Skip to main content
Log in

Potential patient preference for 3-day treatment of bacterial vaginosis: Responses to new suppository form of clindamycin

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment options for bacterial vaginosis (BV) include oral and topical formulations of metronidazole or topical formulations of clindamycin. Opinions of a new vaginal suppository form of clindamycin, administered for 3 days, were obtained in a survey of 96 women who had been generally satisfied with their previous treatment. Following manipulation of the clindamycin ovule and metronidazole vaginal gel, more respondents expressed a preference for the ovule (52% vs 47%), and 54% preferred the ovule to the gel (44%) for possible future use. The gel was rated easier to use, but the ovule was found to be less messy. After manipulating both products, respondents read a profile of the ovule and identified the 3-day course as its most beneficial feature, citing this reason as increasing their likelihood of completing therapy with the ovule than with the gel. Approximately three fourths of the respondents who initially preferred the gel switched their preference to the ovule after reading the product profile. At that point, 86.5% of all respondents preferred the ovule. These results suggest the potential for improved compliance with therapy for BV with the clindamycin ovule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sobel J. Vaginitis.N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1896–1903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1998 Guidelines for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases.MMWR. 1998;47(No. RR-1):1–118.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benrubi G. BV: diagnosing and treating the most common vaginal infection.Female Patient. 1999; 24(suppl):4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hillier S, Holmes KK. Bacterial vaginosis. In: Holmes KK, Mårdh P-A, Sparling PF, et al, eds.Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1990:547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Majeroni BA. Bacterial vaginosis: an update.Am Fam Physician. 1998;57:1285–1289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Faro S, Apuzzio J, Bohannon N, et al. Treatment considerations in vulvovaginal candidiasis.Female Patient. 1997;22:39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Data on file, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Peapack, NJ.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broumas, A.G., Basara, L.A. Potential patient preference for 3-day treatment of bacterial vaginosis: Responses to new suppository form of clindamycin. Adv Therapy 17, 159–166 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853158

Keywords

Navigation