Skip to main content
Log in

A simple method for estimating homotoneity of sets of phytosociological relevés

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The homogeneity of sets of phytosociological relevés or syntaxa—the homotoneity—is tested by means of a homotoneity-coefficient. This coefficient consists of the basic homotoneity-coefficient expressing the proportion of highly constant species (61–100%) in the species composition of the average relevé and the correcting factor which is proportional to the difference of species number between the richest and poorest relevé. Successive analysis of heterotoneity of sets of relevés for detecting sources of heterotoneity is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Češka, A. (1966): Estimation of the mean floristic similarity between and within sets of vegetational relevés.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha,1: 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. T. (1959): The vegetation of Wisconsin.—Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. T. etGreene, H. C. (1949) A study of relic Wisconsin prairies by the species-presence method.—Ecol., Lancester (U.S.A.)30: 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1956): Rhondane—mountain vegetation in south Norway and its relation to the environment.—Skr. Norske Videnskape-Akad. Oslo, Cl. Math.-Nat., No. 3, Oslo.

  • Dahl, E. (1960): Some measures of uniformity in vegetation analysis.—Ecol., Durham (U.S.A.),41: 805-808.

  • Dahl, E. etHadač, E. (1941): Strandgesellschaften der Insel Ostoy im Oslofjord.—Nytt Magasin Naturvid., Oslo,82: 251–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. etHadač, E. (1949): Homogeneity of plant communities.—Studia Botan. Čechoslov., Praha,10: 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deyl, M. (1940): Plants, soil and climate of Pop Ivan.—Praha.

  • Ellenberg, H. (1956): Grundlagen der Vegetationsgliederung. I. Aufgaben und Methoden der Vegetationskunde.—Stuttgart.

  • Hadač, E. et al. (1969): Die Pflanzengesellschaften des Tales “Dolina Siedmich prameńov” in der Belaer Tatra.—Vegetace ČSSR, B 2, Bratislava.

  • Hofmann, G. etPassarge, H. (1964): Über Homogenität und Affinität in der Vegetationskunde. —Arch. Forstwesen, Berlin,13: 1119–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, P. (1992): Gesetze der Pflanzenverteilung in der alpinen Region auf Grund statistischfloristischer Untersuchungen.—Flora, Marburg,90: 349–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajina, V. (1933): Die Pflanzengesellschaften des Mlynica-Tales in den Vysoké Tatry (Hohe Tatra).—Beih. Bot. Centralbl., Dresden, 50: 774–957, 1933; 51:1–224, 1934 (Sep. 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, J. (1965): Wiesen im mittleren Teil des Böhmerwaldes (Ŝumava).—InNeuhäusl, R., Moravec, J. etNeuhäuslová-Novotná, Z.: Synökologische Studien über Röhrichte, Wiesen und Auenwälder.—Vegetace ČSSR, A 1: 179–385, Praha.

  • Moravec, J. (1967): Zu den azidophillen Trockenrasengesellschaften Südwestböhmens und Bemerkungen zur Syntaxonomie der KlasseSedo-Scleranthetea.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 2: 137–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhagen, R. (1924): Om homogenitet, konstans og minimiareal.—Nyt Magazin Naturvid., 61: 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, H. H. (1957): Betrachtungen zum Homogenitätsproblem in der Pflanzensoziologie.— Mitt. Flor.-Soz. Arbeitsgem., Stolzenau/Weser, N. F. 6/7: 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti, S. (1964): Ein neues Verfahren zur Bearbeitung von Assoziationstabellen.—Acta Botan. Croatica, Zagreb, Vol. Extraord: 89–93.

  • Pignatti, S. etMengarda, F. (1962): Un nuovo procedimento per l'elaborazione delle tabelle fitosociologiche.—Accad. Nazion. Lincei, Rendic. Cl. Sci. Fir., Matem. Natur., Roma, Ser. 8, 32/2: 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, E. W. (1950a): Über die Vegetationsverhältnisse der Insel Fehmarn.—Mitt. Arbeitsgem. Flor. Schleswig-Holstein u. Hamburg, 1.

  • Raabe, E. W. (1950b): Über die “Charakteristische Arten-Kombination” in der Pflanzensoziologie. —Schr. Naturwiss. Vereins Schleswig-Holstein, 24: 8–14.

  • Raabe, E. W. (1952): Über den “Affinitätswert” in der Pflanzensoziologie.—Vegetatio, Den Haag, 4: 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, T. (1948): A method for establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons.—K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk., Biol. Skr., København, 5 (4): 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüxen, R. (1970): Einige Bestandes- und Typenmerkmale in der Struktur der Pflanzengesellschaften. —In:Tüxen, R. (Ed.): Gesellschaftsmorphologie (Strukturforschung).—Den Haag.

  • Williams, C. B. (1950): The application of the logarithmic series to the frequency of occurence of plant species in quadrats.—Journ. Ecol., Cambridge, 38: 107–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moravec, J. A simple method for estimating homotoneity of sets of phytosociological relevés. Folia geobot. phytotax. 6, 147–170 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851759

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851759

Keywords

Navigation