Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of potato varieties and selections for resistance to bacterial soft rot

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Potato varieties and selections were evaluated for resistance to bacterial soft rot caused byErwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora and Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica in mist chamber. A randomized complete block design with a single treatment and 3 replications was used in this study. Potato lines were inoculated with bacterial suspension (10 tubers / line) using the puncture inoculation method and incubated for 4 days in a mist chamber at 21 C and 100 % relative humidity in the dark. Although there were differences in incidence of soft rot and in amount of weight reduction, most of the potato lines were susceptible to tuber soft rot. Mean incidence (%) of soft rot ranged from 10 to 100%. Mean reduction of tuber weight (%) ranged from 0.13 to 16.43 %. Among the varieties and selections tested, AF 522-5 was the most resistant to tuber weight loss, while AF 1424-7 was most susceptible. There were also significant differences between years, and a variety by year interaction. Testing over a period of years is recommended. A significant correlation coefficient of soft rot incidence (%) and reduction of tuber weight (%) was obtained (r=0.65; P=0.05), indicating that incidence was a fair measure of soft rot potential. However, the greater variability in results for incidence make weight loss a better measure of soft rot reaction. There was a significant difference among varieties in the reduction of tuber weight when potato lines were inoculated either 1 month or 2 months after harvest, but the interaction of time by year prohibits a conclusion as to which time gives a better test reaction. Late maturing varieties had slightly less weight loss than earlier maturing varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bourne, W.F., D.C. McCalmont, and R.L. Wastie. 1981. Assessing potato tubers for susceptibility to bacterial soft rot (Erwinia carotovora subsp.atroseptica) Potato Research 24:409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, W.S., C.E. Sams, and A. Kelman. 1994. Enhancing the natural resistance of plant tissues to postharvest diseases through calcium applications. Hortscience 29(7):751–754.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cromarty, R.W. and G.D. Easton. 1973. The incidence of decay and factors affecting bacterial soft rot of potatoes. Am Potato J 50:398–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M., B. Jouan., R. Samson, F. Poutier, and M. Sailly. 1978. Prospects of pathogenicity test concerningErwinia carotovora var.carotovom andErwinia carotovom var.atroseptica, on half potato tubers, variation according to variety of bacterial species and strains, inoculum dose, temperature, variety of potatoes, physiological age of tubers and delay between injury and inoculation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic bacteria, Beauconze, Angers, pp. 591–602.

  • Koppel, M. 1993. Methods of assessing potato tubers for resistance to bacterial soft rot. Potato Research 36:183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapwood, D.H., P. J. Read, and J. Spokes. 1984. Methods for assessing the susceptibility of potato tubers of different cultivars to rotting byErwinia carotovom subsp.atroseptica andcarotovom. Plant Pathology 33:13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapwood, D.H. and P.J. Read. 1985. A simplified slice method for assessing tuber susceptibility of potato cultivars toErwinia carotovom subsp.atroseptica. Plant Pathology 34:284–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G.D. 1989. The biochemical basis of resistance of potatoes to soft rotErwinia spp. — a review. Plant Pathology 38:313–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perombelon, M.C.M. and A. Kelman. 1980. Ecology of soft roterwinias. Annual Review of Phytopathology 18:61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabot, B., C. Pasco, and J. Schmidt 1994. Assessing six Austrian potato cultivars for resistance toErwinia carotovom subsp.atroseptica. Potato Research 37:197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, K.C., R.G. McGuire, and A. Kelman. 1990. Resistance of tubers from different potato cultivars to soft rot caused byErwinia carotovom subsp.atroseptica. Am Potato J 67:287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. F. Reeves.

Additional information

Paper No. 2309 of the Maine Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station and the University of Maine External Publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reeves, A.F., Olanya, O.M., Hunter, J.H. et al. Evaluation of potato varieties and selections for resistance to bacterial soft rot. Am. J. Pot Res 76, 183–189 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854220

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854220

Additional Key Words

Navigation