Skip to main content
Log in

The rate and amount of absorption of maleic hydrazide by potato tubers

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Sebago and Huron potatoes were given a foliar spray of 2500 ppm MH Amine three weeks past full bloom. Sufficient absorption occurred within a 24 hour interval (six ppm residue) to satisfactorily inhibit sprouting of tubers stored six months at 50 F. A more complete inhibition of sprouting was attained following a 48 hour absorption period (17 ppm residue) with the exception of a few tubers with long sprouts which occurred at random. Sprouting was stimulated under conditions of slight absorption (two to four hours and four ppm residue). Residue levels of the Sebago variety continued to increase from six ppm after 24 hours of absorption to a maximum of 36 ppm at the end of seven days, despite very heavy rain on the third and fourth days. Approximately 60 hours were required to attain a 50% level of absorption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Franklin, E. W. and N. R. Thompson. 1953. Some effects of maleic hydrazide on stored potatoes. Am. Potato J. 30: 289–295.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Freed, V. H. and M. Montgomery. 1957. A new aspect of foliar absorption of herbicides. Res. Rept. Western Weed Control Conf.

  3. Greulach, V. A. and E. Atchison. 1950. Inhibition of growth and cell division in onion roots by maleic hydrazide. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 77: 262–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hubbard, W. L. 1955. Effect of relative humidity on absorption of MH as sodium and diethanolamine salts. A literature summary on maleic hydrazide. U.S. Rubber Co. Naugatuck Chem. Div., Naugatuck, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hubbard, W. L. and L. B. Rowland. 1955. Observations on response of tomatoes to maleic hydrazide at different humidity levels. A literature summary on maleic hydrazide. U.S. Rubber Co., Naugatuck Chem. Div., Naugatuck, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Isenberg, F. M. R. 1954. Effects of foliar sprays of maleic hydrazide on the storage and respiration of certain vegetable crops. Penn. State Univ. Bull. 584, 12 p.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paterson, D. R. 1952. Some effects of foliar sprays of maleic hydrazide on the post-harvest physiology of potatoes, onions, and certain root crops. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept. of Hort., Mich. State Coll., 90 p.

  8. Pilet, P. 1957. Action of maleic hydrazide onin vivo auxin destruction. Physiologia Plantarum 10: 791–793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, A. E. 1955. Absorption studies of maleic hydrazide by plants. Bethany Info. Sheet No. 88, U.S. Rubber Co., Naugatuck Chem. Div., Naugatuck, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aukel, J. W. 1956. Effect of some factors on rate of absorption of maleic hydrazide. A literature summary on maleic hydrazide. U.S. Rubber Co., Naugatuck Chem. Div., Naugatuck, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franklin, E.W., Lougheed, E.C. The rate and amount of absorption of maleic hydrazide by potato tubers. American Potato Journal 41, 191–195 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855082

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855082

Keywords

Navigation