Skip to main content
Log in

Colorado potato beetle resistance management strategies for transgenic potatoes

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

NewLeaf potatoes could provide substantial ecological and economic benefits to potato growers. A concern with NewLeaf potatoes, however, is that Colorado potato beetle may develop resistance to the Bt endotoxin because of the intense selection pressure imposed by its constant presence in the transgenic crop. Before these cultivars were released, however, entomologists throughout North America conducted biological research needed for a strategy to prevent or delay resistance in Colorado potato beetle. This paper describes the considerations and research behind the proposed strategy. Because NewLeaf potatoes express a relatively constant and high concentration of Bt endotoxin throughout the foliage of each plant, reducing selection for resistance must come from planting standard potatoes as a refuge for susceptible beetles. Avoiding resistance through random mixtures of NewLeaf and standard potatoes was evaluated in laboratory and field studies. The conclusion from this research was that the seed mixture would not provide an effective refuge. The most effective alternative refuge was judged to be a block of standard potatoes planted in the same field as the NewLeaf potatoes. By allowing susceptible beetles to survive in their fields, potato growers might sustain the benefits of very effective controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Arpaia, S., F. Gould, and G. Kennedy. 1997. Potential impact ofColeomegilla maculata predation on adaptation ofLeptinotarsa decemlineata to Bt-transgenic potatoes. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 82: 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative gentics, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferro, D.N., A.F. Turtle, and D.C. Weber 1991. Ovipositional and flight behavior of overwintered Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ Entomol 20:1309–1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgash, A. J. 1985. Insecticide resistance in the Colroado potato beetle, pp. 33–52.In: D.N. Ferro & R. H. Voss [eds.], XVII International Congress of Entomology, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amtierst. Research Bulletin 704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, N.L., R.N. Hofmaster, and M. Semel. 1981. History of Colorado potato beetle control., pp. 47–68In: Advances in potato pest management (J.H. Lashomb and R. Casagrande, eds.). Shroudsburg, PA: Hutchison Ross Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, F.A. Martinez-Ramirez, A. Anderson, J. Ferre, F.J. Silva, and W.J. Moar. 1992. Broad-spectrum resistance toBacillus thuringiensis toxins inHeliothis virescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89:7986–7990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, C.W. and G. Head. 1995. Correlation between behavioral and physiological responses to transgenic potatoes containingBacillus thuringiensis d-endotoxin inLeptinotarsa dedemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) J Econ Entomol 88:480–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, C., J. Feldman, F. Gould, G. Kennedy, G. Reed, and J. Wyman. 1998a Naturally occurring biological controls in genetically engineered crops. pp. 185–205In: Conservation Biological Control. (Pedro Barbosa ed.) Academic Press. San Diego. 396 pp.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, C.W., G. Head, and F.R. Hall. 1998b. Spatial heterogeneity and insect adaptation to toxins. Ann Rev Entomol 43:571–594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H., Z. Smilowitz, M.C. Saunders, and R. Weisz. 1995. Field selection for esfenvalerate resistance by the Colorado potato beetle. Am Potato J 72:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, P.M., E. Grafius, and M.E. Whalon. 1991. Patterns of insecticide resistance to azinphosmethyl, carbofuran, and permethrin in the Colorado potato beetle. J Econ Entomol 84:1417–1423.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karban, R. and I.T. Baldwin. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago. Univ. Chicago Press. 319 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G.G. and M.E. Whalon. 1995. Managing pest resistance toBacillus thuringiensis endotoxins: constraints and incentives to implementation. J Econ Entomol 88:454–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavrik, P.B., D.E. Bartnicki, J. Feldman, B.G. Hammond, P.J. Keck, S.L. Love, M.W. Naylor, G.J. Rogan, S.R. Sims, and R.L. Fuchs. 1995. Safety assessment of potatoes resistant to Colorado potato beetle. Pp. 148–158.In: Genetically Modified foods: safety issues. American Chemical Society symposium series 605.

  • Perlak, F.J., T.B. Stone, Y.M. Muscopf, L.J. Petersen, G.B. Parker, S. A. McPherson, J. Wyman, S. Love, G. Reed, and D. Biever. 1993. Genetically improved potatoes: protection form damage by Colorado potato beetles. Plant Mol Biol 22:313–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahardja, U. and M.E. Whalon. 1995. Inheritance of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis subsp.tenebrionis CryIIIA delta-endotoxin in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 88:21–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roush, R.T., C.W. Hoy, D.N. Ferro, and W.M. Tingey. 1990. Insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): influence of crop rotation and insecticide use. J Econ Entomol 83:315–319.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B E. 1992. Resistance risk assessment: realized heritability of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), tobacco budworm (Lepidoptem: Noctuidae), and Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 85:1551–1559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B.E., N. Finson, F.R. Groeters, W.J. Moar, M.W. Johnson, K. Luo, and M.J. Adang. 1994. Reversal of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis inPlutella xylostella. Proc Natl Acad Sci 91:4120–4124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B.E., Y.B. Liu, N. Finson, L. Masson, and D. Heckel. 1997. One gene in diamondback moth confers resistance to fourBacillus thuringiensis toxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:1640–1644.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trisyono, A. and M.E. Whalon. 1997. Fitness costs of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 90:267–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R.H. and D.N. Ferro. 1990. Phenology of flight and walking by Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) adults in Western Massachusetts. Environ Entomol 19:117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, D.C. and D.N. Ferro. 1993. Distribution of overwintering Colorado potato beetle in and near Massachusetts potato fields. Entomol Exp Appl 66:191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalon, M.E., D.L. Miller, R.M. Hollingworth, E.J. Grafius, and J.R. Miller. 1993. Selection of a Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) strain resistant toBacillus thuringiensis. J Econ Entomol 86:226–233.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casey W. Hoy.

Additional information

This review paper was originally presented, somewhat modified for oral presentation, in the program symposium at the 1996 Potato Association of America Meeting in Idaho Falls, Idaho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoy, C.W. Colorado potato beetle resistance management strategies for transgenic potatoes. Am. J. Pot Res 76, 215–219 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854224

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854224

Additional Key Words

Navigation