female reproductive structure ofMyrica pensylvanica. Canad. J. Bot. 58: 2001–2006.Google Scholar
  58. Molder, M. &J. N. Owens. 1973. Ontogeny and histochemistry of the intermediate and reproductive apices ofCosmos bipinnatus var. Sensation in response to gibberellin A3 and photoperiod. Canad. J. Bot. 51:535–555.Google Scholar
  59. Moore, H. E., Jr. &N. W. Uhl. 1982. Major trends of evolution in palms. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 48: 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nougarède, A., G. Bernier &P. Rondet. 1964. Comportement du méristeme apical duPerilla nankinensis, en relation avec les conditions photopériodiques. Rev. Gén. Bot. 71: 205–238.Google Scholar
  61. Pankhurst, R. J. 1994. The representation of shape and form by computer. Pages 153–168in D. S. Ingram & A. Hudson (eds), Shape and form in plants and fungi: Papers presented at a Linnean Society regional meeting held at the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. Linnean Society of London and Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  62. Parkin, J. 1914. The evolution of the inflorescence. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 42: 511–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Philipson, W. R. 1946. Studies in the development of the inflorescence. I. The capitulum ofBellis perennis. Ann. Bot. (London) 10: 257–270.Google Scholar
  64. —. 1947a. Some observations on the apical meristem of leafy and flowering shoots. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 53: 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. —. 1947b. Studies in the development of the inflorescence. II. The capitula ofSuccisa pratensis andDipsacus fullonum. Ann. Bot. (London) 11: 285–297.Google Scholar
  66. —. 1947c. Studies in the development of the inflorescence. III. The thyrse ofValeriana officinalis. Ann. Bot. (London) 11: 409–416.Google Scholar
  67. —. 1948. Studies in the development of the inflorescence. IV. The capitula ofHieraceum boreale andDahlia gracilis. Ann. Bot. (London) 12: 65–75.Google Scholar
  68. —. 1949. The ontogeny of the shoot apex in dicotyledons. Biol. Rev. (Cambridge) 24: 21–50.Google Scholar
  69. Popham, R. A. 1964. Developmental studies of flowering. Pp. 138–156in Meristems and differentiation. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 16. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY.Google Scholar
  70. — &A. P. Chan. 1952. Origin and development of the receptacle ofChrysanthemum morifolium. Amer. J. Bot. 39: 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Posluszny, U. 1981. Unicarpellate floral development inPotamogeton zosteriformis. Canad. J. Bot. 59: 495–504.Google Scholar
  72. —. 1983. Re-evaluation of certain key relationships in the Alismatidae: Floral organogenesis ofScheuchzeria palustris (Scheuchzeriaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 70: 925–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. —. 1993. Evolution of the helobial flower. Aquatic Bot. 44: 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. — &R. Sattler. 1973. Floral development ofPotamogeton densus. Canad. J. Bot. 51: 647–656.Google Scholar
  75. ——. 1974a. Floral developmentof Potamogeton richardsonii. Amer. J. Bot. 61: 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. ——. 1974b. Floral development ofRuppia maritima var.maritima. Canad. J. Bot. 52: 1607–1612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. ——. 1976. Floral development ofZannichellia palustris. Canad. J. Bot. 54: 651–662.Google Scholar
  78. — &P. B. Tomlinson. 1977. Morphology and development of floral shoots and organs in certain Zannichelliaceae. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 75: 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ramírez-Domenech, J. I. &S. C. Tucker. 1989. Phylogenetic implications of inflorescence and floral ontogenyof Mimosa strigillosa. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 1583–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rauh, W. &H. Reznik. 1953. Histogenetische Untersuchungen an Blüten- und Infloreszenzachsen. II. Die Histogenese der Achsenköpfchenformiger Inflorescenzen. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 29:233–296.Google Scholar
  81. Rickett, H. W. 1944. The classification of inflorescences. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 10: 183–231.Google Scholar
  82. —. 1955. Materials for a dictionary of botanical terms. III. Inflorescences. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 82: 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sattler, R. 1965. Perianth developmentof Potamogeton richardsonii. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. —. 1973. Organogenesis of flowers. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  85. Shannon, S. &D. R. Meeks-Wagner. 1991. A mutation in theArabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Pl. Cell 3: 877–892.Google Scholar
