Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of bromoethane and ethanol on potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber sprouting and subsequent yield responses

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of dormancy breaking agents on basic nuclear stock tubers can improve production system efficiency, reduce turnaround time and eliminate storage costs. Single and double treatments of bromoethane, and bromoethane with ethanol were given to dormant seed tubers of the three cultivars Kennebec, Katahdin, and Russet Burbank. Two consecutive bromoethane treatments for 24 hours each gave the best overall response although strong interactions were observed between cultivars and treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Adkins, S.W., J.M. Naylor and G.M. Simpson. 1984. The physiological basis of seed dormancy inAvena fatua V. Action of ethanol and other organic compounds. Physiol Plant 62:18–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman, W. 1983. An evaluation of bromoethane for breaking tuber dormancy inSolanum tuberosum L. Am Potato J 60:161–167.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coleman, W. 1984. Large scale application of bromoethane for breaking potato tuber dormancy. Am Potato J 61:587–589.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCallum, W.B. 1909. Twentieth Ann Rep Univ Arizona Agric Exp Stn. pp. 584–586.

  5. McDonald, J.G. and W.K. Coleman. 1984. Detection of potato viruses Y and S in tubers by ELISA after breaking of dormancy with bromoethane or rindite. Am Potato J 61:619–622.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, L.P. 1933. Effects of various chemicals on the sugar content, respiratory rate, and dormancy of potato tubers. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 5:213–234.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller, L.P. 1934a. Time relations in effect of ethylene chlorohydrin in increasing and of ethyl alcohol in decreasing the respiration of potato tubers. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 6:123–128.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, L.P. 1934b. The effect of the alkyl halides on the respiration of potato tubers. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 6:279–296.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peckett, R.C. and F. Al-Charchafchi. 1978. Dormancy in light-sensitive lettuce seeds. J Exp Bot 29:167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosa, J.T. 1923. Abbreviation of the dormant period in potato tubers. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 20:180–187.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steele, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics (2nd ed.) McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Taylorson, R.B. and S.B. Hendricks. 1979. Overcoming dormancy in seeds with ethanol and other anesthetics. Planta 145:507–510.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylorson, R.B. and S.B. Hendricks. 1980/81. Anesthetic release of seed dormancy — an overview. Israel J Bot 29:273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thornton, N.C. 1933. Carbon dioxide storage V. Breaking the dormancy of potato tubers. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 5:471–481.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thornton, N.C. 1939. Oxygen regulates the dormancy of the potato. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 10:339–361.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, W.K., Coleman, S.E. The effects of bromoethane and ethanol on potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber sprouting and subsequent yield responses. American Potato Journal 63, 373–377 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853885

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853885

Key Words

Navigation