Dao

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 273–289 | Cite as

Buddhist logic and apologetics in 17th century China: An analysis of the use of Buddhist syllogisms in an anti-Christian polemic

Articles
  • 138 Downloads

Conclusion

A glimpse of the new application of Buddhist logic in the seventeenth century leads us to reflect about our approach to logic in a given religious tradition: Should we isolate a logical system from the very context that has given rise to the genesis and development of such an intellectual apparatus? Methodologically, we do have the legitimate right to approach Buddhist logic from a purely logical point of view. However, when we study the actual use of Buddhist logic in the seventeenth-century anti-Christian polemic, an analysis of its intentional application allows us to conclude that Buddhist logic in the context of controversy is primarily apologetic. Therefore, with a methodological concern, I suggest that philosophers and logicians should reconsider the apologetic nature of logic in any given religious tradition.

Abbreviations:

SCPXJ

Shengchao poxieji, 8 vols. Ed. by XupU Changzhi, 1639; reprinted in Japan, 1855–1856

T

Taishō shinshō daizōkyō, 100 vols. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō et al. Tokyo: Daizō Shuppan, 1924–32

Z

Shinsan dai Nihon zokuzōkyō, 90 vols. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankōkai, 1975–1989; originally published asDainihon zokuzōkyō, 750 vols. Kyoto: Zōkyō Shoin, 1905–12.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhatt, S. R. and Anu Mehrotra. 2000.Buddhist Epistemology. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  2. d’Elia, Pasquale M. S. J., ed. 1942–49.Fonti Ricciane. Rome: Libreria dello Stato.Google Scholar
  3. Dudink, Adrian. 1994. “Review of Iso Kern’sBuddhistische Kritik am Christentum im China des 17. Jahrhunderts. Texte von Yu Shunxi (?-1621), Zhuhong (1535–1615), Yuanwu(1566–1642), Tongrong (1593–1679), Xingyuan (1611–1662), Zhixu (1599–1655).”T’oung Pao 80. 4–5: 400–420.Google Scholar
  4. Frankenhauser, Uwe. 1996.Die Einführung der Buddhistischen Logik in China. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
  5. Gernet, Jacques. 1985.China and the Christian Impact: A Conflict of Cultures. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gregory, Peter. 1995.Inquiry into The Origin of Humanity: An Annotated Translation of Tsung-mi’s Yüan Jen Lun with a Modern Commentary. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  7. Inoue Enryō. 1897.The philosophy of the rthikas (Gedōtetsugaku). Tokyo: Tetsugaku-kan.Google Scholar
  8. Jackson, Roger R. 1999. “Atheology and Buddhalogy in Dharmakīrti’sPramānavārttika.”Faith and Philosophy 16. 4: 472–505.Google Scholar
  9. Keenan, John. 1994.How Master Mou Removes our Doubts: A Reader-Response Study and Translation of the Mou-tzu Li-huo Lun. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kern, Iso. 1984/85. “Matteo Riccis verhältins zum buddhismus.”Monumenta Serica 36: 65–126.Google Scholar
  11. —. 1992.Buddhistische Kritik am Christentum im China des 17. Jahrhunderts. Texte von Yu Shunxi (?-1621), Zhuhong (1535–1615), Yuanwu(1566–1642), Tongrong (1593–1679), Xingyuan (1611–1662), Zhixu (1599–1655). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  12. Kohn, Livia 1995.Laughing at the Too: Debates among Buddhists and Taoists in Medieval China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lancashire, Douglas. 1969. “Anti-Christian Polemics in 17th Century China.”Church History 38. 2: 218–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. —. 1976a. “Buddhist Reaction to Christianity in Late Ming China.”Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia 6. 1–2: 81–103.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1976b. “Chinese Reactions to the Work of Matteo Ricci (1552-1610).”Asian Culture Quarterly 4:106–116.Google Scholar
  16. Mochizuki Shinkō. 1954.Bukkyō Daijiten (Mochizuki Dictionary of Buddhism), vol. 1. Tokyo: Sekai seiten kankō kyōkai.Google Scholar
  17. Mungello, David. 1989.Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1994.The Forgotten Christians of Hangzhou. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nobumi Iyanaga. 1929. “Daijizaiten (Maheśvara).” InHōbōgirin, ed. by Paul Demiéville. Tokyo: Maison franco-japonaise. VI: 713–765.Google Scholar
  20. Perdue, Daniel Elmo. 1992.Debate In Tibetan Buddhism. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Ricci, Matteo. 1985.The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven. Trans. by Douglas Lancashire and Peter Hu Kuo-chen. Taipei, Paris, & Hong Kong: Ricci Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Spence, Jonathan. 1984.The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  23. Standaert, Nicolas. 1988.Yang Tingyun, Confucian and Christian in Late Ming China, His Life and Thought. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  24. —. 1995.The Fascinating God, A Challenge for Modern Chinese Theology Raised by a Text on the Name of God Written by a 17th Century Chinese Student of Theology. Rome: Pontifical Gregorian University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Stcherbatsky, Th. 1993.Buddhist Logic, vol. 1 and 2. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  26. Tillemans, Tom, J.F. 1999. “On Parārthānumāna, Theses and Syllogisms.” In hisScripture, Logic, Languages: Essays on Dharmakīrti and his Tibetan Successors. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Wu, Jiang. 2002. “Orthodoxy, Controversy and the Transformation of Chan Buddhism in Seventeenth-century China.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
  28. Xia, Guiqi, ed. 1996.An Anthology of Writings Exposing Heterodoxy. Hong Kong: Alliance Bible Seminary/China Alliance Press.Google Scholar
  29. Xingyun, ed. 1989.Foguang Buddhist Dictionary. Gaoxiong: Foguang Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  30. Zhang, Shengyan. 1975.A Study of Chinese Buddhism in Late Ming Period. Tokyo: Sankibo Busshorin.Google Scholar
  31. Zhang, Zhiqiang. 1997. “The Mind-Only School and the Study of the Mind-Only School in the Late Ming Period.” Ph.D. Diss., Beijing University (Reprinted inStudy of Chinese Buddhism. Taibei, 2000).Google Scholar
  32. Zürcher, Erik, et. al., ed., 1991.Bibliography on the Jesuit Mission in China, Ca. 1580–1680. Leiden University: Center for Non-Western Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Scholarly Publications 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of East Asian StudiesThe University of ArizonaTucson

Personalised recommendations