  86. Skipworth, J. P. &W. R. Philipson. 1966. The cortical vascular system and the interpretation of theMagnolia flower. Phytomorphology 16: 463–469.Google Scholar
  87. Stebbins, G. L., Jr. 1973. Evolutionary trends in the inflorescence of angiosperms. Flora 162:501–528.Google Scholar
  88. — 1974. Flowering plants: Evolution above the species level. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  89. Swamy, B. G. L. &I. W. Bailey. 1949. The morphology and relationships ofCercidiphyllum. J. Arnold Arbor. 30: 187–210.Google Scholar
  90. Tomlinson, P. B. 1983. Tree architecture. Amer. Sci. 71:141–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Troll, W. 1964. Die Infloreszenzen, Typologie um Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. Vol. 1. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar
  92. —. 1969. Die Infloreszenzen, Typologie um Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. Vol. 2, Part 1. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar
  93. Tucker, S. C. 1959. Ontogeny of the inflorescence and the flower inDrimys wintert var.chilensis. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 30: 257–336.Google Scholar
  94. —. 1960. Ontogeny of the floral apex ofMichelia fuscata. Amer. J. Bot. 47: 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. —. 1980. Inflorescence and flower development in the Piperaceae. I.Peperomia. Amer. J. Bot. 67: 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. —. 1981. Inflorescence and floral development inHouttuynia cordata (Saururaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 68: 1017–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. —. 1982. Inflorescence and flower development in the Piperaceae. II Inflorescence development ofPiper. Amer. J. Bot. 69: 743–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. —. 1987. Pseudoracemes in papilionoid legumes: Their nature, development, and variation. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 95: 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. —. 1988. Heteromorphic flower development inNeptunia pubescens (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Amer. J. Bot. 75: 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. —. 1991. Helical floral organogenesis inGleditsia, a primitive caesalpinioid legume. Amer. J. Bot. 78:1130–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. —. 1998. Floral ontogeny in legume generaPetalostylis, Labichea, andDialium (Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae): A series in floral reduction. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 184–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. — &A. J. Bourland. 1994. Ontogeny of staminate and carpellate flowers ofSchisandra glabra (Schisandra). Pl. Syst. & Evol., Suppl. 8: 137–158.Google Scholar
  103. Uhl, N. W. 1972. Inflorescence and flower structure inNypa fruticans (Palmae). Amer. J. Bot. 59: 729–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. —. 1976. Developmental studies inPtychosperma (Palmae). I. The inflorescence and the flower cluster. Amer. J. Bot. 63: 82–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. — &J. Dransfield. 1984. Development of the inflorescence, androecium, and gynoecium with reference to palms. Pp. 397–449in R. W. White & W. C. Dickison (eds.), Contemporary problems in plant anatomy. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  106. — &H. E. Moore Jr. 1978. The structure of the acervulus, the flower cluster of Chamaedoroid palms. Amer. J. Bot. 65: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Weber, A. 1973. Die Struktur der paarblütigen Partialfloreszenzen der Gesneriaceen und bestimmter Scrophulariaceen. Beirr. Biol. Pflanzen 49: 429–460.Google Scholar
  108. —. 1978. Transitions from pair-flowered to normal cymes in Gesneriaceae. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 36: 355–368.Google Scholar
  109. Weberling, F. 1965. Typology of inflorescences. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 59: 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. —. 1988. The architecture of inflorescences in the Myrtales. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 75:226–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. —. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Transl. by R. J. Pankhurst. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  112. Wyatt, R. 1982. Inflorescence architecture: How flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit-set. Amer. J. Bot. 69: 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Yahel, H., A. Kadman-Zahavi &Y. Tsukamoto. 1985.Chrysanthemum (perennial species). Pp. 258–264in A. H. Halevy (ed.), CRC Handbook of flowering. Vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shirley C. Tucker
    • 1
  • James Grimes
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology (Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology)University of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Royal Botanic GardensSouth YarraAustralia

Personalised recommendations