Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of simulated insect defoliation on potatoes

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There were 3 distinct periods during which 100% defoliation affected yield parameters of potatoes. Plants were especially susceptible to defoliation 3–5 weeks after 50% stand emergence. In a weekly defoliation study, the 29% defoliation level had no effect on yield but the weekly 58% level significantly reduced yield. An equation relating fresh plant weight to leaf area was developed.

Resumen

Se encontraron 3 períodos distintos durante los cuales defoliación del 100% afectó los parámetros de rendimiento de papa. Las plantas fueron especialmente susceptibles a defoliación 3–5 semanas después que el 50% emergieron. En un estudio de defoliación en períodos semanales, el 29% de defoliación semanal no afectó el rendimiento pero el 58% de defoliación semanal redujo el rendimiento significativamente. Se desarrolló una equación relacionando peso fresco de la planta con área foliar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Anonymous. 1972. United States Standards for Grades of Potatoes, USDA, Food Safety and Quality Service, Washington, D.C. 19 pp.

  2. Beresford, B.C. 1967. Effect of simulated hail damage on yield and quality of potatoes. Am Potato J 44:347–54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chester, K.S. 1945. Defoliation and crop loss. Plant Dis Rep 29:162–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cranshaw, W.S. and E.B. Radcliffe. 1980. Effect of defoliation on yield of potatoes. J Econ Entomol 73:131–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein, E. and R.R. Robinson. 1965. A rapid method for determining leaf area of potatoes. J Agron 57:515–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hare, J.D. 1980. Impact of defoliation by the Colorado potato beetle on potato yields. J Econ Entomol 73:369–73.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen, R.L., L.D. Newsom, D.C. Herzog, J.W. Thomas, Jr., B.R. Farthing, and F.A. Martin. 1977. A method of estimating defoliation of soybean. Ibid. 70:240–2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy, H.J. and M.J. Goven. 1962. The effect of simulated hail damage on yield and quality of potatoes in Maine. Maine Agric Exp Stn Bull 607. 33 pp.

  9. Poston, F.L. and L.P. Pedigo. 1976. Simulation of painted lady and green cloverworm damage to soybeans. J Econ Entomol 69:423–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Snyder, G.B. and L.F. Michelson. 1958. The effects of simulated hail damage on potatoes. Massachusetts Agric Exp Stn Bull 506. 16 pp.

  11. Sparks, W.C., G.W. Woodbury, and F.H. Takatori. 1957. Estimating hail injury in potatoes. Idaho Agric Exp Stn Bull 274. 22 pp.

  12. Sparks, W.C. and G.W. Woodbury. 1959. Stages of potato plant growth: a guide in estimating losses from defoliation. Ibid. Bull 309. 22 pp.

  13. Stone, J.D. and L.P. Pedigo. 1972. Development and economic-injury level of the green cloverworm on soybean in Iowa. J Econ Entomol 65: 197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takatori, F.H., W.C. Sparks, and G.W. Woodbury. 1952. A study of simulated hail injury on potatoes. Idaho Agric Exp Stn Res Bull 22. 15 pp.

  15. Watson, D.J. 1937. The estimation of leaf area in field crops. J Agric Sci Camb 27:474–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Approved as TA-16016 by the Director, Texas Agric. Exp. Sta., College Station.

Formerly, Texas A&M University Vegetable Research Station, Munday, Texas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wellik, M.J., Slosser, J.E. & Kirby, R.D. Effects of simulated insect defoliation on potatoes. American Potato Journal 58, 627–632 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852593

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852593

Key Words

Navigation