Plant and Soil

, Volume 122, Issue 1, pp 9–19 | Cite as

Control of soil physical properties and response ofBrassica rapa L. seedling roots

  • J. A. Shaffer
  • D. D. Fritton
  • G. A. Jung
  • W. L. Stout


A system was designed, constructed, tested, and used to growBrassica rapa L. seedling roots which were exposed to O2 concentrations from 0 to 0.21 mol mol−1, water potentials from 0 to −80 kPa, temperatures from 10 to 34°C, and mechanical impedance from 0 to 20.8 kPa. The experimental design was a central composite rotatable design with seven replications of the center point. Measurements were taken of taproot length, taproot diameter at the point of initiation of root hairs (diameter 1), and one cm above the first measurement (diameter 2), and total length and number of first-order laterals.

Temperature had the greatest effect on seedling root growth, with linear and quadratic temperature effects significant for all root measurements except taproot diameter 2 which just had a significant linear effect. Water potential had a significant linear effect on lateral length and number of laterals and a significant quadratic effect on taproot diameter 1. Mechanical impedance had a significant effect only on taproot diameter 2. Oxygen was not significant for any root measurement. The mechanical impedance by water potential interaction was significant for taproot length and taproot diameter 1.

A temperature optimum was found for taproot length, taproot diameter 1, lateral length, and lateral number, at 26.0, 42.5, 26.5, and 26.4°C, respectively. Taproot diameter 1 had a water potential optimum at −36.5 kPa, whereas taproot diameter 2 had a mechanical impedance optimum at 12.5 kPa.

A growth cell designed for this study allows independent control of soil strength, water potential, oxygen concentration, and temperature. Thus, the cell provides the capability which was demonstrated forBrassica rapa L. to grow seedling roots under complete control of the soil physical properties.

Key words

mechanical impedance oxygen response surface root diameter root length root number temperature water potential 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armstrong W, Healy M T and Webb T 1982 Oxygen diffusion in pea. I. Pore space resistance in the primary root. New Phytol. 91, 647–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry W L 1978 Nutrition, containers, and media.In A Growth Chamber Manual. Ed. R W Langhans. pp 117–135. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  3. Blacklow W M 1972 Influence of temperature on germination and elongation of the radicle and shoot of corn. Crop Sci. 12, 646–648.Google Scholar
  4. Cannell R Q and Jackson M B 1982 Alleviating aeration stress.In Modifying the Root Environment to Reduce Crop Stress. Eds. G F Arkin and H M Taylor. pp 141–193. ASAE Monograph #4. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
  5. Cochran W G and Cox G M 1957 Experimental Designs, second edition. John Wiley and Sons, NY.Google Scholar
  6. Draper N R and Smith H 1981 Applied Regression Analysis, second edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Eavis B W, Taylor H M and Huck M G 1971 Radicle elongation of pea seedlings affected by oxygen concentration and gradients between shoot and roots. Agron J. 63, 770–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emmert F H 1974 Inhibition of phosphorus and water passage across intact roots by polyethylene glycol and phenylmercuric acetate. Plant Physiol. 53, 663–665.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldman L J 1984 Regulation of root development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 223–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gill W R and Miller R D 1956 A method for study of the influence of penetration resistance and aeration on growth of seedling roots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 20, 154–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ginrich J R and Russell M B 1956 Effect of soil moisture tension and oxygen concentration on the growth of corn roots. Agron J. 48, 517–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goss M J 1977 Effects of penetration resistance on root growth in barley. I. Effects on the elongation and branching of seminal root axes. J. Exp. Bot. 28, 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goss M J and Russell R S 1980 Effects of penetration resistance on root growth in barley. III. Observations on the mechanism of response. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenwood D J and Goodman D 1971 Studies on the supply of oxygen to the roots of mustard seedlings. New Phytol. 70, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoagland D R and Arnon D I 1950 The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Ag. Exp. Sta. Cir. 337.Google Scholar
  16. Huck M G 1970 Variation in taproot elongation rate as influenced by compaction and the soil air. Agron J. 62, 815–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyden S 1956 A turbidimetric method for the determination of higher polyethylene glycols in biological materials. Kungl. Lant. Ann. 22, 139–145.Google Scholar
  18. Janes B 1974 The effect of molecular size, concentration in nutrient solution, and exposure time on the amount and distribution of polyethylene glycol in pepper plants. Plant Physiol. 54, 226–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Konings H and Jackson M B 1979 A relationship between rates of ethylene production by roots and the promoting or inhibiting effects of exogenous ethylene and water on root elongation. Z. Pflanzenphysiol Bd. 92, 385–397.Google Scholar
  20. Kumar P and Alka 1977 The influence of varying temperature on seed germination ofBrassica campestris, L. Comp. Physiol. Ecol. 2, 152–153.Google Scholar
  21. Lachlo D R, Harrison-Murray R S and Audus L J 1982 The effects of penetration resistance to growth on the levels of ABA and IAA in root tips ofZea mays L. J. Exp. Bot. 33, 943–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawlor D W 1970 Absorption of polyethylene glycols by plants and their effects on plant growth. New Phytol. 69, 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mazurak A P and Pohlman K 1968 Growth of corn and soybean seedling as related to soil compaction and matric suction. 9th Int. Congr. Soil Sci. 1, 813–822.Google Scholar
  24. Mexal J, Fisher J T, Osteryoung J and Reid C P P 1975 Oxygen availability in polyethylene glycol solutions and its implications in plant water relations. Plant Physiol. 55, 20–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Newman E I 1966 A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J. Appl. Ecol. 3, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nielsen K F and Humphries E C 1966 Effects of root temperatures on plant growth. Soils Fert. 29, 1–7.Google Scholar
  27. Richards B G and Greacen E L 1986 Mechanical stresses on an expanding cylindrical root analog in granular media. Aust. J. Soil Res. 24, 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. SAS Institute Inc, 1985 SAS Users Guide, Statistics, version 5 edition. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  29. Shaffer J A, Fritton D D, Jung G A and Stout W L 1987 Forage turnip (Brassica rapa L.) seedling root morphology changes in response to soil physical properties. NEASA abstract p. 8.Google Scholar
  30. Shaffer J A 1988 Forage turnip (Brassica rapa L.) Seedling Root Responses to Soil Physical Properties. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Agronomy. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. 73 p. Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI (Diss abstr.).Google Scholar
  31. Sikurajapathy M, Cappy J J and Goss H D 1983 A method for inducing moisture stress on seedlings. Agron J. 75, 840–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tennant D 1975 A test of the modified line intercept method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63, 995–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tingley D T and Stockwell C 1977 Semipermeable membrane system for subjecting plants to water stress. Plant Physiol. 60, 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Veen B W 1982 The influence of mechanical impedance on the growth of maize roots. Plant and Soil 66, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walker J M 1967 Soil temperature patterns in surface-insulated containers in water baths related to maize behavior. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31, 400–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang J 1983 Growth Simulation of the Corn Radicle Root for Various Soil Physical Conditions. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Agronomy, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. 194 p. Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI (Diss Abstr. 44, 2037B).Google Scholar
  37. Wanjura D F and Buxton D R 1972 Hypocotyl and radicle elongation of cotton as affected by soil environment. Agron. J. 64, 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yapa L G, Fritton D D and Willatt S T 1988 Effect of soil strength on root growth under different water conditions. Plant and Soil 109, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zur B 1966 Osmotic control of soil water matric potential. I. Soil-water system. Soil Sci. 103, 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Shaffer
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. D. Fritton
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. A. Jung
    • 1
    • 2
  • W. L. Stout
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.USDA-ARS, U.S. Regional Pasture Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations