Advances in Therapy

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 161–170 | Cite as

Initial clinical experience with the trabecular micro-bypass stent in patients with glaucoma

  • Detlev Spiegel
  • Wolfgang Wetzel
  • David S. Haffner
  • Richard A. Hill
Article

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficiency of a trabecular micro-bypass stent designed to allow direct aqueous drainage from the anterior chamber into Schlemm’s canal in patients with glaucoma. In this prospective case series of 6 patients with open-angle glaucoma, the microstent was inserted ab interno under local anesthesia in an ophthalmic operating room. Patients were seen postoperatively at 1 to 2 d, 1 wk, and 1, 2, 6, and 12 mo. All stents were successfully placed within Schlemm’s canal. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at preoperative baseline was 20.2±6.3 mm Hg (range, 14–31 mm Hg). Mean IOP decreased during the immediate postoperative period to approximately 12 to 13 mm Hg and was stabilized at 14 to 15 mm Hg with reduction of medication throughout 1 y of follow-up. No major complications occurred. According to observations reported in this feasibility study, the microstent was effective in reducing IOP and in decreasing the number of glaucoma medications required to control IOP. Implantation procedures were safe, and stents remained in place throughout the follow-up period. None of the complications traditionally associated with filtering surgery were reported. Further research on this stent in a larger group of patients is needed to assess its role in glaucoma therapy.

Keywords

glaucoma stents trabecular surgery intraocular pressure glaucoma therapy trabecula 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Preferred Practice Pattern: Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. San Francisco, Calif: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2003:1-36.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. Savona, Italy; European Glaucoma Society; 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings R. Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma.Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1651–1656; discussion 1657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery.Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1943–1953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deokule S, Sadiq S, Shah S. Chronic open angle glaucoma: patient awareness of the nature of the disease, topical medication, compliance and the prevalence of systemic symptoms.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24:9–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gurwitz JH, Yeomans SM, Lewis B, et al. Treatment for glaucoma: adherence by older persons in managed care.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996;59:172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Urquhart J, Bell J, Metry J-M. Meta-analysis of reported study with micro-electronic monitoring of patient compliance.J Clin Res Drug Develop. 1989;3:227.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kass MA, Gordon M, Morley RE Jr, Meltzer DW, Goldberg JJ. Compliance with topical timolol treatment.Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103:188–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kass MA, Meltzer DW, Gordon M, Cooper D, Goldberg J. Compliance with topical pilocarpine treatment.Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:515–523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Broadway DC, Grierson I, Sturmer J, Hitchings RA. Reversal of topical antiglaucoma medication effects on the conjunctiva.Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:262–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, Gieser D, Vitale S, Lindenmuth K. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma.J Glaucoma. 2000; 9:134–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy: preliminary report of a new method.Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66:673–679.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Addicks EM, Quigley HA, Green WR, Robin AL. Histologic characteristics of filtering blebs in glaucomatous eyes.Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:795–798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schwartz AL, Anderson DR. Trabecular surgery.Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;92:134–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Budenz DL, Hoffman K, Zacchei A. Glaucoma filtering bleb dysesthesia.Am J Ophthalmol. 2001; 131:626–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stegmann R, Pienaar A, Miller D. Viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma in black African patients.J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:316–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mermoud A, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, Chiou AG, Hediquer SE, Faggioni R. Comparison of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma.J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:323–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    El Sayyad F, Helal M, El-Kholify H, Khalil M, El-Maghraby A. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma.Ophthalmology. 2000;107: 1671–1674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sunaric-Megevand G, Leuenberger PM. Results of viscocanalostomy for primary open-angle glaucoma.Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:221–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R. Viscocanalostomy: a pilot study.Eur J Ophthalmol. 1998;8:57–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Drusedau MU, von Wolff K, Bull H, von Barsewisch B. Viscocanalostomy for primary openangle glaucoma: the Gross Pankow experience.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1367–1373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jonescu-Cuypers CP, Jacobi PC, Konen W, Krieglstein GK. Primary viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in white patients with open-angle glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial.Ophthalmology. 2001;108:254–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spiegel D, Kobuch K. Trabecular meshwork bypass tube shunt: initial case series.Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1228–1231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bahler CK, Smedley GT, Zhou J, Johnson DH. Trabecular bypass stents decrease intraocular pressure in cultured human anterior segments.Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:988–994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhou J, Smedley GT. A trabecular bypass flow hypothesis.J Glaucoma. 2005;14:74–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Health Communications Inc 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Detlev Spiegel
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Wetzel
    • 2
  • David S. Haffner
    • 3
  • Richard A. Hill
    • 4
  1. 1.Klinik VincentinumAusburgGermany
  2. 2.Private PracticeWeinheimGermany
  3. 3.Glaukos CorporationLaguna Hills
  4. 4.Orange County GlaucomaSanta Ana

Personalised recommendations