Skip to main content
Log in

Bimatoprost 0.03% versus travoprost 0.004% in Black Americans with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This randomized, investigator-masked, multicenter, parallel-design trial compared the IOP-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% and travoprost 0.004% in African Americans with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After a washout of all ocular hypotensive agents, patients were assigned to bimatoprost once daily (n=16) or travoprost once daily (n=15) for 3 months. Study visits were at baseline and at months 1, 2, and 3. Primary outcome measures were the percentage of patients who achieved selected target pressures and the mean reduction in IOP from baseline at month 3. Both drugs comparably lowered IOP, but bimatoprost was more likely than travoprost to allow achievement of every target pressure from 12 to 19 mm Hg at month 3. After 3 months, the mean IOP reduction from baseline was 8.4 mm Hg (34%) in the bimatoprost group and 7.9 mm Hg (30%) in the travoprost group. These results are being evaluated further in a larger clinical trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marshall EC. Racial differences in the presentation of chronic open-angle glaucoma.J Am Optom Assoc. 1989;60:760–777.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al, for the Baltimore Eye Survey Research Group. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans.Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1090–1095.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Palmissano P, Hynes M, Mueller L. Glaucoma and race: a case for screening in Connecticut.Conn Med. 2000;64:75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore.N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1412–1417.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Javitt JC, McBean AM, Nicholson GA, et al. Undertreatment of glaucoma among black Americans.N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1418–1420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 9. Comparison of glaucoma outcomes in black and white patients within treatment groups.Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Higgenbotham E, Schuman J, Goldberg I, et al. One-year, randomized study comparing bimatoprost and timolol in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Bimatoprost Study Groups I and II.Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1286–1293.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Netland PA, Landry T, Sullivan EK, et al. Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:472–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noecker, R.J., Earl, M.L., Mundorf, T. et al. Bimatoprost 0.03% versus travoprost 0.004% in Black Americans with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Adv Therapy 20, 121–128 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850259

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850259

Keywords

Navigation