Advertisement

Advances in Therapy

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 174–180 | Cite as

Impulse magnetic-field therapy for insomnia: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study

  • Rainer B. Pelka
  • Christof Jaenicke
  • Joerg Gruenwald
Article

Abstract

This 4-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy of impulse magnetic-field therapy for insomnia. One hundred one patients were randomly assigned to either active treatment (n = 50) or placebo (n = 51) and allocated to one of three diagnostic groups: (1) sleep latency; (2) interrupted sleep; or (3) nightmares. Efficacy endpoints were intensity of sleep latency, frequency of interruptions, sleepiness after rising, daytime sleepiness, difficulty with concentration, and daytime headaches. In the active-treatment group, the values of all criteria were significantly lower at study end (P < .00001). The placebo group also showed significant symptomatic improvement (P < .05), but the differences between groups were highly significant (P < .00001). Seventy percent (n = 34) of the patients given active treatment experienced substantial or even complete relief of their complaints; 24% (n = 12) reported clear improvement; 6% (n = 3) noted a slight improvement. Only one placebo patient (2%) had very clear relief; 49% (n = 23) reported slight or clear improvement; and 49% (n = 23) saw no change in their symptoms. No adverse effects of treatment were reported.

Keywords

insomnia magnetic waves alternative therapy impulse magnetic-field therapy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borbely A. Das Geheimnis des Schlafs. Neue Wege und Erkenntnisse der Forschung. Dva Stuttgart. 1984;94–130.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mendelson W.The Use and Misuse of Sleeping Pills. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwartz A.Schlaflosigkeit überwinden. Munich, Germany: Ehrenwirt; 1983.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wheatley D, ed.Psychopharmacology of Sleep. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akimov G et al. Effects of alternating field on healing of ulcers of the lower extremities.Vestn Chir. 1977;119:84–85.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barnothy M.Biological Effects of Magnetic Fields. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1969.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basset C et al. Nonoperative treatment of pseudoarthroses and nonunions by pulsing electromagnetic fields.Orthop Trans J Bone Joint Surg. 1978;2:218.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergsmann O. Selektive Feldtherapie bei pseudoradikulären Symptomen. In:Manuelle Medizin, XXI. Vienna, Austria; 1983.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cameron H et al. An examination of the effects of pulsed magnetic fields on knee swelling following total knee replacement. Presented at the International Congress on Foot and Hand Surgery; 1981; São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ehrmann W et al. Therapie mit ELF-Magnetfeldern.Z Phys Med. 1976;4:161–170.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evertz U, König H. Pulsierende magnetische Felder in ihrer Bedeutung für die Medizin.Hippokrates. 1977;1:16.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vallbona C, Richards T. Evolution of magnetic therapy from alternative to traditional medicine.Compr Ther Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;10/3:729–754.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sandyk R. Resolution of sleep paralysis by weak electromagnetic fields in a patient with multiple sclerosis.Int J Neurosci. 1997;90:145–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sandyk R, Anninos PA. Magnetic fields alter the circadian periodicity of seizures.Int J Neurosci. 1992;63:265–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandyk R, Derpapas K. The effects of external picotesla range magnetic fields on the EEG in Parkinson’s disease.Int J Neurosci. 1993;70:85–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lebet JP, Barbault A, Rossel C, et al. Electroencephalographic changes following low energy emission therapy.Ann Biomed Eng. 1996;24:424–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reite M, Higgs L, Lebet J-P, et al. Sleep inducing effect of low energy emission therapy.Bioelectromagnetics. 1994;15:67–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borbely A. Endogenous sleep substances and sleep regulation.J Neural Transm Suppl. 1986; 21:243–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hainovici N, Negoesen. Beeinflussung der Kallusbildung unter der Behandlung mit niederfrequenten gepulsten Magnetfeldern.Therapiewoche. 1987;30:4619–4631.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hauri P.The Sleep Disorders: Current Concepts. Kalamazoo, Mich: Upjohn Company; 1982.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klettman N.Sleep and Wakefulness. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1963.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Langen D. Sprechstunde: Schlafstörungen. GU München. 1982.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pelka RB, de Moliere M. Migräne, Wetterfühligkeit und Spannungskopfschmerz: Essentielle Linderung durch Magnetwechselfelder? Notabene Medici; 1989.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gaillard J. Brain noradrenergic activity in wakefulness and paradoxical sleep: the effect of clonidine.Neuropsychobiology. 1985;13:23–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watson J, Downes E. Clinical aspects of the stimulation of bone healing using electrical phaenomena.Med Biol Eng Comput. 1979;17:261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Health Communications Inc 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rainer B. Pelka
    • 1
  • Christof Jaenicke
    • 2
  • Joerg Gruenwald
    • 2
  1. 1.Universität der Bundeswehr MünchenNeubiberg/MünchenGermany
  2. 2.PhytoPharm Consulting Institute for PhytopharmaceuticalsBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations