Abstract
This 2-year prospective study was conducted to identify those at risk for ophthalmologic emergencies, to define the risk factors and reasons for eye injuries, to analyze treatment options, and to compare findings with those of previous studies. A total of 203 patients (74% male, mean age 27.3±13.9 y, 51% right eye injuries, 44% left eye injuries, 5% bilateral injuries) with injury to 208 eyes who presented to the emergency department for treatment were included in this study. All patients were evaluated by an ophthalmologist, who completed a formal questionnaire. Information recorded included demographic data, details of the eye injury, whether eye protection was used, and the type, location, and mechanism of injury to the eye. Mechanism of injury was categorized as blunt, sharp, or a combination. The ophthalmologist reported the time that had passed between occurrence of injury and presentation for treatment. Each patient was examined by the ophthalmologist, and findings, diagnosis, and treatment were documented. Of treated patients, 93% were hospitalized, most of whom required surgical treatment. One hundred (48%) injuries were related to blunt trauma and 86 (41%) to sharp device trauma. Only 10 (4%) patients were wearing protective eyewear when injured. Ruptured globe was the most common diagnosis of hospitalized patients and the most frequent cause of this was corneal lesions; subconjunctival hemorrhage was the most common diagnosis among nonhospitalized patients. In this study, the leading cause of eye injury was workplace accidents, probably attributable to growing industrialization in the region. Ocular trauma continues to be an important health problem in Turkey. Investigators believe that with education about and use of proper eye protection, 90% of eye injuries could be prevented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Negrel AD, Tylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1988; 5: 143–169.
Chiapella AP, Rosenthal AR. One year in an eye casualty clinic.Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69: 865–870.
Liggett PE, Pince KJ, Barlow W, et al. Ocular trauma in an urban population: review of 1132 cases.Ophthalmology. 1990; 97: 581–584.
Schein OD, Hibberd PL, Shingleton BJ, et al. The spectrum and burden of ocular injury.Ophthalmology. 1988; 95: 300–305.
Sternberg P Jr, Aaberg TM. The persistent challenge of ocular trauma.Am J Ophthalmol. 1989; 107: 421–424.
Belkin M. Historical perspective of ocular trauma. In: Stegman M, ed.Ocular Trauma. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1987: 7–21.
Filipe JA, Barros H, Castro-Correia J. Sports related ocular injuries.Ophthalmology. 1997; 104: 313–318.
Durmus I. Evaluation of penetrative eye injuries in our clinic between 1976–1987 [dissertation]. Kayseri, Turkey: Erciyes University; 1988.
Abraham DI, Vitale SI, West SI, Isseme I. Epidemiology of eye injuries in rural Tanzania.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1999; 6: 85–94.
Casson RJ, Walker JC, Newland HS. Four-year review of open eye injuries at the Royal Adelaide Hospital.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002; 30: 15–18.
Girard B, Bourcier F, Agdabede I, Laroche L. Activity and epidemiology in an ophthalmological emergency center.J Fr Ophtalmol. 2002; 25: 701–711.
Meda N, Ouedraogo A, Daboue A, et al. Etiologies of ocular and eyelid trauma in Burkina Faso.J Fr Ophtalmol. 2001; 24: 463–466.
Zagelbaum BM, Tostanoski JR, Kerner DJ, Hersh PS. Urban eye trauma—one year prospective study.Ophthalmology. 1993; 100: 851–856.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oner, A., Kekec, Z., Krakucuk, S. et al. Ocular trauma in Turkey: A 2-year prospective study. Adv Therapy 23, 274–283 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850133
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850133