Skip to main content

In vivo evaluation of biomechanical anterior cervical plate failure

Abstract

Anterior cervical plate (ACP) failure is rarely addressed in the literature. In this retrospective, observational, longitudinal, cohort study, the objectives were to (1) identify incidences of in vivo biomechanical failure in commercially available, US Food and Drug Administration-approved ACP systems, (2) describe modes of failure, (3) suggest structural explanations for system failure, and (4) discuss complications and treatment of patients with failed ACP systems. Investigators retrospectively identified patients who underwent anterior cervical procedures followed by use of ACP as a fusion adjunct and showed evidence of ACP failure on plain radiographs. Components of the ACP system that led to failure were identified and examined. A total of 240 patients received ACP supplementation of anterior cervical fusion constructs during the 9.5-y study period. Evidence of ACP failure was noted in 7 patients (3.3%), and an eighth patient was referred for evaluation after ACP failure. Screw-plate interface failure occurred in all 8 cases. The biomechanical method by which the bone screw head was secured into the vertebral body, or against the ACP, the use of hybrid systems, the surgical technique selected, and host factors were used to determine the rate of failure. Concern for esophageal or other tissue injury often necessitated ACP removal. Screw-plate interface failure, which was found to be the most common mode of biomechanical ACP failure, may occur in hybrid constructs and in systems that do not create a rigid interface between the screw head and the ACP. Surgical technique and patient host factors may also influence the rate of biomechanical construct failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Mayr M, Subach B, Comey C, Rodts G, Haid R. Cervical spine stenosis: outcome after anterior corpectomy, allograft reconstruction, and instrumentation.J Neurosurg. 2002; 96: 10–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang J, McDonough P, Endow K, Delamarter R. Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Spine. 2000; 25: 41–45.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, McDonough P, Kanim L, Endow K, Delamarter R. Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Spine. 2001; 26: 643–647.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Geyer T, Foy M. Oral extrusion of a screw after anterior cervical spine plating.Spine. 2001; 26: 1814–1816.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. ASTM International.Standard Test Method for Static and Dynamic Spinal Implant Assembly in a Corpectomy Model. West Conshohocken, Pa: ASTM; 2000: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cahill D. Anterior cervical instrumentation. In: Menzes A, Sonntag V, eds.Principles of Spinal Surgery. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1996: 1105–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lowery GL. Orion Anterior Cervical Plate System product insert, with surgical technique. Memphis, Tenn: Sofamor-Danek; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fessler R, Stecj J, Giovanini M. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Neurosurgery. 1998; 43: 257–267.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Foley K, Diangelo D, Rampersaud Y. The in vitro effects of instrumentation on multilevel cervical strut-graft mechanics.Spine. 1999; 24: 2366–2376.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowery G, McDonough R. The significance of hardware failure in anterior cervical plate fixation: patients with 2-to 7-year follow-up.Spine. 1998; 23: 181–187.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryken T, Clausen J, Traynelis V, Goel VK. Biomechanical analysis of bone mineral density, insertion technique, screw torque, and holding strength of anterior cervical plate screws.J Neurosurg. 1995; 83: 325–329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baskin JJ, Vishteh AG, Dickman CA, Sonntag VKH. Techniques of anterior cervical plating.Oper Tech Neurosurg. 1998; 1: 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taha J, Zuccarello M. Orion anterior cervical plate system: instrumentation, technique, and technology.Neurosurgery. 1996; 38: 607–610.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garvey TA, Eismont FJ, Roberti LJ. Anterior decompression, structural bone grafting, and Caspar plate stabilization for unstable cervical spine fractures and/or dislocations.Spine. 1992: 17(suppl 10): S431-S435.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Herman JM, Sonntag VK. Cervical corpectomy and plate fixation for postlaminectomy kyphosis.J Neurosurg. 1994; 80: 963–970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnston FG, Crockard HA. One-stage internal fixation and anterior fusion in complex cervical spinal disorders.J Neurosurg. 1995; 82: 234–238.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaccaro AR, Abraham D, Cotler J, Scuderi G, Eismont FJ, Garfin SR. Failure of multilevel anterior unicortical cervical plate instrumentation.Spine. 1998; 23: 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spivak JM, Chen D, Kummer FJ. The effect of locking fixation screws on the stability of anterior cervical plating.Spine. 1999; 24: 334–338.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lowery G. Anterior cervical osteosynthesis: Orion anterior cervical plate system. In: Traynelis VC, Hitchon PW, Rengachary SS, eds.Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1995: 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer P, Rusin J, Haak M. Anterior instrumentation of the cervical spine. In: An H, Cotler J, eds.Spinal Instrumentation. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1992: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morscher E, Sutter F, Jenny F. Anterior plating of the cervical spine with the hollow screw-plate system of titanium [in German].Chirurgia. 1986; 57: 702–707.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Benzel E. Component-component interfaces. In:Biomechanics of Spine Stabilization. Rolling Meadows, Ill: American College of Neurological Spine Surgeons; 2001: 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Haid R, Foley K, Rodts G, Barnes B. The cervical spine study group anterior cervical plate nomenclature.Neurosurg Focus. 2002; 12: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Epstein N. The management of one-level anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion using Atlantis hybrid plates: preliminary experience.J Spine Disord. 2000; 13: 324–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barnes B, Haid R, Rodts G, Subach B, Kaiser M. Early results using the Atlantis anterior cervical plate system.Neurosurg Focus. 2002; 12: 1–7 [Article 13].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reitman C, Nguyen L, Fogel G. Biomechanical evaluation of relationship of screw pullout strength, insertional torque, and bone mineral density in the cervical spine.J Spinal Disord. 2004; 17: 306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William C. Welch MD, FACS, FICS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welch, W.C., Ong, J.G., Gerszten, P.C. et al. In vivo evaluation of biomechanical anterior cervical plate failure. Adv Therapy 24, 415–426 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849911

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849911

Keywords

  • anterior cervical plate
  • instrumentation failure
  • cervical fusion
  • constrained screws
  • arthrodesis