Abstract
New nomenclatural combinations are proposed, resulting from the adoption of a narrower concept of the generic classification unit or from necessary changes of the taxonomic rank in several taxa. A new genus—Anemonidium (Spach)Holub—is proposed inRanunculaceae. Four genera are accepted, includingChamaepitys Hill (Ajuga L. p. p.),Cota J. Gay (Anthemis L. p. p.),Euchiton Cass. (Gnaphalium L. p. p.) andRostraria Trin. (Koeleria Pers. p. p.+Trisetum Pers. p. p.).Genistella Ortega is preferred toChamaespartium Adans. In all 95 new combinations are proposed (83 for species, 11 for subspecies, 1 for a variety), including 21 inCota, 13 inRostraria, 11 inChamaepitys and 10 inEuchiton.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Airy Shaw, H. K. (1966): [J. C. Willis:] A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. Ed. 7—Cambridge.
Ball, P. W. (1972): 1.Ajuga L.—In: Flora Europaea, 3: 128–129.—Cambridge.
Böcher, T. W. etLarsen, K. (1957): Cytotaxonomical studies in theChrysanthemum leucanthemum complex.—Watsonia, London, 4: 11–16.
Briquet, J. (1913-1914): Decades plantarum novarum vel minus cognitarum. Décades 8–16.— Annuaire Conserv. Jard. Bot. Genéve, 17: 326–402.
Čupov, V. S. (1973): Immunoelektroforetičeskije issledovanija v rodachAnemone L.,Pulsatilla Mill. iHepatica Mill.—Bot. Žurn., Leningrad, 58: 189–199.
Cvelev, N. N. (1971): Zametki o nekotorych rodach zlakov (Gramineae) flory SSSR.—Novosti Sist. Vysšich Rast., Leningrad, 7 (1970): 42–59.
Drury, D. G. (1970): A fresh approach to the classification of the genusGnaphalium with particular reference to the species present in New Zealand (Inuleae—Compositae).—New Zealand Journ. Bot., Wellington, 8: 222–248.
Drury, D. G. (1972): The cluster and solitary-headed cudweeds native to New Zealand, (Gnaphalium sectionEuchiton—Compositae).—New Zealand Journ. Bot., Wellington, 10: 112–179.
Ehrendorfer, F. [ed.] (1973): Liste der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Ed. 2.—Stuttgart.
Greger, H. (1970): Flavonoide und Systematik derAnthemideae (Asteraceae).—Diss. Univ. Graz.
Holub, J. (1973a): New names in Phanerogamae 2.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 8: 155–179.
Holub, J. (1973b): Contribution to the taxonomy and nomenclature ofLeuzea DC. andRhaponticum auct.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 8: 377–395.
Horvatić, S. (1963): GenusLeucanthemum in flora Jugoslaviae.—Acta Bot. Croat., Zagreb, 22: 203–218.
Ikonnikov, S. S. (1973): Zametki o gvozdiěnych (Caryophyllaceae), 1.—Novosti Sist. Vysšich Rast., Leningrad, 10: 136–142.
Krčíková, N. (1969): Srovnávací morfologie květních nektárií některých rodů čelediLamiaceae. —Ms., [Comparative morphology of floral nectaries in some genera ofLamiaceae]. (Dipl. Práce; Katedra Bot. Přírod. Fak. Univ. Karlovy, Praha.)
Kynčlová, M. (1970): Comparative morphology of achenes of the tribeAnthemideae Cass. (familyAsteraceae) and its taxonomic significance.—Preslia, Praha, 42: 33–53.
Mitsuoka, S. etEhrendorfer, F. (1972): Cytogenetics and evolution ofMatricaria and related genera (Asteraceae—Anthemideae).—Österr. Bot. Zeitschr., Wien, 120: 155–200.
Rechinger, K. H. (1960): Zur Flora von Syrien, Libanon und der angrenzenden türkischen Gebieten. Reliquiae Samuelssonianae VI.—Ark. Bot., Ser. 2, Stockholm, 5: 1–488.
Schultz, C. H. (1854): Zweites Sendschreiben.—Oesterr. Bot. Wochenbl., Wien, 4: 154–156, 162–166.
Schwarz, O. (1949): Beiträge zur Nomenklatur und Systematik der mitteleuropäischen Flora.— Mitt. Thüring. Bot. Ges., Weimar, 1/1: 82–119.
Shinners, L. (1962): New names inArenaria (Caryophyllaceae).—Sida, Dallas, 1: 49–52.
Smejkal, M. (1961): Taxonomická studie druhuAjuga chamaepitys (L.)Schreb. ampl.Briq. v Československu. Taxonomisches Studium der ArtAjuga chamaepitys (L.)Schreb. ampl.Briq. in der Tschechoslowakei.—Preslia, Praha, 33: 386–398.
Soják, J. (1973): Doplňky k nomenklatuře některých rodů (Phanerogamae).—Čas. Národ. Muz., Sect. Natur., Praha, 141 (1972): 61–63.
Soó, R. (1972): Systematisch-nomenklatorische Bemerkungen zur Flora Mitteleuropas mit Beziehungen zur südosteuropäischen Flora.—Feddes Repert., Berlin, 83: 129–212.
Spach, E. (1845): Revisio generisGenista.—Annal. Sci. Natur., Ser. 3, Bot., Paris, 3: 102–158.
Stafleu, F. A. et al. (1972): International Code of botanical nomenclature.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 82.
Villard, M. (1970): Contribution á l'étude cytotaxonomique et cytogénétique du genreLeucanthemum Adans. emend.Briq. etCav.—Bull. Soc. Bot. Suisse, Wabern, 80: 96–187.
Wagenitz, G. (1965): Zur Systematik und Nomenklatur, einiger Arten vonFilago L. emend.Gaertn. subgen.Filago (“Filago germanica”-Gruppe).—Willdenovia, Berlin-Dahlem, 4: 37–59.
Zelený, V. (1972): No 250.Leucanthemum maximum (Ram.) DC. subsp.pannonicum Zelený, nom. provis.—Sborn. Národ. Mus., Ser. B. Natur., Praha, 27 (1971): 36–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holub, J. New names inPhanerogamae 3. Folia geobot. phytotax. 9, 261–275 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853148
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853148