Skip to main content
Log in

Yield response of two potato culivars to supplemental irrigation and N fertilization in New Brunswick

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nitrogen and water are important factors influencing potato production, and crop response to these two factors may vary with cultivars. The yield response of two potato cultivars (Russet Burbank and Shepody) to six rates of N fertilization (0-250 kg N ha-1) with and without supplemental irrigation was studied at four onfarm sites in each of three years, 1995 to 1997, in the upper St-John River Valley of New Brunswick, Canada. On average, irrigation increased total yield from 31.9t ha-1 without irrigation to 38.41 ha-1 with irrigation and marketable yield from 25.61 ha-1 without irrigation to 30.71 ha-1 with irrigation. Potato yields were increased by irrigation at nine out of the 12 sites, and the irrigation response was similar for both cultivars. Nitrogen fertilization significantly increased both total and marketable yields at all sites except one. The yield response to N fertilization was greater with irrigation. The N fertilization rate (Nmax) required to reach maximum total and marketable yield, however, was similar with and without irrigation. A large variation in Nmax was observed among sites. With irrigation Nmax varied between 158 and 233 kgN ha-1 for total yield, and between 151 and 250 kg N ha-1 for marketable yield. There was no interaction between N fertilization and potato cultivar for both total and marketable yields. The two cultivars had similar total yields (35 t ha-1). Shepody, however, had a greater marketable yield (28.9 t ha-1) than Russet Burbank (27.4 t ha-1). Our results indicate that the response to two of the most significant factors of potato production, irrigation and N fertilization, varies greatly with sites and climatic conditions, and that field specific recommendations are required for the optimum management of N and irrigation.

Resumen

El nitrógeno y el agua son factores importantes que influyen en la producción de la papa, y la reacción de la cosecha antes estos dos factores puede variar con diferentes cultivares. La reacción de rendimiento de dos cultivares de papa (Russet Burbank y Shepody) antes seis medidas de fertilizante N (0-250 kg N Ha-1) con y sin irrigación suplementaria se estudió en dos lotes en granja durante cada uno de los tres años, 1995–1997, en la parte superior del Valle del Río St-John en New Brunswick, Canadá. En un p romedio, la irrigación aumentó el rendimiento total de 31.91 ha-1 sin irrigación a 38.4 t ha-1 con irrigación y al rendimiento comerciable de 25.61 ha- 1 sin irrigación a 30.71 t ha-1 con irrigación. Los rendimientos de la papa aumentaron a causa de la irrigación en 9 de los 12 lotes, y el resultado de la irrigación fue similar para los dos cultivares. La fertilización con nitrógeno aumentó notablemente tanto los rendimientos totales y comerciables en todos los lotes menos uno. El rendimiento ante la fertilización N fue mayor con irrigación. La tasa de fertilización N (Nmax) que es necesaria para alcanzar el rendimiento total y comerciable, sin embargo, fue similar con y sin irrigación. Se observó una gran variación en Nmax en los lotes. Con irrigación, Nmax varió entre 158 y 233 kg N ha-1 en el rendimiento total, y entre 151 y 250 kg N ha-1 en el rendimiento comerciable. No había ninguna interacción entre la fertilización N y el cultivar de la papa para los rendimientos tanto totales como comerciables. Los dos cultivares tuvieron rendimientos totales similares 35 t ha-1). Shepody, sin embargo, tuvo un rendimiento comerciable mayor (28.9 t ha-1) que Russet Burbank (27.4t ha-1). Nuestros resultados indican que la respuesta a dos de los factores más significativos en la producción de la papa, la irrigación y la fertilización N, varía mucho entre lotes y condiciones climáticas, y que unas recomendaciones de campo específicas son necesarias para el manejo óptimo de N y de la irrigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Baldock, J.O., L.R. Higgs, W.H. Paulson, J.A. Jacobs, and W.D. Schrader. 1981. Legume and mineral N effects on crop yields in several crop sequences in the upper Mississipi Valley. Agron J 73:885–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, G., S.K. Asiedu, and P. Boswall. (eds.). 1993. Atlantic Canada potato guide. Publ. 1300/87. Published by authority of the Atlantic Provinces Agricultural Services Coordinating Committee. 60 pages. Available from the New Brunswick Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Fredericton, NB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, L.G., R.P. Wolkowski, and G.G. Weis. 1986. Nitrogen source evaluation for potato production on irrigated sandy soils. Am Potato J 63:385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrato, M.E. and A.M. Blackmer. 1990. Comparison of models for describing corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agron.J 82:138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutterbuck, B. J. and K. Simpson. 1978. The interactions of water and fertilizer nitrogen in effects on growth pattern and yield of potatoes. J Agric Sci Camb 91:161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, J.D. 1994. Estimating Fertilizer Requirements. A Quantitative Approach. UK: Cab International. 262 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curwen, D. and L.R. Massie. 1984. Potato irrigation scheduling in Wisconsin. Am Potato J 61:235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Morena, I., A. Guillén, and I.F. Garcia del Moral. 1994. Yield development in potatoes as influenced by cultivar and the timing and level of nitrogen fertilization. Am Potato J 71:165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errebhi, M., C.J. Rosen, S.C. Gupta, and D.E. Birong. 1998. Potato yield response and nitrate leaching as influenced by nitrogen management. Agron J 90:10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feibert, E.B.G., C.C. Shock, and L.D. Saunders. 1998. Nitrogen fertilizer requirements of potatoes using carefully scheduled sprinkler irrigation. Hort Sci 33:262–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavlak, R.G., W.L. Campbell, J.L. Walworth, C.L. Johnson, J.E. Muniz, and T.A. Tindall. 1993. Nitrogen fertilization of irrigated Russet potatoes in southcentral. Alaska Am Potato J 70:571–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, P.J. and L.P. Simmonds. 1992. Water relations and growth of potatoes. Pages 214–246In: The Potato Crop, The Scientific Basis For Improvement, ed. P. Harris, Chapman & Hall, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. 1992. Mineral nutrition. Pages 162–213In: The Potato Crop, The Scientific Basis For Improvement, ed. P. Harris, Chapman & Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot, W.H. and M. Duquette. 1986. A simple barium chloride method for determining cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:605–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot, W.H., H. Lalande, and M. Duquette. 1993. Ion exchange and exchangeable cations. Pages 167–176In: Soil sampling and methods of analyses, ed. M.R. Carter, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joern, B.C. and M.L. Vitosh. 1995. Influence of applied nitrogen on potato Part I: Yield, quality, and nitrogen uptake. Am Potato J 72:53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langmaid; K.K., J.K MacMillan, and J.G. Losier. 1976. Soils of Northern Victoria County, New Brunswick. Seventh Report of the New Brunswick Soil Survey. Copies available from the New 21 Brunswick Department of Agriculture and Rural Development. P.O. Box 6000, Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1.

