Advertisement

American Potato Journal

, Volume 65, Issue 11, pp 651–658 | Cite as

Varietal differences in potato tuber greening

  • Alvin F. Reeves
Article

Abstract

Greening reactions of 144 potato varieties (16 russet, 29 red, 99 white) were evaluated. Three components of greening (external color, internal color, and depth of color) were measured. In general, depth of greening was less in russetted varieties than in white varieties. Red varieties showed less discoloration for all three components. The three greening components appeared to be independent, and might be inherited separately.

Additional key words

Solanum tuberosum light 

Compendio

Se evaluaron las reacciones de verdeamiento de 144 variedades de papa (16 rosadas, 29 rojas, 99 blancas). Se midieron tres componentes de verdeamiento (color externo), color interno y profundidad del color). En general, la profundidad de verdeamiento fué menor en las variedades rosadas que en las blancas. Las variedades rojas mostraron menor decoloración relacionada con los tres componentes. Los tres componentes parecieron ser independientes y podrían heredarse independientemente.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Akeley, R.V., G.V.C. Houghland and A.E. Schark. 1962. Genetic differences in potatotuber greenings. Am Potato J 39:409–417.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arteca, R.N. 1981. Calcium infiltration of potatoes: a method to inhibit greening. Hortsci 16:439.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arteca, R.N. 1982. Calcium infiltration inhibits greening in Katahdin potatoes. Hortsci 17:79–80.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arteca, R.N. 1982. Infiltration and movement of 45Ca into potatoes. Hortsci 17:757–758.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banks, N.H. 1985. Coating and modified atmosphere effects on potato tuber greening. J Agric Sci Camb 105:59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beyers, M. 1981. The retardation by gamma irradiation of greening in potatoesSolanum tuberosum exposed to fluorescent lighting. Agroplantae 13:29–38.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, E. and W. Riley. 1976. Greening of potato tubers: varietal response to controlled exposure to light. J Natl Inst Agric Bot 14:70–76.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burton, W.G. 1972. Physiological and biochemical changes in the tuber as affected by storage conditions. Proc 5th Trienn Conf Assoc Potato Res, Norwich.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forsyth, F.R. and C.A. Eaves. 1968. Greening of potatoes: CA cure. Food Tech 22:48–50.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gull, D.D. and F.M. Isenberg. 1960. Chlorophyll and solanine content and distribution in four varieties of potato tubers. Am Soc Hortic Sci 75:545–556.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harkett, P.J. 1975. The influence of temperature and skin colour on chlorophyll synthesis in potato tubers exposed to light. Proc 6th Trienn Conf Eur Assoc Potato Res, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Isenberg, F.M. and D.D. Gull. 1959. Potato greening under artificial light. Cornell Ext Bull 1033.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin, S.K. and R.L. Sheppard. 1983. Effect of different packaging materials and light exposure times on chlorophyll concentration in 2 cultivars of potato. New Zealand J Exp Agric 11:63–38.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mottley, J. 1980. Influence of light induced greening on the browning components of different varieties of potato tubers. Luso J Sci Technol 1:1–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parfitt, D.E. and S.J. Peloquin. 1981. The genetic basis for tuber greening in 24-chromosome potatoes. Am Potato J 58:299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poapst, P.A. 1979. The role of endogenous acetaldehyde and ethanol in the prevention of greening in cold-stored Kennebec potato tubers. Potato Res 22:339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poapst, P.A. and F.R. Forsyth. 1974. The role of internally produced carbon dioxide in the prevention of greening in potato tubers. Acta Hortic 38:277–290.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Poapst, P.A. and F.R. Forsyth. 1975. Relative effectiveness of Tween surfactants when used to control greening in Kennebec potato tubers after cold storage. Can J Plant Sci 55:337–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Poapst, P.A., I. Price and F.R. Forsyth. 1978. Controlling post storage greening in table stock potatoes with ethoxylated mono-and diglyceride surfactants and an adjuvant. Am Potato J 55:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Popst, P.A., I. Price and F.R. Forsyth. 1978. Prevention of post storage greening in table stock potato tubers by application of surfactants and adjuvants. J Food Sci 43:900–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sinden, S.L. 1971. Control of potato greening with household detergents. Am Potato J 48:53–56.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, M.T. and D.K. Salunkhe. 1975. Effects of vacuum packaging on light induced greening and glycoalkaloid formation of potato tubers. Can Inst Food Sci Technol J 8:185–187.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu, M.T. and D.K. Salunkhe. 1977. Use of spray lecithin for control of greening and glycoalkaloid formation of potato tubers. J Food Sci 42:1413–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu, M.T. and D.K. Salunkhe. 1978. Aftereffect of submersion in water on greening and glycoalkaloid formation of potato tubers. J Food Sci 43:1330–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu, M.T. and D.K. Salunkhe. 1978. Responses of lecithin and hydroxylated lecithin coated (stored) potato tubers to light. J Agric Food Chem 26:513–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yamaguchi, M., D.L. Hughes and F.D. Howard. 1960. Effect of colour and intensity of fluorescent lights and applications of chemicals and waxes on chlorophyll development in White Rose potatoes. Am Potato J 37:229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alvin F. Reeves
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Soil SciencesUniversity of MaineOrono

Personalised recommendations