Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of treatment to prevent adhesions after abdominal surgery: An experimental evaluation in rats

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the probability of adhesion formation with certain materials after abdominopelvic surgery, and to assess the effectiveness of adhesion-preventing agents. The study included 2 phases. In the first phase of the study, 50 rats that had been divided into 5 groups were examined. Group 1 served as the control group. In group 2,2 mL blood was taken from the femoral vein of the rat; in group 3,0.0625 g talcum powder was mixed with 2 mL saline; in group 4, 2 mL ileal content was identified; and in group 5, 2 mL cecal content had spilled into the peritoneum. In the second phase of the study, 50 rats that had been divided into 5 groups were examined. Ileal content was the leading cause of intraperitoneal adhesions in the first phase; in the second phase, in group 1, 2 mL ileal content and 5 mL povidone-iodine (10%) were used; in group 2,2 mL ileal content and 5000 units aprotinin were mixed with 5 mL saline; in group 3, 2 mL ileal content and 25 IU heparin (5000 IU/L) were mixed with 5 mL saline; in group 4,2 mL ileal content and 5 mL 32% dextran 70 were combined; and in group 5, 2 mL ileal content was used together with 5 mL Ringer’s lactate. On postoperative day 14, the rats were killed with the use of high-dose intramuscular ketamine, and necropsies were performed on all rats. Adhesions were most often established because of ileal and cecal contents. Blood and talcum powder produced less adhesion formation. Heparin and 32% dextran 70 were significantly more effective at preventing adhesion formation due to ileal contents. Intraperitoneal heparin and 32% dextran 70 may be particularly valuable for the prevention of adhesions due to intestinal content in cases with no contraindications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Rerefences

  1. Risberg B. Adhesions: preventive strategies.Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;(577):32–39.

  2. Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, Dervenis C, Young RL. Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance.Dig Surg. 2001;18:260–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Schaapveld M, van Goor H. Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy.Br J Surg. 2000;87:467–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nair SK, Bhat IK, Aurora AL. Role of proteolytic enzyme in the prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions.Arch Surg. 1974;108:849–853.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Galili Y, Ben-Abraham R, Rabau M, Klausner J, Kluger Y. Reduction of surgery induced peritoneal adhesions by methylene blue.Am J Surg. 1998;175:30–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sow M. A classic cause, still not widely known, of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: talc.Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1970;65:659–660.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Janik JS, Nagaraj HS, Groff DB. Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: efficacy of povidone.Arch Surg. 1982;117:1321–1324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chalkiadakis GE, Kostakis A, Karydakis P, et al. Effect of aprotinin on fibrinopurulent peritoni tis in rats.Am J Surg. 1985;150:550–553.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. De Vriese AS, Mortier S, Cornelissen M, et al. The effects of heparin administration in an animal model of chronic peritoneal dialysate exposure.Perit Dial Int. 2002;22:566–572.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Zerega GS, Campeau JD. Use of instillates to prevent intraperitoneal adhesions: crystalloid and dextran.Infertil Reprod Med Clin North Am. 1994;5:463–478.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double blind, multicenter study.J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:297–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Diamond MP, Linsky CB, Cunningham T. Synergistic effects of Interceed (TC7) absorbable barrier.Infertil Reprod Med Clin North Am. 1994;5:485–550.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haney AF, Doty E. Murine peritoneal injury and de novo adhesion formation caused by oxidized-regenerated cellulose (Interceed [TC7]) but not expanded polytetra-fluoroethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane).Fertil Steril. 1992;57:202–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vigond MN, Whawell SA, Thompson JN, Dudley HA. Peritoneal fibrinolytic activity and intraabdominal adhesions.Lancet. 1990;335:1120–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Doodey K, Dunn RC, Buttiom VC. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator reduces adhesion formation in a rabbit uterine horn model.Fertil Steril. 1989;51:509–512.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson B, Lalos O, Marsk L, et al. Effect of intraperitoneal instillation of 32% dextran 70 on postoperative adhesion formation after tubal surgery.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64: 437–441.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cem Kaan Parsak MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parsak, C.K., Satar, S., Akcam, T. et al. Effectiveness of treatment to prevent adhesions after abdominal surgery: An experimental evaluation in rats. Adv Therapy 24, 796–802 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849972

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849972

Keywords

Navigation