Skip to main content
Log in

Species diversity and dominance: A comment

  • Brief Communications
  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Misra etMisra (1981) have concluded, on the basis of an analysis of a grassland community, that there is significant negative correlation between species diversity and dominance indices. It is shown that this result is an unfortunate misunderstanding because negative correlation is an inevitable consequence of indices definitions. Some other shortcomings concerning diversity, stability and species-abundance distributions, contained in the paper, are pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Auclair A. N. etGoff F. G. (1971): Diversity relations of upland forests in the western Great Lakes area.—Amer. Natur., Chicago, 105: 499–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braakhekke W. G. (1980): On coexistence: a causal approach to diversity and stability in grassland vegetation.—Agric. Res. Rep., Wageningen, 902: 1–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer M. G. (1974): On fiting the Poisson lognormal distribution to species-abundance data.— Biometrics, Washington, 30: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Benedictis P. A. (1973): On the correlations between certain diversity indices.—Amer. Natur. Chicago, 107: 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong T. M. (1975): A comparison of three diversity indices based on their components of richness and evennes.—Oikos, Copenhagen, 26: 222–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engen S. (1978): Stochastic Abundance Models.—London.

  • Fränzle O. (1979): Comparative studies on species diversity of plant associations in the U.S.A. and Northern Germany.—Biogeographica, 16: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh B. S. (1980): Management and Analysis of Biological Populations.—Amsterdam.

  • Harrison G. W. (1979): Stability under environmental stress: resistence, resilience, persistance and variability.—Amer. Natur., Chicago, 113: 659–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchingson G. E (1978): An Introduction to Population Ecology.—New Haven.

  • Johnson M. P. etRaven P. H. (1970): Natural regulation of plant species diversity.—Evolutionary Biology, New York, 4: 127–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton R. A. etTaylor L. R. (1974): Log-series and log-normal parameters as divesity discriminants for theLepidoptera.—J. Anim. Ecol., Oxford, 43: 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepŝ J., Osbornová J. etRejmánek M. (1982): Community stability, complexity and species life history strategies.—Vegetatio, The Hague, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel E. van der, (ed.) (1980): Succession.—The Hague.

  • May R. M. (1973): Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems.—Princeton.

  • May R. M. (1975): Patterns of species abundance and diversity.—Cody M. L. etDiamond J. M. (eds.): Ecology and Evolution of Communities.—Cambridge, Mass., pp. 81–120.

  • May R. M. (1976): Patterns in multi-species communities.—In:May R. M. (ed.): Theoretical Ecology.—Oxford, pp. 142–162.

  • Misra M. K. etMisra B. N. (1981): Species diversity and dominance in a tropical grassland community.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 16: 309–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagasawa S. etNuorteva P. (1974): Failure of survey data to conform to mathematical population models as an indicator of environmental disturbance.—Ann. Zool. Fennici, Helsinki, 11: 244–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou E. C. (1981): The broken-stick model: a common misunderstanding.—Amer. Natur., Chicago, 117: 609–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M. (1975): Analýza populaĉní struktury spoleĉenstev: dominance, distribuce druhovŷch významností, diverzita a vyrovnanost.—In: Automatizace sbêru dat v ekologii, Praha, pp. 151–158.

  • Rejmánek M. (1979): Stability and complexity in biotic communities: theoretical and empirical approach.—In:Růžiĉka M. (ed.): Vth Intern. Symp. Probl. Ecol. Land. Res., Bratislava, pp. 65–72.

  • Rejmánek M. (1982): Development of structure at the ecosystem level: succession and stability.— Adv. App. Probab., Sheffield, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser P. G. etRice E. L. (1971): Diversity in tree species in Oklahoma upland forest.—Ecology, Durham, 52: 876–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocomb J., Stauffer B. etDickson K. L. (1977): On fitting the truncated lognormal distribution to species-abundance data using maximum likelihood estimation.—Ecology, Durham, 58: 693–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart J. S. (1976): Statistical test of the broken-stick model of species-abundance relations.— J. theor. Biol., London, 59: 127–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood T. R. E., Brown V. K. etReader P. M., (1979): The relationships of plant and insect diversities in succession.—Biol. J. Lin. Soc., London, 12: 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeb D. J. (1974): The statistics of relative abundance and diversity.—J. Theor. Biol., London, 43: 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski Z. (1978): Wplyw wyboru kryterium oceny, pozycji gatunku w zespole na wartość wskaźnika różnorodności gatunkowej.—Wiad. Ekol., Warzszawa, 24: 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rejmánek, M. Species diversity and dominance: A comment. Folia geobot. phytotax. 17, 329–333 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855715

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855715

Keywords

Navigation