Abstract
It is shown that the (8, 8) model and explicitηπ 0 mixing successfully explain theη→3π decay width whereas the decay width calculated from the mass difference\(m_{K^ + }^2 - m_{K^0 }^2 \) is about one order less than the experimental value.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baglin C, Bezaguet A, Degrange B, Musset P, Bingham H Het al 1969Phys. Lett. 29B 445
Bardeen W, Brown L S, Lee B W and Nieh H T 1967Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 1170
Barnes K and Isham C 1970Nucl. Phys. B17 267
Bell J S and Sutherland D 1968Nucl. Phys. B4 315
Bose S and Zimerman A 1966Nuovo Cimento 43A 1165
Brehm J J 1971Nucl. Phys. B34 269
Browman Aet al July 1973 CLNS 242
Brown L M, Deshpande N G and Conntanzi, Fronk A 1971Phys. Rev. D4 146
Cantor A 1971Phys. Rev. D3 3205
Cicogna G, Strocchi F and Caffarelli V R 1974Lett. Nuovo Cimento 10 25
Chiu Y, Schecter J and Ueda Y 1967Phys. Rev. 162 1612
Dashen R 1969Phys. Rev. 183 1245
Dittner P, Dondi P H and Eliezer S 1973Phys. Rev. D8 2253.
Dolgov A D, Vainstein A I and Zakharov V I 1967Phys. Lett. 24B 425
Dutt R and Eliezer S 1971Phys. Rev. D4 180
Gell-Mann M, Oakes R J and Renner B 1968Phys. Rev. 175 2195
Genz H, Katz J and Steiner H 1973Phys. Rev. D7 2100
Graham R, Raifeartaigh L O and Pakvasa S 1967Nuovo Cimento 48 A 830
Kanazaw A and Kariya T 1968Progr. Theor. Phys. 40 842
Kondo H and Noda H 1970Progr. Theor. Phys. 43 1614
Oakes R J 1969Phys. Lett. 30 B 262
Socolow R H 1968Phys. Rev. 168 1534
Sutherland D 1967Nucl. Phys. B2 433
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, S.R., Roychoudhury, R.K. SU(3)×SU(3) symmetry breaking, (8, 8) Model and theη→3π decay. Pramana - J. Phys. 4, 192–198 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854243
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854243