Abstract
NewLeaf potatoes could provide substantial ecological and economic benefits to potato growers. A concern with NewLeaf potatoes, however, is that Colorado potato beetle may develop resistance to the Bt endotoxin because of the intense selection pressure imposed by its constant presence in the transgenic crop. Before these cultivars were released, however, entomologists throughout North America conducted biological research needed for a strategy to prevent or delay resistance in Colorado potato beetle. This paper describes the considerations and research behind the proposed strategy. Because NewLeaf potatoes express a relatively constant and high concentration of Bt endotoxin throughout the foliage of each plant, reducing selection for resistance must come from planting standard potatoes as a refuge for susceptible beetles. Avoiding resistance through random mixtures of NewLeaf and standard potatoes was evaluated in laboratory and field studies. The conclusion from this research was that the seed mixture would not provide an effective refuge. The most effective alternative refuge was judged to be a block of standard potatoes planted in the same field as the NewLeaf potatoes. By allowing susceptible beetles to survive in their fields, potato growers might sustain the benefits of very effective controls.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Arpaia, S., F. Gould, and G. Kennedy. 1997. Potential impact ofColeomegilla maculata predation on adaptation ofLeptinotarsa decemlineata to Bt-transgenic potatoes. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 82: 91–100.
Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative gentics, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York.
Ferro, D.N., A.F. Turtle, and D.C. Weber 1991. Ovipositional and flight behavior of overwintered Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ Entomol 20:1309–1314.
Forgash, A. J. 1985. Insecticide resistance in the Colroado potato beetle, pp. 33–52.In: D.N. Ferro & R. H. Voss [eds.], XVII International Congress of Entomology, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amtierst. Research Bulletin 704.
Gauthier, N.L., R.N. Hofmaster, and M. Semel. 1981. History of Colorado potato beetle control., pp. 47–68In: Advances in potato pest management (J.H. Lashomb and R. Casagrande, eds.). Shroudsburg, PA: Hutchison Ross Pub. Co.
Gould, F.A. Martinez-Ramirez, A. Anderson, J. Ferre, F.J. Silva, and W.J. Moar. 1992. Broad-spectrum resistance toBacillus thuringiensis toxins inHeliothis virescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89:7986–7990.
Hoy, C.W. and G. Head. 1995. Correlation between behavioral and physiological responses to transgenic potatoes containingBacillus thuringiensis d-endotoxin inLeptinotarsa dedemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) J Econ Entomol 88:480–486.
Hoy, C., J. Feldman, F. Gould, G. Kennedy, G. Reed, and J. Wyman. 1998a Naturally occurring biological controls in genetically engineered crops. pp. 185–205In: Conservation Biological Control. (Pedro Barbosa ed.) Academic Press. San Diego. 396 pp.
Hoy, C.W., G. Head, and F.R. Hall. 1998b. Spatial heterogeneity and insect adaptation to toxins. Ann Rev Entomol 43:571–594.
Huang, H., Z. Smilowitz, M.C. Saunders, and R. Weisz. 1995. Field selection for esfenvalerate resistance by the Colorado potato beetle. Am Potato J 72:1–12.
Ioannidis, P.M., E. Grafius, and M.E. Whalon. 1991. Patterns of insecticide resistance to azinphosmethyl, carbofuran, and permethrin in the Colorado potato beetle. J Econ Entomol 84:1417–1423.
Karban, R. and I.T. Baldwin. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago. Univ. Chicago Press. 319 pp.
Kennedy, G.G. and M.E. Whalon. 1995. Managing pest resistance toBacillus thuringiensis endotoxins: constraints and incentives to implementation. J Econ Entomol 88:454–460.
Lavrik, P.B., D.E. Bartnicki, J. Feldman, B.G. Hammond, P.J. Keck, S.L. Love, M.W. Naylor, G.J. Rogan, S.R. Sims, and R.L. Fuchs. 1995. Safety assessment of potatoes resistant to Colorado potato beetle. Pp. 148–158.In: Genetically Modified foods: safety issues. American Chemical Society symposium series 605.
Perlak, F.J., T.B. Stone, Y.M. Muscopf, L.J. Petersen, G.B. Parker, S. A. McPherson, J. Wyman, S. Love, G. Reed, and D. Biever. 1993. Genetically improved potatoes: protection form damage by Colorado potato beetles. Plant Mol Biol 22:313–321.
Rahardja, U. and M.E. Whalon. 1995. Inheritance of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis subsp.tenebrionis CryIIIA delta-endotoxin in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 88:21–26.
Roush, R.T., C.W. Hoy, D.N. Ferro, and W.M. Tingey. 1990. Insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): influence of crop rotation and insecticide use. J Econ Entomol 83:315–319.
Tabashnik, B E. 1992. Resistance risk assessment: realized heritability of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), tobacco budworm (Lepidoptem: Noctuidae), and Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 85:1551–1559.
Tabashnik, B.E., N. Finson, F.R. Groeters, W.J. Moar, M.W. Johnson, K. Luo, and M.J. Adang. 1994. Reversal of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis inPlutella xylostella. Proc Natl Acad Sci 91:4120–4124.
Tabashnik, B.E., Y.B. Liu, N. Finson, L. Masson, and D. Heckel. 1997. One gene in diamondback moth confers resistance to fourBacillus thuringiensis toxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:1640–1644.
Trisyono, A. and M.E. Whalon. 1997. Fitness costs of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 90:267–271
Voss, R.H. and D.N. Ferro. 1990. Phenology of flight and walking by Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) adults in Western Massachusetts. Environ Entomol 19:117–122.
Weber, D.C. and D.N. Ferro. 1993. Distribution of overwintering Colorado potato beetle in and near Massachusetts potato fields. Entomol Exp Appl 66:191–196.
Whalon, M.E., D.L. Miller, R.M. Hollingworth, E.J. Grafius, and J.R. Miller. 1993. Selection of a Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) strain resistant toBacillus thuringiensis. J Econ Entomol 86:226–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This review paper was originally presented, somewhat modified for oral presentation, in the program symposium at the 1996 Potato Association of America Meeting in Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoy, C.W. Colorado potato beetle resistance management strategies for transgenic potatoes. Am. J. Pot Res 76, 215–219 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854224
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854224