Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical outcome following treatment of isolated subaortic obstruction

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical and nonsurgical patients with isolated subaortic stenosis (SAS) were compared to determine the important factors contributing to the timing of surgical intervention. This study reviews 49 consecutive patients (27 surgical and 22 nonsurgical) aged 1.8 to 15.9 years with isolated SAS. The preoperative peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient in surgical patients was significantly higher than the gradient in nonsurgical patients (59.0±30.4 vs 22.77± 13.9 mm Hg, P=.0001). The progression in LVOT gradient analyzed by echo Doppler was significantly higher in the surgical group compared with the nonsurgical group (10.48±9.7 vs 1.56±6.5 mm Hg/y, P=.007). Repeat surgical intervention was required in 22% of patients in the surgical group for recurrence of SAS, and 4% needed a third surgery. The progression in the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) was not significantly different in the surgical and nonsurgical groups. There was a significant association between the development of AR and patients undergoing surgery (P=.045). AR may not be a reliable indication for early operative intervention in isolated SAS as there was no significant difference in its progression with surgical and nonsurgical patients. Asymptomatic patients with isolated SAS may warrant surgical intervention on the basis of progression of LVOT gradient, rather than the development or progression of AR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Newfeld EA, Muster AJ, Paul MH, Idriss FS, Riker WL. Discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis in childhood. Study of 51 patients.Am J Cardiol. 1976;38:53–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz NM, Buckley MJ, Liberthson RR. Discrete membranous subaortic stenosis. Report of 31 patients, review of the literature, and delineation of management.Circulation. 1977;56: 1034–1038.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shem-Tov A, Schneeweiss A, Motro M, Neufeld HN. Clinical presentation and natural history of mild discrete subaortic stenosis. Follow-up of 1–17 years.Circulation. 1982;66:509–512.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Feigl A, Feigl D, Lucas RV Jr, Edwards JE. Involvement of the aortic valve cusps in discrete subaortic stenosis.Pediatr Cardiol. 1984;5:185–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Firpo C, Maitre Azcarate MJ, Quero Jimenez M, Saravalli O. Discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) in childhood: a congenital or acquired disease? Follow-up in 65 patients.Eur Heart J. 1990;11: 1033–1040.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Attie F, Ovseyevitz J, Buendia A, et al. Surgical results in subaortic stenosis.Int J Cardiol. 1986; 11:329–335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Douville EC, Sade RM, Crawford FA Jr, Wiles HB. Subvalvar aortic stenosis: timing of operation.Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50:29–34; discussion 33–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Somerville J, Stone S, Ross D. Fate of patients with fixed subaortic stenosis after surgical removal.Br Heart J. 1980;43:629–647.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wright GB, Keane JF, Nadas AS, Bernhard WF, Castaneda AR. Fixed subaortic stenosis in the young: medical and surgical course in 83 patients.Am J Cardiol. 1983;52:830–835.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Somerville J. Fixed subaortic stenosis-a frequently misunderstood lesion.Int J Cardiol. 1985;8: 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Penkoske PA, Collins-Nakai RL, Duncan NF. Subaortic stenosis in childhood: frequency of associated anomalies and surgical options.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;98:852–860.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frommelt MA, Snider AR, Bove EL, Lupinetti FM. Echocardiographic assessment of subvalvular aortic stenosis before and after operation.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1018–1023.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gewillig M, Daenen W, Dumoulin M, Van der Hauwaert L. Rheologic genesis of discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis: a Doppler echocardiographic study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:818–824.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leichter DA, Sullivan I, Gersony WM. “Acquired” discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis: natural history and hemodynamics.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:1539–1544.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi JY, Sullivan ID. Fixed subaortic stenosis: anatomical spectrum and nature of progression.Br Heart J. 1991;65:280–286.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Borow KM, Glagov S. Discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis: is the presence of upstream complex blood flow disturbances an important pathogenic factor?J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:825–827.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. de Vries AG, Hess J, Witsenburg M, Frohn-Mulder IM, Bogers JJ, Bos E. Management of fixed subaortic stenosis: a retrospective study of 57 cases.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1013–1017.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kleinert S, Geva T. Echocardiographic morphometry and geometry of the left ventricular outflow tract in fixed subaortic stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1501–1508.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Freedom RM, Pelech A, Brand A, et al. The progressive nature of subaortic stenosis in congenital heart disease.Int J Cardiol. 1985;8:137–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Silverman NH, Gerlis LM, Ho SY, Anderson RH. Fibrous obstruction within the left ventricular outflow tract associated with ventricular septal defect: a pathologic study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25:475–481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ivert T, Astudillo R, Brodin LA, Wranne B. Late results after resection of fixed subaortic stenosis.Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;23:211–218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zellers TM, Kliewer L. Does early surgery for mild discrete subaortic stenosis prevent the development of aortic insufficiency? Paper presented at: Second World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery; May 11–15, 1997; Honolulu, Hawaii.

  23. Brauner R, Laks H, Drinkwater DC Jr, Shvarts O, Eghbali K, Galindo A. Benefits of early surgical repair in fixed subaortic stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1835–1842.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Freedom RM. The long and the short of it: some thoughts about the fixed forms of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1843–1846.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Coleman DM, Smallhorn JF, McCrindle BW, Williams WG, Freedom RM. Postoperative follow-up of fibromuscular subaortic stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1558–1564.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M, Medina A, et al. Immediate and follow-up results of transluminal balloon dilation for discrete subaortic stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1309–1315.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ritter SB. Discrete subaortic stenosis and balloon dilation: the four questions revisited.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1316–1317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stewart JR, Merrill WH, Hammon JW Jr, Graham TP Jr, Bender HW Jr. Reappraisal of localized resection for subvalvar aortic stenosis.Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50:197–202; discussion 202–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giuffre, R.M., Ryerson, L.M., Vanderkooi, O.G. et al. Surgical outcome following treatment of isolated subaortic obstruction. Adv Therapy 21, 322–328 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850036

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850036

Keywords

Navigation