  • Lynch, D.R. and G.C.C. Tai. 1989. Yield and yield component response of eight potato genotypes to water stress. Crop Sci 29:1207–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W.B. and C.T. Figueiredo. 1993. Total nitrogen. Pages 201–211In: Soil sampling and methods of analyses, ed. M. R. Carter, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R.D. and D.B Marcum. 1998. Potato yield, petiole nitrogen, and soil nitrogen response to water and nitrogen. Agron J 90:420–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millette, J.F.G. and K.K. Langmaid. 1964. Soil survey of the Andover-Plaster Rock area of New Brunswick. Fifth Report of the New Brunswick Soil Survey. Copies available from the New Brunswick Department of Agriculture and Rural Development P.O. Box 6000, Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1.

  • Munro D.C, R.P. White, and J.B. Sanderson. 1977. Effects of applied nitrogen on yields, tuber sizes, and specific gravities of two potato cultivars. Can J Plant Sci 57:803–810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ojala, J.C., J.C. Stark, and G.E. Kleinkopf. 1990. Influence of irrigation and nitrogen management on potato yield and quality. Am Potato J. 67:29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paré, T., F.P. Chalifour, J. Bourassa, and H. Antoun. 1992. Forage-corn dry matter yields and N uptake as affected by previous legumes and nitrogen fertilizer. Can J Plant Sci 72:699–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, G.A. and J.A. Sisson. 1993. Yield, market quality and petiole nitrate concentration of non-irrigated Russet Burbank and Shepody potatoes in response to side dressed nitrogen. Am Potato J 70: 101–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldrick, B.H. and C. Wang. 1993. Particle size distribution. Pages 499–511In: Soil sampling and methods of analysis, ed. M.R. Carter, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, G.H., R.W. Chase, R. Hammerschmidt, M.L. Vitosh, and R.B. Kitchen. 1991. Irrigation, nitrogen and gypsum effects on specific gravity and internal defects of Atlantic potatoes. Am Potato J 68:751–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, K. 1962. Effects of soil-moisture tension and fertilizers on the yield, growth and phosphorus uptake of potatoes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 13:236–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Analysis System Institute. Inc. 1996. Statistics. 6 th ed., SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co. NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobbe, P.C. and H. Aalund. 1944. Soil survey of the Woodstock area of New Brunswick. Second Report of the New Brunswick Soil Survey. Copies available from the New Brunswick Department of Agriculture and Rural Development. P.O. Box 6000, Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1.

  • Tel, D.A. and C. Heseltine. 1990. The analyses of KC1 soil extracts for nitrate, nitrite and ammonium using a TRAACS 800 analyzer. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 21:981–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen, H. and J.O. Moir. 1993. Total and organic carbon. Pages 187–199In: Soil sampling and methods of analyses, ed. M.R. Carter, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, J. 1997. The nitrogen response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L) in the field: nitrogen uptake and yield, harvest index and nitrogen concentration. Potato Research 40:237–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westermann, D.T. and G.E. Kleinkopf. 1985. Nitrogen requirements of potatoes. Agron J 77:616–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.M.J and N.A. Maier. 1990. Determination of the nitrogen status of irrigated potato crops. I. Critical nutrient ranges for nitrate-nitrogen in petioles. J Plant Nutr 13(8):971–984.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bélanger, G., Walsh, J.R., Richards, J.E. et al. Yield response of two potato culivars to supplemental irrigation and N fertilization in New Brunswick. Am. J. Pot Res 77, 11–21 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853657

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853657

Additional Key Words

Navigation