Skip to main content
Log in

A current assessment ofin vitro culture and other rapid multiplication methods in North America and Europe

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Micropropagation as a tool for production of nuclear potato seed stocks has clearly made giant steps in the past decade. Almost all seed producing areas of North America and Europe have either built or modified existing structures to accommodate this type of propagation. Micropropagation has all the advantages of stem cuttings, namely, rapid increase of pathogen-free plants and breaking the cycle of tuber-borne soil organisms. This is combined with the additional advantages of higher yield per plant, less labor, a faster rate of multiplication, reduced testing and increased flexibility of scheduling with less dependence on mother tuber physiology.

At the present time we are seeing many different applications and modifications of micropropagation. However, as ideas are exchanged and people have time and the opportunity to evaluate alternate ideas, types of application and methods will probably narrow down, at least in areas with similar climates. Length of growing season, insect populations and irrigation certainly control some of the parameters of growing micropropagated plantlets in the field.

In the United States more seed growers will start small in vitro programs and, depending on their initial success, perseverance and control of costs, will expand their facilities and capabilities, particularly in states that do not have official seed farms. These procedures enable growers to develop their own “closed system” and to be able to introduce new cultivars into their programs without risk of introducing tuber-borne diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Allan, E. and A. Kelman. 1977. Immunofluorescent stain procedures for detection and identification ofErwinia carotovora var.atroseptica. Phytopathology 67:1305–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, M.F. and A.N. Adams. 1977. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol 34: 475–483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. DeBoer, S.H. and R.J. Copeman. 1980. Bacterial ring rot testing with the indirect fluo-rescent antibody staining procedure. Am Potato J 57:457–465.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Linsmaier, E.M. and F. Skoog. 1965. Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 18:100–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mellor, F.C. and R. Stace-Smith. 1977. Virus-free potatoes by tissue culture.In: Applied and Fundamental Aspects of Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. (J. Reinert and Y.P.S. Bajaj, Eds.). Springer-Verlag Berlin. pp. 616–646.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Palukaitus, P., S. Cotts and M. Zaitlin. 1985. Detection and identification of viroids and viral nucleic acids by ‘dot-blot’ hybridization. Acta Hortic 164:109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson, L.T. 1957. Quantitative determination of viability of potato ring rot bacteria following storage, heat, and gas treatments. Can J Botany 35:647–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Slack, S.A., A. Kelman and J.B. Perry. 1979. Comparison of three serodiagnostic assays for detection ofCorynebacterium sepedonicum. Phytopathology 69:186–189.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, E.D. A current assessment ofin vitro culture and other rapid multiplication methods in North America and Europe. American Potato Journal 65, 209–220 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854453

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854453

Additional Key Words

Navigation